Your 7 minute explanation with visuals helped me understand way more than the textbook's long text and the teacher's 1 hour lecture.
@danielolmos5315 Жыл бұрын
CP SLO
@rayanallouzi88063 жыл бұрын
I couldn't imagine what was happening for the life of me... this made it so clear, thanks a lot man.
@shreya88302 жыл бұрын
This is probably the 3rd video that I am watching and I think all the animations that you use are very beneficial! Such videos are very helpful and they cover the basic of that topic in a very less time and that is highly appreciated!! Thanks!!
@bipedalnarwhal2773 жыл бұрын
Way easier to understand than my textbook, thanks Professor Dave!
@AlexAlvarado-d2f Жыл бұрын
Professor Dave deserves every good thing that comes to him in life.
@audreyalvarez85762 жыл бұрын
ive been lost for 2 semesters your video was the only one that made sense to me thank you for explaining it amazing
@codexcodexcodex2 жыл бұрын
The animation in revolving the function is so satisfying.
@mryup61004 жыл бұрын
Your explanations are otherworldly!
@Asad_Ullah3 жыл бұрын
So you don't understand.
@oliehaku5143 ай бұрын
man I'm studying for a test and I would've been absolutely screwed if not for your really easy to understand videos, thank you so much!
@mixalisp28674 күн бұрын
lost the a two hour lecture yesterday that was about this video and the previous one with the disk. these 20 mins of video made up for the whole lecture. even the notes that i got from my classmates had the same examles! thanks Dave
@griest54933 жыл бұрын
I don't get how the average radius magically becomes r. Its clearly a value greater than r1 and less than r2 but you show it to be equal to r2 when you claim that 2*pi*r is the circumference of the outer circle at 4:07.
@yeetri10343 жыл бұрын
I was wondering the same thing
@brainloading5543 Жыл бұрын
I'd like to learn that kind of magic too
@lamaduchamatkapalihena94016 ай бұрын
they just make the difference so small that (r1-r2) which is delta r becomes dx in the limit, and when the difference is so small (r1+r2)/2 magically becomes r cus r1 almost equal to r2. dunno if this is correct.
@veronikabat81716 жыл бұрын
I'm only in 8th form of school, i don't understand some things ,but i really like your videos. Thank you!
@38Fanda5 жыл бұрын
do it chronologically
@TheFirstNamelessOne5 жыл бұрын
Work hard, you'll eventually understand. I was in 7th grade when i was starting to wonder, why.
@crismal64774 жыл бұрын
Nameless same I’m in 7th right now though
@colinking33143 жыл бұрын
Im a senior and this shits rly hard lmao
@noahkatz263 Жыл бұрын
@@colinking3314lol and 7th grader really tryna understand it
@kiplangatenockmutai3 жыл бұрын
Your work professor is marvellous I love it thank you so much, please add more work for calculating volumes,
@sukhmeetsinghsodhi32612 жыл бұрын
The most to the point (time saving) and easy to understand teaching method. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!🙌🙌😍😍
@tiffingbird2 жыл бұрын
Never thought i'd be coming to this channel for homework help and not watching you absolutely wreck the discovery institute but here we are i guess, thanks man
@RadoHudran2 жыл бұрын
5:00 is the first time I heard we integrate from 0 to 2. Anyway, rn I don't get how Δr disappeared at 4:25, or how it became dx. I'll have to think that one through. In the future feel free to ask how, me if I'll find out I can explain
@TheeDeadCreator2 жыл бұрын
thats what im wondering...
@nezz0r11 ай бұрын
I think it is because: m = f'(x) = dy/dx = (f(x+a) - f(x)) / (x + h - x) = (f(x+a) - f(x)) / a so dx = a = x2 - x1 and in calculus as far as I know normally dx = Δx while dy != Δy. In this video r = x and by that dx = r2 - r1 which would be Δr. At least I think that is the reason why. If I'm wrong you may correct me.
@biggerthaninfinity76043 жыл бұрын
Your video had great explanation, and I really liked that you had 3 dimensional models.
@Kiky_MedPhysicist3 ай бұрын
Thank you sir for your dedication and for making this free! 🙏
@saurabhbabu2845 жыл бұрын
U cleared my concept about volume using solid revolution. Thanku Sir
@christopher81994 жыл бұрын
thank you professor Dave for making these videos
@tomasbeltran040502 жыл бұрын
4:07 why does C have a circumference of a circle with the greater radius instead of the average radius? (In the graphic)
@Ando1607944 жыл бұрын
per my understanding 2pixh is a surface area of cillinder at point x and by integration through x basically we get area integrated through x and hence the volume of shape. That's how I see it.
@1em0n_ade8 ай бұрын
Surviving through your explanations this quarter 🙏 ... our professional did not care if the students understood
@selenaz67953 жыл бұрын
best video ever. I love you so much. U r literally saving the world by nurturing future scholars
@doomshroomish2654 жыл бұрын
professor dave saves my grade once again
@Velnio_Išpera10 күн бұрын
4:30 where is delta r in the integral?
@Velnio_Išpera10 күн бұрын
delta r is dx basically.
@AndrewRamirez-t9y3 ай бұрын
This 7 minute video taught me more than a 2.5 hour lecture from my professor.
@jamessu-37810 ай бұрын
Greatest professor in human history
@aliaaelborai94657 ай бұрын
Thank you professor Dave for your great work.
@woodant19812 жыл бұрын
Paying my uni 3k per year to watch KZbin on my own!! "Go to uni it'll be fun"😂
@user-lr2kp2dt5jАй бұрын
Thank you, thank you thank you thank you so much. You are amazing. I didn’t know how to explain my feelings.
@szilike_104 жыл бұрын
while findig the formula for the volume of the cilincrical shell, I don't get how could 2*pi*r be the circumference of the cilinder, since r2 is obviously the radius for its base circle, not the avarege radius. am I not noticing something?
@ProfessorDaveExplains4 жыл бұрын
the circumference of a circle is pi times its diameter, which is twice its radius.
@szilike_104 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains right but you said r was the average radius, not the bigger one
@szilike_104 жыл бұрын
It might be though the difference is approaching to 0 when you deal with infinitessimals
@akbro234 жыл бұрын
@@szilike_10 still didn't get it. Did you understand?
@bisum17903 жыл бұрын
Same doubt
@Attalla-t9b7 ай бұрын
4:27 where does delta r go?
@Velnio_Išpera10 күн бұрын
delta r is dx basically.
@dummydummy5841 Жыл бұрын
How will the formula change if the function revolved about a line other than y or x axis? Say it revolved about x=4.
@chinmayeeshabadi53494 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained the main concept.
@thegrandweasel19264 ай бұрын
why is it when calculating volume of a revolution with circles, we integrate a circle without a thichness onlly pi*r^2 but with cylindrical shells we add a thickness, why can't we use 2pi*r*h?
@thegrandweasel19264 ай бұрын
I just realised the thickness (delta r) may just be dx but I am not sure
@rickychaos71193 жыл бұрын
ty for helping me more than my college professors
@babakshahed5 жыл бұрын
perfect, thank you so much
@neonknowledgehub91723 жыл бұрын
In comprehension , why you put integrated version of the f(x) in V formula . Please explain 1nd and 2nd step
@laibaashfaq45355 жыл бұрын
suppose that a cylindrical can is designed to have a radius of 1 inc . and a height of 5 inc, but that the radius and height are off by amounts dr=+0.03 and dh=-0.01. estimate the resulting absolute change in the volume of a can
@qazimuhammadosama73813 жыл бұрын
How the equation was written at 4:25 ?
@thisriceiswhite5371 Жыл бұрын
THE ABSOLUTE BEST
@Algebrainiac11 ай бұрын
Is this not on a calculus textbook??? I can’t find it anywhere. Maybe I’m looking wrong
@siphamandladhlamini86885 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave you are the best.
@bbugrayuksel2 жыл бұрын
I understand that we just call the average value of the radii 'r', but why did we call (r2-r1) delta r? I did not get that part at all.
@alvideor2 жыл бұрын
r2 - r1 is how much we have moved along the x-axis to get the next cylindrical shell, so this is delta x. When we integrate, we make each shell infinitely thin and so we set this delta x to approach 0 in the limit. You can think of this approach as those old style pirate telescopes that have smaller cylinders inside larger cylinders and can extend or collapse. Only here you've got infinitely many of them and each one is infinitely thin. The height of the cylinders follows the function. When you collapse them all inside each other, you get the whole bundt cake. When you integrate you're summing up the infinitesimal volumes of the cylinders by going along the x-axis (moving r2-r1 by an infestimal amount each time). You only need to integrate from 0 to 2 because each change in x gives you the whole cylinder shell. no need to worry about -2 to 0, that volume is already included.
@TheAuraEngineer4 ай бұрын
Why are we able to swap out the average of r for r?
@dexiexo21992 жыл бұрын
Can I integrate the surface area of a cylinder without the top and bottom area to get the solution
@doumasama56545 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation
@studiant30043 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jesus, I knew you would help me some day!
@jean-pierrevandermerwe76044 ай бұрын
This bundt cake looking thing cracked me up lol
@ddroidgaming139 ай бұрын
Im so amazed I actually got it correct thank you
@alialawadhi80965 жыл бұрын
How did u get the 0 to 2 interval?
@pchander1005 жыл бұрын
Because we are trying to find the volume generated by rotating the curve between x=0 and x=2.
@aimanaltaf88722 жыл бұрын
Can please u expalin how can we take value of a and b if it is not mention in question
@epicm999 Жыл бұрын
You find the zeros of the function. Set the function equal to 0 and solve for all values of x, then look for the two positive values and see if they fall within the bound you're given. Hope this helps!
@sainathreddyvarikuti48356 жыл бұрын
Why u took mean radius 'r' in total volume
@alvideor2 жыл бұрын
At the limit we set Delta r to equal 0, and so r2-r1=0. At that point r2=r1=r and r2 + r1 just equals 2r. No need to bring up the average even, just keep in mind that at the limit we're dealing with infinitesimals.
@Lalalalalalaallala4 жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain how he got the range 0 to 2
@MakeupByAnanyaSharma4 жыл бұрын
Because it is when the function crosses x-axis again You can see in the beginning he took only a certain region to "wrap" around the y axis and that region varied from x=0 to x=2. { equate f(x) to zero and we get two roots ..0 and 2 }
@tauntaun713 жыл бұрын
@@MakeupByAnanyaSharma Thank you!
@CECELIAOWUOR Жыл бұрын
How did you get the radius please
@tdrawdy22 жыл бұрын
Where did you get the limits of integration in the main example shown?
@dramaticreaper Жыл бұрын
Same thought, I think he forgot to mention that it was a made up example.
@angelineconsulta67235 жыл бұрын
Is the solution still the same even if there is another given like y=1. Does it matter in solving this.
@krapsenhelb1804 жыл бұрын
I guess it's only the border of the integration
@anysianas50994 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor Dave
@anuragtiwari22706 жыл бұрын
Sir plz also make a tutorial about physics or astronomy.. waiting for it. From the last 1 year. Only math series is going on
@ProfessorDaveExplains6 жыл бұрын
buddy, i've done like 60 tutorials on physics already! astronomy is coming very soon, i'm filming it now.
@pchander1005 жыл бұрын
Brilliant..!
@az44754 жыл бұрын
Where is the thickness in the volume formula when you integrated it?
@xxmemestar69xx823 жыл бұрын
It’s just dx.
@ya002785 жыл бұрын
you deserve more subscribers!
@infernalspy01764 жыл бұрын
Ikr I was thinking the same
@md.sirazulislam8835 жыл бұрын
thanks mr
@atulbarman77502 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@purpetualbeats4 жыл бұрын
Dave is the goat
@aiqnvc88833 жыл бұрын
thanks for the video
@bl5550 Жыл бұрын
Why did you evaluate from 0 to 2
@tristanchisholm58574 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@beratdikmen61176 жыл бұрын
it is very useful thx
@JJmyri8 ай бұрын
isnt it wrong in 4min mark, the line C should be in between r2 and r1
@Rahoz-mg6gw3 жыл бұрын
U are the best and i hope u know that .
@kellyli95614 жыл бұрын
why make a value from 0 to 2 how did it come
@samialjailani55873 жыл бұрын
solve for y=0 and find the x intercepts
@be.on_teach74153 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@slickyy21 Жыл бұрын
Tried Solving the comprehension check Problem- Wasted more than 2 hours, but couldn't really solve after all-i understand the concept but i just got stuck at arithmetic shit at the end- These kind of things really mess with your motivation....... Should i give up?
@silkynarula15564 жыл бұрын
Why didn't dy in place of dx?
@hana299712 жыл бұрын
Because we used the technique of cylindrical shells we don't have to make things in terms of y
@sheababeyeah5 жыл бұрын
best explanation on this topic, goooood shit
@SoGodCreatedManInHisOwnImage Жыл бұрын
thank you, Mathematixcs Jesus
@sts24857 ай бұрын
How tf did r1+r2/2=r???
@thuclinhoannguyen333411 ай бұрын
thank you professsorrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
@jester60ify2 жыл бұрын
I thought that you were dealing with a cones shaped curve
@pranjalchand67928 ай бұрын
@justinbrannon63912 жыл бұрын
uhhhh are the bounds the x intercepts or y intercepts
@themysteriousfox37672 жыл бұрын
thanks math jesus
@eudaimoniapeisithanatos22524 жыл бұрын
00:09 here you go
@refus_global2 жыл бұрын
soo.. the volume of big jello
@aheedatif6326 Жыл бұрын
Istg old professors needs to retire if they can't help their students 😒
@anjanaa5715 Жыл бұрын
Hlo
@zoya8083 жыл бұрын
h
@marvinclark7277 Жыл бұрын
why you add +1 on the "2x³- x⁴" that it has been already a power rule?