Callaway Epic Flash vs Epic Flash Sub Zero Trackman Testing

[@darrenbell6376]

I moved from the original epic sub zero which was faded biased and i always fought that right miss. Swapped into the gbb epic flash sub last month and now i am seeing a slight draw which I'm loving. The rear movable weight is a game changer for me and i tried the mavrik sub zero 9* head last week set on draw and plus 2 to 11* and was still seeing a fade bias. The epic flash sub will be staying with me as it's a straight flight fairway finder for me.

[@noonster55]

The 2 rights still in the fairway, I'd take them both. I know what you are saying though, I hate that miss right.

[@marksakowski9272]

Obviously, with the lower spin the original Epic is still marginally better

[@per_growth]

Recently purchased a Flash SZ not knowing it was a low spin driver. I always thought that LS drivers would be less forgiving and have a bigger tendency to slice the ball - is this accurate? The video show the hitter is still drawing the balls pretty well (granted he is quite an accomplished ball striker). I ask because I would like to know if I should stick to this SZ model or just sell it and move to something else?

[@2ndswing]

Salvatore San juan It depends on what you’re looking to improve off the tee. If you’re looking for improved launch and a higher ball flight, the standard Epic Flash will be better. But if you’d like a lower, more controlled trajectory, then you’ll get that from the Epic Flash Sub Zero. Both models are pretty forgiving in terms of performance on mis-hits.

[@per_growth]

@@2ndswing so in terms of accuracy off the tee - dispersion of the ball? The LS driver and the normal driver will give me the same amount of forgiveness?

[@2ndswing]

Salvatore San juan Overall, the standard is slightly more forgiving. But if you hit the ball high with a lot of spin on it you’ll see more benefit playing the Sub Zero.

[@danthemanwhocancan]

Consistent ball striker