@@HeyItsShariqyes clickbait, the Mac mini M4 is more powerful and costs way less. Even with 16gb ram it will outperform any Intel or AMD mini PC. Storage can be expanded with Thunderbolt medium.
@stealtheo2 ай бұрын
This device costs almost twice as much as the Mac mini M4 and is significantly less powerful.
@aiwa5012 ай бұрын
What are you smoking? How can you sit there and compare this product (which cost more BTW) over an M4 Mac Mini). Pound for pound the M4 Mac Mini will smoke that PC. I'm a PC guy and I cant even support this BS.
@johnne86sd2 ай бұрын
Nah the M4 is killer and I've been a PC guy my whole life. I'm buying an M4 Mini Pro.
@CallMeRabbitzUSVI2 ай бұрын
Ooof the Pro eh? Thats not the one to get my friend 😅
@edmundignatius77192 ай бұрын
Yes m4 better than most PC today but speed is not everything it’s all about how you use your computer. What programs you have a lot of my programs which cannot be run on mac computer but I like the PC mini pc because it’s upgradeable
@debayanmondalvlogs35652 ай бұрын
@@CallMeRabbitzUSVIThat is the one to get if you need the power, haha!
@SonicFarmAudio2 ай бұрын
Just got one. You'll be amazed.
@jorgem502 ай бұрын
PC guy here who uses his pc for video editing. I've ran a few test using my wife's mini m4 base model against my pc AMD 5900x with an amd 7800xt gpu. My pc is twice as fast for rendering. Both are equally good for editing but render times are much slower than my pc. The mac mini is cool but I'd have spend $1500 and get the mini m4 pro to match my pc. The m4 mini is such a beast for the size, price, and efficiency. My wife uses hers for photography and she likes it. BTW, I used Davinci resolve and filmora 14 on both computers to compare
@googlesucks60292 ай бұрын
Yeah but it definitely used 10x the power of the Mac Mini. Not an Apple fan but I'll call a spade a spade, the M processsors are brilliant processors it's just a shame that Apple made them.
@astro92192 ай бұрын
There was plenty of opportunity for Intel and AMD to make them but they thought they didn’t have to because they had the market cornered. When Windows is able to run on the architecture, PC’s will be dead.
@hadeseye22972 ай бұрын
@@astro9219 Are you even aware that Apple's computers are PCs as well? PC = Personal Computer. My Atari 800 XL is also a PC and it works great.
@astro92192 ай бұрын
@ I think you need a history lesson. Apple has always distinguished themselves from the “PC”. Apples version of a desktop or mobile computer is called a Macintosh. PC has always been associated with windows. PC vs Mac. You never heard of this debate? Now you know.
@YasinHasan2 ай бұрын
its just ARM, snapdragon would be better in that place
@Tonicshades2 ай бұрын
@@astro9219The problem is not Intel but rather Intel and AMD running into the same problem Android runs into, native ecosystem, Apple specifically tailored their hardware to their software and they then give the specs to third parties on Apple for ultimate compatibility, which is why Apple software runs better and longer with minimal power on these M-Series Chips. Intel and AMD is trying to create a chip for thousands of different PC's with thousands of different components, this leads to a handful of PC's running smoothly and still third party compatibility is lacking because of what they model their software to. This is why Apple M Series Chips may never be beaten unless Windows buys out Intel or AMD and create a proprietary chips series specifically to rival M Chips.
@ibassnote2 ай бұрын
Wait, is this a commercial for the Mac Mini?
@whatevermusiciwant2 ай бұрын
The M4 crushes the U9. It's a garbage chip. As a DIEHARD PC Masterrace, I am probably moving to Mac despite their crappy business model the M4 is a gamechanger at this point and no X86 PC will be able to compete, period. If I want to game or develop games, I have a desktop, if I want to be highly productive I have a Mac. It's become as simple as that.
@hadeseye22972 ай бұрын
"if I want to be highly productive I have a Mac" If you want to be higly productive you will investy in AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. ;)
@whatevermusiciwant2 ай бұрын
@@hadeseye2297 lol, yeah I mean what's 10 grand?
@Tonicshades2 ай бұрын
@@hadeseye2297I wouldn't trust anything Windows during a music event, Macbooks are the most reliable when it comes to music gigs. Logic Pro is also second most used software in the music industry after Pro Tools which is also available on Macs. The same goes for image editing, it's smoother on Macs and more stable.
@Baba_Muni2 ай бұрын
The answer is don't. M4 is miles ahead.
@abhijitdash2 ай бұрын
M4 performance is ofcourse quite a bit ahead but the rest of the Mac mini is lacklusture, including the 256gb measly storage, which is non upgradable.
@utopian6662 ай бұрын
@@abhijitdash you said the rest. What else?
@auronkardek2 ай бұрын
ppl making those kind of takes forgot people are buying apple products for ios/macos. If I want a mini pc I can buy a second hand miniforum for 300$ and have far better results for the price
@TedyWoo2 ай бұрын
What model please? 🙏🏻
@hadeseye22972 ай бұрын
Hackintosh.
@JerryDoe2 ай бұрын
I bought a Mac because of performance and money wise it outperformed my gaming pc on the same price range (m3 MacBook air) now I purchased the M4 Mac mini to replace my workstation for the same reason. I learned that the ssd can be expanded by using a Thunderbolt ssd medium and with 16gb I still outperform my gaming pc on so many levels. Also my electric bill has dropped significantly because my PC consumed 550 watts during gaming and my Mac mini consumes 35 watts running the same games
@sarjannarwan68962 ай бұрын
I bought a Mac Pro because of performance and battery. I’d prefer to run Linux.
@JerryDoe2 ай бұрын
@@sarjannarwan6896 As a software developer i see no point in that, even the best Linux distro on x86 hardware does not support HiDPI displays or lack scaling. I still use Windows and Linux but rather in a virtual machine. Even if you manage to find an ARM based distro that can run natively on the latest Macs you'll not be able to enjoy all its perks such as full GPU acceleration and lose device connectivity and functionality if you own multiple Apple devices. You'll be struggling each step while MacOS is Unix based and has everything working out of the box.
@railwaystationmaster2 ай бұрын
OLD TECH ! MAC MINI M4 THE FUTURE.
@ucruci2 ай бұрын
Eh, $989 is too high for this type of PC.
@petepaxton51092 ай бұрын
The point isn't whether or not mini pcs are better than a m4 mac mini, the mac is much more powerful, but I purchased a budget mini pc and put linux mint 22 on it and it runs great. Video editing or for youtubers? No way. But for average computers using email, web browsing, office suite, note/task manager, calendar, youtube or youtube tv, entertainment streaming, texting or whatever else, the $149 budget mini pc I got with 16gb of ram and a 512 hd works fantastic. Much snappier than I thought. I've had it for over a year and no hiccups whatsoever. No where near what a mac mini can do but then again I don't need it to.
@bryans86562 ай бұрын
I did the same thing with the G3 GMKtec, running Mint 22 and LibreOffice. I'm on it now. Great (and affordable) little device.
@dava000072 ай бұрын
There is no benchmark
@popkadurak80542 ай бұрын
5:06
@hadeseye22972 ай бұрын
Single-Core Score: 2577 Multi-Core Score: 14012 From Geekbench. In other words it's not far behind M4 mini. Not in the multi core. In single it is about 1200 points difference.
@DS-iw5nw2 ай бұрын
Actually you're incorrect. X86 is 32-bit. This would be an x64-bit system if it's a more modern Windows computer
@XDAVideo2 ай бұрын
his real name is amd64 🐶
@SonicFarmAudio2 ай бұрын
There's not even a comparison. If you need any serious power to create music or edit videos, Mac Mini M4 eats all the PC's for breakfast. All the gamers can have their PC's, but none for me, thanks. No offense intended, but you gotta call a spade a spade.
@PuOop-j9l2 ай бұрын
twice the price for probably 70% of the performance
@wjckc792 ай бұрын
It's also $989 as a Black Friday deal. You can do a lot better with a mini pc for that price.
@falwickster2 ай бұрын
Answer for this clickbait title: NO
@GEEKOMPC2 ай бұрын
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on our product. Your review and feedback on the GEEKOM mini PC are valuable to us and help us improve.
@abdullahumer16832 ай бұрын
Are there any arm64 based similar mini machine that can run Ubuntu server?
@siumabox2 ай бұрын
What a stupid design still using external transformer!
@Alex-hw3sg2 ай бұрын
does windows in colab with pc manufacturers still wanna take screenshots of my PC every 5 seconds??? and do god knows what with it?? then it can collectivley eff off! apple and M4 all the way
@XDAVideo2 ай бұрын
That's Recall which is part of CoPilot+. Meteor Lake chips don't have the quicker NPU required for that.
@Alex-hw3sg2 ай бұрын
@@XDAVideo thats not all ms are doing spying on users activity its just the straw that broke the camels back.
@prplzbr2 ай бұрын
Banana for scale
@bparihar932 ай бұрын
Then it's all about price Where this pc lacks and M4 Rocks ,Base model breaks the jaw.
@maddada2 ай бұрын
256gb isn't enough for most people. At least the price for upgrading storage and ram on this one makes sense.
@RunForPeace-hk1cu2 ай бұрын
@@maddada external drive LOL and it's ugly, cheap af compared to MacMini. for a mini pc, what the hell do you need more than 16GB for? just browse the web and check emails you need 32GB?
@Tappits842 ай бұрын
An m4 mac mini with the same ram and SSD as this costs 80% more.
@Tommy125612 ай бұрын
Typical clickbait title!
@nekobakafulАй бұрын
what you smoking ? i want some
@SprakyChroniclesАй бұрын
I had to watch it twice (2nd time audio only). Got so damn distracted by the eyebrow flirting it made me uncomfortable. Thanks for the info.
@skyazuldream2 ай бұрын
how this junk is even in the league of Mac Mini for Christs sake 😮
@Tappits842 ай бұрын
There not the same level of product. A 2TB + 32GB Mac mini m4 costs almost twice as much as one of these. You would expect it to be better at that kind of price delta.
@YasinHasan2 ай бұрын
its better than mac mini
@Tappits842 ай бұрын
@@YasinHasan It's better than the Mac mini at what? People forget that not everyone works with programs and systems within the Apple ecosystem, so people have to use other products that fit their needs.
@florif379213 күн бұрын
I watched this video as I own a MAc mini M2 pro which is a disaster. Is not good for business. Maybe for video editing. To turn on video camera you have to restart the computer. There is no Cut and paste function as in the PC. Cannot increase icon size except for a very complicate prrocedure. Mouse pointer is not precise and too slow moving. ETC. Many reasons to drop off MAc and go back to the IBM PC structure. SO thank you for the presentation
@rossbagley90152 ай бұрын
I need to build and deploy ios/macos binaries. There is nothing about this minipc that can help with that.
@LeandroFTW2 ай бұрын
Not have to mess with MacOS is the best part.
@TaureanSmoke2 ай бұрын
Exactly! Apple users never tell you about all the incompatibility issues with third-party software and hardware. Nor do they tell you about the bugs and the glitches inside of Mac OS or iOS!
@PraetorBeast2 ай бұрын
@@TaureanSmoke Wow, it's kinda like all OS' are not 100% perfect. Absolute shocker.
@tommyapocalypse60962 ай бұрын
Yes, because Windoze is SOOOOOOOO much better. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. 😅
@hadeseye22972 ай бұрын
@@tommyapocalypse6096 Btw, I use Arch.
@wjckc792 ай бұрын
Huh? OS X is fantastic, especially with a trackpad. As someone who uses Linux, Windows, and OS X if I could only have one It would be OS X. I am not a gamer though.
@microJUBEI2 ай бұрын
Where's the link to buy this?
@dejabu242 ай бұрын
not bad
@DavidAlsh2 ай бұрын
M4 is frustratingly powerful but it has shockingly few use cases because Apple nerf it with MacOS. If Apple offered first party Linux support I'd buy the max spec M4 - but they won't so it's "big for nothing" to me. Not sure this is the best alternative though
@YasinHasan2 ай бұрын
most small PC would be better purchase than mac mini
@TikTok-to8qq2 ай бұрын
And mac it shits in games and graphics intensive tasks consider noise reduction with film grain and other effects you will know it sucks