Dragon kitchens are open overnight and cooking hard af
@jobejacobs624 ай бұрын
Buster Blader DM Branded actually made Top 8 Regionals 5 times.
@Trynottoblink4 ай бұрын
This Buster Blader deck is sick
@kauan17484 ай бұрын
4:08 Couldn't resist attacking
@j2c6954 ай бұрын
Hello nightfall grinder live laugh love to see it
@citydreams1014 ай бұрын
I’ve been playing buster blader since the first wave of support. To help yall out the trap didn’t protect buster blader only the equip welp. He’s “buster blader” while on field so he doesn’t get treated as a destruction sword card. Konami really shafted us with that technicality.
@unknownmj16994 ай бұрын
chets are sad
@sam_i__4 ай бұрын
How sure of that are you? It's name becomes Buster Blader, but it still is a destruction sword card.
@citydreams1014 ай бұрын
@@sam_i__ that’s not how yugioh works. That would be true if it said, “this card is treated as buster blader on field and graveyard”. But its name literally becomes “buster blader”.
@sam_i__4 ай бұрын
Ok thanks
@shterkz7774 ай бұрын
Can get a kist for the buster blader deck!? Coz that's so sick
@giftedhippos4 ай бұрын
Agreed
@uriel68733 ай бұрын
Agreed bro
@raykrucifer51544 ай бұрын
Game 3 left buster on field because its not a dragon, seals needs dragons lol
@citydreams1014 ай бұрын
Naw he did because sometimes it’s good to have non fusion buster on field. If you play it right you’ll force your opponent to pick between two of the evils that prevent your deck from functioning. I knew what he had planned it’s just linear without something to back it up.
@enricoagata65303 ай бұрын
Decklist?
@PunchM34 ай бұрын
Let’s go dragons are coming back
@leolima91474 ай бұрын
10:15 droplet should have negated SE Ash
@chewdoom84154 ай бұрын
No it should not have. C1 oak, c2 droplets, c3 eclipse. Droplet resolves before oak does, at which point there are currently no monsters on field to negate, so it fizzles. Ash would be summoned after droplet has already resolved.
@leolima91474 ай бұрын
@@chewdoom8415 my boy, you're right
@bulbapig4414 ай бұрын
@@leolima9147he’s definitely right my son
@marque_iii38594 ай бұрын
@bulbapig441 That dude's correct, bro
@nerfirelia82354 ай бұрын
Is the part of Prologue that destroys the monster during the next end phase considered a lingering effect? That would make sense then why the monster wouldn't be destroyed if temporarily banished.
@crispetona103 ай бұрын
When it leaves the field, once back is kind of another "name" besides is the same card...
@gubigubigubigubi4 ай бұрын
Thats kind of cool I might have to try Buster out lol