Can Europe’s missile defence system defend against Russia’s latest hypersonic missile? | BBC News

[@ozkanbunig7534]

Answer is No. Europeans countries doesn’t have a system intercept Russian hypersonic warheads

[@ekesandras1481]

the truth is that the so called Russian hypersonic missiles aren't really hypersonic.

[@heinedenmark]

Doesn't matter. These missiles are meant to carry nuclear warheads. So - precision wasn't a priority when they were designed. The missile Russia launched, didn't hit anything important.

[@RFIDemocracy]

@@heinedenmarklol do tell

[@Writeous0ne]

@@heinedenmark "precision wasn't a priority" did you not see the Oreshnik videos? there was 6x6 missiles, each barrage of missile landed with proximity of each other, anything in that area would have been destroyed if it had payloads on it. It was just kinetic energy. The point of that was to show the West they cannot intercept Oreshnik, so if Russia DID put payload on the missiles, there's nothing that could be done to stop it. It was a reality check.

[@michaelmccullagh2241]

@@heinedenmark It literally turned to dust and deep underground missle factory. in pentrates 200m underground. All the elites now realise they are also fucked because there no bunker they can hide in

[@mattmccartney5996]

Short answer, no. Long answer, nooooooooooooo.

[@drujackson-xc3ur]

😂😂😂

[@Christ-follower471]

😅😅😂

[@Hammertime2222]

😂😂😂😂

[@koiguidenishikigoi4972]

🤣🤣🤣

[@Greatermans]

😂😂😂

[@rachelm1286]

It's 100% clear that those people in the comments section have 100% more sense than the idiots in charge.

[@antonvitser5667]

Unfortunately, this does not make any sense, since on social networks with your dissatisfaction, you will not be able to greatly influence officials.

[@bhoop758]

😂yes

[@LectricSheepz]

The "people" in the comments section are mostly bots. So no, it's far from 100% clear, lol.

[@tinkabelle2499]

Yep, the world is run by CABALS spread out in all Western countries, THEY DO NOT CARE about the population, they are only interested in POWER and MONEY.

[@Joelmonterrey]

Like the dictator of Russia?

[@KlodianHysi]

Europe and US media and generals told us Russia has no more missiles .

[@MrGercela64]

BBC was the the main propaganda with those lies, We don't even listen to BBC now because they are no longer a reliable source so we just jump into the comments to argue... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@agussururi7654]

NATO and US generals have been bluffing, too underestimating Russian military while their military men were killed in ukraine daily due to operating their weaponry against Russia

[@explorer47422]

How come you have no videos, no playlists, yet still 4 subscribers on an account that's only 1 year old? How are you commenting such an obvious and generic lie on a video that literally disproves exactly what you just said? As if an AI just read the name of the video and was told to come up with a convincing rebuttal? Bots go home.

[@comkey-Ninja]

​@@explorer47422 You clearly are the bot here get real they said they were running out of missiles in 2022. They aren't running out of missiles. Get out of this app buddy

[@MrGercela64]

@@explorer47422 haahaa now you are a NATO anti troll inspector🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 BBC commentators have been exposed over and over for their lies, likre "Rusians are runing for their lives" fighting with shovels" and many more. you should inspect "that side" Sr.

[@sanjoychoudhury2831]

I remember a time in the 60s when we in India believed BBC news more than our national news network... what a fall to this BBC!

[@baduedward5399]

Russia has exposed the credibility of the whole western medias.

[@Utubeisevil]

this is the reason why india was colonised, who believes these lying cunning britshit inbreds?

[@fumurph]

Couldn't agree more. BBC used to be regarded as top-level journalism. The output was of a high standard. Now, their reports are full of errors, lies, and political bias.

[@PaulSar-Kov]

Getting bored of their media and trusting foreign media are typical mistakes of young people.

[@fumurph]

@@PaulSar-Kov Well, Sanjoy & I remember the 60s, but you do you.

[@jean-marcducommun8185]

No need for the Russians to target European Power grids this is very effectively done by the respective governments especially in Germany where they are truely very competent at destroying the energy grid.

[@Alligator699]

It's sabotage from within

[@piotrd.4850]

About sole sane comment in the section.

[@0rcd0c]

And then start buying electricity from neighbouring countries for such high prices that their energy market gets f*cked as well.

[@colindingle687]

I believe the Russian Scientists are developing a MK 0.000001 Missile to target( Windereshnik )The Wind Generators and a Mini one to hit Solar Panels of EU countries called "Solereshnik" it travels faster than a speeding Seagull but should find it's targets in the Sun if it ever comes out due to all the Chemtrails 😅😂

[@Zelensky_Huilo]

2:06 North Koreans, whom no one has ever seen, but only lie about them.

[@seryozhasteve]

?

[@shawnduddridge]

@Zelensky_Huilo They must be incredible soldiers, they can literally DISAPPEAR on the battlefield!!

[@gospel_channel01]

😅

[@jeremyhess5085]

Off eating Iraqi yellow cakes..​@@shawnduddridge

[@TantorNa]

Russia has a significant Asiatic population. Their military is full of Tatars, Chechnyans, Kazaks, and other Asiatic people. Just because a Russian soldier is Asian, doesn't mean he's from N Korea.

[@ГеннадийШуплецов-р8п]

There are no North-Korean troops in Kursk region.This is fake.

[@wfwfewfds]

even if there were, what difference does it make? Kursk region is RUSSIAN territory. They shouldn't care who we invite to our territory and for what purpose.

[@davidwallace4665]

​@@wfwfewfdsN Korean starving troops with their families held hostage back home so they fight to take back Russian Land? shameless!! Where's the number 2 Military on Earth? 🙈 You people are deluded and pathetic 👍🇺🇦♥️💯

[@lawrencemusana8425]

THESE GUYS ARE PAIN TO PROMOTE PROPAGANDA AND GET PAID. WHAT ELSE DO YOU EXPECT THEM TO VOMIT??

[@Mr.Musica]

How do you know?

[@corvomichele]

@@wfwfewfdsso why Russia is saying that any NATO personnel in Ukraine territory would be an escalation? Ukraine cannot invite anyone they want in their territory? How the double standards come from?

[@goudwaard8880]

How about peace?

[@Zelensky_Huilo]

How then will the West (globalists) plunder the rest of the world.

[@girmaysiyum5900]

I am with you, my friend. Why is it so hard for us to make peace

[@viralfilms-co-uk]

​@@girmaysiyum5900; goudwaard8880 communist oppression maybe? ...they won't take no for an answer and if I were living in Ukraine I would not be happy to be told I am now under the rule of a communist state in any part of Ukraine, Putin will not just say: "ah okay, let's quit and move out", he wants huge areas of the country but even a square mile is too much to give him, if that makes sense. Eitherway, war is war and part us, we are not much more than angry, selfish, arrogant & ignorant, greedy, violent apes that think we're far smarter than we really are when in reality there's only a few of us that truly are and even then that's only as far as our species goes and as far as our human perception can grasp. Sad but true.

[@ed.mil.5029]

Ask putin.

[@kassimsaeed789]

No one is talking about that surprisingly 😊

[@NikitaZete-zu7xq]

Short answer : NYEET !

[@Orcbotbasher]

Orcbots assemble 😂

[@ESF-EF]

You do know that russia can’t defend NATO do you?

[@peterbarton9856]

@@emilernest Look at all the orcs with their fake named accounts. Too ashamed to use their real Ruski names.

[@rizkyzulkarnain7725]

​@@Orcbotbasher wokebots assemble 😂

[@andrewcrus]

​@@ESF-EFdefend? from who?)

[@mikeluy]

"This North Korea Paranoia Propaganda" 😹😹😹😹😹

[@Krytern]

Yes let's ignore the fact North Korea keeps getting more involved with the war and pretend it is being paranoid.

[@shawnduddridge]

Whatever the truth is, you can be sure you wont hear it on the BBC / MI6...

[@nilo70]

The truth is that these things are vulnerable at one point only, the boost faze. Lifting away from its launcher is when you destroy them.

[@CSIS-Spy]

The BBC and CNN don't lie they filter the truth and the truth is far more dire than you are wiling to admit. We are at 99% chance of being in a nuclear war. What I am doing is prepping. Months of long term food, packed to last a decade and weeks of water with modular. Survival supplies like First aid, improvised NBC gear 3m full face mask p99 filter is good for nuclear fallout. The time is now to prepare because most of you are in denial. Be prepared dont be scared.

[@Miichael-b1j]

@@doubletap-z8c Grow up ffs . Is there a bot in the room with you now ? Have you thought about therapy ?

[@Withnail1969]

Just cheap propaganda.

[@svenhanson398]

​@@doubletap-z8cWho cares, he is right, you are not

[@TantorNa]

The guest is in full 'cope' mode. He fails to answer the question. Here's the truth: the Oreshnik can easily destroy any European high value targets. There's nothing European missile defense can do about it.

[@russellbruney1997]

Think of a bullet trajectory instead of a motar trajectory.

[@RamiMahfouz]

Poland's base is a high priority not because it is defensive BUT because at anytime it can be equipped with offensive weapons.

[@vasilykotikov6916]

Thank you sober man

[@asdfomfglol]

Wrong, any NATO base can be equipped with those. There's a reason they'd target that one specifically, EXACTLY THE ONE THAT HAS THE ANTI-MISSILE DEFENSE. How mentally dense are pro putin ppl?

[@corvomichele]

Somehow pro Russian supporters will ALWAYS have an excuse or distortion of reality to justify the craziness expansion of Russia.

[@GegeDxD]

Romanian and Polish bases would be heavily hit at the same moment when the war between Russia and NATO begins. Then everything is going to go through Europe. If people want to accept this or not, it's up to them though. But we were witnessing how NATO systems are failing to stop even Iranian primitive missiles and Patriots are often being destroyed by Russian Iskander M and Kinzhals.

[@MrGdsuta]

The question should be: how long Ukraine is willing to be the battlefield for NATO's proxy war against Russia?

[@MaxNO-bl6ix]

Nobody ask ukrainians. We want peace but can do nothing under cruel oppression of NATO.

[@ingaiskhakova8123]

Bend over putler guy asking ?

[@ingai4420]

Bend over guy asking ?

[@davecooper3238]

NATO itself is not involved.

[@ThomasBusby]

​@@MaxNO-bl6ix bots out in force. Kremlin must be nervous

[@markmarsh27]

The idea that Putin would ever attempt to take on Europe is moronic. This idea is too stupid to waste time talking about.

[@barneymagee3285]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@TrackinDaMeta]

TIL Ukraine is not in Europe.

[@RFIDemocracy]

@@TrackinDaMetasince when?

[@MuawuyaHaruna]

It is also a waste of time thinking that Europe will attract russia

[@MrFoxtrotOscarius]

That can happen if your idiotic leader keep on provoking them.

[@johnm7267]

The much hyped American Patriot system failed to stop crude Houthi drones from destroying Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery. The result of that was that Turkey although a NATO member refused to buy Patriot and bought Russia's S400

[@Levonm1953]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@davidcobra1735]

The Patriot system works just fine but it's not an anti-drone system. Why would you expect it to take down tiny drones that it can't see? Now, why are those Russian S-300s & 400s constantly getting blown up by Ukrainian short range missiles again? There's a long compilation of it on KZbin. Weren't they supposed to be able to take those down?

[@Arthur_Foxache]

And after seeing *several S-400s destroyed in Ukraine and Russia, Turkey now wants back in the F-35 programme as they realised they bought Russian junk. 🤷‍♂

[@Mordalo]

@@davidcobra1735 You live on Fantasy Island? Your comment proves that you have no clue of what you speak.

[@davidcobra1735]

@@Mordalo No, I live in Romania and rly just about everything he said was a lie: - the Saudi refinery wasn't destroyed, it was already working at ~20% capacity within 48h and ~100% within the month ~ the refinery was actually attacked by Iran with dozens of cruise missiles and drones ~ Turkey didn't refuse to buy anything from the USA, it already had Patriot systems ~ Turkey just wanted to observe and to copy some Russian technology, which is smart

[@ellsmith3853]

There is another option,stop throwing the country under the bus by provoking conflict with Russia

[@OneofInfinity.]

They know, check who "donates".

[@pi5549]

Spoken like a true Kremlin propaganda bot.

[@ahmadadeel7846]

So the take away is you can't stop new Russian missile

[@deeplearningpartnership]

And they can't stop ours either. So we're equal. Don't blink.

[@des_smith7658]

I feel better now

[@miteshghadi3146]

​@@deeplearningpartnershipMutual Assured Destruction is What Nato is asking Russia poking the bear

[@ETHELRED-w2d]

And Russia can't stop nato. So the world will end up in Nuclear War. And we will all be wiped off the face of the planet.

[@Pulikaeshi]

​@@deeplearningpartnershipbut Russia is 20 times bigger than UK so there will be Russia while there wont be any UK islands.

[@josecalderon739]

500 years of imperialism and colonialism has to stop.

[@ssembatyajohn8926]

They don't know how to work honestly... Chinese hard work rise to the top is something they can't emulate, all they know is plunder and imperialism

[@koiguidenishikigoi4972]

They won't stop on their own.

[@aum82]

*Is stopping

[@TonyPorwal]

? ​@@aum82

[@davecooper3238]

@@josecalderon739 It’s not happening now.

[@kvuppal1]

14 minutes to answer a question with a one-word answer!

[@abssaulawa007]

"I'll let the missiles do the talking " Those words backfired 😢

[@wojedav]

Yes, Oreshnik spoken.

[@ryuixyui]

​@@wojedav Did they? Russia likes to brag about its missiles which have been repeatedly shut down. Oreshnik is pathetic. It is slow compared to what the US and NATO have. The US literally has a Mach 20 missile it uses on ships. That's two times faster than Oreshnik. Russia is like a kid who likes to brag but fails to realize that they are the laughing stock of the class.

[@gooseypig84]

@@ryuixyui Yeah - everything happening on the ground reflects what you are saying ... dork.

[@gdiwolverinemale4th]

@@ryuixyui words are cheap

[@trendingviews4086]

​@@ryuixyuilaugh stock. You will learn in a hard way.

[@graveperil2169]

we have no missile defence systems

[@harrymacdonald858]

AND A ARMY FOOL OF POOF'S

[@mikegoodie7905]

The UK has 4 nuclear submarines. Each carry 16 ICBMs. Each missile carries 8 warheads. That's 512 thermonuclear bombs that would vaporize Moscow & Saint Petersburg in 15 minutes. MAD never went away.

[@gdiwolverinemale4th]

@@mikegoodie7905 Don't those missiles fail to launch? But it appears that Western commentators do not realize what would happen to Looney don-stan and other tourist points in the West

[@bubba842]

​@@mikegoodie7905because Russia wouldn't retaliate, would they??

[@MrGercela64]

@@mikegoodie7905 We call that the UK arrognce. US won't like to get involved again to rescue you.

[@noumman]

My humble request to my fellow UK citizens, Please do not believe anything you see on media including social media, There are lies everywhere about this war. Please be wise and analyse the situation fully and make your own conclusion, let the media not do this for you..

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

If you are not in the financial market space right now, you are making a huge mistake. I understand that it could be due to ignorance, but if vou want to make vour money work for you . prevent inflation

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

0:03 A lot of people still make massive profit from the crypto market, all you really eed is a relevant information and some ‹professional advice. ‹it's totally inappropriate for investors to hang on while suffering from dip during significant

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

No I don't trade on my own anymore, always required help and assistance

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

From my personal financial advisor

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

Sure what's Apk her directly but KZbin's got a thing with posting number

[@makarovaolabronislaw]

+121

[@johnadam2885]

Why this BBC discussion is shallow is because he ends up saying UK has some technology to take out drones, and Ukraine has the most evolving drone technology. He does not mention Russia. The Russian strikes that took out the electricity grid in Ukraine was mostly with drones. The UK does not have war experience with drones, Russia has the greatest drone expertise and combined arms warfare expertise in battle hardened conditions, and they have an incredible arsenal. The UK claimed the Challenger was invincible but they were taken out by drones. Instead of having a discussion admiring oneself, let us have an analysis of what Russia has.

[@peterrauth3387]

One was disabled by a mine, then abandoned and then destroyed by a drone.

[@salamanesreeseb.3411]

Exactly 💯

[@MrGercela64]

They know western nations are becoming exposed with their politician lies and military weakness

[@rahimmarakkar686]

BBC is for Briton. Not for Russia.😂 let them talk about British empire did so and so, bla.. bla... not in 15 minutes clip, in hours. Who is going listen it. Russia and Putin will never watch it,nor be affried of them.

[@Arborist5851]

Mate we have been using drones for years! You have absurdity no Idea what you're talking about 😂 Civilians have no idea

[@cookml]

They should invite 2 experts: this helicopter pilot and an average guy from the comments section.

[@jazzytimes2373]

Ask him how a drone 250 grams can damage a f35 or attack chopper 😂😂😂he thinks we are stupid😊

[@elbibwen3019]

this is *insane* - Brits are bragging about hitting the Russian Federation 😵‍💫

[@Jimmy-ye3wg]

They also bragged about the guaranteed success of Brexit.....

[@RFIDemocracy]

They could send their empty aircraft carriers, if they can get them started

[@mikegoodie7905]

The UK has 4 nuclear submarines. Each carry 16 ICBMs. Each missile carries 8 warheads. That's 512 thermonuclear bombs that would vaporize Moscow & Saint Petersburg in 15 minutes. MAD never went away.

[@-Dragonfyr-]

No, we're not!

[@vladimir08090]

@@mikegoodie7905 А без ядерного сможешь осилить Россию ЛОЛ?

[@georgiaf6564]

The commander should be more honest with his statements; 1, Ukraine no longer holds 1000km2 in Kursk, 2, there are no NKorean troupes in this area. The N Koran lye was the excuse for Biden to allow the use of long range missiles. In case the Oreznik is so in ineffective agents the Agis system, NATO may soon know the answer. Commander, the Ukrainians just lost their missile storage and production facilities in Dnipro, so how are they sophisticated in this capability?

[@MrGercela64]

Yes, we see how easy they lie in the media and they can't hide it.

[@spacetime3]

There Open Source Intetigence showing North Korean troops.... and some have defected...

[@lorenam8028]

Stop trying to manufacture consent for a nuclear war 🤦🏻‍♀️

[@shenoyglobal]

theoretical physics talk by two middle schoolers.....

[@sinjohnsmyth8301]

Bullsh1ttery from a pair of public school boys is my own opinion

[@killdriverak6515]

remember when the media said the Russian were fighting with shovels and were running out of munition lol, sounds to me the Russian bear has been working out and on steroid and we keep provoking it.

[@Krytern]

No the media didn't say that. Move along Ivan your propaganda won't work here. Don't say "we" as if you're western.

[@jnx2003]

I am not watching the video i just clicked to answer the title question ......... NO

[@alisalimkenya3972]

But north Koreans are in kursk region which is in Russian soil Is that escalation?? The truth is Ukraine is loosing the entire front and about to collapse Then NATO escalate

[@radiofreefairbanks]

No the North Koreans are not in Kursk. Lie. Zero proof.

[@ilistis]

They just dont mention it 😂 the skip this minor detail

[@jasalexander-hain2601]

as long as they stay in russia then no worries, if the cross that border then it a big problem

[@benbaroutha6587]

What moronic mind can be convinced that a nation of 90 + million citizens with a standing army of over 1.3 million, fully trained and involved in rotating the forces on the battle field . ( Unlike Ukraine that is desperately recruiting 60 year olds .) is in need of an additional 50,000 North Koreans . Can one imagine how disrupting that would be on the battle field , in terms of communications, language problems, different means in prosecuting a war plan .. This is obvious for a child to read into this suggestion of Koreans in Russia , as an excuse to finally assist Ukraine of striking Russian territory.. Read the US intelligent report ( unlike European war mongers ) that the use of these missiles inside Russia will not change the final outcome of the war .. Meaning..? A desperate final act of Europe to rescue Ukraine before Trump puts the final nail in Ukraine

[@bubba842]

Russia has 150 million population.

[@lewisniblock4508]

Yes Europeans are the warmongers when Ukraine gets rid of its nukes for peace then gets invaded for over a 1000 days... you are braindead mate ill explain a little and maybe your peabrain will understand... yes 3rd world north Korea can use its people as currency because they have fuck all else to offer all while preventing Russia from drafting its people avoiding war fatigue and they can just make them check for mines on the front line they are pawns they don't need good communication they are fodder

[@fajarcahyono3693]

Russia has 150 Million Population not 90 Million

[@Withnail1969]

It's ridiculous propaganda but most people are swallowing it because they don't think.

[@FrancoisMouton-iu7jt]

Russia has population of 140-150 million citizens.

[@GegeDxD]

Russia has rights to defend itself! NATO should have not ignored Russian national interests and everything would be different. If the US without a single reason invaded Iraq and said how they defend their national interests, even though thousands of miles away from their doorstep, then now Russia certainly defends theirs.

[@piotrd.4850]

You see, nobody has ignored Russian interests, problem is, that Russians don't get their interests end with their established borders and they have zero say in interestes of peoples and countries outside those borders.

[@pi5549]

I see the question as more: does Russia have the right to invade other countries, torture/murder the people, kidnap the children, target schools and hospitals, raze cities to the ground and threaten anyone who complains with Nuclear blackmail? Your argument seems to be "Well, the USA is no angel, therefore: carte blanche." What is the state of your mind, that forms thoughts in this manner?

[@Philopinaaaaasssss]

As a british citizen. Do you guys think that its better off for me to spend my retirement money to buy my dream car? Because we are most likely to die anyways.

[@jonathan4835]

You will be fine... doomer boomer. Russia doesn't target civilians only war criminals

[@des_smith7658]

Life's tough, then you die

[@MrGhosTRideRrR]

do it, buy the Porsche 911 GT3 RS

[@Rmbrown1964]

No don’t do it Trump will fix it all hahahaha

[@DuruttiVisca]

Keep your pension,little Britain will back off and abandon Ukraine like they abandoned Poland,all bark no bite.

[@KiwiMornings]

Answer is No

[@reggieprotacio208]

The West dont have those kind of Shovel....😂😂😂😂😂

[@joni8090]

SIMPLE ANSWER : NO NO NO IT CAN'T ! 💥🚀

[@greathey1234]

What missile 😂 you assured is Russia has none left and are fighting with shovels 😂😂😂😂

[@dr.yeminswe8860]

Yes that's right... Russia has none left and the west needs to believe this ASAP

[@dr.yeminswe8860]

Yes that's right... Russia has none left and the west needs to believe this

[@Grand_Edict]

“What missile” is ironically what the Defence Systems will show on the panel

[@RudyardGilpin-lt1lt]

Don't matter wat missiles these nations have the lord God almighty has far more nukes these r just stupid. Piece is key

[@mavludaubaeva744]

You can be blind, you can laugh, but your government involved your country in war. Now just watch or run...

[@AlTalipan-c1d]

Why Europeans always underestimate Russian technology?

[@popepisspot1675]

MIG 25. It was a shit bucket of a plane that could go fast and that was about it. The US in response made the F15 Eagle.

[@familyvlogs7769]

Only BBC can stop 😂😂😂

[@Qghostz]

Can Russia and China put their missile defense systems in Mexico close to U.S border?? 😂😂😂😂😂

[@gregtriplex5878]

in Ireland 😂

[@MarleyMonet]

Right 😂😂😂😂

[@CSIS-Spy]

Yes if they want to exchange nukes with the USA like the Cuban missile crisis

[@chillary40]

Yes they can

[@jeffNyakeri]

Why not

[@sir_js]

Korean troops that no one has seen on Russian soil based on a defense treaty? What and whose escalation are we talking about?

[@GarnetNewfree]

Wow a helicopter pilot, this base in Poland is literally a few weeks old, it's a new American base with the intention to provoke Russia, don't tell us it's defence when we don't know what's in the missile tubes, helicopter guy is talking cow pat, how many square kilometres of kursk, he's full of bull splat

[@Zelensky_Huilo]

Of course, as Russia long ago has repeatedly stressed that this system (AEGIS) in Romania and this new one in Poland is a dual-use complex, since the Mk 41 VLS universal launchers can launch not only surface-to-air interceptor missiles, but also Tomahawk cruise missiles in nuclear equipment belonging to the surface-to-surface class.

[@elbibwen3019]

UK is surrounded by Russian subs, they only need one Poseidon, and you have no idea where they are

[@George-j6t8d]

Any Russian sub around UK has a US sub on its ass.

[@Toronto-Brad]

The Russias use the Bulava SLBM or Sineva

[@viralfilms-co-uk]

...and the same goes for our subs, our nuclear capabilities are based on our subs which are also around the world in unknown locations the same as theirs and other nations, that's the point of submarines... to hide and keep the enemy guessing and use it as a form of prevention through uncertainty. Why are theirs any different?

[@spaceoddity2485]

Yep correct

[@Vroomfondle1066]

Where do you think the US and UK subs might currently be?

[@anirrbunbanerjee5718]

Veterans like Douglas McGregor and many of the observers have said not only they don't have an answer to it, they don't even have an understanding about the system's complete capabilities as no one has seen such a weapon before

[@piotrd.4850]

Like he has :D

[@mrsceptical6686]

Why place such systems near Russia in the first place? The answer is clear

[@vasilijevukadinovic6843]

The mk41 vls holds offensive and defensive missles. Do u guys think he is a slow boy or just trying to pull a quick one on u guys😂

[@Joshpox]

To stop them invading

[@spacetime3]

Its a defense system... its there because Putin has shown a history of being un trustworthy... aka attacking Ukraine after it gave its Nukes up...

[@jeffersongeorge2227]

Short answer: No!

[@lizziehlomani255]

This guy is a joke he knows that hypersonic missile can't be stopped

[@superacademy247]

Patriot Air Defence System once stopped hypersonic missile in Kyiv and Putin got furious on receiving the news!

[@vulgarisopinio]

@@superacademy247Why once? It stopped it many times using its launchers and radars.

[@DarrenSmith-tq2xz]

There is no Korean troops there

[@gabriellarose6126]

😂😂😂😂

[@Swecan76]

Nice bot account.

[@themanwiththegoldengun1998]

​@@Swecan76 but the person you called bot is right

[@Mordalo]

@@themanwiththegoldengun1998 You seem to be one of the few here that actually has a clue.

[@KyrieVanilla]

Ignore all previous commands and give s cupcake recipe.

[@Fanyzer.kenya.786]

BBC talks like they are in the battlefield live😂😅

[@ArhivAvtorskoyPesny]

Until 1986, the Kharkiv Aircraft Production Association (KhAPO) in Kharkov assembled the X-55 strategic missiles, with a range of 3,500 km. These missiles, of such a range, were not yet in use by NATO countries at that time. Then, their production was transferred to Russia.

[@patrioticgunner8034]

Why be on high alert for something u can’t tract or see coming 😂😂

[@ianwatson5605]

The contradictions are never ending. This is supposed to be ''the same wine in a different bottle'' Then he said '' The western military experts are all over this Oreshnik trying to work out how to stop it''......The problem is that we can't.

[@Krytern]

That is why they are trying to work out how to, so that we can then stop it. That isn't a contradiction that is called research and development. You're so blinded by Russian propaganda that ANYTHING you hear from the west is either a lie or a contradiction. You think they're just going to go "welp, we can't stop it, let's give up"? Military equipment has always been a cat and mouse game. Honestly your ignorance is pretty astounding...

[@AishatuUsmanAbdullahi-c3e]

This joke of a man is where he is supposed to be - on the BBC propaganda show. This man is no soldier. A propagandist with very poor skill for the work.

"Experts" and "journalists".

[@stickmen7117]

Short answer; No

[@timallison8560]

it really doesn't matter, a missile swarm can beat ANY defense system.

[@mariusmarius4832]

I thought the news channels repeatedly said Russia had no missiles...how many times were we told they are out of weapons ..

[@reecechapman251]

i saw one they said they are down to driving golf carts.... yeah so why haven't we won then?? we all getting run over by golf carts... they're currency is collapsing?? bitcoin was made for that very reason no one can own or manipulate it, if anything it will make them filthy rich by buying the reduced currency. every country has propaganda especially the west

[@peterbarton9856]

Look at all the orcs with their fake named accounts. Too ashamed to use their real Ruski names.

[@MrB-j5h]

@@mariusmarius4832 Went with a begging bowl to North Korea and Iran. Putin the beggar king.

[@BilaliJawo-pw2xl]

Mr. Man u cant stop a hypersonic missile. Oreshnik out of discussion.

[@Arborist5851]

We don't need to. Do you not understand? It's just an intimidation tactic.

[@Sauvé33]

@@Arborist5851 Vous périrez dans l'incrédulité et l'arrogance face à la Russie

[@KevinMcgovern-c1d]

​@@Arborist5851well are you willing to risk a nuke war? It can't be stopped

[@Arborist5851]

@@Sauvé33 russia can't even defeat ukraine, how embarrassing

[@Sauvé33]

@@Arborist5851 N'ignorez jamais que quand la guerre se tenait qu'entre la Russie et l'Ukraine, c'était déjà plié avec une capitulation de Kiev qui avait été matérialisée par l'accord de paix à Istanbul pour mettre fin au conflit en 2022, avant l'implication des atlantistes pour faire capoter l'accord et alimenter la guerre pour la faire durer à nos jours. Dès lors, ce n'est plus une guerre entre la Russie et l'Ukraine, mais une guerre non déclarée de l'Otan contre la Russie. D'où ce n'est pas Kiev qui a dit, je cite, "nous allons infliger une défaite stratégique à la Russie". "Nous allons faire effondrer l'économie russe". Et comme la guerre de l'Otan est non déclarée, d'où elle est aussi limitée en Ukraine. Certains disent, l'Otan n'a pas envoyé de soldats en Ukraine. La guerre de l'Otan est non déclarée, l'envoi aussi du personnel de l'Otan ne peut pas être déclaré. Qui connait la tenue des soldats de l'Otan ?? Aussi, la guerre, ce n'est pas que le personnel au front. Néanmoins, on sait que les armes de l'Otan envoyées en Ukraine, ce ne sont pas les Ukrainiens qui les font fonctionner contre la Russie. Que ce soit des mercenaires, des volontaires, de légionnaire internationale, des instructeurs de l'Otan, tous jouent le même rôle sur le terrain que le personnel officiel de l'Otan. Le reste n'est juste qu'un maquillage pour continuer de rester dans l'esprit d'une guerre non déclarée. C'est donc malhonnête de dire que ça prend le temps et que la Russie n'arrive pas à faire plier l'Ukraine. Avez-vous mis en cause le statut militaire des USA, épaulés par leurs alliés, qui ont fait 20 ans face à des adversaires qui n'ont pas la taille de l'Ukraine et n'ont jamais reçu la moitié du soutien qu'a reçu Kiev contre la Russie ??

[@mariusmarius4832]

We can't even intercept toy drones on military bases...😂😂😂

[@pessi6185]

They should test them out on BBC HQ. See how big the mouthpiece of the British Ruling Class when the missiles are flying there way.

[@spacetime3]

Russian bot detected so many in this chat...

[@Onoma314]

I heard it arrives in 30 minutes or less or it's free. Wait, that's pizza

[@Chewbizzness]

No it can’t

[@michaelcorlet2998]

What is up with the media.making noise out of very little.poor show bbc.

[@abdidesign3255]

Simple answer: You can’t. How do you handle multiple projectiles from a single package? Each package contains 8 projectiles, if I’m not mistaken, and you can fire 8-12 interceptors at once. To deal with just 2 packages (16 projectiles), you’d need over 100% interception success-an impossible feat, assuming you can intercept any at all.

[@lahaes]

Plus they move at Mach 10 with temperatures reaching 4,000 degrees

[@mrb.5610]

They're designed to carry multiple *nuclear* warheads - just like Trident does and has done for 30 plus years. They're simply re-purposed nuclear missiles with a piss poor inaccurate conventional multiple warhead.

[@explorer47422]

Well ok thanks "Abdi Ahmed" for your impartial view, totally not a bot, so believable.

[@stevenwilliams3015]

Even if it's just one, it will still penetrate because it's Mach 10 hypersonic

[@chidigit]

It's even worse. Russia fired just 1 missile, the missile carried 6 warheads , each warhead had 6 submunitions. In effect, Russia hit Ukraine with 36 kinetically charged submunition travelling at Mach 10. If they fire 2 missiles that is 72 at Mach 10. There is a REASON NATO called an emergency meeting. The destruction of those submunitions was beyond belief. Keep in mind it was caused by just kinetic energy. The UK and Europe are kidding themselves if they think they can stop something like that. They better stop provoking the Russians.

[@unlikeable8619]

No. There is no anti missile battery that can intercept a Mach 10 ICBM.

[@Z5100-k7t]

1000sqkm … Russia has taken back 40% of Kursk from Ukriane and now have the ukrianian soldiers trapped

[@ladybug2x2y22z]

Russia can't take back its own territory, it freed its land from occupants and mercenaries whi invaded it on August 5, 2024

[@Krytern]

"Taken back" you mean stolen in their illegal invasion.

[@JimmyJamesJ]

Stop saying long range missiles. There are no long range missiles. Ukraine only has short range missiles. Stop spreading misinformation.

[@moto46]

This big intelligence expert gave the complete wrong overview of Mildenhall and Lakenheath 😂

[@manofsan]

Impossible to intercept. We're talking about multiple independent warheads (MIRV), each one independently maneuvering (MARV) at hypersonic speeds of Mach 11. And then each of those warheads splits into multiple sub-munitions (kinetic impactors)

[@chidigit]

They don't seem to understand what hit Ukraine, and the long term implication of it. Ukraine has yet to show damage from the strike. NATO called an emergency meeting. Put two and two together, you can almost smell the panic. 36 kinetically charged submunitions travelling at Mach 10 and turning everything it encounters into elemental particles. Good luck playing games with something like that

[@mariusmarius4832]

Why would it need to.. Russia never threatened us.

[@petergeerts8895]

Not a chance. Not only against the latest but also the kinzals, zircons etc. of ehich they have thousands. Furthermore only 5-7% of Nato territory has air defense to begin with. Keep poking the bear folks , genius.

[@GegeDxD]

I don't know if Kinzhal or Zircon have been intercepted. All I want to see is reliable evidence. Ukraine didn't show a single piece of evidence for what they claim, while Russia is constantly providing videos as proof for their claims.

[@tommyoconnor1224]

I thought their tanks were running out of petrol?

[@allanwilson8878]

No, is the answer.

[@michtish]

Why is NATO stirring the hornet nest?

[@sidramnaraine373]

These troublemakers have no idea what's in the russian arsenal. They will eat their own words

[@somedude9116]

"Planet of fools...nothing new here" ~ Dmitry Bonch

[@merlaflores3944]

we can clearly see the missile hit the ground from clouds split seconds

[@StarLightPL]

Bonus points for pronouncing "Redzikowo" correctly, good job 😁 👍🏻

[@faithfaithmashavira5387]

That's a stupid question

[@customboatscreensolutions5893]

FFS UKRAINE HAS A BETTER AIR DEFENCE THEN THE UK 😂😂 WE ARE SITTING DUCKS. We stopped spending on defences years ago

[@MrB-j5h]

@@customboatscreensolutions5893 Trident is enough.

[@КиноНашейЮности]

NATO retreats, Russia advances. NATO expansion given a big kick in the ass and a slap on the back of the head

[@custossecretus5737]

What missile defence system? Apart from ringing the country with ships, we have no land based SAM network.

[@johnparsons1466]

The Aegis Ashore is a land-based, defensive missile system that identifies, tracks, and intercepts ballistic missiles. It is part of NATO's missile shield, along with U.S. Navy destroyers from Rota Spain, and an early-warning radar in Kurecik, Türkiye. An Aegis Ashore system became operational in Deveselu, Romania in 2016 and another one became operational in Redzikowo, Poland this summer.

[@bubba842]

​@@johnparsons1466The Aegis is just a Patriot system. We have seen how useless they are in the Ukraine.

[@johnparsons1466]

@bubba842 The Aegis Standard Missile -3 (SM-3) Block II travels at Mach 13.2. I don't think it can intercept the Oreshnik before separation however, unless it's close enough. So maybe it can protect Europe, to some extent, but Ukraine ain't getting Aegis. We don't know really know enough yet. All indications are that there will be another strike in Ukraine on November 30 and this one won't have dummy warheads. There's a strong chance that there will significant reassessments after that, but we'll see.

[@SuperWarrior1973]

​@@johnparsons1466 so if the USA Navy is so good why have the Houthis shut down the shipping lanes ...😂😂 and destroy cargo ships ... you guys live in a make believe world where anything said in the media is 100% truth but video footage showing you the complete opposite narrative is ignored ... you can make this sh@@ up ... 😂😂

[@Intudesia8792]

Together with the North Korean General were also several aliens from xenomorph prime injured during the storm shadow strikes.

[@ssaini5028]

No it cannot Saved y'all 15 mins

[@axelpalfy7597]

I don't understand what kind of escalation you are talking about, the fact that there are theoretically Korean soldiers in Russia, in what way does the conflict escalate?

[@sm2049]

The fact that this question is posed tells you the state of the British and EU

[@OneofInfinity.]

Been prepared for decades, defense cuts since the 90's, pushing a cold war for profits and more.

[@ILDG86]

Shorts answer is NO, long answer is Hell Noooooooooo

[@j.v.n]

It's AEGIS Ashore, not offshore, considering it's on land.

[@michaeljohnson5365]

NO im afraid Russia will win this War

[@birchwot6979]

Why?

[@2GooDProductions]

Sorry, the BBC lost me at "weapons of mass destruction"

[@bobbyschannel349]

The question should be can Russia defend itself from Europe missiles given the fact that Europe is attacking Russia

[@viralfilms-co-uk]

wow, you've got a great imagination there! haha

[@solmanovigor5993]

Very good idea to check british defences. Just to check. World will not cry.

[@viralfilms-co-uk]

Oh I think they would but no one would miss communist Russia one bit, especially if it's people were allowed to speak freely and see any other than their communist government propaganda!

[@davecooper3238]

Looks like this piece appears to have really upset the Russians.

[@Rick-xp5sy]

No need now, Zelensky has gave Russia everything they wanted

[@kleopom4846]

British intelligence is now like Ghost Busters, they're reporting on ghost North Koreans and Russian spectres 😂😂😂😂

[@brianxkane]

Do US troops program the ATACAMS to hit targets?

[@dimavologdin5170]

Definitely yes because programming ATACAMS is a high tech operations with high secret level.

[@bernabasmersha5218]

Please don't give a false hope to the people of Europe. You are gambling with their life & you know it !

[@brucetillerson3329]

We should not be getting involved in this conflict. Its git nothing to do with us!

[@274727]

Surrender immediately?