Brahms Trio op.114

[@jesusalfonzo3811]

Wonderful performance. BRAVO !!!

[@derblindesanchez7250]

Bravo! Wonderful played!

[@iaf4454]

❤❤❤❤❤

[@ketgoca758]

braviiii

[@anikotothnepataki9283]

Amazing performance, and perfectly, wonderful....

[@dianamuller3970]

Hello, It's Diana from EpochTV. Your videos are great! As a media outlet that focuses on truth and tradition, The Epoch Times always tries to promote traditional values, art, and culture. As part of our mission, we hope to showcase more valuable content to audiences all over the world. We would like to upload your video to our app and page. Can we have your permission to do that? Thank you.

[@dianamuller3970]

Greetings, I wanted to kindly remind you that I sent you an email regarding your content. Please see my previous email. We would be happy to know if there is any special requirement for publishing it that we could fulfill. I am looking forward to hearing from you. Thank you

[@daniel3231995]

What unknown trio?

[@janne7263]

Not really, but it's written for clarinet and not viola. It's therefore often overshadowed by his clarinetquintet op.115

[@daniel3231995]

Much better like this :)

[@janne7263]

@@daniel3231995 Not really, it lacks the character when you have 2 stings. Furthermore the viola lacks the extremes you have on a clarinet, so soft parts aren't soft enough and loud parts get drowned out by the piano. It works and still sounds good, but it's not "better"

[@janne7263]

@@daniel3231995 Or if I misunderstood you and you mean that 114 is better than 115. Then yeah kinda agree. It's simpler and worse from an analyzing standpoint, but its nice in its own way