Breitling SuperOcean Critique + Why The "SlowMotion" Should Be Better (Diving Chronograph)

A Discussion and Review of the Breitling "Slow-Motion" Superocean. From the 1957 Reissue to the Heritage Superocean, the issue with the Superocean line in general is that they struggle to find a grounding point to define the watch. This newest incarnation takes inspiration from the Ref. 2005 "Slowtimer" Diving Chronograph but strips away the many defining features in favour of streamlining the design. The result is a watch that comes across as an "in-between" trying to please everyone but lacks any real emotion.
#breitling #breitlingwatches #breitlingsuperocean
Intro 0:00
On The Wrist 1:09
The Breitling Superocean Evolution 1:24
Reference. 2005 "Slow Motion" 2:58
The Diving Chronograph 4:40
The Modern Superocean 5:29
Redesign Ideas 7:03
Conclusion 8:23
All Images are Sourced from either Press Release Photos or Public Listings.
Below are a list of the common sources that are used in no particular order:
Bob’s Watches | Revolution Watch | HQ Milton | Hodinkee | Monochrome Watches | Jomashop | Analog Shift | Bulang and Sons | Robb Report | Watchfinder | WatchBox | Phillips Watches | Christies | Timekeepers Club | Fratello Watches | Bexsonn | Worn and Wound | A Collected Man | Oracle Time | Time + Tide Watches
IDGuy Store: teespring.com/stores/the-idguy-store
Support the Channel: www.patreon.com/idguy
Follow me on Instagram: id.guy?hl=en
Contact me: [e-mail]

[@ID-Guy]

My "excellent value for money" line about an SW300 movement - I assumed these new Superoceans used the same Kenissi movements that Tudor does... should've read the spec sheet. The SuperOcean is deep with a great history. Do you feel that this new “SlowMotion” is an odd choice to introduce as Breitling’s flagship dive watch? Or do you like this new direction? Personally, I’d take the ’57 SuperOcean any day but that’s just me 😉

[@juniorjohnson5961]

Agree !

[@ID-Guy]

@@mkii2363 Or drop a grand and hello Tudor. I can't actually believe these SW's are being sold for this much. They're great movements but damn... Let's hope they're kind when it comes to service costs 😉

[@davidb5720]

They are charging a pretty penny for this not to have done firm of in house movement in it. Maximum profit was the order of the day in this brief I think!

[@ID-Guy]

@@davidb5720 Max Profit is always the name of the game ;) It's just a pity that most unaware buyers (me included) might've mistaken these for truly in-house movements instead of sellitas. Oof.

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

Sorry, but $5k for a watch with an off the shelf sellita movement is by no means whatsoever “value for money.”

[@ID-Guy]

Here I was thinking (foolishly) that it used the same Kenissi movements that Tudor does... should've done my research on this.

[@2yoober]

In-Effin'-deed. 😎

[@franky3fingers337]

FYI. No one is gonna pay $5k for this unless they buy from the boutique. Once these sit for a while 55% off MSRP shouldn’t be hard to find.

[@vc.moser.ferrier]

@@ID-Guy I just want to tell you, that I am impressed how you react to comments and catalyze interaction to learn and exchange.

[@EDHBlvd]

@@franky3fingers337 ya this watch for $2200 would be compelling.

[@revandrem]

I received one for Christmas from my wife. This watch was not on my radar and I quickly worried that she paid too much for it. But I made the mistake of putting it on my wrist (42) and I’m in love. It’s the blue and white and it really pops.

[@wisamal-hakim5531]

Breitling have been on fire. The pistachio premier, the salmon version, the navitimer cosmonaut, the up time, and this is another handsome piece. Not for me, but breitling are currently doing it right. At least compared with many of the other big brands

[@ID-Guy]

I've loved so many of their recent releases like the new Navi and this Cosmonaut that they sneakily brought out (I barely saw any coverage of it). Don't know what it is about this SuperOcean, but I just can't get behind it. Still! They're killing it in many, many areas 🔥

[@ashleychambers7602]

100% agree with you

[@JasonTheWatchGuy]

I actually love it in fairness. If I had space for another Breitling in my collection then it'd probably be this one!

[@ID-Guy]

And this video has cemented one thing... I need to add a SuperOcean 57 to the collection 😆 Ah, don't you just love it when that happens? Thanks for the feedback Jason 🥃

[@davemcc7713]

I didn't like the new SuperOcean initially. Pictures of this watch didn't do anything for me. Once I got it on my wrist, I love it. It's brilliant and could very well be my next watch.

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you for sharing this Dave. It just goes to show that in the metal can make a big difference. I'll definitely be checking these out the next time I'm in town 🥃

[@ashleychambers7602]

I was exactly the same as you, as soon as I saw it in the wild I had to have one . I purchased the black 46mm on the rubber and looks stunning and I’ve had loads of compliments

[@technom3598]

If you haven't seen it in person you are missing out. It's awesome.

[@krasnaludek298]

The new Breitling lineup is gorgeous; absolutely love the direction that they’re taking the Superocean, Navitimer, & Aviator. Even the EndurancePro is nice as a quartz option. The aqua blue Superocean is especially appealing … use of bold colors & accents. 👍🏻

[@pauledbrown]

My local dealer had these in along with the older models. I must say after trying them on I couldn’t disagree with you more. It’s a great looking watch that doesn’t look like a copy of any other brand. I went with a seamaster but this was a close second. If they come out with a chrono version I think I’d get one

[@IrvingMagik]

When this was first released… i agreed 100% with you.. i was like meh.. but man has it grown on me, im about to order me one.

[@wkdsid]

This superocean type of release that is initially very controversial, and then years go by and most people start to love its uniqueness and willingness to be off trend. Smp300 was controversial at first too. As for the power reserve, does it really matter for most buyers for whom this will be a daily ? Understood that Tudor omega include 55-70 hr in house movements at price points, but you could argue new superocean is a more complex (expensive) dial, and they put more $ into the bezel, clasp, and overall build. Fwiw the in house thing is a great marketing ploy by watch industry for buyers to spend MUCH more on proprietary servicing vs off shelf movements

[@ID-Guy]

This model could easily make a big dent in years to come. It actually has a design that comes across very timeless (not beholden to a time period) which will help it age well. And as for the Sellita... foolish of me, I thought it house the same Kenissi movement that Tudor does... but you're right about servicing etc. You can't bash ETA's for their robustness and cost effectiveness when it comes time to service. Great points all around Sidhant!

[@wkdsid]

@@ID-Guy haha no worries you have the best watch content!! But for now yeah, I’d also take a black dial superocean heritage ‘57. That one will really be a collectors piece now that it’s sold out

[@ID-Guy]

@@wkdsid Something about those timeless 50's designs. So quirky and unique that always leaves you scratching your head and asking "what was going through their minds back then?" 🥃

[@jimlittle5769]

Loved hearing your thoughts on this release. I personally loved it the day it came out and ordered the Kelly Slater Limited Edition the next day. Can't wait to strap it on. When I sent a pic of it to my wife, she said, 'That watch looks like it was made for you'. I couldn't pass on it once she said that. This will be my first Breitling after almost getting the Pistachio B09 Chrono.

[@ID-Guy]

And I can understand how this model would pull people in. Must say, the cleanliness of the design does grow on you. It does away with a lot of the superflous (which is hard to find on modern watches today) ;)

[@jimlittle5769]

@@ID-Guy Yeah, I agree with that. I've noticed most reviewers, and people who comment on those reviews, are way down on this release. I think a lot of them have been fans of Breitling for awhile and just prefer the older versions. I've never been a Breitling fan myself. The first one that got me interested was the aforementioned Breitling Chrono B09 Pistachio. I will also say that a few have changed their mind once they got it in hand.

[@ID-Guy]

@@jimlittle5769 Who's to say that this model smashes records and actually becomes a classic? All the naysayers, me included could be totally wrong ;) In a few years time these designs might truly surprise us. Thanks as always Jim 🥃

[@daviddigilio3036]

The KS orange dial is the one I’m looking at as well. The Aquaman maybe? All the colors really come together quite nicely imo. I’ll be taking a trip to the local ad soon to see it up close.

[@jimlittle5769]

@@daviddigilio3036 Yeah, I agree, the colors just somehow work together. I will say there are only 1,000 of these made. Now with all the horrible reviews, that may not be a big thing, but it could be. Something to think about and hope you like it.

[@thearmandoandvaleriegroup]

without knowing the history of this model, its a good looking sporty watch! I'm going to try one on.

[@RobOnRefresh]

I thought the same thing until I put one on my wrist. I'm holding out for the deep blue in the 42mm (they were out of stock). It's obviously quite popular and very striking in person. I understand your concerns but this one will sell amazingly well. I felt like it was quite unique compared to all the other boring styles available (not Breitling). Perhaps I'm just a Breitling fan boy - lol.

[@13siniestro80]

I'm not a fan of the new super ocean. It looks like a cheap watch, with small hands like a flik flak or an ecodrive. With a smaller chapter ring and longer hands the watch will be gorgeous.

[@ID-Guy]

One of my Renders I tried to shrink the white portion of the dial and make the inner a little bigger (doesn't show very well because there's nothing to compare it to) but it's so hard to tweak this model... It's been a battle ;)

[@authorjohnwquinn]

Love your reviews. You do a wonderful job.

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you as always John. The fact that someone out there in the world enjoys them is enough for me. I hope you had a superb weekend sir! 🍻

[@baze3SC]

I don't know... Tudor Black Bay is almost the definition of derivative design whereas this look is quite interesting actually. However it's true that it's a very polarizing look. That slow-motion chronograph feature would really set the SuperOcean apart but Breitling is not going to develop a new movement just to be able to reproduce a feature that nobody needs today. It would only make sense if people still used watches for diving which they don't. This is an everyday sports watch and I think it was OK for Breitling to take some design liberties.

[@AS-po9pm]

I love it as my summerwatch, it screams quality, except the movement, but as I get 40% off breitling it is the perfect value for money for me.

[@markriobr]

Love the brand . now got one as a gift The Tabarly model back over 87 . Looks a lot like that one

[@khronokraze]

I think the design could also use some work. I'm most bothered by the fat minute hand. I daylight and good lighting conditions, I was concerned it was so broad that getting a solid read on the minute would be hard. BUT, it does have an extended tip that reaches the minute markings on the outer chapter ring. HOWEVER, in the water where light is much lower and perhaps in some cases you may need to depend on the lume of the watch, I fear the fat square may be too casual about telling the exact time. In fact, you'll get a general idea of where the minute hand is pointing at. Idk? It may be good enough. But, where the broadness of the minute hand could float between 2-4 minutes of precision, having your life depending air supply on a vague time reading may not be such a great idea. It could certainly be enough to mean difference between life and death if you misjudge the general remaining minutea left by too far a margin. That being said, how many of us will actually use it for real dive time purposes? Let alone in situations where we'd rely so heavily on the lume of the fat square minute hand? And, any modern diver would likely just use modern dive equipment and electronics to successfully guide them through their deep aquatic activities. Wearing a dive watch on a dive is more a romantic idea rather than a practical one. So, my gripes about the minute hand may be moot.

[@ID-Guy]

Perfect thought on the fat minute hand and accuracy in the dark! It's generally why the minute hand is always pointed and extended to the end of the dial (with lume) Just so the eye can spot the minute to minute difference as it passes the plots. I think this is a very good point that we've all overlooked - the sheer impracticality of being able to tell the time accurately in the dark 🥃

[@jxp3632]

huh this video was super cool to learn about their archive design! i always thought this watch was just an expensive version of zodiac watches but with less exciting features. maybe i should revisit their store in the next couple of weeks.

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you brother. Must admit, those early ref. 2005's are killer! And you're right! Zodiac and those 50's / 60's designs look period correct in every way (sans colourfulness and excitement) Great call 🥃

[@thenutcracker2921]

That ‘57 re-issue is stunning! I like it as much, if not more, than the Fifty Fathoms. I realize they have to stay current and fresh but good luck Breitling in ever beating that vintage masterpiece. Good lord thats impressive design.

[@ID-Guy]

If there's one thing I hope I did in this video, it's promoting the gorgeous '57 😆 I love it so much... so much so that I'm thinking of adding it to my pickup list in the next few years... 1957 Seamaster and SuperOcean together? Feels like a match made in heaven! 🍻

[@denmastur8996]

see it in real life.. so much better than picture advertised from breitling.. price still ok.. sellita based but regulated in cosc.. very nice built quality

[@ID-Guy]

Definitely going to see one of these in person the next time I'm in town 🥃

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

Price ok???

[@denmastur8996]

@@whereRbearsTeeth refine bracelet, nice adjustment clasp (kind of glidelock from submariner), nice ceramic bezel action, very nice built quality, cosc movement though it is not inhouse... price ok

[@speedzero7478]

The 57 was one of my favorite watches, ever. I only wish Breitling had kept it going instead of making it limited edition.

[@ID-Guy]

I have been spending waaay too much time looking at the 57's this week... Honestly considering adding this to my collection in a year or three. It's just such an unconventional design that we don't see anymore AND they crammed so much detail into it... Ah, we like our oddities ;)

[@wkdsid]

@@ID-Guy 57 is amazing. 100m more than enough because they made it 9.7mm thick… super. And the mesh is so comfy

[@ID-Guy]

@@wkdsid Ah, you're tempting me... love the ultra slimness and that dished bezel... and the dial balance and the mesh... man it's so good...

[@speedzero7478]

@@wkdsid Huge fan of Breitling's mesh bracelets. I made fun of them until I tried one on, nothing like it.

[@pth8888]

I prefer the previous super ocean collection. I do like the new colour options for the new collection.

[@vce2103]

I love the watches - didn't at first, but has completely won me over!! I actually do like having a date, I always check my watch for the date. I feel like without a date, and it being a chronometer, I will very rarely use the crown except on holiday abroad... silly point for some, but it would've made this number one on my list!!

[@jimlittle5769]

For some reason when I see the Breitling Superocean 57, I think Rado Captain Cook.

[@ID-Guy]

It's hard not to think about the CC! I think it arrived in the early 60's (obviously using that OG broad arrow hand etc.) Most manufacturers back then used "parts bin specials" to assemble their watches 😆

[@btyc]

Eagerly awaiting your Tudor reveal / review

[@ID-Guy]

The video will be ready and uploaded on Sunday next week. Going to put some extra time into it and make a lengthier video than usual. Ah, I'm looking forward to it man...

[@btyc]

Cheers IDGuy. Eager but also not wanting to rush your process. Quality and a considered opinion takes time, plus I am a long time sub to this channel. I ain’t going anywhere lol

[@ID-Guy]

@@btyc Considering the Tudor has now been with me for 5 months it's definitely time to do a proper discussion on the piece 😆 Let's hope it lives up to the expectations! Gotta say, I'm still besotted with it. What an excellent experience... And thank you brother. It really means so much that someone can take time out of their day (time out of their lives) to listen to my ramblings ;)

[@georgehave]

I think they should have made the 2005 again. One I would purchase.

[@ID-Guy]

Imagine? Breitling the King of Chrono's remaking an original property. Ah, it would've been a banger.

[@floydmorrison2025]

I like this watch, but totally agree with your sentiments about it lacking personality. It just seems a bit 'off', if you know what I mean. That chapter ring is WAY too big, and it just shrinks down the dial, especially when you consider the bigger sizes of the watch. Which is completely incongruous in contrast to that massive minute hand. There's no harmony of design whatsoever. Your chronograph version mock-up looks awesome! Now THAT has some personality! You should work as a designer for Breitling LOL. Cool video!

[@ID-Guy]

Exactly my thoughts Floyd. Still can't put my finger on why it lacks that "something". Hate using the word "safe" when describing a design like this... Man, but a chrono of this... Breitling is the Chronograph master after all, it would've injected some X-factor into a collection. Thanks as always brother ;)

[@soundssimple1]

Great critique, I've checked out the website and looking over many of the models they are mostly all 'very nice' looking watches, but for approx £3800 UK they have to be a bit better looking or more individual in their core styling than a Seiko MOD. That's what came into my mind, lots of Seiko MODS, and now that I have seen Seiko MOD I can't unsee them. I'm fighting with myself now to pick my favourite without 'seeing' something one tenth of the price. Sorry Breitling but I need to sleep on this one. And to all those who have one, please no offense meant , it's my problem not yours, I hope your watch smiles back at you every day you wear it. 🙂

[@ID-Guy]

And speaking of Seiko. Why the hell hasn't Breitling taken that OG '57 Superocean and used that as the template for their modern diver? Like Seiko has done with their famous SLA017 / SPB143. You'd swear the blueprints are right there for them 😆🥃

[@johnbalian874]

Happy Sunday ID Guy

[@ID-Guy]

And to you John! It's been a busy weekend BUT busy is always good ;) Hope you've had a cracker!

[@bjornhuijnen5044]

I love the new one, I own the old model in blue. I am going to buy the new one as well🤗

[@albinf40]

I really like this new super ocean I just wish it had the tudor movement or was a chronograph like the old watch with the same quirky central minutes instead of seconds

[@ID-Guy]

You and me both... A Tudor movement or Breitling's B01 chrono in this machine would've excellent! 🥃

[@dingodave3966]

I tend to prefer watches with a vintage design. I really enjoy your thoughts and explanations. At the end Of the day I buy what I like however. Heritage 57 is one on my list.

[@ID-Guy]

That '57 is just something else... that should be the summary of the video 😆 Enjoy the SuperOcean 57! Haha! Love it.

[@dingodave3966]

@@ID-Guy ID Guy, it’s so good you finally show us your good self. Do we know your name however…? I am Dave although I’m not actually a Dingo, that parts a fib…😬

[@Alejosales]

What you are looking at is a Seiko with a Breitling logo.

[@ID-Guy]

The hour hand and those quarter plots look SO close to one... great shout!

[@SamrayGTR]

I'm both excited for these new Super Oceans and slightly critical. Something about them has a "cold" feel aesthetically and I can't figure out why. Something about this (excluding the 'B' logo) feels like the dial belongs in a Bentley and seems to appeal to young Bentley owners. I know Bentley and Breitling have done Collab editions before.

[@ID-Guy]

It's odd, right? I still can't put my finger on why this new release feels odd to me. That cold aesthetic definitely hits home man... And the Bentley collabs... off the top of my head I can't remember if any stood out as great releases 😆

[@anthonystevens8683]

This watch seems a bit form over function, it looks good but when you get into it for normal use the bezel function just mirrors the chapter ring but in a negative colour scheme ultimately reducing the readable dial for the time. Looking at the photographs it might not be for me, I'm not a fan of the 'Thor's Hammer' minute hand either. I'll not draw any conclusion right now though but will wait untill I see one in the flesh at an AD at some point. It would not be the first time that less than top notch initial impressions of a watch has resulted with it on my wrist.

[@ID-Guy]

I still can't put my finger on why I don't dig it. On paper everything checks out BUT something is off. Maybe it's because I feel like there's a blandness to it overall? No idea. Definitely needs to be experienced 🥃

[@chrisstevenson2622]

Why don’t they have screw down collars on the pushers to prevent the pushers from being pushed during diving? One thing I’ve noticed when looking at their website is they are limited on their offering of watches. Heck, they don’t offer the most simplest of field watches.

[@davidb9531]

Are you going to do a tudor Ranger review in the metal, I recently compared it to the new explorer and much preferred it, I think it is great but I’m in a minority I think

[@theoriginaloc]

Good commentary.

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you OC, The SuperOcean is a tough nut to crack for sure 🍻

[@alfieakaronaldog]

I am not a Breitling fan, but the new SuperOcean is not generic! It’s the best thing they have done in years. Too thin, too expensive, no power reserve, cac movement……… but still a nice Breitling.

[@ID-Guy]

You've summed it up well brother 😆 Maybe I've been too harsh calling it generic... but the cons here... it's sad that they're asking so much for such a simple setup. Ah well 🥃

[@thegorn]

I think it looks incredible. I won't go near it though unless they have an option for the Tudor movement - I refuse Selita / ETA generic 38hr power reserve moments. This is 2023. 60hr power reserve should be minimum spec, same as a-magnetic and COSC, and the ability to change time/date without breaking the moment.

[@Thomas-vq5pb]

Thank you for the video! I really love the original model, but honestly I don’t understand how Breitling managed to make the new model look so cheap (🙊)…. Colored dials are not enough I’m afraid …..

[@crazylikeafox7290]

Although this watch has been, understandably, getting a bit of flak regarding the movement I managed to pick up a new one in Spain for only £3200 and at that price, it's well worth the money. And it honestly looks stunning when on the wrist. Photos etc do not do this watch justice.

[@CaptCanuck4444]

Personally, I like it. Much more than the prior iteration.

[@blainecole5452]

Perhaps, just perhaps, the new Superocean will grow on me. But... my Superocean Heritage II with mesh bracelet is looking better and better.

[@SamrayGTR]

Weird to think the 2000s will be known as Vintage soon ish...

[@ID-Guy]

And to think that WE'LL be known as Vintage too! 😂

[@jeeperspeepers8323]

Sweet Lord Jesus! A Selitta movement? $5000? F--k me dead and bury me pregnant!

[@ID-Guy]

My bad... I had an inkling that these models used Tudors Kenissi movements by now... oof 😆

[@davidb5720]

This falls in a bit of a no man’s land. The question would be, why would you buy this watch? The alternatives are just much better. I love brands harking back to their history, it’s the best part of enjoying watches. Unfortunately, you highlighted at the start of the video, the gold standard in dive watches! The Omega 300 ‘57😍

[@ID-Guy]

Darn Seamaster 300 setting the benchmark ;) Man, but that SuperOcean '57 has had me looking at it so much over the last few days...

[@davidb5720]

@@ID-Guy watches eh! Such an affliction that we can’t resist! 😉

[@singlendhot8628]

You could have reintroduced the 2005's functionality to it?

[@ID-Guy]

I think this could've been possible if Breitling took the B01 Caliber and simplified it 😉

[@singlendhot8628]

@@ID-Guy I'm not sure how aware you are of the Enicar Sherpa line of vintage professional watches but I have a hunch that they will rocket to the top of your preference list.

[@cliffordgriffith818]

I think, Breitling is hanging out with tudor, too much😄

[@ID-Guy]

Boss: "Hey, that Snowflake dial and handset seems quite popular over the road..." - Designer: "Say no more" 😆

[@WestCoastAce27]

I like it a little more than you but agree it could use a little more ‘pop’ (for lack of a better term. But you made me stop the video about halfway through - the Aquastar! - that is gorgeous. So many vintage queues (wearing my recently acquired homage to the McQueen Rolex Explorer). Have you been able to review one? I may just get one sight unseen.

[@ID-Guy]

So many weird and rare oddities out there Mark and no I haven't! Maybe I should get in touch with Aquastar and ask. The only issue I've seen with them is their case thickness is a bit on the large size, like 15mm's (maybe more) which is a bit of a detractor) BUT the quirks are all there! 🥃

[@WestCoastAce27]

@@ID-Guy my Helm Komodo white dial - 15.6 - no worries. Yes, amazing how many options we have when especially after Steve Jobs dropped the iPhone on the world and a few yrs later the death of the entire industry was predicted.

[@OneManReviews]

It is always better to judge a watch in the metal but from what I see on photos and videos I don't like this new version of the SuperOcean. It doesn't do anything to me with the design. They have many beautiful models but this one is very strange to me.

[@ID-Guy]

Couldn't have said it better. There's something about it that stands out (in a weird way) Maybe, just maybe it'll stand the test of time BUT there's a fine line between how gorgeous a dive watch can be vs how functional it can be. This one leans a bit to far away from the beauty ;)

[@OneManReviews]

​@@ID-Guy Agree. It also could be like the issue with the new Ranger or the Blancpain Bathyscaphe - a few little tweaks would do the magic and the watch would stand out totally differently.

[@AGC828]

No ruining seconds heard?? Arms... Don't know if watch if running??

[@ericb8888]

Diving Chronos are the Undiscovered Country ……The future ;)

[@ID-Guy]

We'll have to keep our appreciation for them on the down-low ;) Super impractical...but who cares??

[@ericb8888]

@@ID-Guy Spot on , especially the white strap variant;)

[@alvinmick218]

I’m trying to be kind but this release is a “head scratcher.” What was Breitling thinking? I want them to succeed but this was a missed opportunity in my opinion. Do vintage or do modern but it’s just a bad idea to combine the two. Maybe this release will be successful for them but I highly doubt it. Let’s hope for something more inspired next time please.

[@ID-Guy]

I think this is the current approach from the CEO and brand in general. Take a selection of past models and mush them together. Sometimes they stick... other times... I just don't know 😆

[@christianebert8086]

I have my issues with this new superocean - maybe we have get used to the looks of this thing - at first sight I thought it is a toy watch compared to the previous very masculine superocean which was for me a combination of diver and aviation watch.

[@jaysp1910]

Interesting range but find the hand set too jarring. Would have looked better withe a reduced size white chapter ring and a smaller ^hammer" on the handset.

[@ID-Guy]

Well said Jay. I reckon balancing out those hands would've made a difference AND in the renders I played with the white disc size and even still, it's so hard to notice a difference 😆

[@EDHBlvd]

Like everyone else says, these watches are priced $1000-1500 too expensive. If they want to ask $4600, they need an in house movement.

[@ID-Guy]

And here I thought they used the same Kenissi movements that Tudor did with this new series... oof 😂

[@EDHBlvd]

@@ID-Guy lol yep I see you are getting all these comments flooding in. I may go down to Breitling AD at mall next summer and see if they want to sell me the SO 36mm with teal dial and teal rubber strap for 50% off. Hahaha!

[@ID-Guy]

@@EDHBlvd It'll be interesting to see where these are in a years time ;)

[@aussieexpatwatches]

Perfect summer watch!

[@ID-Guy]

Something we can all agree on. Breitling has nailed the timely promotion for these (rubber strap et al) Really digging these Green dial configurations on Green rubber 🔥

[@ziko317]

Breitling probably just sourced wrong size dial from China and went with it LOL.

[@ID-Guy]

The old saying measure twice, cut once is a good one 😆

[@FFL3001]

The watch is ok, but it should have been in the Heritage collection. We are running out of modern divers.

[@xpusostomos]

The oversized chapter ring grated on me because it made no functional sense. But as a diving chrono, suddenly it makes sense. Seems like they ruined the concept with retro for the sake of retro.

[@ID-Guy]

How great it is seeing that minute hand? Man, they could've followed through with it... chuck in a B01 movement, strip away some of it's bulk ( unnecessary running parts) and make a cracker of a Ref. 2005 remake 🥃

[@YongJoonPaek]

Exactly, this. Like it straight up makes no sense. I really love breitling, it's history, design, especially the superocean 57 heritage. But this??!!! Just genuinely confused.

[@ID-Guy]

@@YongJoonPaek It does feel confused man... I look at that '57 Superocean and think "you have a formula to work on right here" They could give this dial, case and bezel a modern refresh (like what Seiko has done with the SLA017) and create an absolute banger!

[@PaoloZucchetti]

the 2005 was a fantastic piece.....the modern one is just an another diver......

[@ID-Guy]

Man, that OG 2005... All Swiss watch brands were smoking / drinking the best stuff back in the 50's and 60's. Masterpieces everywhere! Gimme a '57 SuperOcean or one of these original 2005's any day 🥃

[@melvinch]

Breitling designs were at its best in during the 2000s. The Chronomat series, Colt series and SuperOcean series in those days just scream masculinity. Now their designs just look bland, cheap and lacking in character.

[@ID-Guy]

Have to agree Uncle. Just reading those names I can envision all of those 2000's models (and how popular they were) It's clear that the Masculinity has been adjusted for inclusivity - affecting how their designs come across today. It's a weird paradigm! Very well put 🥃

[@melvinch]

@@ID-Guy Thanks for replying. Hope you can review those older Breitling models one day, especially the Crosswind Special with the big date, which is a great favorite of mine.

[@melvinch]

​@@ID-GuyThe newer models are also playing too safe, clearly taking design cues from Tudor, Seiko and some others. Not a good sign in my opinion.

[@Nefville]

This watch is a mess. Its terrible value for money (I saw the pinned comment), its unattractive with that gigantic chapter ring and the because of that questionable design choice the dial and hands *have to be* tiny. That chapter ring makes sense on a chrono, where it measures the minutes elapsed but on a three hand date? Why? Why get this when you can get a Tudor with an inhouse movement for less or an inhouse Oris with 5 day power reserve for less? They royally messed up.

[@ID-Guy]

Tudor & Oris & Seiko's value props next to this does make you question a lot, right? Ah, it's a mystery...

[@cuestion-de-tiempo]

I prefer the current superocean with the big 6-9-12 numbers in the dial, this model doesnt speak to me.

[@juniorjohnson5961]

I don't care for this model. Hope your doing well 🙏

[@ID-Guy]

Thank you Junior and I hope you've had an excellent weekend! We feel the same about this piece 😉

[@plikkkk]

This video is proof that there’s no accounting for taste.

[@omegafanboyian]

What exactly are Breitling giving here ? A new clasp & Bezel , that's about 3 years overdue ! They have removed the date function from an Off the Shelf supplier & all the new SuperOcean's only have a 300M rating so no helium valve also on the 44mm & + sizes. Thank the Lord Tudor is a Much better package & value proposition.

[@ID-Guy]

This coming from an Omega Fanboy says a lot ;) I know what you mean though... Tudor continues to hit it out the park in so many ways... most brands are simply struggling to keep up. Omega, Tudor, Longines & Seiko. What else do you need nowadays?

[@omegafanboyian]

@@ID-Guy I only recently got my Tudor Black Bay Black 41mm at the end of May this year. The plan was the Omega Seamaster 300 41mm but had to make a compromise as my son is getting married. But what a Fantastic compromise and will always be an Omega fan boy. My personal take on the new SuperOcean is Breitling is giving much less for a higher price.

[@ID-Guy]

@@omegafanboyian Very astute take on the SuperOcean and a huge congratulations! On the Wedding and the Tudor. Been a helluva good year for you sir ;)

[@jamesblonde2271]

Woulda been even better if they used the original "all dial" chrono layout. Total grail for me and this is a bit of a miss.

[@wristcandy5451]

Rolex yachtmaster homage

[@ID-Guy]

Really does have Yachmaster 2 vibes, right? It's so weird! Who would've thought?

[@ismailzeki]

5K and a 38h Power reserve😂 Every Tissot Powermatic have 80h for 800 Bucks

[@ZeroSOFInfinity]

That "thing" on the minute hard though is hideous.....

[@ID-Guy]

Thor's hammer. Yeah, it's a bit too hardcore to be "elegant" but hey 😆

[@javierdanielmoreteau8522]

Based on my opinion you know haw to wear sir.

[@ultimaetsolder]

Looks like a Fossil or Invicta.

[@ID-Guy]

We're not nice to Breitling ;)

[@japudjuha]

The handset is horrid. Coming from any other watch that latest Superocean would be so confusing. I Much prefer the previous model.

[@user-vk9ff9gr4x]

the superocean jazz hands edition. 😂. The problem is the white inner ring- what purpose does this serve? delete this, extend the hands out to normal, keep the dial colors.... oh my... it now looks like every other cheap dive watch. OR just upgrade the old version, upgrade the bezel to ceramic, keep new bracelet design, but make it brushed, grab the herritage mov't with the much larger power reserve, plop it in there. Make 2 versions, date and no date make in only in 42mm. They are not going to get the all important Asian penetration with what they are doing. Settle for a single logo- for F* sake, now its just a striped shield and 2 lumps on a hill, vs a B with a anchor and wings. Hot mess of a company.

[@gelmibson883]

It is a technically downgrade. Less ATM, bad wanky bezel. They even cheaped out on the back. Don't get me started on the cheap pseudo ecological packing. But plus 600€? Yeah rrright. If they would have put it in the heritage line. But who cares. I would throw it in a spaghetti bowl anyway.

[@ID-Guy]

No spag bowl for this SO :/

[@jimlittle5769]

How is the Bezel wonky? It's made so when in water you can press down with your gloves and rotate.

[@jimlittle5769]

@@IDKline My bad. Misread it.

[@ImTheDudeMan471]

Zero fan of the "square block" minute hand. It is a crooked broken toof on a supermodel.

[@carattentat4944]

The 'BOY GEORGE'S KERN watch world’s constant feasting on the past, with each regurgitation looking less and less elegant and original, is really unhealthy. Breitling has taken the new Superocean to the abyss of shame, and replaced it with something that looks so cheap and clumsy as well!! And all because of the greedy cannibalising their back catalogues content,and instead of coming up with a REAL dive watch the 21st century demands for !!

[@patrickbrannen2887]

A futile attempt.

[@Jeepsteve1982]

The new navitimer is very effeminate compared to the original, this superocean however is very alpha male. I like it.

[@trethatdude]

Make every watch boring and the same is what I hear. Diver is just a category at this point. How man people would use a watch in todays time. That’s why they invented the dive computer 😂😂😂