An Introduction to Post-Keynesianism (Engelbert Stockhammer & Victoria Chick)

Post-Keynesianism has gained a lot of attention in heterodox circles in recent years, particularly after the Financial Crisis of 2007/8 which showed that financial research produced by Post-Keynesians was empirically relevant. Come along to our free event to find out what Post-Keynesianism can add to economics, what it stands for and what's in store for the future. Please invite your friends who might be interested as well!
Professor Engelbert Stockhammer is Senior Lecturer at the pluralist Kingston University. His research areas include macroeconomics, applied econometrics, financial systems and heterodox economics. He works heavily with the Post-Keynesian Study Group and has published numerous articles in international peer-refereed journals including the Cambridge Journal of Economics, Structural Change and Economic Dyamics, the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, the International Review of Applied Ecnomics and the European Journal of Industrial Relations.
Victoria Chick is Emeritus Professor of Economics at the University of College London and is the co-founder of the Post-Keynesian Study Group, which whom she is very active. Her main research interests lie in Monetary Theory and Macroeconomics. She has written numerous works on John Maynard Keynes and Post-Keynesianism, such as "The Theory of Monetary Policy" and Macroeconomics After Keynes. More recently she has been active in founding the group "Economists Against Austerity" and encouraging politicians to speak out against actions on this front.
This talk took place on Tuesday, 20th October at the McGrath Centre, St Catharine's College.
Follow us on:
Facebook: CambridgeSocietyForEconomicPluralism
Twitter: CSEPEcon
Website: www.cambridgepluralism.org/

[@josejesusborjonnieto394]

Estupenda explicación, Clara, convida y muy ilustrativa*****

[@merveburnazoglu]

I'm curious about the order of names in the video description. Isn't Victoria Chick first to speak?

[@Attalic]

Neo-Marxist here, really solid introduction.

[@robowizard6132]

Marxism fails

[@Attalic]

@@robowizard6132 thanks for that well thought out critique

[@larisabug6917]

thank youu

[@Nhoj737]

" . . . . what it stands for and what's in store for the future. . . . " It's 'too late'? 'We' have ten years? “ . . . our best estimate is that the net energy 33:33 per barrel available for the global 33:36 economy was about eight percent 33:38 and that in over the next few years it 33:42 will go down to zero percent 33:44 uh best estimate at the moment is that 33:46 actually the 33:47 per average barrel of sweet crude 33:51 uh we had the zero percent around 2022 33:56 but there are ways and means of 33:58 extending that so to be on the safe side 34:00 here on our diagram 34:02 we say that zero percent is definitely 34:05 around 2030 . . . we 34:43 need net energy from oil and [if] it goes 34:46 down to zero 34:48 uh well we have collapsed not just 34:50 collapse of the oil industry 34:52 we have collapsed globally of the global 34:54 industrial civilization this is what we 34:56 are looking at at the moment . . . “ kzbin.info/www/bejne/eKnMn3SrbbSFrq8&feature=emb_logo

[@cameronburnard2301]

18:40

[@jamesbancroft2467]

An Austrian here but interesting

[@lowersaxon]

Chick is like her books are written. Thats fine and not surprising. Stockhammer is often terribly wrong. => You need no financial markets ( in certain models) bc there is no uncertainty and therefore no need to hold any money. What? So the only reason to hold money is uncertainty?? Sorry, but Nooo!

[@Greg_Ulmer]

What a poor speaker!

[@RushuFriends]

She's pretty good actually. If you read Keynes, that's probably as good a summary as you can get.

[@jessicag67]

You are mean

[@fachriranu1041]

Maybe it is your poor intelect?