Bryan Litz - Applied Ballistics | #56

[@BestICan]

People like Bryan are far and few between. He exhibits a humbleness born of honoring the scientific method in his work. That means continually pursuing the falsification of a working hypothesis. We wouldn't be awash in so much misinformation and outright falsehoods If more people took this approach in their thinking. Erik, thanks for having him on the podcast.

[@redrock425]

Bingo. Too few people, scientists included, can leave their ego behind in the pursuit of the facts. Why try and fool yourself, the truth will set you free 😉

[@br4713]

@@redrock425 you're right, and facts here are the results on the target and not stats that don't take in account the most important and unexplained factors. If you can't prove scientifically that barrel harmonics have an effect on accuracy, it doesn't mean that it has no effect on it.

[@bronsonwhite611]

I LOVE seeing two mature adults that don't agree 100% have an amazing conversation that everyone benefits from.

[@AZGunner-mp7yx]

Man, Bryan is a walking science lab. He puts out amazing data based info that really is a blessing and clearly a very humble guy.

[@akirshbom]

Eric, I love that you talk to so many people from various disciplines. So much of the info is compartmentalized by discipline yet we can all learn from outside our own bubble.

[@jasonparrish3236]

Eric, the exposure you provide to us from the elites of the shooting sports gives us an immense opportunity to receive knowledge we would normally never have gotten without an untold amount of expenditure of funds at the loading and shooting bench. Thank you sir.

[@hrbricker]

The reality of it is that without the support of other people's money, we simply cannot do it.

[@charlesbradshaw8673]

Wow, what a show. I feel like I need to go look in the mirror to make sure my hair isn't on fire. Will most definitely be watching this one again.

[@CacheCropp]

Still watching the video because I had to rewind twice so far to make sure I understood correctly. Thanks to both of you for this video. It takes a lot of intelligence, curiosity and a lack of ego to sit down and have an open-minded convo. 👏👍😎

[@davevenier2950]

Thanks Erik and bryan for doing a great job at educating all of us.

[@jwschroeder804]

Thanks Bryan for bringing true knowledge of population distribution and statistical inference to the discussion. Like one of my stats teachers told us, "use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post, for support not illumination".😊

[@kinked_chrome1438]

Everytime you post a podcast, I cant believe that I get to listen for free.

[@sk8snwmx]

Just after 1:40, The dialogue is the leading edge of our time from 2x shooting dynasties. Thank you.

[@rotasaustralis]

Thanks Eric. This series is turning out to be a gold mine of information, not to mention a ground breaker in moving shooters thinking toward a far more scientific & realistic outcome. I see your podcasts as well as Hornady, Litz & etc to be the tip of the spear in pushing the shooting community from the subjective to the objective way of thinking & determining an outcome. These podcasts will have a long term effect not only on individual shooters but the industry as a whole. Thanks again Eric. Great stuff. Looking fwd to the next interview.

[@bodnarboats444]

2 great shooters in one pod cast. nice to see them on the same stage. I have read 4 or 5 books of Bryan Litz most of the pages I had to read 2 or 3 times to get it but Bryan's knowledge has made me a great hand loader and shooter. Also I have put a lot of old wise tales about loading and ballistics to rest around the campfire.

[@mediaconsumer9483]

This is gold!!! Referencing the scientific method sums it all up.

[@MrPrgallo]

Two of the best talking with each other. As good as it gets.

[@jamesmooney5348]

RIGHT ON ERIK! Great interaction and conversation! Bryan is a top dog! Really enjoyed him!

[@jimhudson9958]

This is the best interview yet! Can't wait to get out and start retesting everything I thought I was doing right before!

[@baddrandy]

Eric the look on your face during the early part of this interview is priceless. When Bryan speaks people listen. 🤣😭🤣😭🤣😭 I’m not busting your balls either. The look on my face was the same😬😭🤣😭😬🤣 I was hanging on every word!!!!!!😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

[@mannybarroga1878]

Valuable information explained in layman's terms. I can't find the words to express gratitude ,thank you

[@ericbennett1253]

Been hoping for this interview since the channel was started. It did NOT disappoint. (Except for being too short. ha ha.) Thank you Erik and Bryan for making this happen. Great conversation!

[@DanielBoone337]

I've always looked at things like everything is just another data point and the more you can put together the better informed decision you can make. This is why I love these podcasts so much you're taking info from every discipline and putting it out there for everyone which is amazing. Great video as always keepem coming brother!!!!

[@TheParkingLotGarage]

@44:00 The thing that kept coming to my mind is that there’s a point of diminishing returns in terms of barrel roughness and bullet velocity. That may also explain why velocity slows near the end of its life. Of course, I also like Bryan’s explanation for the bore size slightly increasing which may decrease friction and reduce velocity. Whichever the cause may be, his roughness explanation still makes sense to me.

[@blacksand9805]

For me it explains easily why some barrels shoot better with more cleaning and some others don't.

[@magwamagwa45110]

Thank you both for sharing what many of us have been looking for ,information based on sound trails and years of experience... wow what a great pod cast..

[@lennyfoffa5971]

Thank you Bryan and Erik, Excellent topic. As I shoot Bench Rest from time to time , I use the frequent cleaning method, using solvents, during Load Development, in my Hunting Rifles. I shoot .270 Win AND .270 Weatherby mag most often. One range session is either 15 or 18 or 21 rounds as I shoot 3 shot groups. . Thats it, then clean that rifle. During load development, I, may go to the range twice a week, with one rifle. until I have the group size, I'm looking for , at the velocity I need for Hunting applications. Thank You both again for an excellent Pod cast.

[@oldschooljack3479]

Man! The last few days have been like Christmas! These podcasts have been popping up in feed... Seeing Erik interview Frank Galli AND Bryan Litz! Phenomenal stuff.

[@golong8150]

I am greatly appreciative of the interviews you do and the wealth of knowledge that is passed along to new shooters like myself and those who have been at it for awhile. I’m blown away by how far down the rabbit hole really goes !! Keep up the good work 👍🏾💪🏾

[@wrstew1272]

Great interview with a very knowledgeable professional!

[@DaleFranke]

What an incredibly comprehensive and detailed information trove. Thank you Erik and Bryan!

[@chriss4325]

New favorite podcast! Good discussions!

[@jollycoveimaginginc.9337]

What a video. This was awesome. Thank you so much

[@evoevil124]

just watched this for the 3rd time. Great Video. Best thing I got from this is to keep an open mind and keep searching for more knowledge.

[@BelieveTheTarget]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@michaeltaylor7436]

Thankyou Erik and Bryan, great questions and discussion. This is a video that watching twice will double what you get from it. I have been watching Erik's videos for about 4 years and they are improving, like his shooting. It is hard to wrap your head about the statistical sample size issue when it is hardly practical to shoot the required sample size. I recently viewed Erik's video with the developer of the OCW method of load development. A key point was that OCW looks at average impact point more than group size. This seemed like an Ah Ha!! moment for me. Groups are made up of a vertical component and a horizontal component and I have thought separating these components was necessary. Another point made in the OCW discussion is that flyers are probably shooter errors or some other factor rather than the load, but still a real event.

[@Vamike9]

In my opinion, most shooters who've been in the LR/ELR shooting game for a long time aren't as open-minded as they'd like to believe. We have "our way" and that makes us feel good so we don't look for better ways. This is why I'm glad to see people challenging old ideas like Litz. After a while, the knowledge increases/changes, based on actual evidence, and newer shooters take advantage of this by not getting stuck in the "only way." The goal is not to have it all figured out, the goal is to be less wrong as Litz emphasized.

[@redrock425]

Yes, modern affliction to think anything old is wrong and new is good. Usually it's a bit of both. Too many "scientists" only interested in proving themselves right rather than testing the hypothesis, revising it and retesting. Lots of rumour, habit and superstition in shooting sports.

[@patrioticguy1791]

I found it very interesting that two professionals in their respective areas of ballistics and marksmanship have such varying opinions on different things. It doesn't mean that either is wrong or right, but it opens up dialogue that makes us think outside the box that we normally hang out in. Pretty good interview. I love your channel.

[@mikeadams9337]

Thank you very much for this podcast! I loved the info in this one and will definitely have to listen multiple times to get all the info out. When two people can sit down with different points of views on their experiences and how they achieved them, people can sure learn a lot. Thanks Erik for sharing so we all can try and better ourselves in the shooting sports.

[@amletog63]

I have watched this video first time today. That's a great video and an impressive talk. Please keep on sharing! Thanks!

[@BelieveTheTarget]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@repairfreak]

Wow, what an in-depth conversation. I watched the entire video trying my best to wrap my grey mass around what all was being discussed. Very interesting stuff. Its a pleasure to learn from experts that are willing to share information. ❤️✌️😎👍

[@garystaggs2771]

Great conversation! Thanks Erik

[@afroghair6793]

I've been waiting for this interview and Bryan and Erik delivered.

[@BG-gr7fh]

My brain just exploded... Thanks for the information Brian and Erik

[@volanteaggie]

Let me start by saying my brain hurts from all this knowledge bomb being dropped! So much great info. But I can’t believe you did this to us!!!!!!!!! Lol😂 dang that was a cliffhanger like no other! I can’t wait for the next segment! Thank you so much and thanks for a great tuner break!

[@hrbricker]

Wow! By virtue of Government contracts, Bryan has experienced courses of testing that the rest of us are unlikely to ever achieve. Let's face it, who can blow off 1500 rounds of .308 every day for a week or so and not get excited about the cost? For the uninitiated, get a copy of MIL Std (Standard) 105 which is the government guidebook for quality control inspection and or testing. It lays out in text what Bryan is explaining in this video. What I just learned from Bryan is that I'm spinning my wheels weight sorting 22LR ammo because the small sample sizes I'm capable of are not sufficient to overcome the effect of natural selection. I'd need at least a hundred of each sample weight to have a prayer of learning anything from the testing. (Avg of each individual sample)

[@DHaun100]

Another great interview.

[@ThePfirefighter2]

So much good information to digest! I think the "trust, but verify" attitude will always be the key to success. Erik, THANK YOU so much for bringing all of these great people together. The knowledge, wisdom and experience from you all bolsters my enthusiasm for learning more. Bryan, thanks for publishing your findings to share with us.

[@hrbricker]

"Derty Harry" said, "A man has got to know his limitations". These guys help me to avoid spending more on improvement then I can possibly achieve with my given resources. Thanks

[@Gareth96v1]

Great episode.. Lot of good info to think about.

[@hbudsmalley6317]

Wow! So many great topics! I'm going to save this one and come back for reference. Good job.

[@shadowironbank5469]

First of all thankyou Erik for taking us back stage and deep into the sport of high end precision shooting! We are just peons and as far as im concerned enjoy this trove of information you have exposed. Information which always useful and only enhances and promotes the sport of precision shooting. That being said I would like to thank all of your guests! Super informative, entertaining and just plain fun! Just to name a few, speedy gonzalez, jack neary, this guy hear too many to list. I think what hes trying to say concerning statistical distribution of group size is that no barrel can shoot 1 moa or 1/4 moa without changing something in the equation to stay ahead of the curve. He said “Using the same load” for 1500 rounds without changing the load. We all know that everything breaks down if adjustments are not made. Like for example as you said changing your oil. Im sure toyota, ford, honda etc all know this break down distribution as well. We all know barrels will lose accuracy with shots fired unless we change something like load, bullet seating, and yes proper cleaning.. at least thats what I got out of it. Great videos! Thankyou once again! And yes, Im the same guy that bought about 5 tuners from you, great products!

[@johnstewart2011]

I wasn’t sure about listening to a two-hour video, but it was certainly worth it. Thanks to you both. I am still puzzled about one thing that was mentioned here and I first read in volume III of Litz’s advancements in long range shooting book: How can external humidity affect powder that is contained inside a stout metal cartridge case that is stoppered with tight fitting bullet and primer? Mention was made of “leaky” cartridges. How does that occur? Are the bullets seated so loosely that air can migrate in and out of the case? Does change in atmospheric pressure due to weather conditions or altitude make that happen?

[@wheelzandgillz]

Ambient temp and altitude maybe? The brass heating up and offgasing from the air inside expanding? The higher drier your altitude the more its gonna wanna expand/depressureize the air inside the case like an airplane? Also the lower more humid altitudes causes a vacuum inside the case from the ambient pressure being more compared to where the ammo was loaded causing a strong vacuum in the case therefore the case will pull in moisture? Crack a fresh bottle of water in ambient temp put it in the fridge and it may shrivel up some, take it out of the fridge and let it sit and it will expand and youl hear it pop from it expanding, thats also happening to ammo but the world is its fridge lol

[@genedavis759]

Thanks for the discussion guys really enjoying your program Eric .

[@colemanmize3779]

I like the idea of monitoring powder humidity with a Kestrel Drop in a sealed ammo can with desiccant before reloading.

[@georgelza]

so so appreciate this channel and these chats, thank you all

[@alexs1972]

On the abrasives topic; I have my second 6.5 creed Proof barrel on my competition rifle and it had somewhere between 1600-1900 rounds on it and I just could not get it to group with anything..y buddy has a nearly identical set up and cleaning habits as me but his rifle shot absolutely stellar and we develop our loads at the same time. Bore sighting his barrel vs mine, I had WAY more fire cracking and carbon fouling that absolutely wouldn't come out. I would bronze scrub with lots of solvents, let it sit, scrubs, wipe clean, etc, and it still wouldn't clear. Over winter I had decided it was just a "bad" barrel and was ready to replace it this year but decided to give it one last go with some jb bore paste followed by bore bright since that had cleared up some issues with my non-competition rifles and after... a TON of jb and one more good cleaning I took it out to redevelop loads and Holy cow. It went from doing maybe 1.5-2moa down to 0.4"-0.75" on every charge with my 144 hybrids. So I'm a believer. If anyone is frustrated with their barrel that SHOULD be good, give it a shot.

[@JimYeats]

That’s a tough one, obviously your story is just one anecdote. A copper bullet blistering through a barrel should “smooth” imperfections far better than a bore paste…. would be the counter argument. Was it just not clean enough with solvent? Was it placebo? The argument will likely go on.

[@hulley5223]

Bryan, thank you for all the helpful literature you've provided for us.

[@halisidrysdale]

Outstanding insights

[@practical1372]

Requarding primer powder match up Brian is spot on a good example would be a slow burning powder in a large case and burning that powder completely and consistently.

[@xxstr8jacketxx]

One of my friends shoots for applied ballistics you guys are awesome

[@Seanconnery1st]

Erik with a “K”! Very interesting dialogue. Bryan has made a career out of testing data, with more resources available. It’s probably why his shooting days are behind him. Moving forward I am keep those 3 aspects in mind; ignition, harmonics, and external ballistics. I’m going to be getting a 223 AI, and I can afford to shoot larger sample sizes with that 😂. Thanks again, Isaac

[@brettmorgan9797]

No tuner discussions 😂, as always awesome awesome awesome podcast 👌🏻

[@tonystewart7287]

Awesome interview, some great info, cheers 😎😎👍

[@Carney556]

That was a fantastic conversation!! Looking forward to the next one

[@Lemur70]

One more question, maybe?lol. With annealing, how many more reloads do you get verses not annealing. I admit that I am relatively new to this and haven't annealed yet. That is my next step in the process. I have to say with some brands of brass I get as little as 4 to 5 reloads (nosler) and other brands 10 to 12 reloads while not annealing depending on quality. Thank you so much. I am learning so much from your experience.

[@judodavid1]

Thank you for the knowledge

[@colinkobel2868]

I had a Remington 700 bdl in .223 that I bought barely used, meaning less than 500 rounds. It also came with over 90 reloads and the recipe. I pin wheeled targets at 100 yds. It was mounted with a 6 power Redfield wide field scope. Although, I kept this gun in great shape, I used it to hunt everything from gophers to deer. I never did completely clean the barrel and it never stopped shooting. It would shoot 3 shots in the bull that you could cover with a mercury dime. I could and did shoot multiple shots trying to to take out the lines of the bull. I was always successful when hunting antelope. Though I no longer have the gun, it makes me wonder if I could have made it better by a better job of cleaning.

[@jtmcfarland3512]

At around 19:00 in, Mr Litz said 38 thou. He accidentally divided 75 by 2 instead of multiplying. He meant 150 thou as in 0.1” to 0.4” is 95% of groups if your average is 1/4.

[@WvMnts]

Just getting into hand loading and long range shooting. Very interesting thanks

[@Stockettguns]

Thanks for all the work you do! You and Bryan use abrasives to clean barrels. Frank Green clearly says don't use a copper brush with or without a patch when using an abrasive cleaner. You indicated that you use a nylon brush to apply the cleaner. I would love to know Bryan's abrasive cleaning process. How is he applying it?

[@plstein20]

This was great. I was looking forward to the tuner discussion, but y’all covered a lot of good ground. Please link us to his podcast when you do it. I’m also looking forward to your discussion with Quintan from Hornady. Listening to Bryan today makes me think those two have quite a bit of common ground on the sample size and seating depth issues in particular.

[@plstein20]

Quinlan*

[@BelieveTheTarget]

I wonder if they will agree on the best ballistic solver. 😜

[@plstein20]

Lol, probably not that. Or what match bullets is best. But maybe they can agree on a few things. You should ask Quinlan about tuners!

[@brentrasmussen2440]

@@BelieveTheTarget or will those ballistic silvers agree?

[@HM1-d4d]

​@@BelieveTheTarget could you 3d print a barrel with Inconel

[@halerob1]

I believe that the best BR shooters are able to see/read the variances and know how to compensate with their loading whether it's caused by the humidity or the natural curve.

[@technerds8820]

For me the comment "they try to attack everything at once, they are really confusing themselves" is 100% accurate. After I shot 1200 rounds in two and half months I decided to get into reloading and it was overwhelming. I just wanted to keep shooting at the volume I was but do it for cheaper. I had to slowly work on each piece of the reloading process. Now I feel much more comfortable with everything. Just need to get a damn lab radar lol.

[@jlppayette4992]

Great interview. I was looking forward to the Tuner discussion. Hopefully you can share parts of that discussion on your channel.

[@jamesmooney5348]

If you did seating depth and a tuner, would it make the group even tighter?

[@darrellblanchard2362]

What Eric said about an abrasive for break in is my approach. I use jb bore paste between 10 shots. My idea is to smooth the lands that were cut by the reamer. The reamer marks are across the bullet travel on the lands and catch jacket material.

[@JimYeats]

Wouldn’t the argument be though that a copper bullet blistering down the barrel is going to do a pretty good job of naturally smoothing the barrel assuming you keep it clean in between the first few shots? I mean, that’s an insane amount of friction.

[@chriskloster13]

Kept hearing “all day long” 😊 made me smile

[@shaneclow8189]

Was enjoyable to listen. Some interesting concepts discussed. Shooting a Comp in Australia at a distance of 500m Called Fly shoot were we score and measure group size then add together for a total score. Understanding how to make our rifle consistently consistent to shoot a 25mm X (Fly) is a passion. Not sure I will worry about the paid subscription for a discussion on Tunners... my popcorn machine is broken... one day Erik might visit Aus and shoot a SSAA CF Fly shoot.

[@RealDuckMaster]

Excellent!

[@precision_rifleman]

I remember watching movies and the ending sucks, it always was a letdown… glad to learn about powder / ammo storage and it’s correlation to fps/ sd’s

[@post_historic]

I think Bryan's point with the custom drag table is that you can more accurately determine dope when targets are at varied distances. Obviously it wouldn't be useful for a known and zeroed distance such as 1000yds. For prs when you need to hit a plate the first time this is much more convenient then doping @ 100, 200, 300 and all the way to 1000yds.

[@Trailerpark_joe]

I wish I could do what you guys do for a living, to be an “apprentice” to guys like you would be the coolest job out there

[@wendellsullivent4028]

Been waiting for this interview for sure. A tremendous amount of info but to me he talks like a politician in some aspects when you try to pin him down to a specific area, just one example on bullet pointing, you asked for a specific measuring step or function to achieve the proper meplat or best tip. His answer was it depends on what bullet your using and I agree but where and how to measure for this should have been answered and he just answered it depends... Again lots of info but no resolution to anything at least for me. Bryan is a VERY smart man for sure and I respect his knowledge but it seems to be sorta closed minded to others input or testing. Thank you Erik and Bryan for this video and interview it was an eye opening view. It depends!!

[@SigmaBallistics]

it’s because Bryan understands these questions are not black and white like we want them to be. It is frustrating to grasp at first, but once you understand why he responds this way it will make you a much better precision shooter. remember, if there were definitive answers to these questions they would have been figured out by now, but they haven’t been.

[@redrock425]

@@SigmaBallistics Yes, learn all the principles then apply them to your particular use case.

[@wendellsullivent4028]

@@SigmaBallistics Sorry sir I don't drink that flavor, again he's a smart politician. I's not frustrating for me at all I take away what I need and I expect other do as well.

[@patrick6087]

I spent a month training for a six sigma black belt certification under a very accomplished statistician it was massively eye opening. Couple things I got out of it: engineers (like me) are not statisticians and we routinely make errors in data analysis and two, we rarely know all of the real variables or their impact on the outcomes… So my take on some of this is that bench rest types have experience that engineers and statisticians can’t find the measurements to explain and they don’t precisely know how to explain it…

[@dalehorkey4476]

You said six sigma. Now my brain hurts! Good stuff though.

[@ZeroBoostBuick]

It's very cool how you don't have to be a scientist to understand everything Bryan says. Only the best of the best can articulate such topics in Layman's terms.

[@johnharris6589]

You can measure the speed at two target distances using radar cronos and calculate a bc or you can use a bc calculated from shape ogive length tail angle etc

[@faethon21]

Two living legends arguing and at points discreetly disagreeing, but touching the subject of handloading neither mentions "accuracy nodes". That alone should tell us something about popular testing protocols, but listening to the whole discussion is a treasure trove of useful information.

[@soonersteve3733]

Wow! You asked about the bullet sorting question! Exactly what I wanted! So now that I’ve sorted 200 by base to ogive… no I’ll just redo 100 base to tip and compare the two.

[@RogerBodrero-n7m]

Barrels slowing down is essentially the same thing a plus p in a chamber you reduce the height of the lands then you have to add more powder to get velocity back up. Just the lands are eroding

[@larrybaker9059]

Erik, I would recommend using Median as a measure vs. Average. Averages can and are very deceptive & can be blown with one shot. Median calculates group center with 50% of shots above center & 50% of shots below center. A much better measure for group. As far as BR changes through the day, consider the Canadian sniper who placed his ammo in direct sunlight in order to get the velocity he needed to make the record shot. Temp is one obvious variable through the day.

[@xstevenx8132]

In a normally distributed relationship, the median and the average are the same. Obviously that requires an appropriately sized sample size. However, mathematically you have to use the average to calculate sd, so while I’m not disagreeing with you. It really depends on what you’re looking at and how you’re going to test it. You are absolutely right when it comes to reading groups. If you have four shots grouping, and one straying, versus, a tighter group with a smaller moa but a much more random pattern. It would be good to further test the 4 that grouped before writing it off.

[@larrybaker9059]

@@xstevenx8132 👍

[@bretnmannn]

Bullet seating depth of jump, jam or touching of the barrels rifling is the horizontal part of the group and the powder charge and type of powder is the vertical part of the group!

[@yuccaman3545]

I'm sure this has already been covered in another comments, but truing your Kestrel (ballistic calculator) for each profile is important because all of the available chronographs will not be consistent across all manufactures and might not be precise. So by truing the Kestrel it is adjusting the true MV by using the known distance to the known bullet drop per the custom drag model. So if you put in a MV of 2900 and the known bullet drop from the Kestrel is say 30 MOA at a 1000 yards and the actual drop from live fire is 30.5 MOA then the MV is faster then 2900. When the POI of 30.5 is added into the Kestrel it will make the appropriate adjustment of the actual MV.

[@brentrasmussen2440]

At 45:30 they were talking about velocity loss in a shot out barrel. Brian mentioned throat erosian and the lands wearing from 4 thou down to 2 thou. Would this erosion possibly allow for gas to escape in front of the bullet and reduce pressure?

[@JaysonVilett]

The interview was awesome but the amount of ads is ridiculous.

[@RabbitSlayer48]

I loaded 204 ruger with powder fresh out a new bottle. It was like 52 degrees and i was in 3900s. I left excess in the rcbs scale for a week and live in las vegas. Very low humidity. Next week it was 62 degrees. I was getting like 150 to 200 fps more the next week. Yeah its ball powder but 200fps?! Bet it was reduced moisture in the powder.

[@DLoh2o1]

Excellent discussion gentleman. Erik, please broadcast your tuner discussion on your channel.

[@ccfdmd]

Did they ever do a follow-up podcast?

[@redrock425]

It's important to rank the variables. Some will have a much larger effect than others on group size. Start with the biggest variables and control what you are able to. Wind and shooter ability will be right at the top.

[@blacksand9805]

Hello, what is true for PRS or offhand shooting isn't the rule. I have the exact opposite approach. First, since I shoot with very light triggers from the most steady positions (prone or from a bench, with rear support on sandbags + bipod or tripod on the front), shooter ability is not in the first limiting factor. I would say wind reading and rifle+ammo overall accuracy are the two most important parameters of the equation. Since checking your gear overall accuracy is the easiest thing to do, that's what I always begin with, but there's another reason. Just suppose you have a bad barrel and/or bad quality bullets (supposed to have the best BC in the world), and you decide to test your skills at 600yds. Each time it will spit a bullet in a random direction you won't have any way to understand if it's you or the wind or anything else. No way to understand the reason of a poi shift on target = no way of improving your wind management.

[@jwschroeder804]

"Under the conditions of the experiment". Curious, is your data reported in refereed journal available for review?

[@Lemur70]

Another question? With the primer testing, with a load. How many primers on a given has Bryan tested, 25, 50, or let's say a thousand to see what consistency may or may not be?

[@jfess1911]

What Litz did not point out when Eric was asking about BC and software is that the G1 and G7 software is based on how a particular shaped bullet flies. The bullet used to develop the G7 curve has a 7.5° boattail 0.6 calibers long, a shank 1.45 calibers long and a 10 caliber tangent ogive. Unless your bullet is shaped EXACTLY like that, the equation will predict the wrong drop. It might get close, but it won't be perfect. A custom drag curve is developed for the specifically for the bullet you are shooting.

[@Michael-rg7mx]

I like to load some cast bullets. Then for the last shot I have one that is lubed with fine valve grinding compound. Then I cut slips in a 1/4" wood dowel and put multiple cloth patches with more fine compound and go with the rifling. For deep cleaning I pull the barrel and plug both ends with my fingers. I have a bottle of mercury I pour in and tip the barrel for an hour, then pour it back to reuse.

[@redrock425]

And that is why I rarely buy a used rifle 😉

[@Michael-rg7mx]

@@redrock425 Did you know that you can fire a 243 in an 06?

[@tonydevich7937]

Thanks to both of you, my brain is swelling

[@back30Precision]

I am not as experienced as you guys but at 45-46min in the interview where you are talking about barrel speeding up and slowing down, i have notice when you do a rapid firing during a stage of say 10 shots, the barrel is hotter more towards the middle of the barrel. So the idea of friction and powder burn is very logical to me, but like i said, i am far from the experience level here. Erick, great videos and content. Thank you.