Brown v. Board of Education, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Review, Required Supreme Court Cases]

[@Griddyale86987]

im so grateful for this nice bald man, thank you

[@heimlershistory]

And the bald man is grateful right back

[@jade-dk9hu]

so thankful for these videos man. been watching for two years now and you never cease to not carry my grade.

[@user-jb7pe7wf1z]

facts plessy v fegurson ruled seperate but equal, so schools were segregated. a brown family was denied admission to a white school. const principal: violated equal protection clause decision: seperate is not equal for schools

[@lordvonmanor6915]

The history behind segregation is very confusing for young people to understand. Blacks were not allowed to go to White schools but Whites could attend Black schools. Students in Black schools were Blacks, Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans, Indo-Europeans, and Anglos. Therefore not as segregated as you'd think. The same goes for housing Blacks were not allowed to live just anywhere they wanted. Therefore a Black Community consisted of Blacks, Korea Town, China Town, and Tokyo Town. Where as White communities main focus was not to be mixed "Indo" which is a new breed of humans.👍 What they don't tell you is the State's ruling party were people living in Black communities. Yet they want you to believe Black communities were inferior people when fact is most inventions, and working class people lived in Black communities. And that is why the United States was nick named Black-Amerika until after WWII. Thats when every Black community in every US State was flooded with Drugs & Guns by the US Government.

[@chrisx5628]

So helpful!!! Thank you!

[@AJ1770s]

Before i moved i went to a previously segrgated school (this was in near present times to clarify) and i think it was built in the 1960 just to show the stalling

[@bugscranks7605]

Great video. When I look at Brown v. Board and Plessy v. Ferguson I see the Constitution as more a living document versus what I believe originalists view the Constitution as. Can you do a video to add clarity to what being an origanalist means as I see different opinions and definitions depending on who you read.

[@teoanselmi581]

"The answer given at the argument to these questions was that regulations of the kind they suggest would be unreasonable, and could not, therefore, stand before the law. Is it meant that the determination of questions of legislative power depends upon the inquiry whether the statute whose validity is questioned is, in the judgment of the courts, a reasonable one, taking all the circumstances into consideration? A statute may be unreasonable merely because a sound public policy forbade its enactment. But I do not understand that the courts have anything to do with the policy or expediency of legislation. A statute may be valid and yet, upon grounds of public policy, may well be characterized as unreasonable. Mr. Sedgwick correctly states the rule when he says that, the legislative intention being clearly ascertained, the courts have no other duty to perform than to execute the legislative will, without any regard to their views as to the wisdom or justice of the particular enactment. Stat. & Const. Constr. 324. There is a dangerous tendency in these latter days to enlarge the functions of the courts by means of judicial interference with the will of the people as expressed by the legislature. Our institutions have the distinguishing characteristic that the three departments of government are coordinate and separate. Each must keep within the limits defined by the Constitution. And the courts best discharge their duty by executing the will of the lawmaking power, constitutionally expressed, leaving the results of legislation to be dealt with by the people through their representatives. Statutes must always have a reasonable construction. Sometimes they are to be construed strictly; sometimes liberally, in order to carry out the legislative will. But however construed, the intent of the legislature is to be respected, if the particular statute in question is valid, although the courts, looking at the public interests, may conceive the statute to be both unreasonable and impolitic. If the power exists to enact a statute, that ends the matter so far as the courts are concerned. The adjudged cases in which statutes have been held to be void because unreasonable are those in which the means employed by the legislature were not at all germane to the end to which the legislature was competent." - MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting in Plessy v Ferguson

[@angelicart3741]

I love these videos! but you forgot to put the Shaw V. Reno case video in this playlist. Not a big deal but just thought I would point it out. (These videos are the only reason I'm passing AP Gov lol)

[@alexciabynoe8774]

Thank you 🔥🔥

[@alexandersands8447]

Thank you.

[@crazyfunguslady]

bro is the reason im passing civics LMAO

[@MarieDavis-xt7er]

There never had to be the riots each child that had a post office mailbox that every child in Alabama and America and around the world was to receive a medical education program packet inn the mail to do there home work onthere own time to learn about being a doctor or nurse no matter the stage of poverty the mailbox and mail did not care who a person was it was all to be done by the mail inn accordance with the local papermills that was making enough paper packets about a medical education program packet for every child on the earth

[@Im.analissa]

1:54

[@hannahwolke5439]

its written so well

[@tbrowntracyj]

Did justice warren suggest that the right here was entitled to instill inferiority JUST NOT FOR RACE

[@stolfoch.]

hello

[@melvinsherrod6846]

Does not mean anything, just put segregation into the constitution and it's legal. Affirmative action is not in constitution, it is a federal law. We have a triangle-- constitution, federal law and Supreme Court decision

[@TheRealMinuteMarket]

I'm confused is brown a person

[@Dragonoidalpha]

yes, last name

[@trired1729]

no the case was the board of education vs all brown people

[@trired1729]

they all had to show up to court

[@emmittmatthews8636]

@@trired1729 🤣

[@smadworld8515]

Ok

[@demarcus5291]

15 minutes before the exam 😭

[@monger6726]

Lets go

[@tomnassar5884]

Joe biden supported separate but equal