Secret To Optimizing SQL Queries - Understand The SQL Execution Order

[@cumbi-mongo]

Great video! One addition: The "EXPLAIN" command is an invaluable tool for optimizing SQL queries. It provides a detailed execution plan, allowing the developers to understand how the database engine processes a query. By analyzing the execution plan, you can address the performance bottlenecks with proper optimizations, e.g. proper indexes.

[@Omar-ic3wc]

Thanks for sharing this.

[@luis5d6b]

Thanks a lot for the addition, really good :)

[@ksm1847]

@cmertayak - I second you. It's an awesome command I use many times at my work to optimise. My go to command to improve queries execution.

[@zeelthumar]

Thanks for sharing

[@DavisTibbz]

Oh yes, if you run EXPLAIN in some desktop client like Mysql Workbench, shows you detailed chart diagram of your Query, quite useful

[@uzair004]

Opt for indexes with SELECT, WHERE, JOIN clauses. Use full column comparison to get data instead of half or computed comparison (i.e startsWith) Avoid ORDER_BY on large data retreval Use limit of smaller number with pagination for more data.

[@sampri22]

Could you explain how? What if i need large data retrieved with order by. How would i use limit and pagination in this case? Thanks

[@beebeewijaya1374]

​@@sampri22 for data processing and analytics? better way to do this is dump your database data and put into BigQuery or Hadoop, they have better resources for processing a large data

[@ayazahamed8254]

The way you explained with the animations are Awesome. Great Job. Very Well Explained.

[@abhinav10x]

Very profound, please share more on SQL like windows and CTE, your explanation is very approachable.

[@JohnS-er7jh]

One of the best SQL videos I have come across, just the way it is put together and the infographics. If you are learning SQL, you really should understand the mechanics behind optimizing queries, how databases work. Just adding more hardware or VM resources will not fix the issue if your queries are not optimized properly.

[@rembautimes8808]

Very well presented, thanks for explaining SARGAble concept

[@vivektarab1959]

0:08 - Start 1:25 - Using Index on Join Columns significantly improve the Join 1:47 - Next Step is use of Where Clause 2:13 - Lets 3:14 - To write Sargable Queries 4:18 - Optimising 5:21 - Remember - Order of Optimization

[@gabrielb.962]

Index usage tip: When using params in your query (e.g., select .... where year > ?), databases may not utilize an index if it is unbalanced. For instance, if you have approximately 1 million rows with year = 2022 and only 1000 rows with year = 2023, the database cannot predict whether the parameter will be useful for filtering. To resolve this issue, pass the value directly in the query itself, allowing the execution plan to determine if the index is suitable for the intended purpose.

[@stpaquet]

As I wrote in my comment, good understanding on how you db engine works is key. And they are all different. So never assume that a good query on a MySQL will be a good query on Postgres, Oracle or any SQL engine.

[@maf_aka]

this opens the gate for SQL injection, don't do this

[@maksymbaranovskyi8362]

@@maf_aka I think the idea was not to use prepared statements *where you don't need them.* E.g. if you already have validation in place that ensures your received value is enum (number, null, etc.) - you can be sure no SQL injection is possible there - so no need to use prepared statements *there.*

[@lethern2]

Ok, but then you get a different query plan for each (different parameter / set of parameters) query

[@stpaquet]

@@lethern2 yep. but that's why you need to understand how your db engine works

[@JosephDSilva-i6j]

Additionally, for the optimizer to "make up" a reasonably good plan (from the various alternatives), it needs to know a bit about the data (value) distribution. This is where STATISTICS / ANALYZE (depends on the DB vendor) come handy. It helps the optimizer do estimates for the various steps (rows, size of data, etc.) of each plan, and figure out which of the different plans is the best candidate to execute. Therefore it is important to collect this information on critical columns (usually join, where clause columns). It is also important to keep this information regularly refreshed so that the optimizer does not make bad decisions based on stale statistics. Very bad things can happen with stale statistics.

[@SalmanSayyad-q1h]

bro this way of teaching is really really make sense. thanks a lot for these visuals.

[@Qith629]

the way you help us visualize this is next level. Thank you!

[@CyberMew]

Very good intro. Would like a more detailed explanation on more complex queries.

[@adicide9070]

they don't do detailed explanations. it's basically "use indexes". don't sort lots of data. well, thanks.

[@davidlee588]

@@jonbaird9718agreed, KZbin is made for juniors

[@TheSocialDrone]

Thank you, @bytebytego, for breaking down the topic with clear visuals and simple narration!

[@stpaquet]

Understanding how the DB engine works with indexes is key. you may assume that a WHERE purchase_date >= 2022 AND purchase > 100 would be the same if you have indexes on purchase_date and purchase, but it might be required to have a composite index... Order in the WHERE clause may also be important as it helps reducing the dataset before applying the second condition.

[@MiningForPies]

WHERE order has no effect on most sql systems. The only way you can force SQL to filter data first is to use a derived query.

[@連文瑞-o5n]

This is the best explanation I've ever seen. Big thumbs for you!

[@MrSuriyam]

Hi Sir thank you 🙏 for taking the time to explain the SQL. Sorry Iam new and very helpful.

[@deni_.s]

That's the gap I needed to fill. Couldn't find this info wrapped in the right words and animations as here. Thanks a lot for the content! Hoping to find more relevant videos to expand my knowledge of SQL. Currently struggling with performance of my queries on big datasets (~6mil rows). Not clear how to avoid functions and computations during search and filtering in some cases. Biggest struggle so far

[@mobiledisco]

Thank you. SELECT coming practically at the end of the process was a hard thing to get my head around, let alone remember, when I first began with SQL. Still is TBH. The fact it means something more like 'display' than 'go and get' (what we typically mean by 'select' in conversational English) was a hurdle too. Wish I'd come across this video back then.

[@lucyk7292]

Thank you for a fantastic visualization of the SQL queries execution order. That's exactly what I have been missing in the other materials. I really appreciate your style of teaching

[@karunakaranr2473]

Thank you for your time and effort to explain any of the subjects. Really like it and more over able to register the concept in mind easily. Thanks again,.

[@naveenverma2951]

oh my goodness, this is too good for non IT background jumping ship to see where AI will land. Thx. You are my 3blue1brown for IT

[@bonita799063]

What a Video , Voice , Explanation , Graphics and etc...well done mate

[@zackwong1000]

You should select from the orders table then join the customers since your where clause is a column in orders table! Your SQL is joining on unnecessary rows from orders & customers!

[@niketu99]

Superb video! Simple explanation on query optimisation.

[@AliBensoukehal]

Simple and to the point explanation. Love it. Thanks 👍

[@RobinSingh-ms3zt]

You are awesome at explaining any concept. Thank you so much

[@int1128]

LOL just had an interview and had exact copy of example he is showong and explaing on 😂😂😂 Thanks on this video realy helped.

[@gokulkumarprasoon5158]

00:45 Understanding SQL query execution and optimization techniques 01:30 Understanding SQL execution plans can optimize queries for better performance 02:15 Optimizing SQL queries through index usage 03:00 Writing soluble queries is essential for optimizing database performance. 03:45 Sargable queries improve query performance. 04:30 Understanding the SQL execution order is crucial for query optimization 05:15 Optimizing SQL Queries with Indexes 05:57 Understanding SQL execution order is key Crafted by Merlin AI.

[@JeremyChone]

wow, what an awesome introduction to SQL optimization.

[@developersharif]

*Explanation level is so beautiful!*

[@huywarrior]

Lord Buddha. I'm looking for an active data flow visualization that can shorten data query response times! A great video, it saved me today. Leaving with 1 subscription as a fan! 🔍⚡

[@moneycrab]

I heard it called "predicate pushdown" when you move a condition earlier in the plan

[@KEsh_123_4]

Great explanation in a short video. If orderby comes after the select then it will work on the data already read from disk, right?

[@caseyspaulding]

Wow. To the point with knowledge I can use today. Thank you.

[@user-rw6iw8jg2t]

The best one , interms of Optimization !

[@prasasthaslife6270]

Great video!! Very helpful! Thanku sir!

[@vasiliynet3425]

Awesome as usual! Thanks a lot!

[@robbybankston4238]

Love your channel. Your videos are great.

[@nixjavi7220]

these videos are amazing!!!! thanks!!!

[@souhaildahmeni9961]

Thanks for this kind of explanation

[@jagmanderbazzad8425]

Nice and simple explanation.Thanks

[@tallalmoshrif6643]

Great video, very informative and well explained bravo!

[@twistedace6365]

thanks, helped clear up some issues I had.

[@chobemaloso]

Thank you for sharing your knowledge

[@anirudh7463]

This stuff is gold. Thank you for making this available for free. Really appreciate it!

[@anitacusick7658]

1:26

[@avijeethati5323]

Excellent video explaining basic concepts in very short time..❤ Impressive graphic animation, could you please share how the execution plan animation was done

[@mikeshin77]

Very good video. It is really helpful.

[@yashwanthbedre8220]

Best explanation ever

[@TravisMcAuley-e1z]

Awesome visualization, I've been loving all the short videos on this channel! Clarifying Q. The execution order has SELECT happening after HAVING, so this should mean that the calculated column total_spent doesn't exist at the time the HAVING clause is evaluated?

[@MarredNDisenchanted]

Having uses total_spent from the SELECT, so how come HAVING is executed before the SELECT?

[@urgorka]

I'd say so too. This is error. First SELECT part is evaluated, then - HAVING part.

[@NiamorH]

Nice bird's-eye view introduction. It is not clear how to 'use appropriate indexes' to optimize for sorting, and how to implement pagination. Especially in your example where the sort order is made on an aggregate.

[@blackisblack22]

I have always thought that the Sql structure is poorly designed by not starting from FROM and placing the reference at the end of the statement, for example in a SELECT it should go just before ORDER BY, in an UPDATE the SET after WHERE, etc. Somehow they wanted to remedy the problem by introducing the WITH clause but I'm sure many regret that whoever designed the language should have worked a little harder at the time.

[@DerBarde2012]

Your presentation is so pleasant to watch, is it manually key-framed in the video editor or are there tools to do that naturally?

[@antonboiko788]

cool, didn't think it's possible to include all these concepts in 6 min video. One thing, it's great to watch it when you want to summarise already existing knowledge

[@zixuanzhao6043]

This query actually does not need to join customers table since all the fields are present in the orders table already. (unless there are invalid / dirty customer_id data in the orders table and you want to filter them out)

[@MuhammadFahreza]

I still don't understand the difference between first point noted on here 3:19 and second point noted on 3:23. Would you mind to re-explain it ? thank you!

[@mahmudulmohtasim7612]

In this example the 'total_spent' alias is already in use in the HAVING clause without defining. How is that possible?

[@tianyuhu349]

yes, I have the same question, it doesnt make sense...

[@yash1152]

0:12 _[JOIN comes before WHERE]_ is there any way to make the WHERE clause execute first to narrow the rows required to make the JOIN in the first place?? this is the only reason i still do this using a nested query rather than JOIN

[@notbalding]

a CTE can be benefitial in your use case.

[@gliderguld]

Well explained. However I do miss 1) the generation of more query-plans and selection amongs them (cost estimations) and (as an element herein) 2) different table access tactics (sequential scan, index access or index only).

[@darrenklein6090]

Thank you, this was really helpful.

[@99aabbccddeeff]

Excellent explanation, thanks!

[@bilo1897]

Great video!

[@enockoloo3814]

really cool - thanks.

[@mer2550]

good things to practice for the interview. Thanks

[@AbhishekVaid]

Something doesn't add well here. If you notice HAVING clause refers to 'total_spent' which is defined in SELECT, so dependency wise HAVING should be after SELECT and not before it.

[@HariGajan-yl1en]

Good insight Thanks!

[@jerichaux9219]

You guys are awesome!

[@ThinhLe-eh9re]

Thanks for your sharing Bro's.

[@sahandjavid8755]

Question: at the end of the video you mentioned do not sort the whole data and use pagination for optimizing ORDER BY and LIMIT. Those are the things I use for pagination! What do you mean by that? The other thing is from your video LIMIT happens after ORDER BY. How come it can help when ORDER BY has already happened?! Btw great videos and content, thank you for these

[@fishinawaterbottle]

I feel like this is a bit misleading because sometimes where and select influence the first stage. As you said, when there’s a covering index, the database won’t read the entire table. So the select and where influence what is read from the source. Order and limit can also come it at the source as well if the index can be used with the order. You refer to this when you talk about “sorting the whole table”. CTEs and sub queries are not mentioned but that’s okay i guess.

[@SudharshaunMugundan]

Fantastic explanation.

[@MPIPolitics]

my app didnt reached 40 queries per second yet but i will implement that just in case my app will be next amazon :D

[@mohan1958]

Great. Thanks for sharing..

[@sengs.4838]

So good explanations

[@martingrof1685]

Amazing. Thank you!

[@some1rational]

Is that a typo in the first select clause, total spent should be total_spent?

[@tianyuhu349]

yes, i think so, and I have another question, 'Having' uses total_spent from the SELECT, so how come HAVING is executed before the SELECT? Doesnt make sense...

[@vi-2932]

Thanks. Good to know! Useful!

[@AndreW-ce4ry]

This a good information

[@mwaikul]

What tool do you use to generate your animations?

[@sriteja2510]

Hi The actual plan should be derived from the explain and explain analyze right instead from the query?

[@jamesayento1321]

Thanks for this! Will there be a transcription soon?

[@nguyentanphuc4101]

Avoid using non-saragable condition (func or calc) on index column If has to use func on column, write a computed column or function-based index first.

[@pieter5466]

As usual, excellent and to the point video!

[@crossedpolars]

Very good video

[@bhooshan25]

good explaination

[@Piyush_Kumbhare]

why don't you make a tutorial on SQL. I would like to watch it and I think it'll help a lot of people. By the way thank you very much for this amazing explanation.

[@antonanton22743]

thanks a lot for your content

[@Moali11]

Can you make a video explaining the difference between system design and software architecture?

[@bigbrother1211]

Thank you so much!

[@Matthew8473]

This is top-notch in every aspect. I read a book with similar content, and it was top-notch. "Better Sleep Better Life" by William Brook

[@UrielVS]

Think the key component missed here is that you are utilizing a SELECT aggregate within the HAVING statement. To me that looks like SELECT has to come before HAVING, would it not?

[@helal.ismail]

Very simple and to the point, love the visualization too

[@PrakaashUSA]

is there a way to contact you? I have some specific questions on indexes?

[@resistentemente]

What program is this used in the presentation?

[@amrithpurandhar9882]

Can anyone help me when does the function count or sum will be executed will it be after limit ?

[@GabrielGasp]

I always thought that the SELECT happened before HAVING, considering that we can use SELECT aliases in the HAVING filter.

[@christopherli5828]

thanks so much!

[@VivekRaj-i3j]

Won't it throw an error near Having total_spent as total_spent is an alias used in select clause and according to order of execution having will be executed before select and total_spent won't be recognised

[@ronenTheBarbarian]

Would building a cte table and then running a non-sargable query on it, should also be avoided?

[@theawesomeharris]

hi, can you enable captions/subtitle for this video? thank you!

[@hyperborean72]

your write in predicate in one case '2023-01-01' and in another '01-01-2008' - which format is correct?