It's great how you take the time to explain units! I'm feeling a lot better about this now. Thanks a bunch!
@micheleberkey9 жыл бұрын
You are welcome, I absolutely believe in UNITS getting us to the correct answer. :) Glad it helped.
@netchill57729 ай бұрын
Thank you SOO much!!! This is the only video that actually breaks everything down and makes it easy to understand!:)
@kagenw10 жыл бұрын
I actually came here looking for some help in calculating the molar mass of carbon dioxide, but your helpful instructions in your explanation of oxygen were enough to clarify that in my mind. Thank you!
@micheleberkey10 жыл бұрын
Fantastic!!
@yumiogawa8824 Жыл бұрын
You are the best!!! Thank you so much !!! I found simple way to calculate !
@micheleberkey Жыл бұрын
Thank you and I am SO glad the video helped you! :)
@simpatiko867 жыл бұрын
Explained perfectly by breaking all concepts of units clearly. Thank you very much!
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I am a firm believer that cancelling units will always get us to the correct answer! :)
@7icecube710 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I have midterms coming up for my Chemistry class in uni and this cleared it up :)
@Kerwyn2048 жыл бұрын
finally someone that explained this well! THANK U!!
@micheleberkey4868 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU for the comment and dedication to find a good explanation!!! :)
@micheleberkey4868 жыл бұрын
For some reason your second question does not show up here.... I am not sure how you could have gotten that answer because that's NOT my first guess, that the square root was not taken.....I enter 3 x 8.314 x 298 then divide by 0.032 - no parenthesis needed since it's all mult/div. Maybe you're putting parenthesis somewhere? So I get 223272 then I take the square root (or raise that answer to the 0.5). :) Hope that helps....
@albertcuevas3236 жыл бұрын
You saved my life, God bless you!
@micheleberkey6 жыл бұрын
Fantastic!! This calculation has many possible errors along the way that are very easily made. UNITS are always the key (for me anyway). :))
@nattcattt8 жыл бұрын
Very clear, no room for confusion. Thank you
@micheleberkey8 жыл бұрын
+Nat Cat Awesome!! Thank YOU!! :)
@Griffinplay9 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Best explanation on KZbin
@micheleberkey4869 жыл бұрын
+Griffin Layne Thank you!! That's a great way to start my day!! Glad it helped!!
@dom_the3166 Жыл бұрын
I forget that chemists don't use negative powers in their units
@JO-ej3nh8 жыл бұрын
You are amazing, thank you! It is so simple now.
@micheleberkey8 жыл бұрын
Thank you for that comment!! The equation can be a bit intimidating, especially if you want to see what happens to all those units. :)
@sagheerahmad-hw9tq3 жыл бұрын
I actually need to know, like how to calculate it without calculator,.....😶🙁plz help
@pooja-nh2lv3 жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining
@avishekmajumder84143 жыл бұрын
This vid still helpful xD, i got confused in the units of gas constant lel
@micheleberkey3 жыл бұрын
So glad the video helped and the units are tricky here! :))
@GoblinNutts9 жыл бұрын
Thank You for making this video.. I totally understand how to do it now!
@micheleberkey4869 жыл бұрын
+Ricky Gornek That's great to know!! Thanks for viewing. :)
@epic79066 жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much ..without you i cant do my Numericals..i made a mistake on 'C like 100'C. I add it without change it in Kelvin like i should do this 100 + 273 = 373 ..Now i know my mistake because of you ...Thankyou So much ..You are Great ..Keep it up Mam..From Karachi,Pakistan
@micheleberkey6 жыл бұрын
Greetings to you in Pakistan!! I am glad the video was helpful, most equations require specific units, and as you are probably aware, many units have other units hidden in them. Using units is SO important in getting the correct answer in cases like this. Thank you for the comments and keep up the studying. :)
@epic79066 жыл бұрын
Michele Berkey Thanks mam
@manomanomano16976 жыл бұрын
A bundle of thanxxxx ma'm...m so happyyyyyyyy
@janvigupta5584 жыл бұрын
thanku so much : )
@micheleberkey4 жыл бұрын
You're so welcome! :)
@auravstomar76296 жыл бұрын
Hey there ! Nice video. Could you please explain why we can't use the other R = 0.0821 ?? I'm somewhat confused...
@micheleberkey6 жыл бұрын
Hi & thank you. The R value of 0.0821 has units of Liter x atmosphere in the numerator (which does work out to an energy unit, Energy being Force x distance). Converting Liters to meters^3 and since pressure is Force/area (m^2), the result of V x P = Force x meter. But for your specific question, since units must always cancel only leaving the appropriate unit(s) of the value in question, the R value of 8.314 is uses because its numerator is not L x atm, but rather Joule (J) and the Joule unit is a unit of force (Newton) x meter. And a Newton is a combination of units. In physics mainly, you'd see force units a lot, and Newton's first law of motion is that a Force = mass x acceleration, mass in kg and acceleration is the change in velocity per second, so has units of m/s per second, which becomes m/s^2. In my opinion, all problems to be solved come down to determining the units for what is asked for, and then making sure all other units cancel. The equation for the rms speed will give the speed in m/s only if Joule is present. Hope that helps!
@ManzilSafarAurBaateinOfficial4 жыл бұрын
Why some times they Multiply the given mass with proton mass???
@micheleberkey3 жыл бұрын
Sorry I did not see this and I don't have an answer for your question unless it's the speed of a hydrogen atom?? Then Boltzmann's constant would be used instead of the R value - just throw out a hand waving possibility??
@WhoPlaysMc7 жыл бұрын
Perfect explanation.
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
Thank you, I hope it cleared up any confusion. :)
@Dodeforel11 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks. :)
@micheleberkey236411 жыл бұрын
Thank YOU!! :)
@sidxaener54557 жыл бұрын
god that pencil is so satisfying !
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
LOL, isn't it though?? 0.9 mm lead, I'd use 1.8 if it was available!! :)
@sidxaener54557 жыл бұрын
hope u'd use 1.8 in your next videos lol
@bobgut43849 жыл бұрын
Thaaaaank Yoooou!!! your the best :D
@micheleberkey4869 жыл бұрын
+Bob Gut Thank you Bob for the kind comment! I am very happy it was helpful. :)
@mdaishakhan93197 жыл бұрын
hii can you are from where and which college you are going say and which country
@dannylee9816 жыл бұрын
life saver
@micheleberkey6 жыл бұрын
So glad it helped you out! :)
@berroairesp.45094 жыл бұрын
A bunch of thanks❤️
@ImJustStandingHereMenacingly7 жыл бұрын
GOD BLESS YOUR SOUL
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU!! :)
@sam_30547 жыл бұрын
what if its in NTP and not at 25 degree will it still be the same? or 25 degree is NTP itself?
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
Hi Sammy: The oddest thing to me is that NTP Temp is 0 Celsius not 25 Celsius (298K) as most tabulated data is. So when the temperature is NOT 273 K, the ideal gas law would need to be used with 298 K.
@onetapserve21437 жыл бұрын
I love ur pencil 😂😂😂✌🏻Thanku for the explanation
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
Thank you - I love it too! 9.0 mm lead!! And you're welcome, thanks for the view! :)
@starshipengine5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Great video. could you please help me figure out a formula for the speed of oxygen, when its under a pressure difference.. flowing through a pipe, or a hose. I think have density figured for 293.2 degK .. and a pressure drop of say 10Bar. How can I add a pressure change into the equation.. if that makes sense
@micheleberkey5 жыл бұрын
Hi and thank you for the view! I've contemplated this for a bit and cannot figure out how to approach this at a different pressure. If the pressure increases (and the gas is in a sealed container like a pipe), then that would increase the temperature of the gas, using PV=nRT, since oxygen behaves in an ideal manner. I'm not sure how to incorporate that into the formula for the rms speed, maybe delta P x V = nR delta T? and increase the T in the rms formula by that amount??? Great question, sorry I have no answer.... :)
@moeedbaloch95815 жыл бұрын
Can you solve it MKS system
@TheArnoldification8 жыл бұрын
So basically PatrickJMT but not at sanic speed. Huh.
@SkyeKing8 жыл бұрын
One oxygen atom does not weigh 16 grams silly! One mol of oxygen (6.02*10^23 oxygen atoms) weighs 16 grams. Otherwise, this is an excellent explanation!
@micheleberkey8 жыл бұрын
I SOO stand corrected!! Thank you!! :)
@JO-ej3nh8 жыл бұрын
She kinda stated that the 16g of oxygen represented the molar mass which is correct. She also state that the mass would have the units of g/mol so she was still correct technically speaking. :)
@micheleberkey8 жыл бұрын
And thanks for 'sticking up for me' LOL. ;) I get lazy in my speech at times.....
@andrewmelcher4503 жыл бұрын
It's a common mistake not to convert to kg
@micheleberkey3 жыл бұрын
Yes, for the students who have NOT taken physics, this often causes an error. :)
@shubhambhatt52414 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@melftheelf9 жыл бұрын
thank ms berkey
@micheleberkey4869 жыл бұрын
+Fed You are welcome Fed. :)
@mdaishakhan93197 жыл бұрын
hii please say me you are which country and which college are you going to say and please say me your college an country because I am going to apply study visa for forgen please can you suggest me a better country and college for study and your chemistry is excellent
@shadabbasir52245 жыл бұрын
rms ko mks system m kesy calculate kry?
@RiggyRonnie7 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much I feel enlightened and more confident. I wasn't there the day my physics teacher went over all of this
@micheleberkey7 жыл бұрын
Fantastic! Confidence is crucial and enlightenment is even better! Thanks for the view and comment. :)