Thanks for watching! Grab a free PDF copy of Bufett's Financial Rules of thumb here: longtermmindset.co/buffett
@RobinKeck-i2b9 күн бұрын
And spell Buffett correctly please.
@robkennedy59063 ай бұрын
Also, EBITDA does not consider working capital requirements. A company can make lots of earnings but be illiquid as they do not have the cash required to operate.
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Good point
@girish-d9p24 күн бұрын
That's the reason u always look at the cash flow statement
@brians122522 күн бұрын
thats why EBITDA is just a proxy for operating cash and you layer in working capital after to adjust for free cash flow....
@ApriliaCollector9 күн бұрын
Correct! Most commen made fault in Entrepeneurship, under estimating the cashflow, ending up in more debt…😊
@davidreichert9392Ай бұрын
I first learned about EBITDA when the CEO of my company used it in a presentation. For the life of me I couldn't understand why people would want a number that ignores expenses. Seemed to me like a dodgy way to overstate profits. Turns out my instinct was right.
@BrianFeroldiYTАй бұрын
Yet sooo many companies still use it
@thenoodlebuddy27 күн бұрын
Yeah it's just a way for highly leveraged and risky companies to make themselves look like they're doing well. Then they start using adjusted ebitda for those companies that are struggling to even make ebitda look good!
@aisolutionsindia713825 күн бұрын
it actually makes sense because depreciation is not a cash expense, it is generally not normalized to market cap but enterprise value.. enterprise value is like what market cap would have been in the absence of debt and cash.. however, in the long term cash flows converge to nopat, and eventually, cash flow is the king
@timothyharshaw234723 күн бұрын
It's not that much different from when any lender or Landlord asks and only cares about your Gross; not your net after deductions/expenses
@brians122522 күн бұрын
It also gives you a general proxy for operating cash by removing non cash
@bacchuslax7967Ай бұрын
Specifically says it does NOT complain with generally accepted accounting principles. Yet people go straight to it. Might as well say we’re hiding the debt but it’s still profitable
@kumark2145 күн бұрын
Evitda means nothing without cash flow statement.
@vincentf.23173 ай бұрын
Actually, I knew that EBITDA is widely used, and that both Buffett and Munger disliked it, always wondered why. Thanks for the clarification!!
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Glad it was useful!
@MillsOn2Wheels16 күн бұрын
This is why EBITDA is not looked at in a vacuum. You would do a quality of earnings analysis focused on EBITDA in addition to working capital analysis and debt and debt like analysis to get a more full picture
@randrothify29 күн бұрын
I agree with Munger. Yes, EBITDA allows you to compare companies with different capital structures, but it does so without accounting for the fact that different businesses have different capital expenditures and working capital needs. EBITDA is a terrible metric for companies that constantly have to reinvest in plant and equipment or R&D just to keep their businesses competitive.
@BrianFeroldiYT26 күн бұрын
I think Munger’s logic is sound
@RayRose-wp4isКүн бұрын
@@BrianFeroldiYT straight to the point.
@johnwasilenko1703 ай бұрын
Great summary of why Wall St sell side uses EBITDA for specific industry stock price valuation and targets while long term investors should be quite skeptical of this ploy
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@kumark2145 күн бұрын
I doubt wall street uses ebitda for valuation. It’s one metric. But valuation is generally done using dcf.
@osunaedgarАй бұрын
Well explained..! IMHO the background music becomes a nuisance after a while...
@BrianFeroldiYTАй бұрын
Thanks for the feedback
@harshadsubhashАй бұрын
I second that.
@rolandfisherАй бұрын
agreed
@clementgavi729019 күн бұрын
EBITDA means Earning Before Interest Taxes Depreciation and Amortisation. In French it is called EBE in other words Excédent Brut d’Exploitation. EBITDA refers to figures from the Income statement. It is the result that shows the real operating efficiency. In accounting terms only accounts of classes 6 and 7 are concerned.
@mikebaxter24727 күн бұрын
Motivation is key to understanding, banks like EBITDA so they can lend you more, they also use financial covenants to manage debt loads. As a rule of thumb, it youre doing well with net income youre growing your bank account!
@mahmoudghoneim800426 күн бұрын
Both measures are useful in my opinion because every business has two legs one is operational and the other is financial, as a long term investor you should check each separately before taking a decision.
@jjcooney975821 күн бұрын
Always agreed with him. Good principles
@raedaljowdah936416 күн бұрын
Excellent explanation. Deserved a 10x likes. A bit too fast for a subject that makes you think while you talk. I would've loved to see more on the worked out example. Pls do the same for key financial ratios.
@BrianFeroldiYT13 күн бұрын
Thanks for the feedback!
@djfghwetrysdfg24 күн бұрын
earnings and free cash flow are better then?
@MaksimSSM9 күн бұрын
Good explanation 👍
@bryanwoods57093 ай бұрын
Absolutely great overview of EBITDA
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@richardgordon3 ай бұрын
Really love videos like this! Interesting, informative and clearly explained 😊
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@DavidBoothroyd-e9o12 күн бұрын
EBITDA may be hated for certain reasons. However, it can be very important in some situations. In some cases in Europe, you can only claim tax deductions on interest of 30% of EBITDA. This stops people financing a company with high intra-group loans claiming high tax deductions on interest. When buying a private company, you want to see what the EBITDA is so you can see how profitable a company may be without interest and taxes which can be different depending on who the owners are. So be careful before you think that Charlie and Warren are always correct in every situation.
@BrianFeroldiYT12 күн бұрын
Sure. This video is meant to be more of an overview.
@RayRose-wp4isКүн бұрын
EBITDA is a Revenue metric. Key point noted: A portion of interest payments may be claimed as a tax deduction.
@davidjimenez167024 күн бұрын
Best Finance video I have ever seen
@BrianFeroldiYT23 күн бұрын
Wow! Thanks for the huge compliment
@john4444422 күн бұрын
Awesome video, thanks for the upload!
@BrianFeroldiYT20 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@parmsingh977322 күн бұрын
I’ve heard a lot of companies are starting to use EBIT( earnings before interest and taxes). Especially PE companies looking to acquire small businesses.
@BrianFeroldiYT20 күн бұрын
That makes more sense to me. Still far from my favorite profit metric.
@kumark2145 күн бұрын
Not a great metric. Never gives you info on working capital and cash flows
@HudsonLighting19 күн бұрын
I recently learned about EBITDAC - essentially removing the impacts of Covid
@johnbatson877919 күн бұрын
There is no correlation between EBITDA and a company’s free cash flow. Which is all that really matters
@BrianFeroldiYT18 күн бұрын
Not a direct one anyway
@johnbatson877918 күн бұрын
@@BrianFeroldiYT maybe an inverse correlation, every company with a high EBITDA and low cash is destined for the financial toilet
@MH_Bikes2 күн бұрын
Charlie was 100% correct, it's a waste of time. Why not have IBCOGS? Income Before Cost Of Goods Sold
@BrianFeroldiYTКүн бұрын
lol. Wall Street would love that one.
@BonnieSKCАй бұрын
Love it. Thanks from HK.
@BrianFeroldiYTАй бұрын
Our pleasure!
@illfunk19672 ай бұрын
Great breakdown 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@BrianFeroldiYT2 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching
@bonsai43223 ай бұрын
Hey, Brian, can you do a video on why you have Cloudflair on a short leash? Appreciate you.
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
I think you mean that for Brian Stoffel
@sonofsarek27 күн бұрын
Financing through debt shouldn’t be taken lightly. Far too many companies do this.
@BrianFeroldiYT26 күн бұрын
Agreed
@jose9180723 күн бұрын
Depends on the business but debt is cheaper than equity. if you have a business that has a constant cashflow it's better for them. The M&M research shows that really well
@mannyme298617 күн бұрын
Is not what you make.....is what you keep!!!!
@BrianFeroldiYT16 күн бұрын
Correct
@patusoro478124 күн бұрын
I would like to help the company I work for, allowing them to pay me 10 years up front... then they can amortize it lowering expense and make huge profits. Win-Win!
@BrianFeroldiYT23 күн бұрын
lol - yup! This is a great reason why including operating leases as debt makes no sense to me
@muhammedrahilck465113 күн бұрын
Ever heard something like cash flow statement Nobody value a company based on its EBITDA
@BrianFeroldiYT13 күн бұрын
Umm….. have you ever heard of private equity?
@bossntetainment17 күн бұрын
The definition for depreciation you used is really wrong. You should not teach this if you define inflation the way you did… it is a reduction in the value of an asset over time, due in particular to wear and tear.
@aravin1115 күн бұрын
What he has used is correct. Slowly the interpretation changed to what you are mentioning. But both are still the same.
@m_c_8656Ай бұрын
Wut he like den? Do he go wit operational cash flow, free cash flow ?
@azulsimmons10403 ай бұрын
Interesting history lesson.
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@kevinfrommheaven17 күн бұрын
very interesting
@David-nx2vm27 күн бұрын
Your example of the two companies and how they are financed is a great illustration of why EBITDA sets off alarm bells. I retired from a company that started including EBITDA in quarterly earnings reports only after they went public and had to soothe shareholders. Of course Charlie Munger was right about EBITDA.
@BrianFeroldiYT26 күн бұрын
Glad to hear it was useful
@OnurcanYigit-tg1sk4 күн бұрын
Ebitda is a great metric to make apples to apples comparison. That being said it is not bullet-proof. Asset heavy businesses (like Telecom) is not suitable for Ebitda valuations given high Depreciation charges. Ebitda alone does not factor in the full cashflow generation power of a company. A company can be highly profitable on Ebitda basis but working capital and capex requirements can wipe out all the operating cash (if not more), reverse is also applicable. Thats why there is no single multiple for all types of businesses. Financial analysts (bankers) factor in all these moving parts to make sense of the valuation multiple based on Ebitda. Nevertheless it is a great metric to compare similar businesses in the same industries and should shed a lot of light on operating performance of the company.
@BrianFeroldiYT3 күн бұрын
Good color
@jeffreypritchard61024 күн бұрын
Naturally, companies that have lots of debt LOVE EBITDA...lol. Who wouldn't? "If you take out all the bad stuff, our company looks pretty solid."
@BrianFeroldiYT4 күн бұрын
Lol
@cassbielski43253 ай бұрын
Aren’t owner earnings a lot like EBITDA?
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
No - owners earnings are effectively the amount of capital that be pulled out of a business without harming it. It’s a much harder number to achieve than EBITDA.
@cassbielski43253 ай бұрын
@@BrianFeroldiYT Thanks. I guess then, if you are asking for ideas, a similar explanation and example of owner earnings, perhaps contrasting with EBITDA, would be fun. Regardless, thanks for all your efforts.
@sutats6 күн бұрын
Speculate to accumulate!
@MuphoShana17 күн бұрын
Loans are not intangible assets,,,,,
@BrianFeroldiYT16 күн бұрын
Correct - but they are amortized
@ThisIsGoogle17 күн бұрын
It's for Special purposes. If you have to ask it's not for you, it's a very obvious Accounting tool when you know what it's used for
@Tuberis3 ай бұрын
Very nice. I would skip the music and slow down the pace of speech if I were you.
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the feedback
@szymonc87393 ай бұрын
Yeah well if you’re pure minority stock investor then yes, EBITDA does give you much insights as you’re probably more into net income (dividends) and free cash flow (whether company has enough resources to grow). But let’s be honest, if you’re buying companies out then you look at EBITDA because you don’t give a shit about capital structure or tax costs. You want to see how strong earnings the business can generate which tells you a lot about its performance
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Lol
@sergesantos889725 күн бұрын
EBITDA is used as a proxy for the annual operating cashflow. That's why EBITDA has been used since the dawn of time
@username776324 күн бұрын
That might explain depreciation and amortization, but doesn't explain excluding interest expense and taxes.
@BrianFeroldiYT23 күн бұрын
EBITDA was invented in the 1970s by John Malone.
@marcinekpomaranski6 күн бұрын
I thought I was the last one to see a scam in Ebitda :))))
@yashagar4443Ай бұрын
Depreciation and amortization are cash expenses
@BrianFeroldiYTАй бұрын
Incorrect. They are cash expenses at the time of purchase, reflected on the cash flow statement. However, they are non-cash expenses on the income statement.
@George-ni5ic12 күн бұрын
Earnings Before All The Bad Stuff
@BrianFeroldiYT12 күн бұрын
Lol
@JD-im4wu3 ай бұрын
...yet u still see "CFA"s who base all their valuation on EBITDA on youtube for years posing as stock analysts "for" investors. tsk tsk Cameron
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Yup….
@summerbreeze51153 ай бұрын
😢
@jvh5820 күн бұрын
Nothing wrong with ebitda, you just need to account for average replacement investements. Which isnt necessarily equal to depreciation. But I agree that basing valuations solely on ebitda is dishonest, especially for capital heavy companies.
@icecream625613 күн бұрын
Hello, a university student in investment club here. Yeah, EBITDA is used a lot, and seeing it as non GAAP, i asked my seniors who replied with differrent capital structure businesses, especially new companies that has bought a lot of equipments which incurs a lot of depreciation. I always use the P/E valuation to track a company, not EV/EBITDA as im unfamiliar with it
@JD-im4wu12 күн бұрын
@@icecream6256 yes p/e def better then ebitda nonsense. but p/e is also very manipulated its the free cashflows where the magic really seems to happen
@olivier994619 күн бұрын
Let’s be honest here and Munger or this video could make you think that EBITDA is the sole metric we are using… Not at all, it is one of them and we can be pretty sure that BH did/do use EBITDA in their evaluation. If it was that simple we would be all rich… or poor Munger was also a real BS’ter too. Whenever I hear about Warren and Charlie, I think of the two old farts of the Muppet show sitting at their balcony laughing at their own jokes 😂 RIP Charlie, EBITDA is still used!
@RobinKeck-i2b9 күн бұрын
Please turn the music off and speak way more slowly. I’m not 5.
@BrianFeroldiYT9 күн бұрын
Feedback recieved!
@sigungajoshua61492 ай бұрын
I HATE IT TOO !!!
@rholalbi8155Ай бұрын
😭🤷🏿♂️
@tompuijpeNL26 күн бұрын
Let's just all pay 40x community adjusted EBITDA ;D
@BrianFeroldiYT23 күн бұрын
Lol
@davidsantos60483 ай бұрын
remove the song behind pls
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Good feedback
@davidsantos60483 ай бұрын
@@BrianFeroldiYT or decrease the volume :) thanks
@rholalbi8155Ай бұрын
Stfv & leave thanks
@thenoodlebuddy27 күн бұрын
Didn't forget about the even dodgier adjusted ebitda!
@BrianFeroldiYT26 күн бұрын
I was thinking about making a video about that…
@Chadhogan11121 күн бұрын
Hate these click bait thumbnails
@jkb46216 күн бұрын
Fell for it too
@petermeszaros38493 күн бұрын
Ebitda??? Latka says what???
@brienchia15 күн бұрын
Long story short...listen to the accountant, not the capitalist
@clarkkirkpatrick17 күн бұрын
I hate this music Great video but very distracting, repetitive, sanitary music
@BrianFeroldiYT16 күн бұрын
Noted
@borism462916 күн бұрын
In short it's a sham
@matt.stevick15 күн бұрын
rip to a goat 📈🇺🇸
@BrianFeroldiYT14 күн бұрын
He was a gem
@QqQ-h5h22 күн бұрын
This is so good. Lol
@BrianFeroldiYT19 күн бұрын
:)
@CP-oo8mj3 ай бұрын
So much wrong information in your video, don't know where to start...
@summerbreeze51153 ай бұрын
Elaborate 🤔
@swphilosophy30403 ай бұрын
@@summerbreeze5115 The definition of amortization is inaccurate. The statement that EBIT and operating income are the same is also false.
@CP-oo8mj3 ай бұрын
@@summerbreeze5115statement that EBITDA doesn't include SBC
@BrianFeroldiYT3 ай бұрын
Constructive feedback is always appreciated
@butwhytharum25 күн бұрын
Never knew tax expenses weren't operating expenses. As if you don't pay and would continue to operate.