California Propositions | Breaking down all 10 on the Nov 5, 2024 ballot

[@Linguinestick6]

0:00 - Intro 1:02 - Prop 2 2:46 - Prop 3 4:06 - Prop 4 6:03 - Prop 5 8:02 - Prop 6 10:26 - Prop 32 12:33 - Prop 33 14:17 - Prop 34 16:50 - Prop 35 20:10 - Prop 36

[@ShellyBomb]

@Linguinestick6 ~ 🗳️ ... Thank you! I was looking for information on Measure C, but I guess it isn't covered here; however, thank you for your breakdown!! 💙 💙 💙

[@GabrielaChaves-gy7jo]

Thank you for this

[@wvvwwvwvv]

Thank you

[@idread3523]

Thanks

[@Entertainm897]

Thank you for your kindness 🌹

[@gothicel]

This is AMAZING, I was hoping to see this kind of break down for a long time now.

[@Ya-Right]

VOTE NO ON ALL NEW TAXES!!! Watch Carl DeMaio Reform California For an amazing easy to understand Voter Guide For all of California and more. You won't believe the truth.

[@SavageListener]

Filing out my ballot now. I hate the language and double negatives used on ballots and need a simplified video to guide my decisions. Thank you CBS 8!

[@Ya-Right]

VOTE NO ON ALL NEW TAXES!!! Watch Carl DeMaio Reform California For an amazing easy to understand Voter Guide For all of California and more. You won't believe the truth.

[@nafeidt]

I am not even a Californian but I like this video! Great editing, clear communication, and awesome that Californians have a say in their government.

[@J.E.Lockwood]

Don't we all have that, regardless of State of residency?

[@jamesbutler174]

Proposition bond measures that borrow billions of dollars are not FREE. Every time you vote for a bond measure to borrow billions, the tax payer must pay it back. This is done by adding a line to every property tax bill in the State. The bond line does not drop off the property tax bill until it is paid in full, years if not decades down the road. I have Prop bond measures still on my bill from 2005. While the idea of billions for schools sounds wholesome, the reality is the California Educational system draws 50% of all property tax dollars already. The system is not underfunded, it has more money than the Gross National Product of entire Nations. The money is just mismanaged and mis-spent. These Props for billions come up every year, and people still vote yes with no idea it's costing them personally. Because when you vote yes to these bonds, they must be paid back. If you are a renter, and you vote yes to these bonds, then you have no right to complain about the rent going up. Your landlord's property tax goes up, and they raise the rent to cover the increase. This is why the rent is so high in California. You vote yes on a Prop Bond for billions, property taxes must pay for the bond, and the increase is passed to the renter. It's sad the media never explains what is really happening.

[@JannatMiranda]

Properly said.

[@Paul-sk2pc]

I will NEVER vote yes on ANY tax or bond, regardless of its purpose. Here is what I learned about CA over the years. We have THE highest taxes, so the state already has money. The ONLY reason it is not enough is because CA mismanaged or waste spending (24 billions on homeless and nothing). Not enough for something? Cut spending somewhere else.

[@CatNair]

Thank you!

[@seanmatthewking]

That's not why rent is high, rent is high because there are major obstacles to building more housing. That has lead to high cost of housing for home-buyers and renters alike. The bonds and property tax in general are based on property values. Values and rents have surged because housing supply is constrained, and increased values drives up property taxes. It's just inaccurate do blame housing costs on anything but the artificial constraining of housing supply.

[@elizabethbetty2662]

A resounding NO on proposition 5.

[@carolynritchie694]

Thank you. This non-biased explanation of all the propositions was very helpful ❤

[@SirKabawl]

Great informative breakdown of the propositions, much appreciated.

[@jaker4ster]

This is so well done. Exactly what I needed. Great job!

[@martykimble9999]

This is just more propaganda! Don't be fooled. All these propositions are just ways to raise taxes!!

[@protectork9831]

No on all bonds . It just aligns the pockets of rich friends of government. Remember high speed rail , money for roads , schools and homeless .

[@phoebecat6449]

Thank you! Please do this, forever!

[@NatalieJ22]

Thank you!! I was pretty sure I knew how I wanted to vote but this helped me feel more confident that I actually know what I’m voting for

[@jigenking6324]

No more money given to the government and no to anything that will raise our taxes.....they need to learn how to handle their books.....we pay some of the highest taxes in the country already.

[@el_queso_fresco5240]

Nothing in these props increase taxes tf you smoking

[@narcman81]

@@el_queso_fresco5240it literally says it will cost taxpayers

[@protectork9831]

@@el_queso_fresco5240money is magic . It comes from trees . I know it’s difficult to understand

[@somanygustavosonYT]

​@@el_queso_fresco5240there's no accountability, if it mentions the word taxes in it, it probably isn't in our benefit

[@chelseasmith4753]

​@@el_queso_fresco5240 Ah, you must have missed Prop 5 and also the potential impacts of Prop 2, Prop 4, Prop 35, and Prop 36.

[@conormcelroy1479]

This was a great resource. Thanks for doing this!

[@BettyBlack99]

Our Govt needs to tell us where the homeless billions went before they get another dime. They do not have the credit to take out a single bond. Start cutting out the waste & less Govt is better. These guys really really don’t want 36 to pass. They even came up with last minute tough on crime policies which are way too little too late. Yes on 36, yes on the gays, no on any bonds, no on rent control. No one anything that doesn’t put $ back in OUR pocket. The nerve of them asking for more billions. They r nuts

[@wstadlock]

Exactly!

[@YuShawStang]

For homeless matter, I heard someone mentioned there is no audit and the public would not know where the money goes.

[@cannabisflame]

if California had a credit score, it would be in the lower 300's

[@chelseasmith4753]

​@@YuShawStang Here in my county they awarded the $23 million (or maybe is was $30million?) for retrofitting an old motel to a 3rd party developer (Shangri-La) that embezzled all the money and then filed for bankruptcy! The ONLY good thing is that a California state judge is blocking the Bankruptcy but still now you know they've got the money hidden somewhere and certainly not giving the money back and of course now we still don't have any money or housing for the homeless.... No real accountability has turned this country in to a massive Ponzi Scheme. These "developers" need to be imprisoned just as much if not even more than the snatch and grab thieves and drug peddlers.

[@oscar_2190]

Thank you guys!! Y’all made it easier to understand. Go out and vote today folks!

[@memory-nownow-anticipation7087]

Why spend 17 billion on schools if they are closing them ? Who actually gets that money ?

[@mslpfanatik]

What schools are being closed??

[@memory-nownow-anticipation7087]

@@mslpfanatik In LA, Catholic schools. In Greater Pasadena, public schools. There is smaller enrollment than in the past.

[@gtripmusic2906]

​@@memory-nownow-anticipation7087 fewer children are being born hence why they need immigrants

[@itz.rafael]

@@memory-nownow-anticipation7087catholic schools aren’t actual schools.

[@purplemist7]

​@@memory-nownow-anticipation7087 What is the percentage compared to total schools in the state?

[@jenniferdean2749]

Thank you Neda and Brandon for this excellent piece; very helpful as I am preparing to cast my ballot. The visuals and user-friendly language is so helpful and needed as we make informed decisions. Sharing out the link to my friends!

[@Tulareguy]

I'm tired of California taxing us, flight back. Vote no on all tax hikes

[@purplemist7]

Yes, flight back 😂✈

[@simplybysuzie]

Have a safe flight. ✈️

[@Zackarandruid]

This is such a great break down of everything. Thank you guys so so so much

[@nikkiprak]

This is AWESOME and thank you so much for make it clear for me. Filling out my ballot now.

[@markfitzurka9995]

Thanks to all that worked on this project it was a big help. Well done

[@elitenoob1147]

for the prop 2, i though that the taxes from legal weed was going to go to schools. what ever happened to that.

[@kmff8]

They never use tax revenue the way they sell it to us. This is why I no longer vote for tax increases. Learn how to balance a budget as us regular people must do.

[@Rascal77s]

The politicians stole the money just like with the lottery. Any money you vote yo give them will be stolen. Remember the bullet train to nowhere that was never built? What happened to the $10 billion that was spent on it? Nobody knows, but there sure are a lot of 'consultants' that are fat and happy because of it. What happened to the $30 billion for ending homelessness? Nobody knows, but there sure are a lot more homeless people in CA. see how things work?

[@mslpfanatik]

I thought it was going to help fund youth programs and to fight drug abuse. For both the state and local governments it's probably just being put in the general fund. That means locally a fair portion will go to public safety.

[@JannatMiranda]

​@mslpfanatik, what public safety? Cops don't even want to work, and schools need new surveillance systems as WE went through a lot of elementary kids who went MISSING. HAS BEEN LIKE A PANDEMIC and detectives play the long game by then kids have gotten into gangs, prostitution, drugs, physical and mental abuse, rape, violence, trauma etc. Yes 10+ yr olds sadly.

[@jokh9992]

They don't know where the money had gone too. No accountability.

[@michellereidemail]

excellent segment! Thank you so much!!

[@Nancy........]

More bonds again?!!! They have been closing schools all over the Bay.. renovating?? Schools look the same...

[@sebastianorozco1114]

All it is is money for Newscum and his cronies to launder

[@deannafoster9721]

Right. Renovating schools isn't going to do anything for the shit education kids are given. lol

[@snaxs2000]

Anything that has the word BOND means borrowing. And the tax payers will pay the interest on that borrowed money. Vote NO on these tax increases.

[@Tounguepunchfartbox]

Ok but if that infrastructure is profitable, ie creates value to the economy, then it pays for itself. If we install covers on canals and save hundreds of millions of gallon of water annually, we are creating value for agriculture. You should invest in infrastructure.

[@portcybertryx222]

It may be shortsighted to vote no on some of these.

[@snaxs2000]

@@portcybertryx222 YES on 34 and YES 36

[@chelseasmith4753]

​@@Tounguepunchfartbox Trust me I want invest in infrastructure, water, schools, healthcare, etc but after seeing all the previous prop/bond money being embezzled with zero accountability I don't trust them to make moral or financially sound choices let alone give them a $10 billion dollar credit card to run amok with. I'm done lining their pockets at our expense.

[@ramonz.8857]

@@chelseasmith4753fr, there is zero accountability as to how the money given to schools is managed. I worked at high schools for a while and saw how much these schools received, while seeing how little the school did to properly place and create plans to use that money. The money is there, it’s just never been spent properly

[@lucynajjar7121]

This was a long time coming! I could sit with my ballot and mark as you went from prop to prop! Now do one for the Measures PLEASE!!!! Great job I am going to make sure all my adult children know about this.... once again GREAT EZ BREEZY JOB GANG!!!!!

[@mflaherty]

Awesome explanation- good job everyone

[@riquisimx]

Y'all are doing great work, thank you for this breakdown!

[@Stoney_Snark]

This is an excellent and fair overview, informative and helpful.

[@RandomRyter]

Yes

[@CarlosMendez-gd2zm]

A lot of borrowing money and raising taxes with no plan in the future and how the borrowing is going to get paid back. This is why California is going down the drain.

[@Diana-nj6og]

No on prop 2 and prop 4. Prop 2, those who want to earn their degrees, graduate highschool will do so whether the building is outdated or not. Besides I have two friends who are educators and the consensus is young childern and adults have no home training and are pissing away their education anyways. So why spend money on a lost cause generation, buying them all ipads giving them state of the art tools or fancy modern buildings isnt going to make those bad kids want to learn anymore than they already donttt

[@purplemist7]

California is the richest state. WTF are you talking about?😂

[@cameronrhodes7390]

Yes California is the richest state but are the people that’s the real question. Here is an example, I’ll use gun laws. Chicago has the strongest gun laws in the country so it should be safe but it’s not then what’s the problem.

[@DanMizu]

@@cameronrhodes7390 You described the opposite. We're voting on these props that supposedly end up coming out of our pockets yet we're the richest state, the richest people want to live here, best programs, etc etc.

[@thegoldstandard55]

Love this explanation. Vote no on all bond measures and higher taxes.

[@MelMonroeShow]

Well, you're going to be taxed regardless, so I'd say vote on the measures that support HOW you'd like that tax money spent.

[@sidvesterseamenloid34]

I thought they said it’s in the budget for the state every year that needs to be subtracted so doesn’t that mean no new taxes or am I dumb

[@thegoldstandard55]

@@sidvesterseamenloid34 Does money grow on trees? You gotta pay for the useless bonds somehow. They might not raise taxes now but they will later or cut spending on roads to pay for the nonsense global warming bonds.

[@thegoldstandard55]

@@MelMonroeShow After waste, fraud and abuse steals 3/4 of each bond, there isn't much spending left. How do you like the high speed rail from San Francisco to San Diego?

[@MelMonroeShow]

@@thegoldstandard55 Indeed, I agree. I see it as an opportunity to, at the very least, get something that matters written into books. Other than that, we have to hold those in position accountable. I'd have to do a lil more research to speak to the rail but on the surface it seem ok.

[@wstadlock]

No bonds! If you don't have it. Dont spend it!

[@carlosmacedo8772]

O they have believe that

[@JannatMiranda]

They do have it. They mismanage money that isn't theirs.

[@Lola-385]

This may be unpopular but I do feel inmates should be required to work. Jail/prison shouldn’t be a vacation. It should be punishment. It’s so expensive to house inmates already. If we keep making it more and more comfortable then it’s not actually deterring anyone from committing crimes. In state prison inmates get phones, tablets, gaming consoles…. I just think it’s too sweet of a deal they can not work, have someone else cook all their meals and deliver to them, wash their clothes, clean their living areas, all while they kicking their feet up and watching movies all day. On tax payers dime. If the inmates don’t work, then the tax payers will have to fund actual non-inmates to do the labor inside the jail at a significantly higher rate. Inmates still get drugs inside… so if they can just refuse to work there’s no real punishment. I’ve had inmates yell and demand the deputies to reheat their food cuz by law they are entitled to 1 “hot” meal a day not “warm”… prop 6 will definitely make jail/prison more comfy and increase spending to house them. Combine that with the other prop to make crimes back to felonies…. More inmates means more spending tax payers money. More felonies meanies people can’t get jobs due to the felony so then they resort to more crimes. It’s a never ending cycle which we will pay for.

[@V.E.R.O.]

Same, they should be working. They should at least be growing/picking their own food, cooking it, washing their own clothes and cleaning their own facilities. Nothing goods comes from being idle, that's probably how they first got into trouble in the first place. And entertainment should be earned not an entitlement.

[@alicialara7105]

Agree

[@EvelynHernandez]

Im totally with you on this. They did the crime so why put them in permanent vacation

[@elizabethbetty2662]

NO on Proposition 5. Stop the tax hikes!

[@lauradeclet5516]

Weren’t some of the cannabis taxes going towards schools?

[@jamesharris8583]

Zero mention of spending accountability. VERY basic information.

[@Lawranceinsein]

I want to vote yes on 2 but no matter the amount of money we spend on schools, it doesn’t matter if the money isn’t spent properly

[@larkannx]

Thank you so much for this.

[@charlesc.6767]

No on 5 dont be forced out of your home by trippled taxes

[@TheEqualizer-3.2.1.]

🆘️ In California, we are voting for propositions and measures that have 4️⃣7️⃣0️⃣ NEW TAXES built into them! Please look at the CA voters guide here on Y.T. from the Reform California Organization. They address each one and advise if it would raise our taxes. VOTE EARLY 🗳

[@deannekinzle965]

Doesn’t the California lottery pay for schools? Isn’t that what it was designed for in the first place?

[@JannatMiranda]

It is supposed to just like Cannabis 😂😂😂 - Master degrees in mismanagement and money laundering - I bet the rich cities get most of it. What is Gavin Newsom doing with the money?

[@StunnaSWiFT]

All these borrowing of bonds sounds good but wake up people we pay for it with taxes.

[@haikaz]

Thank you for the great breakdown!

[@Lagunaticmom]

Excellent job! Thank you!

[@raysurx2010]

Thank you for this video!! Wish I would have seen it sooner, as a lot of my Family already voted and sent their ballots.

[@asosorio81]

Wow thank you for this I am an absentee voter and it's nice to get some clarification on the props

[@simplybysuzie]

Great video. Thanks for breaking it down. I’m voting.

[@Cielcity]

Thank you guys this video is really helpfull

[@steven.h0629]

Good review, thanks! 👍😎✊

[@ShamaySpeaks]

Thank you so much. Great information

[@RNGXray]

Anything that asks for more money vote no, we’ve seen time and time again our taxes don’t go where they’re supposed to in California.

[@cannabisflame]

vote no on all bonds/taxes

[@TrU_homie]

Your gay

[@BettyBlack99]

@@TrU_homieit’s YOU’RE. And so what, vote no on all bonds is the smart thing to do. You wanna be smart don’t you?

[@cannabisflame]

@@TrU_homie gay men often usually vote in favor of tax increases.

[@unkatom]

I’ll fund what’s needed, tightwad. You creeps that don’t want to pay for state stuff are all greedy losers.

[@portcybertryx222]

@@BettyBlack99not on all. It’s kind of short sighted to do so. Sometimes borrowing now for infrastructure and public schools/housing has more intangible benefits that outweigh the costs and may even reduce burden on taxpayers in the future. Like having proper water infrastructure now is better than losing farmlands in the future.

[@KittenCasserole]

This is really helpful, thanks so much

[@iankingston480]

Thank you for doing homework on proppppusitions

[@joePARKS]

great breakdown - thank you

[@taritabonita22]

Thank you! Very helpful as I’m here filling out my ballot. 💙🌊🇺🇸

[@lorisharing4142]

Thank you! This is super helpful!

[@iancoolidge]

Great video, thank you!

[@RichieRage]

Less government, fewer taxes, fewer regulations. I'm voting to abolish as much government involvement as possible.

[@kimberlyjablonski3618]

Super helpful; concise and articulate. Save me significant time

[@J.E.Lockwood]

I Have a QUESTION: Wasn't the California Lottery proceeds supposed to go to the public school system?

[@vhamacgeek]

Thank you for this unbiased guide. Just wish there one for my city/county propositions too

[@quangvietle]

Best video explanation!

[@Loves_GodSR]

THANK YOU!!!

[@LilCasinoMusic]

No no and more no! Let’s stop increasing the states credit limit!

[@julesfromcali2436]

No one every bond, it means we are borrowing money. We are already in debt, no more borrowing . No more debt.

[@chinmaiification]

This is great. Thank you.

[@geraldhaynes2989]

Prop 2, what happened to the idea that some of the lotto money would go to the schools???

[@KyleSisco]

Great video!

[@protectork9831]

Prop 5 is the most dangerous, it will repeal prop 13 . No more cap on property tax . Elderly disabled will be homeless and renters would have to pay higher rent

[@pigboykool]

Well said! Make everyone aware of the destruction it will bring if Prop 5 is passed!

[@shawyonsharifi3394]

As a landlord, vote NO on prop 5, we will have to raise the rent!

[@smokemjay]

Prop 5 changes Prop 13 from 67% to 55 % passage of this type of proposition. Vote NO. As for higher rent that would be prop 33 that is rent control and vote no on 33.

[@V.E.R.O.]

I'm a renter and voting NO on prop 5.

[@dustinrussell2573]

Very helpful thank you.

[@4AMO4]

I like how the argument against prop 33 is, "Oh no, the landlords may have to sell their 10th property. That means more first time buyers can buy a home. Noooo."🙄

[@protectork9831]

Rent control everywhere it has been tried leads to fewer homes available for rent . If my mortgage is 4K a month I am not going to rent it out for 1k . Rather let it sit empty

[@4AMO4]

@@protectork9831 why not sell it and recoup the costs. Let someone else actually own a home.

[@protectork9831]

@@4AMO4 that’s not how investment work. You want to drive home prices down allow builders to build more homes. I recently built a home in Elk Grove California. 2800 sqft no garage . Permit alone were 130k . Labor is more expensive in California, fuel is more expensive so material cost is high . I can’t sell that home less than what it cost me and I won’t rent it unless I can cover mortgage

[@bYdkid3]

It’s amazing how the vote of Californians with no understanding of economics or the history of rent control counts just as much as everyone else. That’s not the argument against prop 33. Rent control hurts landlords and tenants. It reduces the quantity and quality of the housing supply available for rent. Pick up a book instead of straw manning the opposition.

[@4AMO4]

@@protectork9831 I know that's not how you gain profit from an investment. But we already have a lot of homes that at most need to be retrofitted. The problem is owners like you who would rather sit and do nothing with a perfectly usable home. Because you care more about short term personal profits than realizing that you, and other "investors", are artificially restricting the overall flow of the economy.

[@Diana-nj6og]

Yes on prop 36, retail crime and drug use is out of control

[@valdemar0204]

Yes on prop 36 all the way

[@edms3656]

unless you want basic goods to increase in price then no on 32, little ceasers hasnt been 5 dollars in over 10 years.

[@jimbennett6558]

Thank you.

[@Blangocarlitos]

Prop 36 charges drug dealers for murder? Thats dumb are they also going to charge car salesmen for murder?

[@EvelynHernandez]

Some of the stuff being sold has fentanyl which is lethal and very dangerous, while the dealers will continue selling without a care. They should be wanting to sell a great product and not broken lemon cars like in your car dealer perspective

[@Blangocarlitos]

@EvelynHernandez doesnt matter how nice your car is, driving is just deadly

[@lg-ii6pm]

So great thanks!!

[@natashatercera8536]

YES ON 33!!! WE NEED RENT CONTROL!!!!

[@V.E.R.O.]

Very helpful explanations, thank you!!!

[@marielaseibert2]

I still don’t understand 3….. yes or no?

[@V.E.R.O.]

It wouldn't do anything other than to change the language. It would change the language from "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in CA" to "The right to marry is a fundamental right". If you vote yes the language will be changed, if you vote no the language will remain the same. Regardless of how you vote, people can still marry anyone they want.

[@78tag]

...be careful marie - VERO isn't telling you the truth about prop 3. The new wording will open the door to under age marriage (including adult/minor couples), incest, polygamous/multiple partner marriages, and other unimaginable relationships that if I were to describe them here I would get censored. All of this, that no one discusses, is also proven to be detrimental to fatherless children's development. The previous prop 8 is not being enforced but a 'yes' on 3 would remove prop 8 and be a big step toward the pervs of the world taking control and ruining society and families.

[@78tag]

@@V.E.R.O. ...then why are you so interested in an unnecessary change to the existing prop ??? - it couldn't be because you know it would erode the intention of limiting the definition of a moral union between a man and a woman.....AKA marriage.

[@78tag]

@@V.E.R.O. ...why don't you admit that swapping prop 3 for 8 changes more than words - words carry much meaning. The 'language' changes the intention of who is getting married and all the doors it will open to perverted and immoral mariages and the damage it can cause to the institution of family and society ?? That is the problem with political lies and deciet.

[@78tag]

...be careful marie - VERO is lying to you by 'omittion' ! Politics is so corrupt these days. ..very simple answer - kzbin.info/www/bejne/iILdhmpmqrl6q7c

[@smokemjay]

I am not part of Reform California. They have a voter guide for San Diego County that addresses the different items on the November ballot and which way to vote.

[@KellyWalsh-rf1gu]

Very helpful short and concise

[@Ardell804]

Great job, Thanks

[@martykimble9999]

How doesm taking out a loan keep this from taxpayers!!!??? Vote no on all these propositions!! Don't be fooled. This is just another tax. We pay enough taxes!

[@smokemjay]

Yes on 34 and 36, no on the rest of the numbered propositions.

[@anadevera29]

Yep

[@hyde1893]

pass prop 3

[@23RV24]

No 34, yes on 36

[@cameronrhodes7390]

The language for prop 3 is a little vague that’s not good “ marriage is a fundamental right”. If was it was for the lgbt then it should be changed to “marriage between a man or a women”, they would just need to change and to or. The word of law should be vague and up to interpretation just like self defense.

[@ian5661]

@@cameronrhodes7390yeah this question is really confusing, if you don’t mind me asking what did you vote, I DONT want lgbtq marriages. I’m still filling out my form. Did you vote yes or no? Again I want straight marriages NOT gay marriages.

[@habibbasit4518]

I am still confused on 33 rent control! Rents are skyrocketing and all of us are facing homelessness! Simple question? Yes or no if I want rent control

[@Chattercatto]

Hoping for rent control so tired of it going up every year 😭

[@Dee-xu6vr]

Undecided about 35... Any pro and con arguments?

[@barbclark69]

Thank you both. I’ve watched this twice now, and will probably watch it again. Very clear explanation. Thank you.

[@User5_]

The state can't even agree how much they're in debt; $32-72 Billion

[@petermelton1598]

This was great!

[@DonGivani]

As of 5 nov 2024: Proposition 2- Bonds for School and College Facilities: Approved Proposition 3- Constitutional Right to Marriage: Approved Proposition 4- Bonds for Water, Wildfire Prevention, Climate Protection: Approved Proposition 5- Local Bonds for Affordable Housing with 55% Approval: Rejected Proposition 6 - Eliminates Involuntary Servitude for Incarcerated Persons: Rejected Proposition 32- Raises Minimum Wage to $18 by 2026: Rejected Proposition 33 - Expands Local Authority for Rent Control: Rejected Proposition 34 - Prescription Drug Revenue Spending Restrictions: Approved Proposition 35 - Permanent Funding for Medi-Cal Health Services: Approved Proposition 36 - Increases Penalties for Certain Drug and Theft Crimes: Approved

[@veronicabanales5255]

Anytime the government asks for more money I grind my teeth

[@illuminationgoddess3]

Thanks

[@ernielazcano4783]

Which prop rolls back prop 13?

[@adayuen5372]

Prop 5. It allows local gov to increase property by making new local bonds easy with only 55% local politicians approval, so your property tax will keep on increasing with new bonds/tax to property owners.

[@GH0ST7361]

Based on previous government spending I wouldn't give this administration a dime more, even if it's for schools... climate change regulations is the reason young people will never own homes in this state. Also we shouldn't be paying for green infrastructure while the gas tax is still a thing....

[@HaloGTMaster94]

More More More More More

[@ZePopTart]

I don’t see why prop 33 would do anything other than raise property taxes paid to local governments. Because of prop 13, aren’t most investment properties likely taxed at a much lower value than what it would be if it transferred hands?

[@Bob-r1d7n]

Filling out the ballot is very confusing with all this doublespeak in describing what the props are for. But I guess that is the job of the Secretary of State, to protect and serve the Governor.