Breaking Aerodynamics with Supersonic Planes | Kerbal Gets Real Redux #3

[@LolixLP]

I AM looking forward to this every Sunday. Playing my Kerbalism Near Future Career in the background. Feels like im doing a lil KSP hangout every Sunday evening.

[@derhesligebonsaibaum]

pretty sure there are a lot more than Carnasa thinks :P

[@saldor0108]

Ditto - I'm always pleasantly surprised to see this series in my feed on Sundays :)

[@Nolys-bk4kd]

ME TOO!

[@aadaoswin]

3:05 that person is me I wait humbly for each episode I just wait for the full release after the premier

[@yasure1535]

Me too

[@ayanshkothari4932]

Me too

[@OCinneide]

I do look forward to these episodes, my dog passed away on friday and its been a struggle to find youtube videos to watch at this time. But your videos are nice and chill.

[@Carnasa]

Sorry to hear about that :( hope you’re doing okay!

[@phapharel]

2:47 yes there is at least one person :D I love this series, please continue to make sucg great videos !!!

[@STS-Dreamer]

lmao I did the exact thing the other day with the advanced biological contract, was rolling out my rocket and then saw the 200 sounding payload and had to sit through another dozen loading screens.

[@thebritishguy4709]

Great video! "Run on the Landway"🤣 Happens to the best of us

[@That_one_person22]

I feel called out I wait for Sundays The Exploring Series and kerbal gets real redux are the highlights of the week

[@LucAbshire]

Poor kerbals

[@darthmemeious9526]

I really love for all kerbalkind, it introduced me to you, and a bunch of other rp1 youtubers with this style of making videos. And i’m happy you got more series to watch as that one takes time to come out. I’d honestly love to see an interstellar series with some cool ship design

[@Carnasa]

Definitely need to get back to finishing coming home redux at some point then! Got some pretty cool interplanetary designs in that already but still a little ways off interstellar, but that’s probably the end goal of that series :p hopefully For All Kerbalkind will be returning soon with little interruptions from now on as we’ve updated to the final version of the game and shouldn’t need to tinker with the install any more! (Once the last few things are worked out, still having a bit of a problem with MLI not working as intended)

[@danielwenzel3877]

2:48 Gotta call me out like that xD for real though, Loved the KGR series back then and am certainly loving it now! :D

[@Carnasa]

Glad you enjoyed that one and glad you’re also enjoying this one too! :D and yeah judging by some of the lovely comments I’ve had maybe I underestimated slightly how many people are enjoying this :p

[@remygoudeseune3517]

These episodes are the perfect way to de-stress after a day of writing my bachelor's thesis! Always looking forward to watch

[@jakervamduf1523]

I am excited each Sunday, it’s a joy to watch;D

[@FruitLoops_]

Don't worry, I'm definitely looking forward to the next Sunday for another one of these!

[@jimmymcgoochie5363]

I had similar issues with gear pushing parts out of place on planes a few months ago, weirdly toggling same vessel collisions on the displaced parts on and off made them snap back into place.

[@aadvaitture]

for where i live, the episode comes out at 12 in the night, so technically i look forward to every Munday! [for KGR that is :)]

[@darthvendar6841]

ooh! Sunday! time for a carnasa ksp video

[@benjaminrickdonaldson]

I love this, weekly Carnasa videos. This video is def your best in the series so far! Edit: Oh no wonder why, It was all adlibbed lol.

[@bradenwolf2179]

I'm that one ... uhhh... maybe there's a little more than one of us. Anyways, I look forward to this every week! Keep 'em coming!

[@TheSealinBlack]

hey man, sundays are good because you and another channel I watch upload stuff I consistently watch now upload stuff on sundays which means I look actually forward to sundays because of these

[@linecraftman3907]

I certainly look forward to new episodes! As for your idea to stream a separate save, sounds like it'll be too many saves to handle? What if you loaded quick saves from this series and did reviews of past designs and/or fixed them for fellas following along?

[@Carnasa]

Hmmm, I don’t have too many quick saves actually there! (Need to get into the habit of making more to be honest) but I’m thinking of maybe streaming a lunar lander design session some point soon, as where I currently am I need to get that done!

[@jeremyhill118]

I am super excited to be getting these weekly!!!

[@Rankoldbeast_UK]

The clouds in this mod look incredible

[@Carnasa]

Blackrack and ballistic fox doing some great work for sure!

[@EndaMRacing]

The Kerbal Land speed Record in RO would be fun!

[@guesswho2778]

there is an advanced setting in the speed control of atmosphere autopilot to make the throttle control more smooth when it reaches its target speed so it holds instead of pulses like you see at 27:12. i forget what exactly it is, pretty sure its something to do with a PID, it might be a checkbox that isnt ticked by default, have a look. it would make that section of footage look and sound a little bit nicer.

[@uranium3000]

Run on the landway lmao

[@jeremyrose4551]

I am that guy! Can't wait for sundays so I can enjoy your videos!

[@izzy-wt9sr]

YEEE TOMORROW IS SUNDAY

[@Carnasa]

And there should be a new episode! (I write this trying to aggressively edit to get it finished, it’s been a long and busy week 😅)

[@guard13007]

I look forward to these but I never noticed which day it was on. Nor do I have any grasp of what a week is.

[@Carnasa]

I think a week is that thing where you do work, but I dunno, maybe?

[@bobthedeleter]

I'm not sure, but to me it looks like the landing gear have attached to the engine instead of the fuel tank, and their drag is pulling the engine down. The engine should be more rigid, but then again it's only attached to the tank by a node at the back

[@Dunelmdrummer]

What mod are you using for the Navball? Looks so nice and clean! Loving the series ❤

[@Carnasa]

Principia! It does a lot more than just change the navball though :p overhauls the physics in game to be n body as opposed to the two body system in stock, more complicated, a bit of a challenge to learn but once you’ve got it it’s great and can lead to things like actual sun synchronous orbits/Lagrange points etc, and I find it easier to do interplanetary missions with it once I got used to its (vastly better) manoeuvre planner :p

[@Dunelmdrummer]

@@Carnasa I love that Navball but Principia scares me xD maybe one day!

[@AllThingsSpace3]

Run on the Landway???? 27:48

[@adsfasdf1847]

You sound very fertile in this video 👍

[@thecatgod280]

Can you upload these amazing videos faster please

[@thejanitor3263]

I've been looking forward to for all Kerbal kind but obviously I haven't been getting that, this is somewhat close

[@wow-roblox8370]

Spoiler Defence!

[@infomaniac50]

It's not clear from the video whether the problem persists after cycling the gear. Launching the planes with the landing gear stowed might get around the tank distortion problem. Deploy the gear after the craft is settled on the runway to takeoff. If it persists, then you could cheese it as a spoiler for landing. I have a give and take philosophy with bugs in simulation type games. If a bug ruins my immersion or realism, then I feel justified in cheating a bit or by turning it around to cheese the bug for something else. The low framerates with full res textures sounds like a VRAM problem. Unity is very wasteful with GPU resources. I'm betting that it's loading everything all at once and using main memory for overflow. The game has enough occlusion code to not pull textures that are out of view. I'd be interested to see if other planets are rendered when you are looking at them while in orbit of another planet. Does this game even have LODs?

[@Iamlurking504]

Plne

[@CalvinMaclure]

Super great episode, man! You're really hitting your stride. Wish I could say that about your planes... 😂

[@Carnasa]

Heyyyyyy they get better I promise! Next episode is the start of actual good looking planes, and they only get better from there 😂

[@CalvinMaclure]

@@Carnasa if you say so! 😆

[@N9GamingOfficial]

04:08 he went in and out and in and out and in and out

[@Carnasa]

And shook it all about? :D

[@N9GamingOfficial]

@@Carnasa like 10 times!!

[@EritoKaio]

Run on the Landway had me wheezing for a solid 5 minutes

[@Carnasa]

That was a complete slip up and I only noticed it when I was editing 😅 found it funny so decided to keep it in :p

[@pelinion5913]

2:51, well thats me❤

[@oaw117]

Oooh it's a Sunday, that means it's the next Kerbal gets real redux episode!

[@wvh-pups]

Bro got 7000m/s at 15km

[@8Byto]

I think u should live other campaigns!

[@ragingnoggly4449]

I love this

[@guy_called_Odin]

Be me: Enjoying a regular upload KSP RSS/RO playthrough. Soon: N9SA is dead. Be me: Find another regular upload KSP RSS/RO playthrough. Soon: FAK Dies (MULTIPLE TIMES). Be me: Finds a third regular upload KSP RSS/RO playthrough. Third time's the charm?

[@44R0Ndin]

"Programs and launch complexes update is a lot more time spent at the space center" So much for me thinking I'd give RSS-RO-RP1 a try. TestLight was already having me on the fence. I don't play games to watch my stuff break several times before it's reliable enough to risk an actual mission on. Acceptable failure rate of any given component is 1 in 1000 minimum before I'll even put it on the launch pad or runway. And even then I'm cagey about using it. And with such low failure odds, why even simulate it when all it does is make a negative player experience? Same with programs and launch complexes. It's not that I don't like limits, it's that I don't like having to micromanage (aka grind) to raise those limits. The less time I spend at the space center thinking "what do I do" or just time-warping forwards with no actual "me doing things" happening, the better. Bottom line, I play video games, and I don't buy video games to not press buttons. Programs and launch complexes is gating gameplay elements behind not being able to press buttons for a while, and that sucks. If that means "I don't get the point of the experience", then I will refuse to understand on principle of "If your thing doesn't look like fun, it's probably not fun and you need to re-think what makes things fun". Nobody would willingly step into a maze without reason. And I won't willingly play RSS/RO/RP1 if it doesn't promise to be more fun than normal KSP, which so far it does a terrible job of doing, if it even tries. Adding management sim elements just sends me personally running for the hills. EDIT: Of course, if I can get all the same "I feel like I did the thing" signals in my brain without actually doing the thing and going thru the hundreds of hours of play it takes to do that, for instance by watching these videos, then I'll do that gladly. But you won't catch me dead actually playing it myself.

[@joshuaconner5887]

Im new to RP1. Have you had the issue where the center of lift/aerodynamics on your planes and rockets does not move when you adjust the wings? Idk if it's just a visual thing, and the aerodynamics are changing. Or if it's not letting move the center of lift at all, and making taking off near impossible.

[@ashtiboy]

you forgot to install the dangorus reentry mod didn't you? thats the mod you need to make the super sonic and hyper sonic aerodinamic heats friction phisics for KSP1 to work right. wihout that mod your can go super sonic and hpyer sonic wihout any heat in ksp1.

[@ezsnacklest]

The landing gear bug is caused by the wheel part of the landing gear having same vessel interaction on even if it shows the part doesnt have it, when you try to select gear up it clips into the part that its placed on and moves it, if you enable and disable same vessel interaction while its happening it fixes it for the duration of the flight, it has to be done for every landing gear thats affected tho even if they are in simmetry. Also it only happens if the landing gear is clipping into a part that its not its "father" part, so you probabily placed the landing gear on the main fuselage and then moved it with the displacing tool and thats why its happening, kinda recent bug anyways Only way to fix it without enabling/disabling the same vessel interaction every flight is to place the landing gears only on parts that it will clip into and to not clip any other part of the plane into the landing gear great series anyways and would be lovely to see you stream another career too

[@AspectCode]

Always look forward to your videos!

[@NovemberOrWhatever]

0:15 Pun appreciated

[@kajmel6444]

My new favourite series

[@PinappleCoinGaming]

DANG IT I MISSED THE PREMIEREEEE great video! awesome =]

[@happykoalabear3544]

Can you do an insttallation guide on your graphics mods your game looks amazing

[@headiii_plays]

Ohh it's sunday. time for the new fak.... kgrr episode!

[@dovbaeb]

I am that person waiting weekly for your videos

[@Chrischi3TutorialLPs]

Tbh i'm mainly watching this because Beardy is taking his sweet time making that next episode

[@robertstuckey6407]

Same

[@simonfrohlich7766]

28:46 She's already dead isn't she...?

[@marijngrashoff30]

Yes I two run on the landway

[@electric0115]

cual es el mod de Smart A.S.S ?

[@SeleneDaSnadGal]

A stream only series would be amazing, I think it would be great lol, it'd especially be easy to involve viewers in some way lol, maybe you could make it a viewer participating stream? Where we can decide what contracts you do and stuff :P Just an idea ;p;

[@Carnasa]

That… sounds like a really good idea :p

[@SeleneDaSnadGal]

@@Carnasa maybe it'll drive more traffic to the discord? Make It so that the polls are on the discord and they appear during stream lol :P

[@danzstuff]

lets goo

[@ghostdog688]

7:39 suggestion: stream major missions and milestones you are looking to make a big deal of :)

[@Carnasa]

Thinking about maybe streaming designing my first lunar lander at some point soon! Not too far off needing to do that where I am in my save and it’s a pretty big event! :p

[@ghostdog688]

@@Carnasa you can always stream a simulation/test of it for now and show off the actual mission in your videos.

[@hantorfolezproductions4402]

Which mod adds missions for things like flying a certain distance?

[@Carnasa]

All the contracts in this series are added by Rp-1 :)

[@ConfusedRaccoon]

Breh, I'd bet more than half your fans just want to hang out and chat shit with you as you stream whatever. Doesn't always have to be top quality whatever. Just has to be fun, and with a good attitude, nearly anything can be fun.

[@PyroMikeHell]

I look forward to each Sunday release. With regards to what to stream I'm in the carnas-b content camp / multiplaying with community, I don't dislike ksp craft design but it is just the nature of the beast that a build can be not quite right and turn into the focus of the stream.

[@teatime1848]

Trust me. I’m looking forward to it. Mainly because this series finally got me back into ksp! Before this I hadn’t played more then 2 hours in a year.

[@CosmicAggressor]

I would not say I am excited. More like interested. Just a case of "oh another one of these came out. Since I don't have anything better to watch I might as well watch it."

[@K6-3]

Thank you so much for the RSS Reborn fix! now i can kill kerbals with smooth framerates :)

[@thedootguy4444]

oh its a sunday that means its a new kerbal gets real redux video! no but really man, your are doing great

[@Chrischi3TutorialLPs]

It's kinda funny how Explorer 1 is the symbol for light satellites and Sputnik 1 the symbol for heavy satellites. I mean, yeah, sure, Explorer 1 weighed 14 kilos as opposed to Sputniks 83, but Sputnik was, by far, the less capable satellite. It was essentially a battery driven transmitter whose only capability was to beep. Explorer 1 meanwhile, despite weighing a fraction of what Sputnik weighed, was equipped with a Geiger-Müller tube (which ended up confirming the existance of the Van Allen Belt), several temperature sensors, acoustic detectors (to detect micrometeorite impacts) and a wire grid detector (to determine the effects of long term exposure to micrometeorites). Not only that, whereas Sputnik stopped transmitting beeps after 21 days, Explorer 1 kept transmitting data at full capacity for 31 days (and continued transmitting in low power mode for another 105).

[@slome815]

Well, by that time sputnik II (laika) had been launched, and sputnik 3 was on the way. And that one certainly did take advantage of the capability of the R7. Weighing more then a ton and being stuffed with instrumentation.

[@Chrischi3TutorialLPs]

@@slome815 See, originally, Sputnik 3 was supposed to be the first satellite, however, it quickly became clear to the Soviets that Sputnik 3 would not be ready in time to beat the US, so what they did instead was to launch what is essentially a glorified ham radio into orbit, just so they can say they beat the US. This is actually a common theme with many (but not all) firsts the Soviets achieved. Many of their firsts were rushed, and sometimes barely even functioned, because beating the US was more important than making a functional payload. In case you havn't seen it, i'd recommend "The Myth of Soviet Space Superiority" by DeadKennedyInSpace.

[@slome815]

​@@Chrischi3TutorialLPs From the moment I read that first sentence I knew you watched that video. It's a dishonest video to say the least. Or at least it glossed over US failures and ignores areas where the soviets where more advanced. The R7 family was launching tons when the US was managing 10's of kg. And they were launching 10 tons when the US managed 1. And even once the US overtook the soviet union in launch capability there where still areas where the soviets where in fact better. Their molniya sattelites where much more advanced then the US's early communication sattelites. Then there are the luna, venera, and (less succesfull) mars probes. When the US was developing their high effcient hydrogen engines the soviets where perfecting their kerolox staged combustion engines, with ISP's that the west refused to believe until they could inspect the engines in the early 90's. As for doing things for propaganda, it's not like the US didn't do that. Mercury-redstone was just that. 8 minutes in space just to be able to have said "we also put a man in space". This while the soviet union never bothered with suborbital flights. Don't get me wrong. There are plenty of areas where the US was superior. But not all of them, and between 1958-1964, overall soviet rockets where much more capable. Like I said, that video really annoyed me because it was nothing more then lying by ommission.

[@Chrischi3TutorialLPs]

@@slome815 Well, the point of the video was never to pretend like the Soviets weren't, at any point, superior to the US. The point it was making was more so that the superiority wasn't as big as people love to claim. Sure, the Soviets were quite capable in many regards, and yes, that video leaves out many failures the US suffered (such as how, for instance, Gemini 4 actually had many of the same problems that Voskhod 2 suffered, even though that video paints it as "look how bad the soviets were"), but even so, at the end of the day, the Soviet lead wasn't as big as popular media likes to depict it (though what is just as disingenuous are things like For All Mankind, which straight up pretends that Buran was a 1:1 copy of the shuttle, even though it was the superior system in many ways)

[@Chrischi3TutorialLPs]

@@slome815 Oh yeah, and also, while that video probably leaves out quite a lot, it very much does credit the Russians for being the first to fly to space, and does give an unequivocal win to them in that field.

[@thefinalsurvivur6161]

Brainpower!

[@Carnasa]

Something I lack in most of the time 😅

[@Tyrannosaurusstudios]

i forgot

[@Tyrannosaurusstudios]

and can i have a mod list

[@ritabuba4831]

desc@@Tyrannosaurusstudios

[@ciretdatsnesie]

I would be pretty interested to see a second streaming campaign, or maybe some live streams for more involved VAB segments for the KGR Redux later on

[@Simon-px8mi]

Another awesome vid!