Good points Brian. I can't believe Adobe hans't offered noise reduction for Jpeg. Most of us have jpeg files from older cameras that can't wait for this feature to be added.
@djmusic130fdy4 ай бұрын
Great review! Version 3.1 really was quite the update. Processing speed is definitely improved.
@mikeanntroutman64634 ай бұрын
Sure do wish Adobe would add plug-in support to Lr in order to simplify the round trip process.
@JackBeasleyMedia4 ай бұрын
Good video! I've had a love-hate relationship with Photo AI since it first came out and it appears they've fixed a lot of things I used to complain about. I still wish I could get it to do bulk noise reduction processing, like I used to get with Topaz Denoise.
@brianmatiash4 ай бұрын
Yeah, I've gotta give Topaz Labs credit for continuing to improve Photo AI. It still has a lot of room to grow, but they're moving in the right direction.
@rwmcgeesr4 ай бұрын
I still mostly use DeNoise, Sharpen and GigaPixel. Face recovery is very good in Photo AI.
@guymatson77314 ай бұрын
Brian, thanks for another great video. You have best Lightroom video I have found. I thinking about adding Topaz Photo ai to my editing as I suffer from hand tremors. I like to send all photos to the cloud so I can edit on my I- pad pro. My question - can you get photos from the cloud into Topaz or do you have save in another form to get them into Topaz? Thanks for you insight. Look forward to future videos.
@malencid4 ай бұрын
What about the sharpening module?
@brianmatiash4 ай бұрын
I’ve found the Photo AI sharpen model has also improved, but I admit that I don’t often use it.
@dangreenhithe14074 ай бұрын
Hi Brian. Thanks for this review. Do you use LR first and then Photo AI or the other way around? Cheers, Dan.
@brianmatiash4 ай бұрын
It depends on the image to be honest. Most of the time, if the image needs noise reduction and Lightroom doesn’t support the file format, then I’ll first sent it to Photo AI and then edit in LR.
@dangreenhithe14074 ай бұрын
@@brianmatiash Nice one. Thanks!
@shoregrl20Сағат бұрын
Thx Brian! I did purchase Photo AI yesterday, but I am already having regret as I didn’t realize it doesn’t have a plug-in with Lightroom? It seems very cumbersome, I am having buyers remorse. Can you share the workflow you follow? Also, for my iphone photos that I like to edit but not necessarily make the cut for me to save in Lightroom, should I just add it as a plugin with Apple photos and keep the workflows separate? Thanks. Actually, I am thinking about returning to LR Classic due to the fact that Lightroom cloud does not let me organize my files by folder and forces the backup by dates….I am so confused now.
@TC_Conner4 ай бұрын
I have Topaz Photo AI, and my workflow is Lr then to PS if needed. I haven't found the need to include Photos AI in my workflow unless I see the need. I just shot a wedding and have a few photos that may need "face recovery," I'll see what Photo AI does for me. I'm mainly a landscape/nature photographer but will accept a nice paying wedding shoot when asked. 😎
@larrymulmed20814 ай бұрын
Thanks Brian. Since Lightroom doesn't support plugins, what is your workflow for going from LR to Photo AI and back?
@brianmatiash4 ай бұрын
I usually send it to Photoshop first and access Photo AI from there.
@porkpie28843 ай бұрын
@@brianmatiash From Lightroom I just click Edit in Photo AI ->choose either Edit Original or Edit a Copy with Lightroom adjustments, and once edited in Topaz, click export to Lightroom
@porkpie28843 ай бұрын
From Lightroom I just click Edit in Photo AI ->choose either Edit Original or Edit a Copy with Lightroom adjustments, and once edited in Topaz, click export to Lightroom
@brianmatiash3 ай бұрын
You’re referring to LR Classic.
@porkpie28843 ай бұрын
@@brianmatiash Yes I am :)
@markcasebeer82734 ай бұрын
Nice video. I have the new Topaz AI and DXO. I think they both belong in my toolbox. Do you think Lightroom will ever implement enhance on JPG files? I normally shoot Raw but sometimes I prefer JPG shooting sports.
@vhriver1980Ай бұрын
What’s the difference between the upscaler in photo AI vs gigapixel?
@Bernardn633 ай бұрын
Great video. One question : does it have a function for batch enhancement of several photos. Like if you want to upscale many files from a smartphone but don't have time or energy to do them one by one ?
@jaclyne21373 ай бұрын
Yes. It does have a batch feature. That's the reason I bought it. You can just batch upscale or you can batch with AutoPilot which will apply the enhancements including upscaling.
@Bernardn633 ай бұрын
@@jaclyne2137 Thank you for this important precision :-) Have a great day !
@VictorKaidoКүн бұрын
why no1 talks about image expanding, im looking for an offline image expander but no1 ever mentioned that about topaz photo ai
@ewallperschwaznyk41693 ай бұрын
I just upgraded Photo AI to 3.1.3. It now takes over an hour to process sharpen, denoise and upsize from 3755X3755 to 7510X7510 and return to Lightroom. In photography time is money and right now Topaz is costing me a lot of money.
@adammutolo58003 ай бұрын
Yeah, doesn’t do any favors unless you have a seriously beefy computer.
@robguyatt96024 ай бұрын
Has anyone else got the issues with white balance when image is returned to LrC? It's been an ongoing issue for me for some time. I was told it is a known problem and will be fixed soon. That seems a long time ago. I can fix it in LrC to an extent but sometimes the image is not recoverable. I'm in latest version at this time. I keep all my apps up to date. Photo AI is 3.1.1 currently.
@MoBetaBlu21 күн бұрын
KEEPS CRASHING ANY SOLUTIONS TO THIS
@kim09424 ай бұрын
The problem using face recovery in Photo AI is not in how well it works for the face but in the difference it creates with the rest of the person or the photo therefore making the whole image look too weird to use. Although if it’s used in a close up of a person’s face with few surroundings it works amazingly well.
@porkpie28843 ай бұрын
Face recovery only works on young smooth faces. On anyone else it looks fake.
@KenToney4 ай бұрын
To me it’s gotten worse, a lot of photos with iso 3200 it won’t even detect it needs noise reduction and it makes faces look plastic. I still love the software
@brianmatiash4 ай бұрын
You should definitely contact their support team if you're getting those kinds of results. I'm sure they'd want to hear about it.
@juliodumbobk4 ай бұрын
I have both Topaz and DXO and I believe DXO is so much better