My father, a member of the RCAF (1916-2016) told me a few stories about Caen. They placed bets, from their position near the Carpiquet airport, on which tanks would be blown up first. He also mentioned the horrific cadaver stench while crossing the only open road through Caen. He served up to Germany and final victory.
@HenryHaven-c3q7 ай бұрын
It was a hard fought struggle , Monty and Bradley both underestimated the terrain , the quality , skill, and determination of Germans ! It was airpower that broke German resistance both at Cean and the breakout at St Lo during Cobra ! The ground was perfect for defense , both the allies and Germans discovered this when they attempted to attack , it was only the allies total control of the sky that tipped the scales in their favor ! Unfortunately many fine men died on both sides ! The allies have landed in Normandy ! What should we do ? Make peace , you fools ! What else ! Gerd Von Rundstedt ! As far as the shooting of prisoners goes , both sides were guilty .
@patrickwalsh89977 ай бұрын
Canadians in WW1 Had a reputation of not taking too many prisoners
@AndrewAustinFrustrated7 ай бұрын
The terrain was well known before d-day and Montgomery realistically didn't expect to take Caen on d-day what he intended to do and did was pin down the best division's the Germans had in France the Wehrmacht and SS bled out at Caen making the American breakout a lot easier then it otherwise would have been. The documents on Montgomery's plan were released a while ago which showed he never believed he could take Caen on day one but he was surprised at how quickly major German divisions moved into Caen given the air superiority the allies had with three division's managing to get into Caen without being spotted.
@desmondgriffith78557 ай бұрын
That's right don't forget the battleships, Kurt Meyer, said "If it wasn't for those broadsides, allied attacks would've fallen in the ditch.
@HenryHaven-c3q7 ай бұрын
@@desmondgriffith7855 indeed the heavy guns of warships dominated the field 20 miles inshore , the Germans had no choice except to give ground and not to advance into overwhelming firepower ! They tried a few times early in the campaign but suffered such horrendous losses that both Rommel and Rundstedt knew it was fruitless to advance their forces into the range of allied cruisers and battleships, a lesson hard learned at Anzio in Italy ! Between the overall superiority in land sea and air power in Normandy the Germans never stood a chance ! As Rundstedt said upon the invasion of France ! What do we do now ? Make peace you fools what else? Unfortunately he was relieved of command and millions lost their lives because of an egomaniac and those who enabled him because of their own petty lust for power and position ! Don't let them fool ya ! Bob Marley !
@desmondgriffith78557 ай бұрын
@@HenryHaven-c3q Remember that they could only move troops and supplies at night, Eisenhower had 10,500 aircraft at his disposal.
@jamest46597 ай бұрын
I enjoyed the video. I have read the comments. It looks like the British and Canadians faced hell in Caen while the Americans faced hell at Omaha Beach.
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
We faced hell in numerous small towns and in the Hurtgen Forest, Aachen, and of course all over the Ardenne, including Bastogne.
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
@@rjvuno Absolutely
@ervintorres12004 ай бұрын
Very true 👍
@marshaprice82266 ай бұрын
While Rommel, who was in charge of the western defenses known as the Atlantic Wall, wanted the tanks kept on the beaches to defend against the expected invaders, the idea that the tanks should be kept farther inland did not originate with Hitler but with the Commander-in-Chief West von Rundstedt. Hitler’s decisions on the tank deployments referred to in the video were a compromise between the points of view of these two commanders who both had authority in northern France.
@mohammedsaysrashid35877 ай бұрын
It was an informative documentary about cean battles during WW2.
@get.factual7 ай бұрын
thank you for your comment❣️
@moss84487 ай бұрын
yeah it was a linchpin or is that lynch pen? y'all Limeys (meant nicely you see) beared the brunt early on so the break out could happen. hat's off.
@stephenmcgraw94667 ай бұрын
It's amazing in many of the Allied bombing of French and German towns. Many of the cathedrals survived the bombings.
@RichardThornton-i4f16 күн бұрын
Why that happened is cause Gen Geo s Patton kept reminding them not to bomb churches or cathedral s as towns people could go there and pray
@chacondremaus5168Ай бұрын
Great documentary!
@Arab--Man7 ай бұрын
The narrator's voice is from Epic history channel on YT 😉
@williamhoole20657 ай бұрын
I think he jumped ship new narrator on Epic History maybe didn't renew contract bad idea
@JoeDiGiovanniIV7 ай бұрын
I was looking for this comment
@lyleslaton30867 ай бұрын
Somebody named Monty said he would take Caen on D+3.
@patrickmacconnell177 ай бұрын
Ya, but it wasnt his fault. He said so!
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
He was holding up the Germans so the Americas could break out. Ask any brit, they will tell you. It was them and Russia overall. The United States contributed very little according to the toothless brits in the comments.
@gryph017 ай бұрын
"The acquisition of Canada this year will be a mere matter of marching" - Thomas Jefferson, August 1812. History is full of arrogant leaders... Be careful when you decide to single one out.
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz6 ай бұрын
@@gryph01 Thank you. One of my favourite quotes.
@MrNcgy5 ай бұрын
Interesting example; not quite appropriate tho.
@robbietoms31287 ай бұрын
The Americans never saw what the British and Canadians were up against and thought that.they were just hopeless The Americans never knrw that the British and Canadians saved their bacon . with the pounding the British took.
@johnnywilson77997 ай бұрын
I think we also saved thier bacon also by merely entering the war and supplying the British with food and weapons
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
So the mighty brits could have done it on the own? Well, they were fighting children.
@sharonwhiteley65107 ай бұрын
General Omar Bradley is often Ann overlooked factor for the Allied victory in the ETO
@Conn30Mtenor7 ай бұрын
why do you think so? I mean, I put him ahead of Patton, if you are interested in what I think.
@loneranger53497 ай бұрын
Did he do anything?
@adamkucera90946 ай бұрын
Must learn more about Bradley.
@davidengel79956 ай бұрын
Who’s Ann ? 👀
@haroldfiedler65492 ай бұрын
I have never heard this part of the story before. The storm that wrecked the artificial ports. Very interesting.
@albertawildcat31647 ай бұрын
My Uncle fought in the Canadian Army at the battle for Caen (at Carpiquet airfield mostly) He said they were mostly up against the 12SS who he described as "arrogant little bastards" and it is true that the Canadians didn't take many prisoners...if you know what I mean.
@garydolan70327 ай бұрын
😊😊😊
@kingwena13977 ай бұрын
Psquea
@JamesObertino7 ай бұрын
The SS, especially the Hitler Jugend Division,12th SS, often fought to the death. Few prisoners.
@4_vaccuum_salesman_of_marr9447 ай бұрын
War criminals.
@stevelauda54357 ай бұрын
Monty pffffttt....he was the biggest joke!
@xanderunderwoods33635 ай бұрын
Aside from the excellent interviews with the veterans, there are sooooo many historical inaccuracies in this video, its rather sad.
@tonyolivari248020 күн бұрын
Name a few
@TimothyDouglass7 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation. Thank you.
@SuperNoname177 ай бұрын
The real battles had taken place on the eastern front, Romania only fought on the soviet -german war but they had more casualties than US Army on the pacific and Europe combined,that showes the scale of that war, it was a war of annihilation only compared with the punic wars between the Roman empire and Carthage!!
@ronalddesiderio76257 ай бұрын
The flame 🔥 thrower tank is one nasty weapon
@rosshardy62235 ай бұрын
The Tommies insulted Gerry by having tea breaks in the middle of battle.
@buzsalmon6 ай бұрын
A very valuable video of war.
@douglaslugo94527 ай бұрын
Excellent document 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@finallyfriday.7 ай бұрын
British troops got burned out by poor leadership (monty) so it's no surprise that, even with massive advantages they had, they got spanked constantly.
@castlerock587 ай бұрын
Monty won the Normandy campaign before turning over command of allied ground forces to Eisenhower in September. If he had not made changes to the invasion plan, it would have failed.
@finallyfriday.7 ай бұрын
@@castlerock58 I agree. Monty's plan was a failure and he had to change it many times, failure after failure, before Normandy was won. That win was due mostly to the US forces and he was demoted from overall ground command and it was given to those that were winning.
@desmondgriffith78557 ай бұрын
@@castlerock58Monty's plan was flawed because encirclement operations require the use of 2 armoured thrust, not 1, remember that the greatest success achieved on the eastern front during operation Barbarossa was by army group centre by Guderian's 2nd panzer group and Hoth's 3rd panzer group.
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@castlerock58 you're delusional ! that weasel's involvement in d-day planning was scant at best !
@plehmann726 ай бұрын
@@finallyfriday. You're way off. Eisenhower always intended to become ground forces commander once Pattons 3rd Army arrived. He also always planned to make Bradley the 12th Army Group commander at the same time. Eisenhower as Supreme Commander reflected the fact that the US was committing 60% of the forces to the ETO. Not that he was a superior commander to Montgommery. He wasn't.
@metoo75577 ай бұрын
This is the narrator from epic TV history.
@ricklayeux56887 ай бұрын
Monty's claim to fame was getting his troops out of Dunkirk! Don't forget operation Market Garden, disaster.
@manuelaguirre10627 ай бұрын
The Germans allowed the evacuation of Dunkirk. It was a goodwill gesture. Hitler didnt want war with the Brits, he considered them cousins of the Germans. Churchill was a warmonger along with FDR. They were surrounded by ppl that hated Germany. Someone profitted from all this death. Alot of history we are taught is false. We now have the internet.
@gryph017 ай бұрын
Dunkirk waa more if a Royal Navy thing. The idea of Market Garden was sound. But a combination of logistics, weather and a spare German division turned it into a messed up operation.
@rockisland85446 ай бұрын
@@gryph01 Montgomery was a second rate commander, at best. Britain didn't have much of a pool of bright generals, and he wasn't one.
@anthonybarbetto97146 ай бұрын
My godfather was wounded on Normandy beach. My other uncle was with Patton's forces.
@ClevorBelmont6 ай бұрын
This sounds like the guy from Epic History Tv :)
@garychekerdjian97 ай бұрын
Thanks
@bobechs72347 ай бұрын
There was another way out of Normandy: Operation Cobra. Once the troops got out from under McNair, breakout was unstoppable
@andytucker95734 ай бұрын
We tend to gloss over the Allied war crimes in Normandy, mostly, the execution of surrendering enemy combatants. It is no wonder the tragedy of Malmedy happened later, although... the Nazis also were Idealogically mind fkd. War sucks and it is the victors who get to gloss over their mistakes and put their heroes on a pinnacle.
@zacheirikssonАй бұрын
This is where my great uncle met his fate. Absolute bloodbath
@jimburow7067 ай бұрын
Montgomery is completely overrated. Too much planning and bigidea, not enough fighting. He beat Rommel because hitler quit supplying the German army in North Africa.
@genaro57666 ай бұрын
The Allies destroyed the German supply lines ... is what actually happened .
@chessmaster32256 ай бұрын
I cant believe that Monty actually had the gaul to assert he could take Caen in two weeks, lol
@burrellbikes49696 ай бұрын
Failure of intelligence led the general leadership to assume the German resistance was weak.
@joeharris93626 ай бұрын
His stated goal was to take it the FIRST DAY.
@TDL-xg5nn5 ай бұрын
Plus Monty tried to rewrite history by claiming his objective was not to take Caen but tiedown German forces so the Americans could break out. Not true.
@rosshardy62235 ай бұрын
its because he was carrying a 12" wanger.
@chessmaster32255 ай бұрын
@@joeharris9362 lol he had such an ego!
@russellreading-xi7fe7 ай бұрын
Caen has been called 'the anvil of victory's the Brits & Canadians absorbed the might of German armour leaving the Yanks with out facing much like it.
@stevelauda54357 ай бұрын
The Canadian army was the only army that my dad had respect for.
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
Keep telling yourself that. Truth is the brits COULD NEVER GO FACE TO FACE WITH THE GERMANS WITHOUT THE UNITED STATES.
@stevelauda54357 ай бұрын
@@joeysausage3437 LOL 😆 YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT 💯!!!!!
@Oakeshott-ko8ig7 ай бұрын
True, the Americans faced an inferior quality of enemy on their end of the front in France, but we also had to defeat the Imperial Japanese single-handedly. Much of our best (the marines) were deployed to the Pacific theater.
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
@@Oakeshott-ko8ig The 12 ss was made up of boys. They sure gave monty trouble.
@Capo516 ай бұрын
The air superiority was decisive advantage.
@rosshardy62235 ай бұрын
no sht sherlock.
@daveabd7 ай бұрын
Montgomery was without doubt the most overrated general of either side in WW2.
@sharonwhiteley65107 ай бұрын
Just look at OPERATION MARKET GARDEN. The Dutch resistance was informing them of the troops and armor in the area. Montgomery blew them off saying they use children who exaggerate and inflate 1 tank into many. Photo recon was showing armor in the area. The Captain showing armor was placed on "forced sick leave. He obviously was mentally overworked ". The LZ for the paratroopers was 10 miles away. British armor had to travel down a single lane road for miles. Montgomery hated and mistrusted the Polish paratroopers. When finally used, they were dropped into a death zone. Radio equipment failed. Yet, Montgomery NEVER accepted responsibility for the failure and loss of personnel.
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
HAHAHAHAHA the arrogant little limey actually compared himself to PATTON !!
@chris79337 ай бұрын
Even that little girl didn't like him, right after the capture of Caen.
@serpentines63567 ай бұрын
@@sharonwhiteley6510 I haven't read a lot of WW2 history...but I have come across the negative assessments regarding Montgomery.
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@serpentines6356 you've mistaken "negative assessments" for stark reality !
@Steven-vw1sv7 ай бұрын
He could be used as a glider with those ears .
@cibetka762 ай бұрын
come on lol
@shanemossmoss7 ай бұрын
And the yanks will never acknowledge the sacrifice of the British and Canadian. That's the yanks
@CW-nt1sd7 ай бұрын
Didn’t they fight the war alone lol
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
@@CW-nt1sdNo, they fought YOUR war because you were not capable of winning it.
@nickdanger38027 ай бұрын
hitler declared war on the USA because FDR had been propping up Britain from 1939. You are welcome.
@gryph017 ай бұрын
@@joeysausage3437Shut up. You are whining like a mule
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@joeysausage3437 spot on, the limeys will fight right down to the last american !!!
@romelrecinto14607 ай бұрын
Nazi Germany during the second world war is much much ahead compared to their adversaries in almost all aspects; from training, to doctrine, to equipage, technology, even in small things like the design of their helmet. their helmet covers the forehead, ear and nape much like the modern helmet design
@amerigo887 ай бұрын
Please explain why the Nazi Supermen were barely able to keep up with the USSR production of war materials while controlling the economies of the modern EU. Why were German Infantry so reliant on the Mauser 98K bolt action rifle? Why were German logistics utterly reliant on horses, horses that died in the millions on the Eastern Front? You need to learn more about what it takes to win a war and lay off the Nazi propaganda films. How many Tiger tanks were built? Less than 1400. The Nazi war economy was a farce compared to all three of the major Allied powers, USA, USSR, and UK. So much corruption. So much power in the Little Corporal's hands. So little regard for properly fighting an industrial war.
@kurthagardorn6 ай бұрын
Thanks for setting him straight!@@amerigo88
@taylorarnold53116 ай бұрын
@@amerigo88 id say their training and doctrine was better even their technology. But what's technology matter if you cant build it in mass. Ya the tiger tanks were incredibly powerful for their time but as you said only 1400 were made so it made little difference. If there wasnt so much corruption and bickering from Hitler maybe it would of made a difference. Maybe instead of having arms companies compete for the best weapons and wonder weapons like the v1 and V2 just build reliable tanks and small arms in mass that would have made a real difference. Nazi Germany never learned how to mass produce. In an industrial war that is what wins not some fancy super tanks that are so expensive and take a very long time to produce.
@jafr999997 ай бұрын
The American Army was like a Thoroughbred. When the Brits & Canadians pinned down Major German Units it allowed the Americans to run wild through France.
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
tell me WHAT "major units" did they pin down and where ??
@gryph017 ай бұрын
@@casedismissed8581I guess uou weren't paying attention to the video...
@robertsolomielke51347 ай бұрын
Canadians went deepest first hours D DAY , so deep they were unsupported , and had to pull back since every one else held down. . Several times they crashed head on into BOTH 12 SS Div. Panzer, and the 12 SS HJ fanatics. Each army trying to out flank each other led to very intense, head on Infantry fighting , since neither side would call much artillery at a CQB. These kinds of fights is where I think prisoners were taken, both sides sometimes.. The bids for Caen went on....that is a few books worth alone. It's out there that Canadian and SS blood fest did draw SS troops away from US held area's, into the Caen caldron , which is what the SS wanted anyway. We all are familiar with the gallant carnage on Omaha, but if only the DD Shermans were not lost at sea , other beaches proved even a handful of DD's could improve outcomes. I am not certain, but I thought the Canadian . deep thrust was an unsupported tank unit. Some say a recon. Still looking , but I knew this from books way before YT was a thing. TY. tell know one...spread the word ;).
@plehmann726 ай бұрын
@@casedismissed8581. These divisions...21st Panzer, 1st SS Panzer, 9th SS Panzer, 10th SS Panzer 12th SS Panzer, Panzer Lehr and 316 Divisions and Panzer Command West.
@casedismissed85816 ай бұрын
@@plehmann72 i suppose acting in a stationary capacity might warrant a tad of recognition ? seeing as though the USA basically funded and guided the entire show ! don't sprain your arm patting yourself on the back.
@destinyigben91637 ай бұрын
The canadians are very strong headed people 😂😂
@Paul-zf8ob7 ай бұрын
Used to be.
@extremelycareless25417 ай бұрын
@@Paul-zf8obreal ones are.
@gryph017 ай бұрын
@@Paul-zf8obStill are.
@Theearthtraveler6 ай бұрын
Quite a battle!!
@jamesbohlman42977 ай бұрын
What was the fate of the cathedral erected by William the Conqueror in Caen?
@normanalbano93846 ай бұрын
Interesting how they don't say how many French civilians were killed in Caen with all the bombing and shelling. Ok they did - 20k French civilians killed by allied bombing.
@franceyneireland16336 ай бұрын
Some two thousand civilians were killed in the bombing of Caen, during a battle that lasted five weeks longer than the British general Bernard Montgomery had planned
@stevewheatley2437 ай бұрын
My great uncle was there. Wouldn't say much about it though. He fought the Japanese too.
@ervintorres12004 ай бұрын
Two fronts eh 😮 what unit was he in
@stevewheatley2434 ай бұрын
@@ervintorres1200 I don't remember. Just that he was Army. He said he kinda felt sorry for the Japanese. They were too weak from hunger to lift their rifles.
@mikelang80206 ай бұрын
MONTY WAS A SUB PAR GENERAL , OUR PATTON WAS A GREAT GENERAL !
@raywhitehead7305 ай бұрын
Patton was appointed over the 3rd Army 1, August. The Battle of Caen was over 5 , August. Patton was 3 Levels of command, lower then Monty. Through Patton did very well, other American Army commanders, commanding Armies of equal size or bigger did well also, and they faced more German troops. The American publics perception was shaped by the movies. Allowing for a bigger opinion of Patton then warranted.
@ronalddesiderio76253 ай бұрын
Monty was so conservative at Normandy than he comes up with the Market Garden plan. Something doesn’t add up
@MikeWoot-swp3 ай бұрын
*_"At Least I Can Dig A Hole In The Ground"_* -- a statement used to highlight the bright side of being an allied infantrymen in ww¡¡. 😮
@bongo6_4625 ай бұрын
How is the mg42 overengineered
@thejunkyarderАй бұрын
Monty was a overstated General. He had 0 tactical gain and the only operation he planned without being 3-1 in both men, guns & airplane ended in disaster. I speak of course about Operation Market Garden. And here in France Monty said he will take Caen on the first day. It was not tactical genius that drove out the Germans, once again he had to turn to the strength of material ( airplane raid that divested the city ) the the supposed strength of his strategic genius.
@johndawes933716 күн бұрын
drivel
@thejunkyarder16 күн бұрын
@ No, fact
@napsome7 ай бұрын
didn't Canada just recently celebrate a Nazi SS soldier?
@xandervk23716 ай бұрын
Not exactly.
@thomaslinton57657 ай бұрын
The "plan" was to capture Caen on Day 1.
@JohnCampbell-rn8rz6 ай бұрын
The objective was to breach the Atlantic Wall and establish a secure beachhead. That was done. If wars always went exactly according to plan, like war games, there'd be no point in fighting them, would there.
@thomaslinton57656 ай бұрын
@@JohnCampbell-rn8rz Great rationalization.
@ondrejdobrota73447 ай бұрын
Time 49:07 we know complete record. OB West numbers are clear.
@user-vv6sy2ox4q5 ай бұрын
Lots of ignorant comments here about Monty and the Brit/Canadian performance during this campaign. The aim of the campaign was for the Brits to draw in the bulk of the German armor and their forces, in order to make it easier for the Americans to breakout from the western flank. The Americans failed to do that, as did the Brits fail to take Caen. Why? Because the Germans were an extremely capable adversary. Market Garden failed because of the poor performance of Gavin and the 82nd Airborne. Don't forget that Monty had to take command of Bradley's formations during the battle of the Bulge because Bradley was a coward. Monty saved the Americans during the Battle of the Bulge.
@brianplymale39657 ай бұрын
The 45th museum is in OKC actually. On ne 36th st.
@RichardThornton-i4f16 күн бұрын
After seeing this I was shocked to see the aftermath of the battle as if ike wasn't supreme allied commander and gen George s Patton Jr was supreme allied commander there would've been less allied casualties and more of the enemy lost in that battle but like gen George said that the allies would pay a high price in takin the city before wakening up and learning from previous mistakes
@PappyGunn7 ай бұрын
Uh, Caen wasn't the final campaign.
@C020457 ай бұрын
It was part of the defeat of the Nazis armour in the Falaise pocket slaughter. The end of German power. The real victory was delivered by Allied air power.
@haroldfiedler65492 ай бұрын
The British and the Canadians in fact lost 500 tanks in this battle. Don’t try and sugar coat it.
@davidhall232724 күн бұрын
A large amount of those tanks was not a total loss. Many repaired and returned to service. Where for the Germans it was a total loss.
@HowardCaplan-b8l6 ай бұрын
Montgomery should have been sent back to England and all ground troops should have been put under General Patton!!
@burrellbikes49696 ай бұрын
The Germans certainly had no problem shooting at the Third Army if you swapped Patton in.
@johndawes93375 ай бұрын
patton could not even take Metz in the 10 days he said it would take him..3 months and 55k troops lite
@rogercruz63325 ай бұрын
@@johndawes9337Who to believe, to you?or any other history source, ehhhh SMARTASS!!!!
@johndawes93375 ай бұрын
@@rogercruz6332 Patton never understood the need to concentrate his forces. Patton couldn't even take Metz for months. And that had nothing to do with lack of supplies. A 1985 US Army report castigated him. Patton's Lorraine crawl of 10 miles in three months with over 50,000 casualties.In the Lorraine Patton fought a 3rd rate Amy full of deaf men, cooks and soldiers with stomach ulcers - literally. He moved a few miles in 3 months, losing 55,000 men. Even the German commander of Army Group G in the Lorraine, Herman Black, who took over in September 1944 said: ”I have never been in command of such irregularly assembled and ill-equipped troops. The fact that we have been able to straighten out the situation again..... can only be attributed to the bad and hesitating command of the Americans. Within my zone, the Americans never once exploited a success. Often Von Mellenthin, my chief of staff and I, would stand in front of the map and say ‘Patton is helping us: he failed to exploit another success’.”.. Harry Yeide
@johndawes93375 ай бұрын
@@rogercruz6332 maybe you should do some reading and prove that what i wrote is wrong..even money bet you can not..
@stevez78547 ай бұрын
Didn't have to happen montie was supposed to take caun on D-Day
@johndawes93375 ай бұрын
US troops were meant to take St Lo D Day+5 a month late..Cherbourg D Day 8 5 weeks late..can you tell me why?
@maxplanck90553 ай бұрын
What is stand fast? This makes no sense ✌️❤️🇬🇧
@thomaslinton57657 ай бұрын
And Slim was ?
@utuberlesmouches3 ай бұрын
Churchill wrote 3 letters to Roosevelt to beg him to stop bombing Normandie killing + 40 000 french civilians for…nothing (no fighting into these bombed cities , on the run the german army would never stop in the middle of open flatlands ) He wrote : « A mistake (military) and a fault (moraly) » despite the deal was that the politics won t comment : ( Churchill and Roosevelt won’t interfer into strategy once the invasion started to let the overall military management to us ) Anthony Beevor « Battle of Normandy »
@MrStalkerhunter5 ай бұрын
Was the creeping barrage a real thing?
@davidjensen2667 ай бұрын
Why advance with no air support...aaaawhat
@RivetGardener7 ай бұрын
Back then, that was not a thing. Air support was developed by Colone Gabe Gabreski who flew the P-47 Thunderbolt and the Infantry. He was instrumental in getting the infantry radios that could communicate with air, and get bullets and rockets where needed.
@Paul-zf8ob7 ай бұрын
Monty was severely overrated!
@JonnyHolms7 ай бұрын
Let's see 👀 you try and fill his shoes 👞 👟, not trying to insult you because I couldn't do it either...
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
@@JonnyHolmsThat wouldn't be hard.
@JonnyHolms7 ай бұрын
@@joeysausage3437 I imagine that you would have a hard time fighting your way out of a wet paper bag 🎒 never mind doing anything in WW2..
@nickdanger38027 ай бұрын
"The National Army Museum conducted a poll in 2011 to determine Britain’s greatest general. Montgomery’s name was not among the finalists." Bernard Law Montgomery - Military History - Oxford page
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@JonnyHolms 2cd time in one century usa bailed out "jolly ole' england"
@tonyolivari248020 күн бұрын
Montgomery can be summed up in a few words. Large ego, small ability. His one and only real victory at El Alamein can be summed up in one word. Supplies. Montgomery had ample supplies, Rommel didn't. There was no great strategy or tactics employed by Montgomery because the battle field was narrow with the Med on one flank and the desert on the other. Rommel failed in his attempt to go around, ran out of supplies particularly fuel and then had to retreat. Montgomery really did nothing but hold the line with superior numbers of men and materials. Not that hard when a second rate general like Montgomery can do it.
@Jeff-r1q16 күн бұрын
Well one may not know at El Alamein Monty did trick Rommel into going into the swamps !
@tonyolivari248016 күн бұрын
@@Jeff-r1q What stopped Rommel was a shortage of fuel and the spirited defence of Ruweisat Ridge and El Mreir by the New Zealanders. Both the fuel shortage and the stiff resistance by the New Zealanders would have occurred without any input by Monygomery. In addition Montgomery had more than twice as many men, more than twice as many tanks, air superiority and a very short supply line to ample supplies. Blind Freddie would have been odds on to win for the British at El Alamein. Man for man the German soldier was better than the British with only troops like the Australians and New Zealanders truly respected by Rommel. As for commanders the Germans had the best most competent commanders of the war. The allied savior was the idiot Hitler right at the top. Rommel wasn't tricked into going into the 'swamp' he had one and only one chance to break through and he had to risk it. Then when the New Zealanders stopped him he prepared to withdraw to fight another day by falling 'back to Fūka in a two-step withdrawal. That redeployment was well in progress when, soon after midday on November 3, an overriding order came from Hitler, insisting that El-Alamein must be held at all costs. The turnabout doomed any chance that Rommel may have had of making an effective stand, as a resumption of the defense of El-Alamein was an exercise in futility.' www.britannica.com/event/North-Africa-campaigns/Montgomery-in-the-desert. The issue with Hotler was that when mobility failed he fell back on WW1 tactics of holding ground at all costs with no retreat which with the changed battlefield of WW2 was not possible
@vintage3496 ай бұрын
War is war !
@fahmyayoob57757 ай бұрын
Montgomery was a fool
@user-vv6sy2ox4q5 ай бұрын
Completely false. Learn some history fool.
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
Monty was way too cautious.
@parabot27 ай бұрын
And look at the USA now , ha ha .
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
explain!
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
@@casedismissed8581Your case is dismissed.😂
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@uberrox452 weak
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
@@casedismissed8581 Yes . Very WEAK 😔
@casedismissed85817 ай бұрын
@@uberrox452 YAAAAWWWN ! I suspect we're posting from mommie's basement ?
@davidjensen2667 ай бұрын
No it was changing barrels...that was and rush to throw grenades
@asullivan40474 ай бұрын
Excellent still-motion photography pictures along with veteran guest speakers. Enabling viewers to better understand what the orator & guest speakers were describing.😉. Just leave it to the. ( WW-1 ) dispatch runner corporal Hitler😈.
@ronalddesiderio76253 ай бұрын
Why didn’t the Allies make there own 88’s 🤷🏾♂️
@uberrox4527 ай бұрын
I don't even like calling them Hitler's Army . It was the Wehrmacht.
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
So the brits and canadians got bogged down by 15 and 16 year olds the Americas had a picnic with the French civilians? Thats what im getting out of the comments.
@lcwhy7 ай бұрын
That is very disrespectful
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
@@lcwhy Its ment to be. So tired of brits disrespecting the U.S. soldier. The green dye they put in their mushey pea's and the fake vinegar is affecting their judgment.
@markchapman25857 ай бұрын
@@lcwhy he's a slow adult or a dopey kid playing too much Call of Duty
@gryph017 ай бұрын
You are a broken record. You are in every post saying the same thing.
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
@gryph01 The truth bothers you, and I don't know why.
@barryking59936 ай бұрын
By 1944 Hitler was a paranoid junkie
@joeblow-tp6gz6 ай бұрын
Looks like 76MM Sherman at 44:25
@memoulisous23664 ай бұрын
Actually a Sherman firefly with a 17 pounder
@AngeloBarba-s3e4 ай бұрын
Where the US airborne?the series band of brothers. American was never feature.😅
@steveyi28596 ай бұрын
Montgomery had the best mustache of ww2
@trailblazer10477 ай бұрын
Montgomry was way overrated.Everyone knows that.Most of his plans failed.
@TerryOkome7 ай бұрын
Monty was a complete disaster.
@jusinsuarez44457 ай бұрын
Exactly right
@adamkucera90946 ай бұрын
Let’s not forget operation Market Garden.
@hisoverlorduponhigh907 ай бұрын
Unlike the German soldiers, the Allied soldiers knew not why they were fighting.
@jackgraves51217 ай бұрын
Not true. Such spin to defend a rotten ideology that Allied soldiers were determined to defeat, and did. Pootana about to find out, also. 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦💙💙💙
@gryph017 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@김화순-p7w4 ай бұрын
나는 적어도 노르망디에서의 몽고메리와 브래들리의 활약에 대해 좋은 점수를 주지 않습니다. 그들의 작전계획은 너무나 허술해서 많은 젊은 이들이 불필요하게 피를 흘리고 사라져갔습니다. 물론 이후에도 두 장군은 독일로 향한 진격상황에서 많은 실수를 하여 또 많은 젊은이를 희생시킵니다. 나는 이 두 장군을 2차대전에서 가장 무능한 장군으로 꼽습니다. 그러나 아이젠하워는 또한 자신에게 아부하는 사람을 즐겨 사용했습니다. 이 사람들은 병사의 목숨을 파리처럼 생각하는 사람들입니다.
@georgejennings35997 ай бұрын
To many stupid ads
@cjn5856 ай бұрын
Should have boomed the hill
@Steven-vw1sv7 ай бұрын
Thompson ears . Should have even intheir air force ....
@brianaumali65917 ай бұрын
Its 12 million not 6 million!
@burrellbikes49696 ай бұрын
Interesting how spin is still used in describing the fighting. Yes, Caen was an important battle and certainly had severe fighting. But calling it one of the largest battles in the war? The Russians would laugh heartedly at that claim. Calling the Vitman attack a draw? The guy attacked with less than 10 tanks and wiped out far more vehicles and troops than he had. In truth, in that specific action, the Germans certainly handled the Canadians. Similarly, the Americans love to pump up how important their fighting was and how the entire war was won but us. But our troops honestly never faced a majority of the German army in any zone.
@AndrewC.McPherson-xf5zw4 ай бұрын
Nein danke
@LeLoS957 ай бұрын
First
@richardwarner37056 ай бұрын
👶YT, removed my comment 50 times. Because, I defeated their "Everybody uses pronouns" fallacy😆
@extremelycareless25417 ай бұрын
America and Britain were major military countries. The Canadians were FAFO.
@joeysausage34377 ай бұрын
The brits contributed very little to the PACIFIC.
@Robomatic7 ай бұрын
FAFO? The German high command always wanted to know where the Canadians were. They knew that the Canadians were the shock troops for many of the campaigns of WW2 in Italy and Western Europe. Remember that on D-day the Canadians penetrated furthest and reached more of their objectives than the Brits and Yanks.
@bobedwards41777 ай бұрын
You need a haircut.
@montrelouisebohon-harris70237 ай бұрын
Sticky bombs!😂😂 that was an American thing because the Americans were always chewing gum, and if they were running low on ammunition, they would make some handmade accelerant and put it in a balloon and stick a piece of bubblegum to it, and walk up to the side of the tank and stick it to the German tank😂😂😂
@AndrewAustinFrustrated7 ай бұрын
British commandos were using sticky bombs in 1942 before the Americans entered the North African or European theatres they were not an invention of the Americans I'm pretty sure the Germans also had a sticky bomb during Barbarossa.
@nickdanger38027 ай бұрын
The "Grenade, Hand, Anti-Tank No. 74", commonly known as the S.T. grenade[a] or simply sticky bomb, was a British hand grenade designed and produced during the Second World War. The grenade was one of a number of ad hoc anti-tank weapons developed for use by the British Army and Home Guard after the loss of many anti-tank guns in France after the Dunkirk evacuation.
@trailblazer10477 ай бұрын
Talk about a one sided story telling.
@C020457 ай бұрын
Montgomery was regarded with contempt by Canadian s and Polish.
@lyleslaton30867 ай бұрын
Somebody named Monty said he would take Caen on D+3.
@mistershepherd68087 ай бұрын
D+1 I believe was his plan.
@katana2587 ай бұрын
then stopped on the beach for days
@robertsolomielke51347 ай бұрын
I never cared for Monty either, or US Gen. Mark Clark at Anzio, the "beached whale" in Italian flanking attack fiasco. If he snatched Rome fast, as was possible at first days, Normandy may have been unneeded.