You explained things I hadn't understood in class in 2 hours in less than 15 mins!! Thank you so much!!
@amandalovestoaudit2 жыл бұрын
You’re so welcome!
@Lukhaphiwo2 жыл бұрын
Yesterday I got my marks for auditing and they were depressing. Today I stumbled upon this channel and all I can say is that am gonna pass this semester. All the stuff that I learnt in semester one are on your channel 😭❤️
@osamashakoor31825 жыл бұрын
After going through so much theory and getting frustrated over it all, it took just over 10 mins to get everything sorted, huge thanks to you Ma'am !
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
You’re very welcome! Best of luck in your exams!
@osamashakoor31825 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit It went really well, the result will be out in a couple of days, I want to thank you again, though there were some issues I had in my exams which I'd like to discuss with you if you will be so kind to let me know where we can talk ? Bunch of thanks again !
@karissabudhai63073 жыл бұрын
Amanda…I am beyond grateful for finding your channel. I’ve recently started a new job and since I came directly from University it was difficult for me to grasp this. You helped a lot!! Thank you so much! Just got a new sub. ♥️
@luvpinas1235 жыл бұрын
TOCs = check if controls prevent or minimise material mistatement, but does not check financial figures.. STs = tests evidence for the balances and transactions
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
You’ve got it 💪
@murchuan87823 жыл бұрын
Failed my advanced audit CPA exam ireland in April... resitting in 4 weeks...this is just what I need... cuts through the waffe... straight to the point... clear and precise... will be checking out other areas on this channel 🙏👍
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Thank you - there are plenty of resources in my study guide - bit.ly/studyaudit - good luck!
@noks-breakingfree19435 жыл бұрын
I just found your channel. Amanda you are the best. I have an exam in 3 days and you're God sent. They are very short and sweet and very informative. Amanda ILYSM
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Good luck with your exam! Please do come back and tell me how it went 😊
@alex_192984 жыл бұрын
I can definitely relate 😋 I've got 3 days left too 😂 Thanks for your amazing work 😊
@Justinacefire17 ай бұрын
This is way better than my audit textbook. Thanks so much!
@rdm3474 жыл бұрын
I loooooove the bank rec example! When you mentioned about the signature = goosebumps!
@sousanmohsen46444 жыл бұрын
You are the best person that explains auditing!!! For real keep going
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sousan ☺️
@bisongbelmond3 жыл бұрын
Exactly the kind of channel i was after for my ACCA - Audit preps. Easy to understand videos. Thanks for for the resources.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Glad to help - we need more accountants in the world!
@aspireformore33554 жыл бұрын
My college professor could not explain this concept well. This video made total sense.
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Donta! 💖
@aspireformore33554 жыл бұрын
AmandaLovesToAudit Thank you! 😊
@karantibrewal67873 жыл бұрын
Your teaching style is awesome... Making a theoretical subject so easy to remember
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
That is so good to hear! Thank you for watching!
@sukhbir69244 жыл бұрын
I also love audit but I need someone to explain it with practical application Which I liked the most in this video This is the first video I have watched on your channel And I loved it Looking for more practical based videos.❤️
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Definitely check out my audit study guide for more examples ☺️ amandalovestoaudit.com/learning-resources/audit-study-guide/
@BambiOnIce19 Жыл бұрын
This is great for anyone who’s about to sit their CISA exam. I love audits too, but from an IT perspective. Your videos are a dream come true for all of us who are learning to differentiate between various financial controls, as we need to understand them very well in order to pass CISA
@zephyrzee94914 жыл бұрын
Test of internal control for bank rec rests upon 'division of duties.' The person who inputs the entries onto the cash journal must be different from the one who performs the bank rec. The latter puts his signature on the bank rec. Usually does not involve the financial controller.
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
That is a great example - thanks for sharing :)
@kauthar98383 жыл бұрын
I think it depends on the scenario given, if your scenario says a busi eases Internal control is that the financial controller or financial manager reviews and authorized the bank rec Then the TOC for the auditor would be to inspect on a sample basis for a 12 month period that the signature/authorization is infact theres I think that's why Amanda mentioned "financial controller" which wasnt wrong Brilliant job Amanda CA 👏🏻
@katlegomagongoa82243 ай бұрын
Marvelous Amnada👏🏽, I learned so much in a short space of time
@mercytipitap7043 жыл бұрын
Wow, wow wow.. Now I throughly understand the difference between internal control and substantive test.Please keep up your good work👍👍
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
That is so good to hear - it can be very confusing at first ☺️
@themirror69804 жыл бұрын
Thank you very for this video, it cleared how i can approach planning my audits. From PNG ❤
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
That is great news! Waving 👋 hi from Australia 🇦🇺
@ResearchBageshwarNews5 жыл бұрын
Again I love your teaching method
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Many thanks Kapil!
@Sturki74 жыл бұрын
I am pursuing chartered accountancy in india , your teaching style is awesome
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
That is fantastic to hear - the world needs more great accountants - good luck in your exams!
@Sturki74 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit i want to become an auditor not Accountant
@MatthewMartinez7214 жыл бұрын
HOW IS THIS BETTER THAN THE CLASS I PAY COLD HARD CASH FOR AT UNI????
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Sorry about that Matt!
@MatthewMartinez7214 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit No it's great! I was saying this is better than the class I pay for!!!! Thank you for what you do!!
@angelaw70553 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for creating these wonderful videos! You explain the subject so well. It's amazing that these high-quality videos are freely available.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@1388Kane4 жыл бұрын
New subscriber from Singapore. Im taking ACCA Audit paper. You explained it better than my current tutor! Thank you!
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Hi Kane! Welcome! And good luck - I visited Singapore back in December and it was amazing (though I have not had any luck replicating the Singaporean hainanese chicken - I'll keep trying)
@abderrahimfennouh50754 жыл бұрын
I'm preparing a graduation thesis and this was useful , thanks a lot
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome!
@febedeolan79883 жыл бұрын
Goodness! This is the best. Very easy to understand. Superbly informative. Thank you Dr. A!
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! 😊
@masisoganesyan90483 жыл бұрын
Amanda is what you teach relevant to Us audits as well
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Hi Masis - yes it is ☺️ processes are the same, but the auditing standards have a different structure in the US (they are I think the only country not following the international standards)
@gauravkashive39482 жыл бұрын
Amanda mam thanks for clarifying the difference.Thanks a lot again.
@tj65444 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. I now fully understand the concept. I have ACCA, Audit and Assurance exam coming up. My tutors are idiots compared to your explanation. You've got yourself a fan here in the UK.
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thanks TJ! Be sure to provide your institution with some constructive feedback if they have the anonymous evaluation surveys - they can’t improve if they don’t know 😊
@marykcoughlin3627 Жыл бұрын
You explained that with a great example - thanks so much
@vidhyabegani9079 Жыл бұрын
Super awesome! the concept is crystal clear Ma'am.
@shahzadhucain23069 ай бұрын
Great job... love your way of giving understanding...
@muhammadzubairkhan3136 Жыл бұрын
Extremely useful video which has cleared my confusion....Thanks a lot Madam..Stay blessed
@Sumeetkakodkar4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!. I am preparing for CISA and your videos are helping me much. 👌
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome Sumeet - good luck in your exam 💪
@Sumeetkakodkar4 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit thank you! 👍
@fads903 жыл бұрын
I never knew a price list was considered an internal control. Good tip!
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Even things like an envelope with a window for the address can be a control!
@patricijavalentincic48065 жыл бұрын
In my opinion in many cases you have to do two tests: (1) are controls design in a way that meet control objectives which usually also means re-performing the check activity (2) are IC working in a way that were design. If you miss the step (1) then you can conclude that IC are working OK but inf fact the design has such significant weaknesses that control objectives are not obtained and also our financial statement objectives are not met. Also if you get bad results from re-performing of controls, so material differences, then you have to conclude, that control may have significiant or material weakness. So in my opinion there is difference in testing of controls and substantive testing in theory but if you want to achieve meaningful results with internal control testing you have to do both and both results give you significance of IC deficiency.
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Yes - this is exactly what I state in the video. You test controls only AFTER you evaluate their design and deem the CR to be Low or Moderate. I wouldn’t call the review of the client ICS (internal control system) a test - but rather an evaluation.
@ReagileKopi3 ай бұрын
This was so easy to understand! Thank you so much!
@LostJellybean2 жыл бұрын
Very well explained. I was completely lost, but thanks to you, I understood this topic. Thanks for the great job.
@divyavishwakarma60144 жыл бұрын
Amanda , I really love ur work .u r amazing with ur teaching styles nd skills.
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@sergioberlin3324 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for your work and videos Dr They are really helpful
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You're so welcome Sergio 😊
@chin7073 Жыл бұрын
If only I knew your channel sooner. Maybe I aced all my audit subjects huhu
@RojisWorld4 жыл бұрын
you explained it so well.....thank you so much
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏
@Kingdom_Dweller7 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos Amanda, you are doing the Lords work, thank you.
@jaxp4707 Жыл бұрын
This was sooooo helpful!!!
@ddd-mac7 ай бұрын
this is a fantastic topic. thanks Amanda!
@sashagaymarks22743 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Amanda!!! It was really helpful
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
You are so welcome ☺️👍
@yujuanliu93293 жыл бұрын
very thorough explanation. finally got it!!! thank you ! subscribed
@sumansaurav11623 жыл бұрын
Hi mam, Myself suman saurav from India pursuing CA. Your videos are great help to me. Thank you so much for these videos. 🌞
@sumansaurav11623 жыл бұрын
I have been a member of many audit engagement teams and i can relate the concepts with what i have done while performing audit. I must say that you have indepth conceptual clarity. Thank you so much for making crystal clear the auditing concepts.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
You are so welcome!
@Brijesh_p Жыл бұрын
meticulously explained, thanks for sharing the knowledge.
@paolasalcedo1271 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the explanation!
@rushipatel743 жыл бұрын
Yes .. it's really helpful
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
That's awesome!
@AKMLDDN3 жыл бұрын
Gosh, you've helped me out with this video. Thanks.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Glad I could help!
@mehakkhanna75663 жыл бұрын
Amanda, which one of these is substantive test procedure: 1. Use of generalized audit software to verify total of accounts receivable file 2. Test of invoice calculation process
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
They both are ☺️
@hassanraza-xq6ni3 жыл бұрын
Excellent ma'am
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏☺️
@manojkumarssr Жыл бұрын
Really nice explanations
@debojyotibanerjee28324 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot ma'am.
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You are most welcome 😊
@ResearchBageshwarNews5 жыл бұрын
Very clear concept 👌
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Kapil 🙏
@munyaradzitapudzai79833 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. l've subscribed to your channel, its really helpful.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for subscribing 🙏😊
@rajrai8383 жыл бұрын
Helpful videos
@wvansluisveld30112 жыл бұрын
I enjoy your videos due to the clear explanation and high production value. A couple of small additions I’d like to make are: - a signature is not sufficient evidence for especially a review control. We also need to evaluate the precision of the control. How does one know that it wasn’t just rubber stamping by someone with their eyes closed. - when testing an automated control recalculating isn’t sufficient. We should evaluate that the system is programmed and configured correctly. Of course it is always easier to comment on something.
@dilshanmad4 жыл бұрын
This helps
@thres343 жыл бұрын
You deserve a place in the heaven.
@kaurie12342 жыл бұрын
What is the linkage between the control objectives and the test of controls and could you provide an example that would help me understand the linkage between the two?❤️ please and thank you.
@evebanda2719 Жыл бұрын
Thanx Amanda
@sethuemlilo11143 жыл бұрын
Thanks again
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@kanenechekwumehope67543 жыл бұрын
thanks in a million amanda. i love the way you breakdown your explanation. i'm elated that i subscribed to your channel. this is the pathway to my success in audit and internal control field. have worked as an internal control personnel in an FMCG company for 9yrs but the control we do is not detailed i believe i will learn alot on your channel and improve my skills in the field of audit.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Thank you Kanene 🙏☺️
@masudbin-arazzaque42953 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Thank you ☺️
@MMthae2 жыл бұрын
You are awesome.... just got a new subscriber!
@BambiOnIce19 Жыл бұрын
I have a question for you. When you identify internal controls in accounting, would that mean you would need to focus on substantive controls, to ascertain how weak internal controls are, and how to ultimately mitigate those weak internal controls??
@CyndizCated Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your clear explanation! If you were my lecturer for audit, think i would ace the subject.. haha
@gladbimalarape991220 күн бұрын
Thanks so much
@WillardMusowa Жыл бұрын
Good lecturing skills
@jyothi37234 жыл бұрын
Awesome.... Love from India...
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Hope you are staying safe and well ☺️
@VictorTJerry3 жыл бұрын
New Subscriber here. I do love your lectures, it's more understandable. Could you do a video of Audit sampling and using statistical approach or stratification to come to a conclusion.
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Hi Victor - welcome! Try this video for sampling Topic 6 - Sampling kzbin.info/www/bejne/eqDMeIKmhZmhfJI
@sevensigam482 Жыл бұрын
thank you
@actenorio81684 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this! :)) very helpful! :)
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You're so welcome Alana!
@irajewelramos4 жыл бұрын
Hello watching from the Philippines
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching Ira!
@TinaRayMusic Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU
@ollyhoyi Жыл бұрын
Loved this❤
@malikmmohamed96792 ай бұрын
Good
@yusufhuseinmukiibi2 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot
@annitamutua242 жыл бұрын
When you are asked to give a test control and substantive test from a website of a certain company what should you give
@martinayang83444 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
You're so very welcome Martina!
@bobojo85915 жыл бұрын
Hello You have a gift. This has always been a rather hazy area for me but with your examples it has become much clearer. Do you have further examples of these two, possibly in a document form or can you point me to a website where l can access them. They would be very useful. Talking of which could you do something along the lines of internal controls.
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Hi bobo jo - there are other videos on my channel. They are all organised here in my study guide - amandalovestoaudit.com/learning-resources/audit-study-guide/gathering-audit-evidence/ Hope this helps!
@sylvester85895 жыл бұрын
Thank you ms amanda :)
@ntokozondamane23815 жыл бұрын
Doctor
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
I’m not fussed - as long as you’re learning! Some students prefer to call me Dr Amanda, others just Amanda, others Dr White - whatever you’re comfortable with 😊
@sylvester85895 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit Thanks to this video and your other videos, i managed to get fresh graduate job at big 4 :))). THANK YOU SO MUCH
@osmanmahamoudnuur13993 жыл бұрын
Please could you explain more the difference between substantial testing and control testing
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Hi Osman - what part is particularly confusing for you?
@elizabethmbewe44143 жыл бұрын
I needed this phew 😊
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
Yay! Good to hear it was helpful!
@davefuster_beubet5 жыл бұрын
I have a doubt Amanda, when it comes to test the Design of the Control during Sox's walktrough what the appropiate test approach is? Substantive, controls test or dual? Nice vid btw
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Hi! For SOX s404 - you walk through the process to understand the DESIGN of the controls. Then you’ll need to TEST them to see if any material deficiencies exist. Sometimes that testing might mean you’re doing a dual purpose - it just depends on the specific control.
@LlamaQueen_785 жыл бұрын
explanation is theoretically just like that. But I have a feeling the existence of just a signature is not sufficient evidence of effective operation of controls. Some one may sign it without putting much effort thinking job has been done right by subordinate or plain carelessness.
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
That is absolutely true Mehran - I once came across a client where all of the bank recs were signed in exactly the same spot, in the same colour pen. Turns out they checked & signed them all just before we arrived 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
@LlamaQueen_785 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit :)
@MBIRD2213 жыл бұрын
Great video! But quick question. So if you're performing a Dual Purpose Test, how does this affect the initial Detection Risk you've set to pull your sample? My understanding is that an auditor initially tests controls in order to determine the number of samples the auditor needs for substantive testing. (Solid controls, less samples. Weak controls, more samples.) But if the controls and substantive tests are being done at the same time, then it seems our sample is no longer based on our assessment of internal controls, since those controls haven't been tested yet?
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
A fab question - when you conduct a dual purpose test - the substantive part won’t be the only test you conduct substantively. So essentially you’ll conduct the dual purpose. Then based on your findings of the control & substantive test you’ve just done - you can adjust future procedures based on what you’ve found as the results ☺️ Does that make sense?
@MBIRD2213 жыл бұрын
@@amandalovestoaudit Hi Amanda, thank you for responding. And it does! But just to give an example... So let's say I want to test payroll. And the audit universe is 500 employees for the year. If I want to pull a sample, initially I would have considered the strength of the organization's controls over payroll before I pulled the sample. And if there were strong controls, a lower sample, and weak controls, a higher sample. And this is what I would base my variable sampling on to perform substantive testing. But with dual purpose testing, I haven't tested controls yet...since that testing will now be part of my substantive testing. So I'm curious, what is my payroll sample based on for dual purpose testing, if I haven't done control testing yet? Or (based on you saying "you can adjust future procedures based on what you've found as the results.") am I pulling an initial, smaller sample for dual purpose testing over payroll...and then pulling a larger sample for payroll based on the results of the initial dual purpose test? Thanks again!
@Spencerb22222 жыл бұрын
can you use benfords law to do a test of controls and a substantive analytical procedure?
@shikhargarg17322 жыл бұрын
So ma'am we can say in TOC we are testing control activities and efficiency and effectiveness of a control and while in substantive procedures we are testing assertions at transaction level. Is that correct to differentiate
@jagatdave11 ай бұрын
I think amanda may be ( may be) incorerct here when she says that " reperformance" is a substantive process... I am reading audit for US CPA and in my gliem maerial; I have an MCQ which says that "reperformance" is a type of internal control.
@JblMichael3 ай бұрын
Reperfomance basically means auditor repeating an activity or process that the clients has been performed in the internal control process of the entity I hope this helps you understand
@elishebagodzi35415 жыл бұрын
Thank you Amanda, i would love to email you some questions i responded to for marking then you assist me.
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Hi Elisheba - thanks for your message - unfortunately I don't provide private consultations at this point.
@giftmokasi2 жыл бұрын
hi. at 7:58 you mention re performance as an example of a substantive test. however in another video you mentioned reperformance is only for internal control testing. so i am slightly confused
@amirfikri65004 жыл бұрын
can you explain about how substantive control and testing control in inventory and warehousing cycle?
@thres343 жыл бұрын
In sample words, substantive procedure used to test the figures in financial statement like recalculte cash rec in her example ,, test of control used to test effectiveness of control like signature in her example - always stick to the basic and you should be fine.
@anantamurti43464 жыл бұрын
Dear Dr Amanda, I am having difficulty understanding TOD/ test of details, Substantive analytical procedures (SAP) and analytical procedures. Wouldnt SAP and TOD have a dual purpose as well. As TOD requires direct evidence on items that adds to the amount presented on the financial statements and are used as evidence to detect misstatements at the assertions level wouldnt SAP and Analytical procedures do the same?
@amandalovestoaudit4 жыл бұрын
Hi Ananta - yes - you're right - all of these different types of tests feed into one another - and TOD will help you get to tests of balances. I prefer to think about designing procedures in a way that is focused on finding the best procedure (substantively) for the assertion - which might be a SAP, TOD or TOB :)
@7johnz5 жыл бұрын
Would you do videos on specific industries audit? Like construction industry?
@amandalovestoaudit5 жыл бұрын
Not at this stage - still lots of basic content to cover!
@muhamuduharidi8722 Жыл бұрын
I rilly want to know the meaning of substantive proceedures
@vatishiahunter8593 жыл бұрын
Hi Amanda, Can you make a video that goes over the reliable evidence i.e of importance like can the auditor use an email, contract, bank statement, etc. to rely on. I know that the auditors own personal knowledge is higher and then outside sources versus externally generated documents. But does an email count as a source document?
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
This is a great suggestion Vatishia and it is rocketing to the top of my list!
@sethuemlilo11143 жыл бұрын
So tests of controls are a component of test of details?
@amandalovestoaudit3 жыл бұрын
No - TOCs are different from substantive procedures (of which TODs are one subset)