Canon RF 100-500mm REVIEW vs EF 100-400 - BEST telephoto zoom

[@cameralabs]

In-depth Canon RF 100-500mm review vs EF 100-400mm. Best RF telephoto zoom! Check prices at B&H: bhpho.to/3fgPW11 // WEX: bit.ly/3iNkAkX Buy Gordon a coffee: www.paypal.me/cameralabs Gordon's In Camera book: amzn.to/2n61PfI / Amazon uk: amzn.to/2mBqRVZ Cameralabs merchandise: redbubble.com/people/cameralabs/shop Sample images: www.cameralabs.com/canon-rf-100-500mm-f4-5-7-1l-is-usm-review/ Music: www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic #canon #rf #telephoto

[@PlanetFrosty]

I don’t use PayPal had bad problems with them and no trust with their customer service.

[@jakobcaiden7206]

instablaster

[@steve.hamlin.artist]

Thank you. I own the 100-400 IS II and a 1.4 III TC. I just took delivery on an R7. I plan to use that combination, along with my collection of older EF primes with the R7, at least for a while. I'm waiting on the RF/EF adapter, due today. I found your comparison of the auto focus (on the bicycle) to be very useful. I wish you had done a similar comparison on the bird in flight shots.

[@黃俊龍-z2t]

Thanks for your video and i will got the RF100-500mm lens tomorrow. Lon Huang from Taiwan.

[@panopsata3038]

I just rented this lenses this sunday and I'm amazed by the performance paired with the R6 high iso capabilities. One day I will definitely buy this lens instead of the 70-200.

[@revealhawaiimedia808]

Wow those moon shots at the end!!! I'm sure you'll be able to see all kinds of interesting things filming like that!

[@barrykirchin7573]

Great review as always Gordon, but I would like you to repeat the test using the EF 100-400mm mkii with the EF 1.4x mkiii teleconverter to see how that combination works, as I own these and have ordered a R5 but will not be able to afford the RF 100-500mm as well, I can not find a review on this combination anywhere on you tube. A lot of people who are switching over to the RF mount that did not buy a EOS R or RP would have this combination of lens and teleconverter.

[@noelchignell1048]

Check out Ken Rockwell’s reviews , according to him the EF version works flawlessly with the R5 and R6 with the 1.4x and 2x T.C and even both stacked if you have the mark ii versions

[@jamesbaxter9123]

Very interesting to hear about the teleconverters and actual lens construction - Australian prices for the Canon mirrorless system are still too high to justify leaving my 100-400 but I appreciate your review so much!

[@cameralabs]

Give it time, hopefully!

[@jimkok1957]

Have you used the 100-500 RF on the EOS R7?

[@kenmack9571]

Great work Gordon . My EF 100-400 mk2 and teleconverters will stay as rightly the review shows it’s not really worth the new lens purchase . Better for owners like me to save for the R5 or R6 body as I already have the RF adapter with the additional ring. I would highly recommend viewing your R camera reviews that provide all the answers to anyone pondering on what to invest in for the future. All in all another coffee donation is well warranted as I continue to enjoy your book and your brilliant back catalogue of KZbin work . The industry would be a lot poorer without your commitment and honesty.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks Ken, your kind words - and coffee! - are always appreciated! And I agree, the R5 makes more sense to your future upgrades.

[@bluejays5660]

If you had the choice between the canon 100-500 or the Nikon 500mm f5.6 which would you prefer? I have both the Nikon z6 ii and canon r6 so can’t decide which to invest in.

[@cameralabs]

Do you want a zoom or a prime? Which camera better focuses on the subjects you take? I think it would be Canon for both for me.

[@justinholding02]

Nice review. After watching this I've decided to stay with my 100-400II. It's still a stellar lens and also works flawlessly with the 1.4x

[@jakegreen9482]

Do the ef teleconverters work when paired with an ef to rf adapter? Or what combination are you using?

[@justinholding02]

@@jakegreen9482 yes, they work perfectly

[@jakegreen9482]

justin holding Thank you!

[@henry2742]

perfect comparison. i love too use the 100-400 verion 2 because of the perfect quality with both extenders. thank you, Gordon.

[@jynw29059]

Great balanced review, would it ever be possible to review a side by side comparison of the 100-500 against the Sigma 150-600 Sport ? I have found the sigma to be almost as sharp as my Canon 600 f4 IS II prime, but unlike the monster prime very practical when you're not sure what distance you will need to shoot at. Like a lot of Canon users, I have no issue swapping to the R5 as I was using the 5DSR and 7DMKII, but the thought of changing over 20k of glass is daunting, to say the least. I also have to say I'm not a fan at all of the new F11, with our weather in the UK being stuck at F11 in poor light would be a nightmare for wildlife, with either the shutter speed coming down or the ISO sky high both of which would ruin a lot of wildlife shots

[@AlbertKel]

Then it’s something wrong with your prime. The Sigma is crap.

[@bngr_bngr]

No way is the Sigma as sharp as the 600/4.0.

[@hellopsp180]

I really like that you do this at 10:50. I wish more people has this kind of information available on their reviews

[@cameralabs]

It's all about putting in extra effort!

[@hansweichselbaum2534]

I have been waiting for this one. Clear, objective and in-depth. Thanks for sharing!

[@cameralabs]

Thankyou!

[@DaveWales1000]

Excellent review although I would have liked to see the 100-400 with a 1.4TC attached vs the 100-500 naked. Using the RF 1.4TC is a bit of a no no really as it certainly restricts the range and field of view so if a subject is coming towards you you need to remove the TC. The 100-400 meanwhile is happy down to 140mm. I'd have like a comparison in AF acquisition between the the naked 100-500 and the 100-400mm plus 1.4TC. and is the latter faster on an R5 than on a body such as the 5D4?

[@cameralabs]

that would be interesting, yes.

[@craigcarlson4022]

Gordon, great review. I just bought the ef 100-400 L is ii. There was a brief sale on it and i still am using apsc canon dslrs. So the ability to work with that and an rf mount down the road, and use the teleconverters throughout their zoom range was what sold me on it. Craig

[@cameralabs]

I was really impressed with the 100-400 II

[@benharveyphotography]

Loving the slow motion b-roll Gordon! Plus the fact that my EF 100-400 is still competing with the new version.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks Ben! And thanks also for suggesting David Cutter music!

[@juliangreaves4727]

Another really helpful and detailed review Gordon. Thanks and enjoy your coffee ☕️:-)

[@bobrose7900]

Fantastic video Gordon, loved the slo-mo videos and animal shots and in particular the dog at the beginning. I noticed some, very slight, hunting on the moon shots and some of the others, but it was very minor, the camera has it's work cut out at these focal lengths. As a combo, I have to gulp at the price though... must get a Saturday job!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks Bob, and also for mentioning all the slomo clips - I did put most of them towards the end, but I'm proud of that little sequence!

[@SteveSSBB]

First class review as usual, Gordon. Thank you!

[@cameralabs]

Glad you found it useful!

[@mavs8888]

All your videos are so informative... great work! Thank you!

[@craigcarlson4022]

Super helpful review. I have the 100-400 vers ii. Based on your review, i think i’ll stick with it and just pick up the 1.4 teleconverter for a bit more reach.

[@glecaillier]

Finally are oy happy with EF 100-400 II and EF extender 1.4 ?

[@peterebel7899]

Thanks for this review! So, this lens is a great follow up to an already brilliant EF version.

[@cameralabs]

Exactly!

[@stephenbarlow2493]

A very useful review that tells me what I need to know, especially as I've owned the 100-400mm mkII lens for four years. One thing you might not be aware of is that the 100-400mm mkII has an undocumented close focus feature at mid-range. I've never actually measured this, but somewhere between 200mm+ to just over 300mm, it will actually focus to around 75cm instead of 98cm. I'm wondering if the 100-500mm might be similar. You can test it out for yourself, and maybe establish the exact figures.

[@cameralabs]

That's a good tip! I only tested them at the longest and shortest ends...

[@stephenbarlow2493]

@@cameralabs - I'd had mine for nearly a year and I only discovered because I read about it on a forum. Actually it makes it easier to handhold and it's very useful as I often use my 100-400mm mkII for photographing dragonflies and damselflies. I've not tested whether the reproduction ratio is higher, but at the very least it seems similar to that at 400mm.

[@jameo3606]

I wasn’t quite expecting f7.1 on the long end! 😱

[@wildcat1065]

No, such a shame. I so wish that Canon had started out planning for 500mm f5.6 at the long end and worked back from there. If it had to end up a trace heavier or bigger so be it. However, now the only reason to buy the 100-500 over the excellent 100-400mk II is for the last 100mm of focal length but you have to pay the penalty of it becoming a really slow lens.

[@alansach8437]

​@@wildcat1065Two thirds of a stop for another 100mm isn't that big a deal! Also, one reason the 100-500 is so popular is because of the (light) weight.

[@IntothewestOkotoks]

Great review Gordon. I’d love to see how the IQ (and AF) holds up using the 1.4 or 2 teleconverters. And how well this lens works on an R. I know it isn’t always practical to test new lenses on older bodies, but I also don’t have $5500 to drop on a R5. As for 100-500/100-400, I rarely shoot below 400 on my 100-400 - I really just don’t have $10-11k to drop on a 400 prime...so for good IQ this is the only option. But need that 1.4/2 TC to get 600+ either way.

[@mjsvitek]

YES! The EOS-R is a great deal these days which MANY people are picking up

[@Mr-Steam]

Just changed from Nikon D850 to a Canon R5, i went for the 100-400 but thought about changing till you pointed out the f stop difference, great review, one of the best I've seen so I've subscribed. Thank you

[@cameralabs]

Thanks, hope you get a chance to check out some of my other reviews too!

[@Mr-Steam]

@Gordon Laing certainly will, yours are clear, in depth and very precise

[@jacobharter7823]

Gordon, you really hit home with the “it’s so easy to enjoy a video, but then move on without realizing you never subscribed.” KZbin suggests your videos all the time, and I love them, but didn’t realize I wasn’t subscribed until today. I really appreciate the work you put in, and the depth that you go into for videos like these. Keep up the excellent work, definitely subscribed now.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks Jacob, much appreciated!

[@stevenwaldstein2249]

First, thank you for the video. Curious why you never compared the EF 100-400mm to the RF with a 1.4X III converter on the EF lens so they both reached out to 500mm? That would have been nice to see . With the greatly reduced price of readily available used 100-400 that would be a strong consideration I would have thought. Take care.

[@LolekBezBolkaShow]

I love the idea behind this lens, which in my opinion was mostly it's portability for traveling. The compact design simply screams "take me to Iceland/ safari!". If I had to choose between this and a 70-200 I wouldn't hesitate one second and grab the larger lens and have the opportunity to photograph Puffins and have them nicely filling the frame without the need of cropping 300% and loosing a lot of the details. The teleconverters compatibility is a big bonus as well, regardless of the need to zoom in to 300mm to fit the extender tube withing the lens.

[@amitchattopadhyay9367]

Probably the best channel for in depth lens reviews. Thanks

[@cameralabs]

Thankyou!

[@iPig]

Thank you! I wish all reviews and comparisons were just like this. Subscribed.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks, all of mine are!

[@grahamfloyd3451]

Can the lens be locked at 472mm?

[@travelphotovideo2297]

Great video and great explanation as well!!!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@marindacoetzee6760]

After 2 years since you posted your review I still benefit from it! I'm about to buy a 100-500!

[@cameralabs]

Glad you're finding it useful!

[@DrummingTmate]

What I want from Canon is a 500mm F5.6 sharp prime for $3,999. Nikon makes one of these for their F mount and it's always back ordered. F5.6 will work. F11 is ridiculous and zooms...I don't like zooms. I want maximum sharp.

[@dj554825]

I would of killed for this to have a max of F5.6. Would of been worth the extra $2000 or less $3000. But I could see a 500-800 coming out for 8 grand or something. I know cannon claims they dont weaken their gear to keep other stuff selling, but if a 500mm ,800mm 5.6 or 2.8 even we will have our answer. Even if this was 500mm max at the old EF 100-400 F 5.6 it would risk cutting into the lenses I think they plan to sell for 6k+ I would love it... and I think they should of done that.

[@astcell]

That chart at 10:00 is exactly what I needed to see, thank you for this!

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome!

[@lima3341]

does it mean EF lens wins because of longer range F5?

[@martyd5819]

I was some what apprehensive about purchasing this lens. Your thorough review makes me feel so much better about my purchase. My pre-order is on the way.

[@cameralabs]

Glad to have helped - and bonus points if you pre-ordered via one of my links!

[@TomMehlum]

I’m a fairly new follower, but this video is the best I’ve seen from you so far! Great review!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks for following!

[@rossman1377]

Thank you for the very thorough in-depth review. Liked and subscribed.

[@cameralabs]

Glad you enjoyed it! Do check out my other RF lens reviews too!

[@realdeusex]

That was the video, which I was serching for. Thank you. I own the 100-400 II (+ 1.4 Konverter) and I will keep it for my R5.

[@paskrell]

I have the RF 70-200 2.8 and am honestly speaking guttered the converter does not work for it. I think I would probably go to the f11 for bigger zoom as I disagree on the f7.1 in this one considering the cost.

[@cameralabs]

Yes, I think the 600 and 800 will be popular for this reason.

[@philfyphil]

Another excellent, thorough and intelligently presented review, thanks Gordon.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@martinrosen9742]

Just got it used after i lost my ef-100-400 ii to water. I can agree 100% with the review: no discernable difference in image quality on 20mpix r6(mk i). Handling is better though with less weight, faster af and better image stabilizatiön

[@utsavratti]

Another great video, Gordon. Thank you! Maybe one of these days my R5 will finally arrive. Until then, I won’t be ordering any RF lenses. Good to know what’s available, though, and by now Canon have released just about every type of lens I’d ever use. Perhaps the only thing missing is a native pancake lens.

[@cameralabs]

Yes, some really small lenses would be nice - that's why I like the RF 35mm

[@itaylorm]

I am definitely going to get this lens based upon your very detailed and helpful review. Thank you for such wonderful detail. One really important detail to me was the fact that 7.1 only kicks in after 472mm. This is a VERY important detail

[@cameralabs]

You're very welcome!

[@howardduran4148]

Thank you for this, I have the R5, already had ef100-400 II and bought the RF 70-200 and rf800. I’m an old guy and find myself doing local hummingbirds.. I LOVE the RF 800 with the 2X, thx for that video too!!

[@cameralabs]

I'm just about to receive the 600 and 800 for testing, albeit 'only' with the 1.4x TC. How are you enjoying the 800 with the 2x? PS - if you're ever ordering online, please consider using some of my links here or at cameralabs.com thanks!

[@howardduran4148]

Gordon Laing I love it, minimum focus distance is a pain, but getting used to it! My hummingbirds are mostly in shrubs and hard to focus at f22, f11 works well at noon. Took som moon shots either the converter and pleasantly surprised! Sorry about not using your links for purchase will do next time. Thx again

[@paulmarks7185]

I really enjoy your videos. I just ordered your book.

[@cameralabs]

Thankyou, hope you enjoy it!

[@bird271828]

Gordon, I love your reviews. Thank you for the time and effort you put into them. Only if I had the money to buy an EOS R5 + RF 100-500.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks! This one took ages.

[@brucehutson1050]

Thanks so much for this review. Very helpful in filling in some of the blanks I had concerning AF and shutter modes!

[@JPLamoureuxsTravels]

As always a superb review and comparison Gordon thanks for the hard work you have put in to do it for everyone 👍👌😉

[@cameralabs]

Thankyou!

[@u.s.acarpfishing2197]

I just recieved the rf 100-500 and r5 today. May I ask you 1 question. Should I turn IBIS and len IS on or should I turn off 1 of the above for the best image quality?. Thanks!

[@cameralabs]

Turn them BOTH on, they work together for the best results. PS - bonus points if you ordered through my links!

[@iamwavingnotdrowning]

Great review, just bought this lens at a tax-free Boxing day sale, around USD 2,300. Looking forward getting out and shooting some photos now

[@cameralabs]

Nice price! It's a great lens.

[@poudrieres]

I was very surprised to learn that the tele-converter is a hard stop for the zoom at 300mm. Maybe Canon does not expect zoomers to use extenders. And I wonder if Canon can possibly defend the price tag : for the Canon RF 100-500 (lens only) you can get a Sony A73 camera plus the 200-600 lens.

[@cameralabs]

Where can you get an A7 III and 200-600 for $2699 USD?

[@poudrieres]

@@cameralabs In Switzerland the preorder price for the RF 100-500 ist CHF 3099,- . I have spotted the FE 200-600 today for 1529,- (mediamarkt.ch) at 15% discount. The remaining 1600,- gets you pretty close to a discounted A73. I remember having seen the camera retailing at 1700,- recently.

[@cameralabs]

@@poudrieres I think you're looking at some grey imports there for those cheaper prices, so check them for the 100-500 when it's been on sale for a while.

[@poudrieres]

@@cameralabs Sorry Gordon - Mediamarkt is chain of stores owned by Ceconomy, one of Europe's biggest retailers.

[@cameralabs]

@@poudrieres I'd not heard of them. But either way you're comparing the price of gear that's a year to a few years old vs a pre-order at full retail. Give the 100-500 a while on-sale and it'll get discounted too. Obviously if you want or need to buy today though, go for the Sony if price is the biggest concern.

[@andrewphillips2520]

fantastic, comprehensive video... thanks Gordon!

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome!

[@RumourHasitYT]

hmmm, 100-500 and 600-1000 with 2x, I'd like to see that combination reviewed

[@cameralabs]

Me too!

[@RumourHasitYT]

Gordon Laing your the man I’d trust to do it 👍

[@ecmelmutlu]

Hi, this is a great review like R5, thank you so much. Apparently new rf 100-500 beter than the old ef 100-400 is II. I will buy it now :)

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome! PS - if you're ever ordering online, please consider using some of my links here or at cameralabs.com thanks!

[@Hordesdaddy]

Thanks for the great review. I’ve been shooting for the last month using my R6 with my 100-500. Love it! Doesn’t come off my camera!

[@cameralabs]

Make sure you update your firmware!

[@Hordesdaddy]

Gordon Laing yes sir! I updated it when it was available 😊

[@cameralabs]

@@Hordesdaddy good man!

[@rezalotf2362]

Grate review, thanks. In comparison with RF 70-200 in similar focal length , which one is sharper?

[@cameralabs]

Good question. I always try to shoot the same scenes for some of my sample images, so try downloading the matching ones from this and my 70-200 reviews at cameralabs.com to find out. Let us know which you prefer.

[@Sam1986E]

Amazing review as always, please make a review on the RF 15-35mm vs the RF 24-70mm, they overlap in focal lengths but do they perform the same within the overlap??

[@frankluo230]

Can the new lens hood fit on EF 100-400 II? That is about the only thing I want from the new lens. There is not enough difference to upgrade optically or even af speed.

[@cameralabs]

I'm not sure - why would you want to use the new hood? For the colour and reduced slippiness? I fear they're quite expensive accessories.

[@finnillson4808]

The latest AF from Canon is amazing. It’s almost set it and forget it, especially for video. It’s one of the reasons I’m migrating to EF and RF.

[@cameralabs]

I agree - and Sony too - I rarely have to think about manually placing AF areas anymore.

[@gkcima007]

So, how do you get this lens????? No one seems to have any idea when it may be available.

[@cameralabs]

I think pretty much all new gear is experiencing production and distribution delays right now.

[@Bassmunchkin1]

Hi Gordon and many thanks for another excellent review. CAN YOU please direct me towards how I update the firmware on my R10. Have I got to download the firmware to my desktop, put it on to my card via a reader and then put the card in my R10 or iOS there an easier way, many thanks for your help

[@cameralabs]

Unless the phone app has a firmware update function, then sadly you've described the process.

[@garymeredith2441]

Fantastic review their Gordon did a great job I love it . I'm on the verge of moving into the RF system myself I borrowed a friend of mine's R5 to try it I was very confused and the look in the viewfinder ( I didn't like it ) I still do love my 7D Mark II I'm not quite ready to move into the R5 yet but when I do I probably will get the 100 to 500 like what you have used here the only question I have is why can't you use that 100-500 with 1.4 at all focal length's .

[@cameralabs]

because the rear element protrudes too far and would bump up against the TC.

[@HeroShotzphoto]

I was either getting this for my rp or getting the r6 and 600 f11. Sold the rp and got the r6 and 600 and i don't regret it at all.

[@salvamando1]

Great video! Gotta say, I love that tune in the slow mo b-roll, it worked perfectly!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@matthewsequoyah2665]

Wow, I really loved this review ! ! I’m currently carefully investigating each lens on my wish list in order to make a choice of going with the Canon R5 platform vs the Sony a1 with GM lenses. That Sony 200-600 looks really, really sweet, but video stabilization is more stable on the Canon with the 100-500. Decisions, Decisions …

[@cameralabs]

Both great choices!

[@Zimmermann310]

The Sony FE 200-600 ist not a GM Lens ist is just a G lens, but still a very good lens.

[@SandyOstroff]

Thanks for your review. I bought the 100-500 and love it! I'm now thinking of getting the 1.4 or 2x teleconverter. Aside from the issue of not being able to close the lens down below 300mm, is there a preference? Do they both autofocus? What are the minimum F stop on each. Anything else I should know? Thanks in advance!

[@cameralabs]

They should both autofocus, so it depends on what reach you desire.

[@channabasappaballolli5295]

Sir are these both lens compatible for Canon 200D

[@cameralabs]

You must use EF lenses for your 200D. RF lenses are for mirrorless cameras only.

[@channabasappaballolli5295]

@@cameralabs Sir suggest me long distance lens and wide angle lens for Canon 200D

[@cameralabs]

@@channabasappaballolli5295 buy whichever EF lenses you can afford. I don't know your budget or what stores you have access to, nor what you're using it for. Sigma ones may be better value.

[@channabasappaballolli5295]

@@cameralabs I am using Canon 200D

[@karlmullings5824]

Great review thank you Gordon

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome!

[@siegfriednoet]

Again an outstanding thorough review Gordon 👍 Hope to see one of the RF24-70 f2,8 performing on the R5

[@cameralabs]

I've actually used this lens on the R5 a lot and really liked it. Much better than the 24-105.

[@anonymouspdg6121]

Great video comparison as always. Hers a question for you. A friend (it's not me, seriously lol) is looking at moving up from the 7D MKII to R6 & has the EF 100-400 lens. As I have the R5, he asked me if the IBIS will work with the IS on the EF 100-400 if used with the EF - RF adapter. I would assume so but not 100% certain. As you have used both, what's the answer? I cant find this on the Canon website. Cheers

[@cameralabs]

Yes, the IBIS on the R5 and R6 works with the IS of any lens whether it's RF or EF BUT due to the greater communications on the RF lenses, the potential stabilisation will be better from RF lenses. this is why they put a plus symbol next to the hand icon vs no plus on adapted EF lenses.

[@anonymouspdg6121]

Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to reply. I'll let my friend know as he's deciding to upgrade from his 7D MKII to either a 5D MKIV or the EOS R. He's mainly stills on motor sport, with the odd landscape and holiday and usually uses single shot and not high FPS. It's a tough choice as both will do a decent job, especially with the firmware updates to the R that have recently come down. If he could stretch the budget, I'd say go for the R6 but that's just me. Cheers

[@naturealbums]

Already got the 100-400mm mk2 good to see it works well on the R5 not going update it when I get the R5. Just waiting for good prices on grey HK imports. UK pricing has gone bonkers good that you mentioned both prices. It used to be we'd get ripped off in the UK same numbers dollars to pounds nowadays it's actually more £ than $. Americans have got it good.

[@RichardLaurence]

Panamoz has been excellent for me

[@naturealbums]

@@RichardLaurence yes I agree they also give you 3 years warranty which might come in handy considering the price of the R5, e-infin is also another one I keep a close eye on prices tend to be cheaper but only 1 year warranty. I will probably wait till after xmas when the prices are stable. I've got some decent cam gear anyway while I wait.

[@noelchignell1048]

Here in New Zealand we really get ripped off with the R5 costing NZD 7,500 which is USD 4,900 , however we get a full 5 year warranty

[@naturealbums]

@@noelchignell1048 In the UK the official price from a lot of the main cam companies is £4200 that is US $5400 :-(

[@cameralabs]

tax is done differently between the UK and US - our prices already include 20% VAT, whereas theirs do not include state tax. Plus they typically pay a lot more for healthcare and education than we do.

[@TT-dx4ez]

what about in shot zooming for motion?

[@PlanetFrosty]

The greatest RF glass salesman ever! Now you’re tempting glass and that R3, you are truly providing temptation. Gotten your hands on a Ninja V+ that will record 8K ProRes Raw from the R5?

[@michaelkingy355]

Thanks for the video Gordon 👍🏻

[@kennethlui2268]

Sigh, I guess I need to start saving.

[@UraFlight]

Awesome review. Thank you ! I think I will stay with my 100-400 lenses

[@bunkermagnus]

Another stellar review Gordon. Thank you!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks@ Do check out my other Rf lens reviews!

[@jittisoolt5927]

Wonderful work. Thank you.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@shankhanilsarkar2161]

Sir please compare this RF 100-500mm lens with Sigma 150-600mm.. 🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@cameralabs]

This one? www.cameralabs.com/sigma_150-600mm_f5-6-3_dg_os_hsm_sport/

[@shankhanilsarkar2161]

@@cameralabs yes sir!! 😀 This one is the Sigma 150-600 "Sport" version. There is another lower priced version called Sigma 150-600mm "contemporary" version. Compare any one of those two with RF 100-500mm. And, if possible, compare Sony 200-600mm G lens with them too.. That'll be a great telephoto comparison video. CANON rf 100-500mm vs Sigma 150-600mm vs Sony 200-600mm...🔥🔥

[@PaulBawby]

Excellent review on a very interesting lens. I do agree that more affordable 200-600mm would be very interesting as well. Thank you very much for your great work !

[@cameralabs]

You're very welcome!

[@DaveMody]

Great review. Perhaps because I was using the lower refresh rate in eco mode, but I found the EVF of the R5 very difficult to track kiteboarders in mid air vs a 5D body. I also found the subject detection was locking onto waves instead of people when the distances were greater than what you're showing in the video.

[@cameralabs]

Yes, it needs to identify the subject in order to track it, but I still had good success with the surfers when they were further than I showed here. If it's prioritising the waves, I help it along with a zoned area instead, but wide with face detect does work amazingly well for me. Make sure you have human selected too.

[@henrikryhle1536]

Great review, thanks!

[@cameralabs]

You're welcome!

[@stevenbolton5181]

This, like all of your review, is very helpful!!

[@cameralabs]

Thanks, you're very welcome!

[@grahamdixon645]

Great review thank you. Considering the majority of these lenses are used for photographing wildlife, I wish Canon would make a green or preferably camo version, I know that lens covers are available but they don't cover the bright white lens barrel when it is extended. I understand Canon claim it is to reflect heat but other manufacturers are able to overcome this issue so presumably it is just a marketing ploy which is ironic when I would be more inclined to purchase a non white lens.

[@vaibhavpisal]

you can use rp to film 4k for birds for exceptional reach.

[@cameralabs]

Yes, the crop can actually be beneficial for long work!

[@JB_Hobbies]

Well, looks like Canon did not lose its mind with those f/11 primes. This lens looks beastly!

[@relaxingnature2617]

Macro tubes are fun on long lenses

[@gregoryrogalsky6937]

I have zero interest in this Canon lens, but really liked your review. Liked and subscribed.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@Goodman-4525]

If I go on the weekends what are the chances of finding people wake surfing in the lagoon?

[@cameralabs]

Every day you'll see people doing it, but there's also lots of beginners, so don't freak them out! Wait for the more experienced ones if you can, and also ask them for permission. At the end of some days, some of the teachers have a go and they're always amazing.

[@PilotWanderlust]

Thank you, Gordon! Your reviews are 👍

[@cameralabs]

Thanks!

[@JustMorad]

Exactly the review I was looking for :)

[@cameralabs]

Glad you liked it!

[@SuperBuickregal]

Good morning Gordon, thanks for another informative and interesting video. I just received my 800 f/11 with the RF 1.4x and weather permitting will photograph the moon 🌝 using a Fornax LighTrack II tracker. Thanks again! ☕️

[@cameralabs]

I will be receiving the same combo soon! Let me know what you think!

[@SuperBuickregal]

Maybe next week, the weather looks sour for at least a week in N.E Ohio USA.

[@cameralabs]

@@SuperBuickregalI wish you clear skies!

[@marcusrudd6675]

Omg not being able to go below 300 with the teleconverter really messes with it's value proposition.

[@Axonteer]

I cant wait until Sigma and Tamron start making RF lenses. I own the 150-600 from Sigma but... i noticed some focussing quirks when adapting it to my R6 and trying to lock on to moving subjects. There was like... a guey delay lag between me telling the camera to start focussing and it actually starting to work.

[@fylphotography9269]

ughhhh, the Tamron 150-600 G2 has ta similar problem. It works great with fast-moving subjects but for anything that is more stationary the AF twitches in and out instead of locking on.

[@serithin4703]

Gordon, I like your attention to detail here.

[@cameralabs]

Thanks, that's what i aim for! Hope you get to see some of my other videos too...

[@nikonmark37814]

As always an excellent review. I currently use a 6D and 5Ds and own a few L lenses but it's the new RF L lenses that make me want to pick up an R5. The R5 comnined with the new RF lenses seem so much sharper with the added benefit of IBIS and lens IS.