Can the Human Eye See More Than 60 fps?

[@safinjo]

When I get glasses, it was Like from 144p to 8K...

[@ravysaini127]

20/20 vision I bet is 512K

[@keovahh]

My eyes usually see around 300-500 FPS, I’m currently running on a 5.3 blood cycle OCed Retina display and a Harvard 9 Brian processor

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Avexverse nice setup

[@keovahh]

ELP _ also (WORDS ARE CHANGED)

[@keovahh]

ELP _ just spreading the word ;)

[@ravysaini127]

My eyes have tech from ten years ago

[@Manuzoka1996]

Human cannot see more than 4GB of RAM! Thank you...

[@arri6267]

as a gamer who deals with fps everyday i certainly notice the difference between 60 and 120 hz. 51 hz is just the speed when our eyes satart having the illusion of movement if frames on a monitor show every 1/51 th of a secind. but humans dont work like cameras. humans can certainly make out the difference between 60 and 120. which means in camera terms the eye can at least 120 fps

[@siriuspope3552]

Humans can see really really high framerates-- but there's a point when our eyes say "Wow. That's... really fast." and our brains say, "Yeah no sh#t. Stop trying."

[@alexanderflores6438]

@@siriuspope3552 lmao I've never heard of a more descriptive yet equally as funny scientific comment

[@Ganslool]

just because you can notice the difference between 60 and 120 fps doesn´t mean that you can see 120 fps

[@tronnygd6696]

@@Ganslool you can see as high as around 500 fps

[@Ganslool]

@@tronnygd6696 under which circumstances?

[@kisore20gp]

At 2:28 It is 46.3Hz ., Will give error in final calculation

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Yea I know. I had a dyslexic moment :p

[@John-xv3by]

Have to take into account the decay and turn on time of the light source. If you would do the same experiement with incandescent lightbulb you would get a much lower frequency probably. The 50 Hz standard in EU was based exactly on that reason so the lights would not flicker. Also im thinking that a big array of lights, the size of a computer monitor, would have you notice the effect probably at a higher frequency. the last sentence is just a theory but your could test it if you build the same thing but with a big LED panel that has halves switching.

[@JAGUARBURST]

When do oscilloscopes ever want to work properly?

[@flyte229]

2:28 46.3 Hz*

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Sorry I'm dyslexic

[@cargelawk9060]

this was gold good job haha

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

lmao thanks

[@kimames7774]

Good to be using the longest side of a right angled triangle, they're often overlooked in these kind of expirements. Well that's my Hypothesis anyway.

[@SpicyNotSalty]

That was great, thank god for Reddit. You’re hilarious, I’m totally subscribing, Freaky Frequency.

[@MFDOOOOM333]

Guys if you didn’t notice the eye starter pack comes with a console eye just buy the pro bundle and you can see 1000hz

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Link??

[@MFDOOOOM333]

@@The_Engineering_Boost they out of stock atm but amidia are resseling them.

[@Delimon007]

I can literally and clearly still see the lights blinking at 100 FPS. This has been debunked a long time ago that the human eye cannot see above 100 FPS.

[@TheTuttle99]

Where was it debunked? Can you show me?

[@Delimon007]

@@TheTuttle99 You can find it on youtube or you can google it. Not everyone can see up to 100 FPS or above, some people can.

[@petejones6827]

@@TheTuttle99 no he cant he can only prove that if its not a constant fps that something is not quite right. fun fact the only people pushing the above 60 fps lie is the gaming industry. isnt it funny how when you look at whos trying to make you believe something and then ask are they trying to make money off of the claim is it likely they are just marketing to me and most people say no of course they wouldnt bullshit me they are only trying to get my money. lolololol

[@pepper7086]

I over clocked my eye

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Same

[@anas8356]

1:23 this was an underrated joke ahahahaha

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

lmao i think so too

[@anas8356]

Alex Right? I came here from a vsauce video..I might habe otism

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

lol

[@stonyrobertsthepleb]

omg the ben franklin line im fkin dead lmfao instant sub

[@ArdePier]

Underrated vid

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

I know right (;

[@IIStasisII]

The human eye can physiologically detect up to 1000 frames per second. The average human, tasked with detecting what framerate he/she is looking at, can accurately guess up to around 150 fps. That is, they can see the difference in framerates all the way to 150 fps.

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Noice

[@seyedmahdiqazanfaree5234]

Maybe it would take time for your led to turn off.it will not turn off as the moment you hit the switch.

[@h3iberg456]

you know... they say god writes straight with crooked lines, so... we good

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Amen

[@anti-bmgoassociation7390]

3:27 I felt that 😔

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

lol

[@Leep458]

Here I am a year late, thinking this dude can't be for real, nothing properly scientific about this experiment, then I watched the whole video, and I gotta say: 10/10 would watch again

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

thanks m8

[@shelletonianhuman]

This is the most scientific video I've ever seen, more scientific than science class, 10/10 would watch again

[@labyrinth2646]

I can run life at about 60 fps at Ultra Settings, but if I want better frames, I turn it down to normal Settings. Specs CPU - BrainWave Ultra 69420 GPU - RealTime Eye Graphics

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

this guy fucks

[@labyrinth2646]

@@The_Engineering_Boost ???

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

@@labyrinth2646 you got godly settings

[@labyrinth2646]

@@The_Engineering_Boost yeah i can run life at ultra settings at 60fps but i can run higher at normal settings

[@Rudy_8668]

Lmao please make more videos like this 👍😂

[@EtherealMarksman]

have to agree 300-500fps if i can detect the difference between frames up to 400-500 fps then how can you say we can not aee at that frame rate. saying that would be like saying that a camera with a shutter rate of 60 is technically only able to recors videos with 15 fps which is just lying as you can see each photo within the video 60 times a second (60 photos within 1 second)

[@5warag]

How many are you from Reddit 😂🤣🤟

[@eightdogstreet]

Swarag Narayanasetty me

[@FrankieCreates96]

You can still see them beeping hella hella fast at the end

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

I think that’s because of the camera because I couldn’t see it changing

[@nikanikani1]

Incredible

[@RehanPlayzYT]

Then why the heck we have games with 120 FPS, Human eye can theoretically have a FPS of 576 but practically it means nothing and it differs.

[@sushimista]

Late night thoughts then i stumbled upon this

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

perfect timing

[@markussmith5818]

Its not stupid its science. Your welcome.

[@codergautama]

1:01 *Sick Beats*

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

freaky frequency

[@codergautama]

@@The_Engineering_Boost lol

[@markussmith5818]

Can you do that with arduino cause i think i can see faster?

[@Chapter356]

1:20 😂

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

CLASSIC

[@georgetim1990]

Oscilloscopes? Never had any good fortune with them. They're cursed.

[@BurnerPigeon]

Amazing

[@pradhumnkanase8381]

But at what fps is your camera shooting at.?

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

60fps

[@Higgsinophysics]

How to science !

[@arpitdhongade23]

Yeah now send your research thesis to Harvard or MIT, hope you will get a phd or Nobel Prize

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Will do, captain.

[@viniciothehook1]

A flashlight lights isn't the same as frames, (whole picture like says 1080)

[@colorlessgreen4778]

Damn bro where's your nobel prize?

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

They said they'll email it once I give them my social security number

[@milkwastakenn]

I have a rtx 8090 and using a i67 proccesor and see 8k graphics and 988700fps

[@namesurname5613]

Just turn off the shadow and reduce texture to low ,thx me later

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Ok thx

[@noahgreene8113]

You have some seriously slow vision sir. lol

[@stanleygarland1666]

2:33 .......BOI

[@Garyxl4]

Do more of these videos pls

[@The_Engineering_Boost]

Will do!

[@Onetooth7997]

In video games, no

[@valentind.5398]

Looking forward to see your paper in Nature.

[@Valerian115]

i actually see 60 fps sometimes

[@yoeymeme24]

Then you’re a NPC, I clearly see that 144hz is smoother

[@Onetooth7997]

No you don’t

[@yoeymeme24]

cant remembner the context, but you can easily notice a 144hz monitor apart from a 60@@Onetooth7997