This video literally helped me more than my entire class trying to understand this information
@pedrocolangelo58442 жыл бұрын
I cannot put in words how much I appreciate professor Burkey's work on KZbin
@johndias6314 жыл бұрын
I am studying Operation Research and this helped me a lot
@ChetanRanjanEd-Wise2 ай бұрын
Best video so far
@mothusilekgetho53106 жыл бұрын
Thank you, very helpful, I wasn't getting the rational from my lecturer because she was talking in abstracts and so is the Asset Pricing book we using, so I needed an example that put in the figures for the expected value.
@lancechen36622 жыл бұрын
The explanation is much much better than my professor
@wmsilvia4 жыл бұрын
Prepping for a decision science course, this puts some confusing text into great context. Thanks!
@Julie-sm6yg6 жыл бұрын
Really helpful video, thank you so much! I needed to understand those graphs.
@sutho736 жыл бұрын
Great video, I couldn't find an explanation as good as this one anywhere!
@sutho736 жыл бұрын
Can I also clarify. The Y coordinate or utility vertical on the the graph is derived by the sqrt of the total possible gain?!? I’m trying to workout how you get the height in the Y axis...
@dani.lefebvre3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else at the point were they start questioning wether or not to attend lecture anymore since people on youtube do a better job? Great video!
@BurkeyAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that- I got into this business because many teachers are unable, or unwilling, to do a great job. I am certainly not perfect, but give it my best shot. Cheers!
@keshavkapoor45944 жыл бұрын
Great teachers are out there!! and this video was made by one of them.
@BurkeyAcademy4 жыл бұрын
😀
@anupamdas97913 жыл бұрын
It cleared my concepts on risk and utility. Thank you very much.
@katlegomehlape86232 жыл бұрын
amazing video!
@mutemupi28292 жыл бұрын
Brilliant and very clear explanations. Thank you.
@danielananta27426 жыл бұрын
can we take a risk (become a risk taker) but still take some insurance at the same time?
@BurkeyAcademy6 жыл бұрын
Certainly! Instead of fully insuring a risk, which means that in both outcome states (our house burns down or not, we lose our job or not) we can partially insure. An example would be an insurance policy with a deductible (I pay the first $1,000 of loss, and the insurance company picks up the rest), or a policy with co-insurance (I pay 20%, insurance company pays the rest). These can be more efficient and cheaper for both parties when there is an element of moral hazard- e.g. people are less careful when they are fully insured. I always get high deductibles on home and car insurance policies because they are much cheaper, and I am very careful with my home and car anyway!
@FlipHackingRealEstate2 жыл бұрын
that example at the end is a little dark lol but overall fantastic explanation of risk aversion and utility functions
@bushrakhan205 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Very well explained
@achutharunr33395 жыл бұрын
Super helpful! Thank you for the intuition!
@MrHimyhimy5 жыл бұрын
The last example of being a risk-lover is Walter white's cover-up story in a nutshell
@nevamind68t232 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing 👍🏾
@razvanastrenie14553 жыл бұрын
EXCELENT EXPLANATION !
@DeepakKumar-co8kw6 жыл бұрын
Can you suggest me the measure of risk aversion without wealth indicator?
@janlauterbach82042 жыл бұрын
Very helpful video!
@pearsgr3 жыл бұрын
Where to get the worksheet please ?
@BurkeyAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Check the video description- I fixed the link. I apologize for the broken links, but Google broke all of my old file links, and I am having to fix 500 of them. Cheers-
@craigmalcom62943 жыл бұрын
brilliant video, well explained
@jwbm19614 жыл бұрын
great explanation. Thanks for sharing your knowledge
@越今朝-s6e5 жыл бұрын
You are my saver, thank you so much!
@eimeargavigan41284 жыл бұрын
how come you do not use a log function when calculating the utility of a risk averse person?
@BurkeyAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Any concave function, which means the person has diminishing marginal utility, will work- so any function where the 2nd derivative is negative. There is no reason why one should choose a log function... but you could if you wanted to.
@davismotomiya292 жыл бұрын
Wealth u(W) = ROOT W, W=10, probability 0.3 to turn to 100, 0.7 to lose everything, wants to avoid risk, how much is he willing to pay? (0,1,2,3)
@henrynguyen67562 жыл бұрын
Good video. Thanks!
@charlottebruce81984 жыл бұрын
this really helped for my EE!! thank you!! :)
@shenren97253 жыл бұрын
AHHH, it helps me alot with my math IA!!!
@farleysantana85513 жыл бұрын
HI. What program do you use?
@BurkeyAcademy3 жыл бұрын
For making the graphs? Maple For drawing while I'm talking? OneNote
@farleysantana85513 жыл бұрын
@@BurkeyAcademy thank u
@officialmintt4 жыл бұрын
Best. Simple. Thank you.
@jingzhang35474 жыл бұрын
This is amazing! thank you!
@maxmustermann67263 жыл бұрын
Why can't we just use the second derivative of the functions to see the curvature? Why do we have to divide by the first one and also add a negative sign before? I didn't get that tbh :(
@BurkeyAcademy3 жыл бұрын
Good question: No one says you HAVE TO divide by the first derivative and multiply by - to get "some measure of curvature". However, if you want a measure that means something, the second derivative (or other similar measures of curvature) aren't sufficient. We can interpret the Arrow/Pratt number we would get at a particular location on a utility curve as meaning "The person's risk premium for a small, actuarially neutral (i.e., fair) addition of risk". In other words, at what rate do they demand extra money to be willing to accept an infinitesimal amount of additional risk. I highly recommend going to the source here- one of which is Pratt 1964 Econometrica "Risk Aversion in the Small and the Large".
@petermorgan56454 жыл бұрын
Outstanding. Thank you
@masego31526 жыл бұрын
thanks extremely helpful and easier to understand! :)
@Ecoinspire20237 жыл бұрын
Much needed... thanks for the video. Please solve more examples
@BurkeyAcademy7 жыл бұрын
I recorded two more videos illustrating designing a contract with Moral Hazard: I added all three videos to a playlist on this topic: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fqOTfGmBZpuDh9U
@sirajjoy5 жыл бұрын
Really helpful video, sir
@miaya56983 жыл бұрын
That was really helpful and thanks
@anirudhramesh82074 жыл бұрын
This was amazing! Thanks.
@BurkeyAcademy4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@rcolaco6 жыл бұрын
Very well explained - thankyou!
@hen3vz7 жыл бұрын
good job
@talhamember6 жыл бұрын
Could you do more videos like this please their is nothing out their like this
@BurkeyAcademy6 жыл бұрын
Sure! Please send me a specific topic or example problem you'd like to see. I don't teach this kind of material at my University, so giving me examples that might help people helps me! Thanks! You can contact me on Reddit on by finding my email address on my website; see the links in the video description.
@talhamember6 жыл бұрын
I definitely will your videos are amazing so simple and concise nothing else like it online. You literally turn the complex into the simple
@TheViomode6 жыл бұрын
thank you for this great video, i have a question : I don't inderstande how insurance company can use this if we had the expected value = 70 and the utillity is 7 , and than we can find the 49 with certain , the campany will propose to you to buy the contract with 49 + risque value of 21 $ to get the utility of 7 ? or what ?? explaine to me this point plz , how insurance company work
@BurkeyAcademy6 жыл бұрын
There are some deals that the insurance company and the person could make that will leave them both better off (if the insurance company is risk-neutral). Since the person has an expected income of $70, but an expected utility of only 7, which is equivalent to a certain income of $49: Suppose the insurance company guarantees this person an income of $60, demanding a payment of $40 if the person ends up getting the $100, but will provide the person an income of $60 if they end up with 0. This makes the person happier, since they will get a utility of sqrt(60)=7.746. The insurance company can make money from this deal if they do it with hundreds of people, because on average each 100 people will be getting: 30 people getting $0 will cost them 60*100= $1,800 in insurance payments, but the other 70 people will be paying them 70*$40=$2,800. They will profit $1,000 for each 100 people, or $10 each policy they sell. Does that make it clearer?
@TheViomode6 жыл бұрын
thank you very much :)
@ChoBee3336 жыл бұрын
Hi, I was wondering what 2 factors are important to consider before attempting to measure risk aversion?
@DinaraRaRa6 жыл бұрын
Amazing, thank you!
@ObristPlayep4 жыл бұрын
thanks so much man
@HyoBear6 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much...
@jabirmhmd235 жыл бұрын
I believe companies are risk-loving as well, why they are risk loving?= Limited Liability may be!
@abdulrazzaq97266 жыл бұрын
Upload complete videos lecturers of Economics for postgraduate students.
@BurkeyAcademy6 жыл бұрын
This request is a bit broad- M.A. and Ph.D. courses for every field? I won't live long enough to accomplish that. ☺ If you have more specific requests, let me know!
@haroonrafique71064 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Could you possibly explain why/how the Expected Value of Utility line appears (or maps) on the same M axis for the Curved Certainty Line? The EVU line takes EV inputs. So, when we are looking at $70 on the X axis for the EVU line, this is the EVU= $100x 70% + $0x 30% = $70 value of input. The utility function would appear to be U (EVU) = 0.1*(EVU)
@benchapman29252 жыл бұрын
this video>
@anisahhakim98376 жыл бұрын
Amazingggggg
@dejeneadugna75345 жыл бұрын
Very interesting lecture
@abdulrazzaq97266 жыл бұрын
I mean upload complete videos lecturers of microelectronics, macroeconomic, statistics for Economics, mathematics for Economics, cover whole course for postgraduate students.