C9 Lectures: Dr. Erik Meijer - Functional Programming Fundamentals Chapter 1 of 13

  Рет қаралды 65,768

jasonofthel33t

jasonofthel33t

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 40
@TremendousSax
@TremendousSax 10 жыл бұрын
I like when he erases the parameters and right hand side of K and then re-writes exactly what he erased.
@MrJC1
@MrJC1 5 жыл бұрын
hahahaha. i thought i was losing it at first.
@noli-timere-crede-tantum
@noli-timere-crede-tantum 3 жыл бұрын
That's 19:34 for those of us coming here from the future when KZbin had a neat feature where you can link into a timestamp in the video within one's comments. Very functional ;)
@QuasarRedshift
@QuasarRedshift 11 жыл бұрын
Great lecture! Glad that you took the time to go over the history and background of functional programming - these were major computer science pioneers, and are usually forgotten about today. Also like your cheerful, upbeat attitude - it makes you a good and dynamic speaker. Good European style thoroughness. And you are right - most programmers and even computer scientists don't know their own history. Good Work. Cheers from Canada!
@antoanbekele9369
@antoanbekele9369 6 жыл бұрын
Its ironic that the presentation contains so many redundant "You Know"s for such a concise language. Great course!
@tomdahulk
@tomdahulk 9 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Thanks for all the history-- I really love that you started off giving a context to everything that you'll cover in the next lectures. Wonderful job guys! Thanks for piquing my interest in Functional Programming even more!
@christiangruhl9441
@christiangruhl9441 10 жыл бұрын
Nice introduction. Especially that you pointed out why and when it is a good idea to use functional programming over imperative programming :-)
@charvakpatel962
@charvakpatel962 8 жыл бұрын
Not negative comment but Watching him giving lecture is funny. In my college some professors give lectures like their parents just died and came to teach us.
@charvakpatel962
@charvakpatel962 8 жыл бұрын
***** ? You do understand that that was a compliment right?
@badi1072
@badi1072 7 жыл бұрын
Logesh Kumar R is a dirty, illiterate bitch.
@0011usagi
@0011usagi 8 жыл бұрын
I know!
@captainheretic
@captainheretic 6 жыл бұрын
You know
@softwareminimalist
@softwareminimalist 6 жыл бұрын
Or whatever.. You know?
@RaspberryPy
@RaspberryPy 11 жыл бұрын
Great lecture. I know Scheme a bit, but want to learn more Haskell.
@educostadev
@educostadev 5 жыл бұрын
In this talk you wil know the history of the Funcional Programming and who was the important names behind it.
@umm_iter
@umm_iter 2 жыл бұрын
still referring to the book and lectures :)
@PetiKoch
@PetiKoch 8 жыл бұрын
Thanks Erik, excellent lecture!
@OndrejPopp
@OndrejPopp 5 жыл бұрын
5:57 no resulting value and all that... ofcourse there is the return statement in java.... So this comparision is not exactly fair, because you are comparing an unfinished java implementation of a sum function with an application of an already implemented sum function in Haskell...
@bocckoka
@bocckoka 7 жыл бұрын
The way he said Peter Landin just died was so disturbing... otherwise, great talk :)
@readingRoom100
@readingRoom100 5 жыл бұрын
if it makes u feel better, nobody "just died" when u saw this video, which was posted four years prior to your viewing it
@mikelee3430
@mikelee3430 11 жыл бұрын
This is great, thank you!
@derekfrost8991
@derekfrost8991 3 жыл бұрын
I just think he should stop recommending hugs because I find it brittle. I write data which type checks but then chokes at runtime because hugs is not optimized for recursion, which is useless in haskell which relies on recursion for everything.. :)
@IndelibLee
@IndelibLee 10 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@privetvastutnestoyalo2339
@privetvastutnestoyalo2339 4 жыл бұрын
Slightly disappointing, that he compares function implementation in Java with a function call in Haskell. I don't think it's correct to compare different levels of abstraction.
@inanme
@inanme 11 жыл бұрын
I was wondering why Scala has never been mentioned.
@trybeee1
@trybeee1 9 жыл бұрын
Why it should be mentioned?
@trybeee1
@trybeee1 9 жыл бұрын
Why it should be mentioned?
@trybeee1
@trybeee1 9 жыл бұрын
Why it should be mentioned?
@peque7338
@peque7338 10 жыл бұрын
every time he says pitch , i always hear bitch =/
@vyuutuube
@vyuutuube 9 жыл бұрын
peque You're right you know...
@RkKing1
@RkKing1 9 жыл бұрын
It's really good video. But why are u speaking 'you know' again and again....?
@at5pm
@at5pm 9 жыл бұрын
+Rk King thats the way he speaks. what an ungrateful brat are you, you know.
@RkKing1
@RkKing1 9 жыл бұрын
+At five Pm Please don't take me wrong! i don't meant be ungrateful, i just wanted to give a feedback. His work is really admirable. I have come across several videos on youtube after all only this playlist seemed useful to me so i thought i should give feedback to make it more better.
@EddTally
@EddTally 8 жыл бұрын
+Rk King ahhh!! I shouldn't of read the comments, im hearing it every time now!
@gofer9156
@gofer9156 8 жыл бұрын
Constantly saying "hmmm", "you know" etc in public talks is a sign of insecurity, and should correctly be criticized.
@pinikmanob7335
@pinikmanob7335 7 жыл бұрын
you just read english grammar books and never listened to people speak
@joecotter6803
@joecotter6803 3 жыл бұрын
Awful. Objectives of the language mixed up with the essence of functional programming. A poor historic survey too.
Is Functional Programming DEAD Already?
21:07
Continuous Delivery
Рет қаралды 48 М.
Family Love #funny #sigma
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
風船をキャッチしろ!🎈 Balloon catch Challenges
00:57
はじめしゃちょー(hajime)
Рет қаралды 50 МЛН
Steve's Database
0:06
Disney Jack 95
Рет қаралды 8
Functional Programming & Haskell - Computerphile
9:19
Computerphile
Рет қаралды 671 М.
Why Isn't Functional Programming the Norm? - Richard Feldman
46:09
React 2014 : Erik Meijer  - What does it mean to be Reactive?
46:39
React Conference
Рет қаралды 87 М.
Erik Meijer: Functional Programming
1:07:58
jasonofthel33t
Рет қаралды 101 М.
Family Love #funny #sigma
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН