Busting The Myths Around Mahabharata | Ami Ganatra |

[@SangamTalks]

Show some love to the author. Book Link: amzn.to/3UQIUHD

[@nothingwronginhinduism5923]

I don't trust her

[@KasDlonewolf]

Bought and read Mahabharata Unravelled! Brilliant read! The passion with which Shri Ami speaks is awe inspiring!

[@nothingwronginhinduism5923]

@@KasDlonewolf it's her ego, not passion due to which she is trying to change the story of Mahabharata for some hidden agenda

[@AnilSathe-s6i]

& what is the hidden agenda? Please elaborate.

[@AnilSathe-s6i]

​@@nothingwronginhinduism5923 Reason?

[@shivamanand611]

her name will go down in history for bringing back the forgotton and misunderstood history of india.

[@chirantanpinto8627]

She is too good...one can keep listening to her hours...

[@Bhardwaj14]

That's true

[@RahiSanthanam]

Always a pleasure to listen to Ami Ganatra. She is so knowledgeable, clear and straightforward in what she articulates. More and more of our youngsters need to hear her to get educated about our ithihasas. Goddess bless her with greater reach.

[@jagannathdas4568]

Level of knowledge of Amiji is very high. She inspired me a lot and I am trying to read Ramayana & Mahabharata at the earliest.

[@theaffiliate7809]

Talking about agency of women: Kaikeyi was a warrior who accompanied Dashratha in many battles. Uloopi, wife of Arjuna, was also a good archer & horse-rider. Chitrangada, the princess of Manipur, was also a warrior. Gandhari & Kunti were very learned women. Gargi is reknowned for debating with Yajnavalkya in Shiradhwaj Janaka's court. Kaushalyawati was well-versed with the Vedas.

[@nehjawanpuria7681]

Another episode that proves women had power in India, is from Ramayana, when it is shown that Kaushalya, mother of Shree Ram, is the caretaker and governor of big chunk of villages under the rule of Ayodhya. She manages the administration of these villages, collects taxes, provides benefits and looks after these people as her own. It would not have been possible if women did not have power and agency in those times.

[@nitinveturkar2801]

Proud to see our enthusiastic youngsters interested in our Itihasa and debating it. Hats off to Sangam Talks! 🎉

[@shankarsagari1461]

Mam the last 5 minutes of u speaking was so accurate..... U just spitting facts and damn the confidence on ur face while speaking truth is just awesome

[@ihaveaboyfriendmeh1026]

Forget Babas. I want to listen to Ami Ganatra's satsang 🙏🏻

[@crewrangergaming9582]

Like to hear views like this, this brings the real values of our epics in light, instead of choosing sides, learn from all sides.

[@garimasingh4659]

Ami Gantara ma'am has nailed it.She has illuminated our minds with deep humanistic deep knowledge and gives us reality check on this real epic Ramayan and Mahabharata.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Mahabharatha itself is a mere story !

[@mansimehra7565]

With concrete evidence of places n their characteristics. Oh sea lvl rise n population decline stats b h​@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg

[@good_king2024]

Pranam to Ami Ganatra ji Lots of my questions on Mahabharat & Ramayan are answered by Ami Ganatra ji.

[@sagardasar6284]

I can listen her all day 😊

[@AtreyaGupta]

I am a big fan of Amiji's. She has analysed both the epics in great detail.

[@SaiRam-hz9dh]

By watching until sutputra i didn't mean manusmriti trust me,I was just randomly watching this video. This is my nation where an tribal woman is president,where an OBC is a PM and a wonderful woman is finance minister.This is the nation with so many marvellously qualified people r at the helm of central govt kaa cabinet as I had expressed previously ! Jai hind❤ Mera Bharat mahaan❤ Proud to be Indian ❤🎉 Proud to be G20 presidency❤ Proud of Kashmir becoming integral part of India . Proud to be India completing Mangalyaan & Chandrayaan 3. Proud to be 5th largest economy from 10th previously in past 10 years.

[@sukhWins]

Am greatful to her for clarifying so many things about the epics

[@hardikdadheech4312]

The moderators are damn good at their job...👑

[@indian9428]

Good to see so young kids showing interested in such topics

[@MS-ov9sv]

So nice to hear her always ❤

[@apoorvasingh6100]

I wish even I was there..!! Just love to listen to her..!!

[@punitagrawal7091]

Also Kaushalya maa had few gaos in her control and collected revenue directly. Kaikaki knew war skills, Maa sita was a expert in Arthshastra. All were well educated and empoweed. So women were very well empoweed in Sanatan History.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

In such stories , not in reality !

[@punitagrawal7091]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg Whats written in ur story books??? Can u show us or can we tell in open public what is written in ur books. coz if we read ur text about how girls were treated...its sar tan se juda, right? keep ur bullshit opinion to urself u M. F..k.r

[@ayush5583]

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg nobody talking about women in your house

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@ayush5583 What do you mean ?

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@ayush5583 All these women were story characters , not real people !

[@superman-b4f]

karna was so loyal that when the gandharva caught duryodhan in the forest, karna abandoned and ran away. only to show up once pandavas secured release of kauravas from gandharvas.

[@vanhannu]

Very True, Ami ji.

[@pallavi.bharati]

56:35 Yudhishthir ji Vann Parv me keh chukey ki Draupadi pancho patiyo pe ek jaisa samarpit hai aur Draupadi khud kahi hai ki Pancho Pandav unhe apne 5 senses jitne pyare hai equally.. Swargarohan Parv chapter jahan Yudhishthir ji kehte hai Arjun se zyada pyar karti hai vo poora chapter hi baad me add kiya gaya hai kyonki Spitzer manuscripts ke 1st century Mahabharat manuscript me Swargarohan Parv nahi mila arthat Ramayan ke Uttar Kaand jaise Swargarohan milawat hai Yudhishthir ji aisa kuch nahi kahe ki kisse zyada pyar Draupadi ko balki pehle hi keh chuke Draupadi equal pyar ki pancho se, Pandavo ke Vaanprast aashram dharan karna hi last hai Mahabharat ka.

[@tanmaybyatham869]

Namaste Ami ji Thanks for revealing many things we didn't know, n silently thinking what we seen in series is true. Many questions, no answer was found earlier. My question is that all Pandavas were children born of different gods as Kunthi devi's chanting Mantra. If so, then KarNa is also the son of Lord SUN. Hence, God's own child took this wrong behaviour character... other five Pandavas' thinking & thirst to know the right ones n learn to live with Dharma. But KarNa is the opposite, being God's son. Please clear this doubt.🙏

[@smitasinha8986]

Some ask questions just for the sake of asking.

[@SR-mv2mf]

Yes those people are there everywhere 😂

[@taniyasonani2968]

Jai Shree Krishna ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@sagarchanchad7700]

In astrophysics of science which talk about different reference of frame and it states that It is possible that in this universe the same event may look different when viewed from different reference frames. (hindi me is line ko bolu to ho sakta hai is universe me ek hi event alag alag reference of frame se alag alag dikhe) i know it is the above line is very complicated to understand but it you watch in youtube there are many video about this topic and with the example they have proved this line in today's era people are fighting over who is most powerful god in hinduism but actually in hinduism god is one i.e. parabrahm and sect is just a refernce of frame to perceive the parabrahm if you follow vaishnavism sect(refernce of frame) you will find parabrahm is lord vishnu if you follow shaivism sect(refernce of frame) you will find parabrahm is lord shiva if you follow shaktism sect(refernce of frame) you will find parabrahm is goddess durga Lord Vishnu, Lord Shiva, Goddess Durga are same i.e. parabrahm but due to different sects, they appear different to us. the beauty of sanatan religion is we have no restriction on choice of god unlike the other religion. because nobody put restriction over god i.e. parabrahm if somebody worship lord ganesha then for him/her lord ganesha is supreme i.e. parabrahm if somebody worship lord hanuman then for him/her lord hanuman is supreme i.e. parabrahm sanatan dharm believe that everyone has different image of god in their mind/soul and according to the image he/she should choose god. the idols of gods are representation of complete devotion of devotee toward his/her god so all puranas are right but People viewed the same event from different frames of reference, so they saw the same event differently. the confusion about the god arises when we trying to understand the god but the god is not a thing to understand but it is a thing to feel like air we can't see the air but we feel the presense of air buy using equipment like fan,AC etc. similarly we can't see god with this physical eyes we just feel the god by our devotion or by penance etc that's why i have heard somewhere lord shiva says to his devotees that "don't try to understand me, because i am the above your intellectual power just feel me i am exist everywhere" and irony is foolish people are judge the god by just reading two or three books btw, i strongly believe that No one can explain the concept of God better than science.

[@AnilSathe-s6i]

जय भारत। एमी जी 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

[@saik7708]

Excellent exposition.

[@lundfakhri448]

The vadh of Big 3 of Mahabharata: Bhisma vadh when he cannot fight back, by Krishna via Brihenlala Drona vadh when he cannot fight back, by Krishna via DhristaDhyumna Karna vadh when he cannot fight back, by Krishna via Brihenlala

[@nagavamsip]

Please don't believe in TV serials.

[@BhaskarKarajgar]

youngsters must know our culture history any education back ground -3500 years oldest civilisation

[@BhaskarKarajgar]

happy to see youngsters -interested our culture -

[@anweshabiswas1483]

I have one question, is purana our history or mythology ?

[@amazingcalvin]

Puranas are a collection of historical incidents told in story form. This is why they are under the umbrella term of "itihasa", which literally means "thus it happened", which indicates actual history.

[@anweshabiswas1483]

@@amazingcalvin ok understood , so devas and asuras are supernatural humans like us .

[@amazingcalvin]

@@anweshabiswas1483 Yes you can think of it that way. And if we do the tapasya sincerely long enough with patience, we can also become as powerful as devas or asuras. That's what many rishis have done.

[@G2Chanakya]

​@@amazingcalvin Yes. Sadly, everyone today has been too much sunken in the moh maaya world that we all have become impotent of attaining the said superior state through determination, focus and meditative stuff. That lack of perseverance is just seen in everyone's day to day behaviour. Maybe some ingrown unhidden seeds might still have that passion and perseverance quality, but it's just not that common anymore especially given the fact that people don't even realise that there are such greater things than just being stuck in the vicious circle of typical moh maaya life with career, engg, family, etc.,

[@alphamale-123]

Mythology

[@MonkeyDZzoro]

Love from Sikkim Ma'am❤❤❤

[@DineshKaria]

द्रौपदीने कभी अंधो का पुत्र अंधा कहा ही नहीं। जब दुर्योधन पानीमें गिरे तब द्रौपदी वहाँ थीं भी नहीं।

[@SaiRam-hz9dh]

I paused it at Sutputra level without any intention only because my mom called me outside for eating Mango at outside the room.There was no intention from my side to highlight caste system trust me , Mother's swear ,becaz first of all I didn't know meaning of Sutputra itself 😢

[@harshnevatiablackjack]

Harivansham and Yoga Vashishta are also Itihasa. Total four texts.

[@drinkinman86]

ORIGINAL MAHABHARATA IS ARRANGED IN A WAY THAT ANY VILLAGE PUNDIT CAN ADD HIS OR HER FAN STORY IN THE MIDDLE. This is why there are many stories in between that do not make sense or clash with the main plot. Ramayana was more tougher to get adulterated, so they added Utara Ramayana at the end to twist Rama, a male character, into 180 degrees opposite of what he is. Actual Ramayana ends at 6th Kand. But the main plots are evident & fan stories are easy to find as they do not make sense.

[@deochandrajha8634]

Many many thanks for you

[@vaghelasanjay433]

1:16:00@ even Bhagavada Gita encourages asking question sloka 34 Adhyaya 4

[@MS-ov9sv]

Lovely hosts

[@Charwaak]

It is not history, its a great book to teach the contemporaries about ethics, morals, political science etc. we have not taken the essence and brainlessly glorified mahabarata.

[@MS-ov9sv]

Ami ii ❤❤❤

[@Ajhng]

For history pls call surya roy sir and praveen mohan they are amazing and talk about dharmic revival. Besides the veducation founder can also be great guest at your amazing podcast who is working to re establish gurukul school.Also Sahana singh who is based in usa to talk about ancient indian education.Venkatesh rangan sir is a great historian too who has published three books and worked upon ancient indian conquests and our great civilization.Raghava krishna ,the founder of brhat is doing great work.Also rajeev malhotra of USA who wrote the book Snakes of Ganga Also ,Capt praveen chaturvedi who made sahib movie is great person who advocates for our santana cause and tells how it has been systematically destroyed.Shaleen wadhwani is a great art educator,curator and talks greatly on how British looted of our riches and how it can be repatriated Also vedveer arya who talks about correct chronology of Indian history.Abhijit jog who is an author also challenges the leftists ideology snd fake history still taught in india.Jay vardhan singh a phd scholar from jnu is also a great history buff

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Karn was standing with duryodhan he didn't pushed him and a freind he did the best 👍💯

[@parthghosh1343]

😃 Hi , I have a question. Dharma means to sustainability. And we heard about twin-cycle of performance : work & rest. But in case of Arjuna, Lot of emphasis on "his restless practice" practicing day & night without sleep. Is it sustainable? As a Human I can't do that. Do we have some Knowledge about arjuna's rest phase? I'm assuming, since he is not competing with anyone, he has no stress about "what the competitor is doing". So, till the point he loves to work, we work. When he not feel well he take rest.

[@Observer41099]

Yes. But then, if someone feels like working more than you and maybe he gets more reward for that. Now u become jealous and say , Samaj and ye sab that’s the problem. And it’s absolutely fine to listen to urself, but then don’t get jealous and blame others. ❤❤❤ take care.

[@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm]

Dharma doesn't mean sustainability. Dharma means that which upholds the proper order of everything (called Rtam). Generally, it is distilled for human consumption as it is too vast in its original definition. And even after distillation, it is very hard to grasp the full concept.

[@amazingcalvin]

Well, a lot of things that people did in Ramayana and Mahabharata cannot be done by modern humans. Arjuna had a very focused mind more than any of his brothers. "Restless practice" doesn't mean 24/7/365. It's just that he never slacked off when it comes to practice and to learn archery in the dark, he sacrificed a few more hours of sleep than usual. And since he was innately talented and hard working, he managed to master night archery pretty quickly. So after mastering that, there won't be much need for him to keep practicing it as regularly as he did when he was just learning. Regarding competition, I would say that he did view Karna worthy enough to be his rival and some part of motivation to keep practicing or gaining divyastras by doing penances was to prepare for the war and especially against Karna since he had taken an oath in Hastinapur court to kill him. And killing Karna was no mean task even for Arjuna despite being the superior warrior. And above all else, he just plain wanted to push the limits of what he can do with bow and arrows.

[@parthghosh1343]

@@Observer41099 didn't feel that if I know I give my best, there is peace within, no matter what other says. I feel jealousy only when I am worrying & not taking action. I time I start action there is a sense of control . Thank you everyone @Observer41099 @JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm @amazingcalvin for this wonderful chat :)

[@parthghosh1343]

Thank you everyone for this wonderful chat

[@shlokgupta9353]

Ami ji on fire!! 44:44

[@pallavi.bharati]

19:57 Kaushik Rishi wali ye story itihas nahi balki Krishna ji ki banai hui kahani hai bas Arjun ji ko samjhaane keliye

[@amazingcalvin]

The probability of story of Kaushik rishi to be real might be quite higher than you would expect. Kaushik was always confused about the nature of dharma as to what it is and how it should be followed. So it is very much probable that this really happened. The main hint for this another story in the mahabharat. Kaushik rishi was just starting to gain some new powers due to his tapasya, meaning he was relatively new to the ways of being a rishi. When he was meditating, a bird pooped on him from a tree above him. In anger, he glared at the bird and his newfound powers incinerated the bird and killed it. Think of it like superman's eye laser. Although he was initially angry, Kaushik was also surprised that he gained such a power and regretted having caused the death of an innocent bird. Later, he went around many houses and asked them for alms (which in those days were mainly food and not money). In one particular brahmin house, he stood outside and asked for alms. There was a housewife who was busy from her housework and did not hear him. Later, she heard Kaushik rishi and prepared to give him some food but her husband just happened to return hungry as well. So the housewife prioritized serving her husband and after she was done, she came outside with her offerings of food and profusely apologized for the delay. But Kaushik rishi was fuming. He chastised her for making a hungry brahmin wait and neglecting dharma and glared at her again just as he did with the bird and his eye laser activated although again, he did not intend to. The woman, however was not affected by his new power. Instead she even rebuked the rishi for being angry which is the most destructive enemy of any spiritual progress and declared that she isn't as easy to kill as the bird was. Kaushik was surprised at how this housewife managed to know about the incident with the bird and enquired further. She said that the reason Kaushik's powers didn't work on her was because she was following the path of dharma as a housewife, which is why she is safe from harm. Seeing that the rishi is visibly confused about the subtle applications of dharma, she advises Kaushik to go and see a certain person in another village where his doubts regarding dharma can be alleviated. Going in search of this new person that this housewife recommended, Kaushik is shocked to learn that this person was not only a shudra but also by profession, a butcher. The butcher treated the rishi with respect and to Kaushik's surprise, already knew that the brahmin housewife sent him here. So rishi Kaushik swallowed his pride, distaste for the butcher's stench and profession and followed him to his house. There after a few days of stay, Kaushik learnt to apply dharma a bit better than before.

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Duryodhan chahta nhi tha pr wo krishna ji ko hi choose krne gya tha kyuki shakuni aur karn ne usse aisa hi sikha ke bheja pr pehle pahuchne ke baad bhi waha arjun ko pehla mauka mila jb ki jana yudhishthir ko tha pr phir bhi arjun ko bolne diya gya duryodhan chahta to sena tha or kyuki sbbe usse sukha ke bheja tha to agar pehl usse mauka milta to wo krishan bhagwan ko hi chunta

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Khandav prast me kya parishram kiya pandavon ne krishna bhagwan ne devtao ko bula liya aur unhone bana diya

[@vaghelasanjay433]

Hindu means first Dharma, second Earth (economy) third Kama (family) , Moksha. But today Dharma is almost absent and Eartha(money) took priority

[@cmntkxp]

First love fellow human beings

[@JusticeAboveAll-ro3sm]

All humans? Can you love Aurangzeb, Hitler, Mao, or Polpot?

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Karn was a student of dronacharya but dron ne karn ko itni hi siksha di ki woh ek saarthi bn ske aur ye jo keh rhi h to bhai spardha ka mtlb jealousy nhi hota h koi smjhao isse aur ye ek hi paksha se bol rhi h arjun aur karn dono ko spardha ki bhavna rehti thi aur ek baar phir mai keh du spardha does not mean jealousy aur agar karn layak nhi hote to parshuram unko divyastra kyu dete brahmastra bhramashiri astra pashupatastra jaise khatarnaak astra kyu dete ab koi chimkandi ye mt kehna ki karn ne jhut bola ki woh bhrahman the isliye unko divyastra mil gye are bhai unhone jhut bola lekin parshuram kisi bhi bhrahman ko aise hi itne khatarnak divyastra -d-e denge aur koi chimkamdi ab ye mt kehna ki karn ke pass pashupatastra nhi tha

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

18:59 is scene me comedy bhi ho gya tha😂😂

[@Krshn_]

According to this understanding of Dharma, was Harishchandra adharmi?

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Bhai jo yeh keh rhi h ki karn aur duryodhan ki dosti bs apne apne maksad se thi toh bhai jb krishna ji ne karn ko pandav ko paksh me ane ko kaha aur raja tak banane ka kaha tb karn ne jo reply diya wo kafi h mitrata dikhane ke liye aur jb kunti ne pandavo ka jeevandan manga tb jo karn ne kaha wo bhi batata h mitrata warna karn chahte to pandavo ke paksh me ho jate aur ek pal me hastinapur ke raja bn jate

[@pallavi.bharati]

16:25 Yudhishthir ji ne pehle Karn ko adhmara kiya par praan daan diye Arjun ki pratigya ko yaad karke tab Karn behosh ho chuka tha adhmara hoke Yudhishthir ke vaar se lekin Yudhishthir last prahaar nahi kiye aur lautne lage tab Karn peeche se aake Yudhishthir ji ke dhwaj kavach ko kaatte hai jo Yudhishthir ji ka apman hai ishi vajah se Yudhishthir ji gussa hote hai Arjun par ki agar Arjun ka pratigya na hota to ve khud Karn ko maar dete aur Karn ko aise apman karne ka mauka hi nahi milta

[@sk-lk2cy]

She should have also cleared it when she said pandavas were pandu putra....were they really? Nothing against panadavas But "Baap" and all is not acceptable. In Mahabharat, we can learn something from every character...all are part for a reason...she doesn't get the complete picture

[@deochandrajha8634]

You are great Didi

[@pallavi.bharati]

56:25 Brahmastra Yudhishthir ji ke paas bhi hota hai bhai jiska prayog ve Guru Dron pe karte hai, sabhi Pandavo ke aur unke pancho beto ke plus Drishtdyumn Shikhandi ke paas bhi Divyastra hote hai, Pancho Pandav ke divyastra ek ek devta ne diye the Uppandavo ke bhi devtao se miley ye Mahabharat me likha hai clearly aur MahaDhanurdhaari sabhi Pandav aur Uppandav the.. Arjun 100% the kyonki unke paas Brahmshira tha par 5 Uppandav Drishtdyumn Shikhandi aur baki 4 Pandav bhi 99% best the dhanur vidya me. Geeta ka gyan Arjun ko keval mila kyonki keval ve vichlit hue baaki nahi.. Yudhishthir ji Vann Parv me keh chukey ki Draupadi pancho patiyo pe ek jaisa samarpit hai aur Draupadi khud kahi hai ki Pancho Pandav unhe apne 5 senses jitne pyare hai equally.. Swargarohan Parv chapter jahan Yudhishthir ji kehte hai Arjun se zyada pyar karti hai vo poora chapter hi baad me add kiya gaya hai kyonki Spitzer manuscripts ke 1st century Mahabharat manuscript me Swargarohan Parv nahi mila arthat Ramayan ke Uttar Kaand jaise Swargarohan milawat hai Yudhishthir ji aisa kuch nahi kahe ki kisse zyada pyar Draupadi ko balki pehle hi keh chuke Draupadi equal pyar ki pancho se, Pandavo ke Vaanprast aashram dharan karna hi last hai Mahabharat ka.

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Bhai sach kehte h ki adhura gyan khatarnak hota h jaise ki in devi jaa ka h draupadi vastra haran me bhut badha chadha ke dikhaya jata h usme galat tha duryodhan ka draupadi ko apni jangha pr baithana aur uske baal pakad ke ghasitna baki jo vastra haran ki baat rhi to us time pe kapde do part me hote the upper garment and lower garments toh jo das log hote the wo upper garment nhi pehente the wo nobility ka chinha tha ab jb draupadi dasi bn chuki h to unhe upper garment pehne ka koi adhikar nhi tha aur haan apne agayat vas me jb vo dasi bni thi tb unhone nhi pehne the yrr ye jo vastra haran h wo sbse bda misconception h in logo me aur pandavon ke taraf ek bada jhukav h aur isiliye waha pandav chup the kyki as a dasi she cant wore it aur oandavin ne bhi nhi pehne the aur bhai ab ye mt kehna ki pandav purush the aur draupadi stree ab isko ajj ke prospective se mt dekho us timw pe nhi pehente the das log

[@bijaltulsidas]

Why is it that women are widely known/remembered to cause trouble in these two historic stories vs make noble contributions? Take kaikaiye, or kunti

[@inspiregrowth9022]

Again, you are looking at this from a biased perspective. There are many male characters who were severely flawed & history remembers them for being wrong. So, no one has made this a male female issue.

[@parikritdas7536]

Plz mam you are very educative plz make a video on Islam.......😂😂😂😂😂

[@OnePiece-dm2up]

Karan was 10 year older then Arjun then how is it possible that both were together taking lesson from drona at same time

[@anandshroff5398]

Senior junior nahi hote Kya ?

[@CosmicSapien-xg]

I guess she just wants to white wash varn vyavastha Can you please tell them In north east India (magadha) Jati was not decided by birth only because of them some suts tribals and shudras became worrier some of them made their kingdom In the rest of Aryavarta they are not allowed to become worrier and vidur was accepted as son of vichitraveeriya Sanjay was actually sarthi of dhritarashtra And in last father's jati was important in Aryavarta matsya raaj was shastriya because of this uttra was shastriya Ved vyas was bhrahman who was biological father of vidur

[@Rated_NPK]

It all boils down to narrative and perspective. If you really keep your thoughts open and be unbiased that Pandavas were good and Kauravas were bad, then you can also reason with Duryodhana and Karna. Each character had their motto and what they thought was right. Each had their own conviction. Neither was right nor wrong. As far as character of Karna goes, he catches attention of the reader because of both his nastiness and nobility. You can't help but feel for that character on a human level. No need to make every character black or white. It can have both. His truly commendable trait was shown when he rejected the throne offered to him by Krishna himself and his heart wrenching encounter with Kunti. Kunti had all the time in the world to break the truth that Karna was her eldest son to her darling sons who would not hesitate to share wife to keep up word of their mother. But it is Karna who is wrong to fight for his ego and place. Just because Vidur did not fight back, yuyutsu did not fight back, Karna should have not fought back too, right !!!!!! Typical suppressive and religious narrative ! Anyway, there have been several poets, authors since ages (Bhasa, Pampa, Ranna, Tagore) who have revered the good traits in Karna. It will carry on as long as people see it from the other side and do not follow things just religiously !

[@ashishGCC007]

सैल्यूट मैडम

[@SubhamML11]

I heard her,but I don't agree with her concept around karn

[@lundfakhri448]

Karna, Drona & Bhsima were of impeccable character. Their only fault was when they supported ayogya candidate for emperor, Duryodhana, which would affect entire Bharat verse. This is the reason they were vadh. Bhisma was vadh by Krishna, because he valued his promise/himself above Dharma, what was right. Drona was vadh, because he valued his family, his son above Dharma, what was right. Karna was vadh because he valued his friend, above Dharma. These 3 are the Big 3 of Mahabharata, whom Pandavas could never defeat with out Krishna.

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Pagal kr diya isne 😭😭😭 kitna counter kru comment me yrr inse face to face baat krni h mujhe

[@defenceaspirants44444]

🙏Arjuna my inspiration 🙏

[@lundfakhri448]

Let's compare Karna & Brihenlala alias Arjuna, power 1) Karna: Kavacha, Kundala, Vijaya Bow, Vasavi Shakti, Son of Surya Dev/Demi God, Student of Parashurama, Astra-Shastra. 2) Brihenlala: Gandheeva bow, Son of Indra Dev/Demi God, Student of Drona, Pashupathastra, Astra-Shastra, wife betting, wife sharing. This is the main plot of Mahabharata, not added village fan story or shakti purana nonsen.

[@lundfakhri448]

Karna is one of the 3 pillars that protect Duryodhana. Without Krishna, Pandavas would have lost to Karna or any of other 2 pillars. Karna character: does not bet his wife, does not share his wife, even Duryodhana the main villain leaves his wife under Karna's care, Indra begs him for his Kavacha & Kundala which Karna donates & so impressed was Indra by Karna's character that he gave him Vasavi Shakti to vadh his own son. Yes, Karna had inferiority complex when he was young because of his class, but after receiving Parashurama's curse, he learns from his mistake. His fault was that he did not understand the meaning of true friendship. Had Karna been a true friend, he would have tried to stop Duryodhana & even break his friendship for this. What would have happened is that Duryodhana would have accepted the last prastava of Krishna Paramathaman, the 5 village one, since Duryodhana did not trust Bhisma or Drona. He only trusted Karna, which is why he started the war. Had Karna's support not been there, Duryodhana would not have started the war & would have lived. This is what being a true friend means. Krishna taught Karna this, before his vadh & in true Mahabharata, Ramayana fashion, Karna accepted his vadh. Brihenlala vadh Karna, when he could not fight back, because this was the only way Brihenlala could win as per Krishna Paramathman himself. You will hear a lot of fan stories from village pundits like this woman, but its just nonsens.

[@inspiregrowth9022]

She has put in hours of research into understanding DHARMA. She is clearly saying that Karna was not in the path of dharma. He also didn't follow the morals of a true friend. So go and confuse others. She is not a random village pundit but a true intellectual.

[@lundfakhri448]

@@inspiregrowth9022 already proven beyond doubt she does not even know basics of mahabharata.

[@lundfakhri448]

@@inspiregrowth9022 she is even worse than TV Serial people, who atleast have to make consistent story. She even think barbarik story is from actual mahabharata, which shows her research was listening to her grandmother.

[@pranjalkumarsarma5636]

Good vocabulary doesn't mean to be logical... mythology and history are two different things

[@inspiregrowth9022]

Then why don't you get outta here.

[@pranjalkumarsarma5636]

@@inspiregrowth9022 that's what your small mind can think of...idiot

[@LoneWolf_11-11]

pandav jaye bhaad me..... pati ho toh bheem jaisa, bhai ho toh krishna jaisa .

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Aur ye jo ke rhi h ki karn ne sandhi nhi hone si to bhai sb duryodhan ko dara rhe the yudh me tum haar jao ge pandav bhut balshali h etc. Tb karn ne ye kaha tha ki tum dar ke faisla mt lo tumhe dena h to do nhi dena to mt do pr yudh se dar ke faisla mt lo

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Ugrashrava ne sanyas liya tha aur wo sbhi jatiyon se mukt h yrr

[@lundfakhri448]

Why make Ramayana & Mahabharata? See, overall NARAYANA PARAMATHMAN does not need to descend & take avatar to vadh Ravana or Duryodhana/Kamsa. He can do it from Vaikunta. Nothing binds him. He is parabrahma. The reason why he makes Ramayana & Mahabharata as Rama & Krishna, is to teach humans Dharma. Its not because of women or whatever nosnens Shakti Purana people claim.

[@adesh8249]

Okay sahi h par is logic se toh pandavas bhi ache bhai nahi hua ek dusre k kisi ne ek dusre ko juaaa khelne se roka kyu nahi jab draupadi tak daav p lagadi tab kyu nahi roka 🙂 toh dekhne ka nazariya h Mahabharata m koi acha bura nahi tha agar koi bura hota toh sb ant m swarg lok nahi jate Bhagwan krishna ne jab kisi ko bura nahi mana aur swarg lok m sab gaye toh hum kon hote h judge karne wale ya yeh madam kon hoti h judge karne wali ki arre woh acha tha arre woh bura tha

[@deeptideeps515]

You have low iq. Kauravas ended up in narak. Please don’t speak with half knowledge. There was a final test for dharmaraj after he reaches swarg to see what he’ll do after seeing kauravas in heaven enjoying.

[@deeptideeps515]

And Dharamraj couldn’t refuse as a king when someone challenges him for a dual. Also he dint know at that time that he will be tricked. He first refuses saying this is not right but he followed dharma and he took the challenge 😊

[@maitreytelang2312]

22:35 🤣🤣🤣

[@vidyadesai1]

yeh madam ne jara jada man pe lia he mahabharat. Matlab she is talking like she was present there on the spot on Kurukshetra.

[@mansimehra7565]

Ppl generally read so that they can learn from it n apply it in real life.😊 oh n when someone read something n someone's spewing wtever on it....u oughta crct d narrative

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Aur bhai duryodhan kyu hi deta gav, pandavo se dar ke ye toh yudhishthir ko indraprastha dau pr lagane se pehle sochna chahiye tha agar us dau me duryodhan haar jata to kya yudhishthir wapas krte hastinapur nhi krte ab kal ko pakistan bole bhai kashmir humara h aur america uske saath ho toh kya india peche hat jayega to bhai vahi cheej h na jb yudhishthir haar gye to phir kaheka hak unka aur haan bhai mai kauravon ko defend nhi kr rha hu pr pandav bhi dudh ke dhule nhi the

[@MS-ov9sv]

Little consideration to language please 🙏 Ami ji ❤

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Maha bharatha itself a myth !

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Ab inke jaise ko kya h karn dan dete to bhi inko dikat ab nhi dete toh kehte kahe ka danveer aur unhone duryodhan ka soch ke hi amog astra manga na and jis way me inhone kaha ki karn ne astra ke badle me san diya to bhai tin tarah ke dan hote h jisme se karn humesha satatva dan dete the yani bina kisi akansha ke or ek baar agar unhone rajasva dan diya to kya ho gya wo bhi dan hi h aur haan ye bhi controversial h ki karn ne manga tha ya indra ne diya tha kyuki issi bat ko counter krte hue suryanarayan ne kaha h ki karn hamesha satatva dan dete the

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Is she mad or what how can she compare yuyutsu and vidur with karn these both were the sons of king how can someone insult them but karn was son of a normal charioteer

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Chatriya pita aur brahman mata ke hone se samaj me bhut uccha pad nhi mil jata aur yrr kichak ke pita chatriya the mata bhrahmam aur karn ke pita jo the woh sut the dono me antar h kichak ne apne chatriya pita ki chatra chaya me siksha li kyu ki chatriyon le age koi bol nhi skta tha aur virat me pitamah jaisa koi virodh krne wala nhi rha aur ek baar jb kichak ne dominance hasil krli raja pe to uske liye apni behen ki shadi karana konsi badi baat hui aur abhimanyu ki shaddi sirf virat ko apne mat me krne ke liye ki gai thi aur vahi par karn ne jb arjun ko rangbhumi me challenge kiya tab sbne unka bahiskaar kiya tha aur kaha tha ki ek sutputra rajkumaar ko chunauti nhi -d-e skta aur bheem ne toh adhirat ki bhi bezzati ki thi aur ye kehti h ki adhirat bhut wealthy the toh Bhai jb adhirat pravesh krte h rangbhumi me tab unka stithi bataya gya h ki unke kapde phate hue h, etc. Toh bhai agar itne wealthy the toh aisa halat kyu

[@prasannabhosale3266]

I had seen her and Ved Vyas few months back in Starbucks. Poori Mahabharat Ved Vyas ne tabhi sunai rahegi issko...most probably

[@inspiregrowth9022]

When you can't debate with her, throw around senseless att@cks.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

Mahabharatha itself is a myth !

[@inspiregrowth9022]

It is itihaas for believing hindus. You can continue crying.

[@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg]

@@inspiregrowth9022 Faith can not change real history .

[@AshokaaAI]

​@@inspiregrowth9022 ha bas man lo Ki itihihas bina Kisi evidence aur proof ke. Kya itihihas Hai 😂

[@DennisGeorge-z7l]

jab bhi dekho inne Karna ki burai karte hue deka Hai....jaise ki baaki saare characters doodh ke dhule te

[@x_y33]

Ab kaha gya tum logo ka so called feminism?? Jis tarah se karna ne Draupadi ke insult ke apni bhoomika nibhayi kya waise ar logo ne kiya?? Waise to tum log bahut bhaukte rehte ho feminism ar women equality ko le kr, ab kaha gya ye sab?? Kya ab Draupadi ke case me ye sb tumhare pich_w@de me ghus gaya?? Ab women equality and feminism ki chinta nahi hai?? Ek stree ka bhare sabha me cheer haran me sath wala Aaj tumhe bechara dikh Raha hai? Was Draupadi not a woman?? Uski koi izzat nahi thi kya?? Aaj ek women abuser (Karn) se tum jaise logo ko sympathy hi rahi hai ar yahi tum log Shree Ram pr galat ilzam lagate nahi thakte, unhe misogynist bolte nahi thakte 🤬🤬😤kya Karn misogynist nahi tha according to his kali kartoot?? Doglepan ki bhi limit hoti hai pr tum jaise neech use bhi cross kr jate Hain 🤬🤬🤬

[@x_y33]

Ab kaha gya tum logo ka so called feminism?? Jis tarah se karna ne Draupadi ke insult ke apni bhoomika nibhayi kya waise ar logo ne kiya?? Waise to tum log bahut bhaukte rehte ho feminism ar women equality ko le kr, ab kaha gya ye sab?? Kya ab Draupadi ke case me ye sb tumhare piche ghus gaya?? Ab women equality and feminism ki chinta nahi hai?? Ek stree ka bhari sabha me cheer haran me sath wala Aaj tumhe bechara dikh Raha hai? Was Draupadi not a woman?? Uski koi izzat nahi thi kya?? Aaj ek women abuser (Karn) se tum jaise logo ko sympathy ho rahi hai ar yahi tum log Shree Ram pr galat ilzam lagate nahi thakte, unhe misogynist bolte nahi thakte 🤬🤬😤kya Karn misogynist nahi tha according to his kali kartoot?? Doglepan ki bhi limit hoti hai pr tum jaise use bhi cross kr jate Hain....

[@x_y33]

Ab kaha gya tum logo ka so called feminism?? Jis tarah se karna ne Draupadi ke insult me apni bhoomika nibhayi kya waise ar logo ne kiya??

[@x_y33]

Waise to tum log bahut bhaukte rehte ho feminism ar women equality ko le kr, ab kaha gya ye sab?? Kya ab Draupadi ke case me ye sb khatam ho gaya?? Ab women equality and feminism ki chinta nahi hai?? Ek stree ka bhari sabha me cheer haran me sath wala Aaj tumhe bechara dikh Raha hai? Was Draupadi not a woman?? Uski koi izzat nahi thi kya?? Aaj ek women abuser se tum jaise logo ko sympathy ho rahi hai ar yahi tum log Shree Ram pr galat ilzam lagate nahi thakte, unhe misogynist bolte nahi thakte .kya Karn misogynist nahi tha according to his kali kartoot?? Doglepan ki bhi limit hoti hai.........

[@PremSingh-ev4mo]

Filmmakers go to jail lies and misleading Bharat

[@Mstfshaloo]

I'm always team Karna mujay nahi pasand Arjun simple.

[@x_y33]

Ja kr apne religion ka channel dekho smjhe simple! Yaha kisi ne tumse opinion nahi maga h.

[@x_y33]

And second one thing, ghatiya logo ko ghatiya log hi pasand aate hain. Jaise tumhara cult h waise hi tumhari soch bhi hai ar baki Jo tumhare jaise Hain wo bhi waise hi hain. Tumhare yaha to waise bhi women "Aurat (ge_n_ it@l)" hai to tum ar soch bhi kya skte ho 😏 tum logo ne kbhi open mind se ladies ki respect krna jana bhi hai jo ab karoge......🤔 Kisi ne tumse poocha nahi hai ki tumhe kaun pasand hai coz Ramayan/Mahabharat has nothing to do with u people okay.

[@x_y33]

And second one thing, ghatiya logo ko ghatiya log hi pasand aate hain. Jaise tumhara cult h waise hi tumhari soch bhi hai ar baki Jo tumhare jaise Hain wo bhi waise hi hain. Tumhare yaha to waise bhi women "Aurat (ge_n_ it@l)" hai to tum ar soch bhi kya skte ho 😏

[@Mstfshaloo]

@@x_y33 muhrk KZbin teray Baap ka hai

[@curious_banda]

Mustafa Sohail ko Hindu pasand hai????

[@ennzee5393]

With all that cultural exposure, presentation is non-engaging unfortunately

[@ShraddheySrivastava]

Ab bhai bheem ko vish de diya toh bade senty ho rhe h ye mai ye nhi keh rha hu ki shi hua pr bheem bhi koi dudh ke dhule nhi the wo bhi apne bal ka pradarshan krte hue kauravon ko bhut maarte pit te the ped par se gira dete the and all

[@PaulSays]

ye bhi to apni book ka agenda faila rahi hai

[@Sdgutfbb34566]

One of the major fact she hides is duryodhana never got narayani sena he just got kritverma. Meanwhile Pandavas got satyaki who was comparatively better. This was the biggest trap duryodhana fell on

[@amazingcalvin]

Duryodhana got Narayani Sena and Arjuna got an unarmed Krishna. Duryodhana was even delighted and thought that Arjuna was a fool to have rejected one akshauhini of yadava warriors who were known at the time to be one of the best in the entire kurukshetra war in exchanged for an unarmed Krishna that too as a charioteer. Also, Satyaki was one of the greatest heroes of the war not just by talent. He was Arjuna's favorite pupil. That's why he was so powerful. So obviously Satyaki chose the side of Krishna and Arjuna who were dear to him. Kritavarma isn't as weak as you make him out to be. It takes a lot of skill, tenacity and strength to survive a war as brutal as the Kurukshetra war where even better men than both Satyaki as well as Kritavarma, like Abhimanyu, Karna, Bhurisravas, Bhishma, Drona, Shalya, Jayadratha had fallen.

[@Sdgutfbb34566]

@@amazingcalvin if narayani sena was with duryodhana then where is pradyumn and samba other sons of krishna why didn't they fought with duryodhana.

[@amazingcalvin]

@@Sdgutfbb34566 Because they chose not to. Just like Satyaki chose not to side with Kauravas. Just like Yuyutsu defected from the Kauravas. The sons of Krishna did not want to oppose their own father. In fact, this is the exact reason even Balarama cited to not participate in the war because Krishna has was on the side of Dharma and he did not want to show partiality towards either Kauravas or Pandavas. If Balarama wanted, entire Kurukshetra war would be over in a minute.

[@Sdgutfbb34566]

@@amazingcalvin that's what I am saying they should not have their own opinion as per the bet entire narayani sena should have sided with duryodhana but it never happened.

[@amazingcalvin]

@@Sdgutfbb34566 Why they should not have their own opinion? 1 akshauhini soldiers participated in the war on the Kauravas side. That is almost the entire yadava clan, although not 100%. Duryodhana got what he wanted and he was satisfied. Arjuna got what he want and he was satisfied. If you are saying having Satyaki on Kauravas side was enough to grant them victory, then you are sorely mistaken. Satyaki was almost killed by Bhurisravas and Arjuna had to cut off his arm with an arrow to stop him.

[@drinkinman86]

THIS WOMAN DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT MAHABHARATA Caste System was not there in the time of Mahabharata. It was CLASS system. There were varnas, but these were secondary to your class. Soodh Putra means son of charioteer, its not a caste, its a class. She is mixing SHAKTI PURANA nonsen where she makes Draupadi into God & then pulls down male characters like Karna. In original Mahabharata, Draupadi has almost no contribution, only she marries arjuna, gets betted & then saved by Krishna Paramathman. The story of Mahabharata is about Dharma, not women.

[@ajaypalekar2780]

rubbish