Canon Was BUSY! 3 RF Lenses That Don't Suck

[@cameraconspiracies]

Thank you www.adencamera.com for lending me the Nikon Z30! Let's all go to Aden Camera for the Black Friday Sale coming soon!! If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, I hope a chiropractor is delivering them to you. You're going to need his help. Canon 10-18mm f4.5-6.3 bhpho.to/3QKfEju Canon 200-800mm f6.3-9 bhpho.to/3QJ39os Canon 24-105mm f2.8 bhpho.to/3FH5Gcm Nikon Z30 amzn.to/460Q2mS Nikon 12-28mm f3.5-5.6 amzn.to/3QHGAQX Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/ All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs.com/topaz-video-ai/ref/1640/

[@falxonPSN]

Is their sale in person only or can we shop online?

[@cameraconspiracies]

@@falxonPSN Probably online is fine.

[@JoeCastellon]

This guy has been using the same 3 or 4 music tracks for the last decade, and I love him for it.

[@Levoiar]

I really Hope Aden tells people it's a camera conspiracy when they ask about the 90% buy 1 get 1 free offer.

[@BoostLeekdMedia]

If these Canon and Sony lenses are so good, how come we are still getting blurry images of UFOS and Bigfoot? 🤔🤔 lol

[@taylorhickman84]

They haven't yet figured out bigfoot subject detection AF

[@bikebree2329]

Hey Kasey, Try the STANDARD Profile on the Nikon, the colors are so much nicer there. You have to tweek it tho to look natural. Turn Sharpness -0.5 Midrange Sharpness +2.0 Clarity -1.0 Contrast -1.0. Then also turn Noise Reduction OFF its way too aggressive on the Nikon. If you get those setting i think you will be very pleased with the Nikon, i think its fantastic. Hope you try those settings, have a nice day!

[@cameraconspiracies]

I just made a vlog video with it and that's the one profile I didn't try lol. I'll try it, thanks.

[@bikebree2329]

@@cameraconspiracies Nice! But like i said you have to tweak it the way i described, by default it is waay to contasty and sharpened. Can't wait for you to try it out ;)

[@warn0245]

@@cameraconspiracies Hey Kasey, I thought u looked good w/o the tweaks described above (happen to agree, it will look really good after those minor adjustments. Great that Aden finally got u the combo, will look forward to your full review. Keep up the good work.

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

I saw a South African wildlife shooter who reviewed the 200-800. She said it's best used on subjects up to 30m away, which is pretty close. Focusing on faraway subjects, like the trees that Gordon Lang shot, introduces atmospheric distortion like what you saw. Even an 800mm F/5.6 would show that. But on songbirds at a reasonable distance and in good light, the RF 200-800 will be brilliant. Imagine it on your EOS R. The RF 10-18 will put your R into crop mode automatically, BTW. So it'll function like a 16-29 in FF. That's decent.

[@gavthane]

She actually said that “any” lens is best up to 30m away, because of the atmospheric distortion, especially in hotter climates. This applies to any telephoto lens.

[@Afriqueleblanq]

Likely the video by Janine of Pangolin? That's why most who travel the cat zone of the Kgalagadi have 2 or 3 bodies, with a variety of lenses. One size seldom fits all, in real life on the bipolar planet

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

@@Afriqueleblanq that's the one.

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

@@gavthane that's pretty much what I said (referring to an 800mm F/5.6 having the same problem).

[@bestcameralens]

Atmosferic distorsion my a** 😅😅😅. It's a joke lens. Why doesn't have that on the sony 200-600mm or even on the super expensive canon 800mm 5.6?

[@77dris]

We Canon users don't skip arm day.

[@Yupthereitism]

Canon sucks

[@scottievee330]

WHY???? The 24-105 F2.8. What?? Super bad ass. I ordered it. I'll let you know how sweet it is. Oh. Par effing Focal!!! Please.

[@markharwood]

I cracked up so bad with the smashing glass sound and scream sound effects!

[@KungPowEnterFist]

@14:07 That is not the focus ring. On the Z 180-600 its similarly to the rear and actually closer to the zoom ring than on the E 200-600. The programmable button(s) on the Sony are better positioned than on the Nikon, however, but the Nikon has 4 vs 3 on the Sony.

[@cameraconspiracies]

Last time I said it was closer to the zoom, some guy said it was near the end of the lens. Guess I'll never know for sure lol.

[@cameraconspiracies]

kzbin.infoUgkxg2NKdU412foNnjQjpILcDvWmc1pZXMVu?si=Q2pAxwSwg3tQhVWl

[@cy9nvs]

@@cameraconspiracies It really is the small ring at the bottom, I own the lens. Trust me, bro. For real though.

[@LTPottenger]

Nikon seems to have less destructive algorithms and better looks in general for the same specs when it comes to video.

[@baconcrusader8382]

Looking forward to your review and thoughts on the Z30 and 12-28PZ. Love using the Z30 with the ML-L7 remote as well.

[@jameshenry6855]

The Olympics next year. Time for the big boys to fight. Canon out the gap with lenses.

[@EmeraldAudiovisual]

24-105mm F/2.8 all the way, but that little RF-S lens is nice, indeed.

[@RANnewlife]

While you have z30, is there a chance that you review the Nikkor Z DX 24mm f1.7 lens? Some photos looks like it has 3D pop.

[@warn0245]

Good idea...I see Kasey has been lately using 35mm FF equiv lenses for vlogging and his YT videos. I have this ittle lens, usually perma-fixed to my Nikon Z fc. For an affordable lens, it really punches above it's weight class., and not nearly as bulky or heavy as the Vitrox and Sigma Z DX bright primes.

[@keithnisbet]

Hilarious. Live Action Animation. Love the "Cripple Hammer".

[@dr_squirrel]

The f9 sounds worse than it is. Add a 1.4 TC to a 600 f6.3 and, surprise, you‘re at f9. Plus it has the same weight as a 200-600. Even the 800 f11 is not as bad as it sounds, so this one with all its flexibility will sell like hot cake. If you have the budget and the muscles you‘re free to get the 800 f5.6

[@jeffbronson3696]

The problem is that from 200-600mm, the Canon is slower than the Nikon and Sony by 1/3 to 2/3 stops at all focal lengths. Brings down the versatility of the 200-800mm. Further, the external zoom requires about 140 degrees of rotation (ie, twisting the zoom ring with your entire hand 3-4 times), whereas the Nikon and Sony variants are internal zooming and only require 60 degrees of turning which can be done with your fingers

[@OateyMeal]

What's up with the swinging exposure changes?

[@cameraconspiracies]

I couldn't figure out how to get out of auto ISO lol. The touchscreen ISO control lets you change ISO but then it reverts to auto. The ISO button also does nothing. Finally read the manual and you have to hold the ISO button down and use the front dial to enter manual ISO.

[@photobeast]

Aden has the Canon rf200-800mm sale now for $2,599 on pre-order...and the RF 100-500mm for $3899 for a damaged box version. According to them you're saving a whopping $389 by buying it from them at 80% markup from everybody else

[@vincentnavea6999]

you got it right. i hate external zooms.

[@FlatWaterFilms]

Cool for video, sometimes.

[@chipsrafferty8362]

Canon 200-800,such a great surprise for wildlife shooters,perfect for midday use when all the critters have sought shelter for the day,,,800mm f9,awesome.

[@NateSceneTV]

True I guess I'm better off buying the 800mm f11

[@Afriqueleblanq]

That cheetah in the shade of the matopi, gnawing at its slain springbok won't escape when you stalk it at 2:13PM when temp is 43°C. 😊

[@glennschiffer1742]

after 4:30pm with the sun in my back and a f9 at 800mm I'm sure to get some nice shots

[@chipsrafferty8362]

@@glennschiffer1742 your sure to or you have?

[@dougkelly8956]

eh, there's no alternative for budget-constrained shooters. Any reasonably priced xx-400 or xx-600 with a TC is going to be f/9 or worse. So, sure, it's great to dream about wider apertures at 800mm, but you're just not going to get it on a budget. Canon has a very nice 800/5.6 they'll sell you for only $17k or so....

[@ekjellgren]

Thanks for Gordon mode engaged. You should do a collab!

[@tankivulture148]

3:30 I don't think you're going into diffraction on that one, if you calculate it for 700nm (deep visible light red, your possible worst case scenario) you are diffraction limited at roughly 7.5um pixels, meaning that smaller ones at that wavelength fall into diffraction. Your camera, the A7s III has bigger pixels than that so you're mostly good to go. My guess is that the lens gets less sharp at f11, which is plausible, mix that with natural light that's not favorable to your shot and you get something that just feels cheaper. Probably it has something to do also with the "processing" that Sony does to their footage and how the camera software works at small apertures, but, don't quote me on that.

[@RealShaneReimer]

24-105mm 2.8 will be the wedding photographers holy grail lens

[@briandipierro8865]

Is there a way to lock exposure on the Z30? I actually want one! But it's so distracting how it goes slightly lighter and darker

[@cameraconspiracies]

Yes but it was hard to find lol.

[@danieldougan269]

Canon are making amazing RF lenses. But who can afford them? RF mount needs Sigma and Tamron, and I hope Canon will eventually come to their senses. That new 24-105mm f2.8 is a game changer...but holy crap is it expensive! I am sticking with Micro Four Thirds.

[@malekith13]

a game changer ? in a world where third company like tamron and SAMYANG managed to make some crazy 35-150 F2-2.8 ? i mean... sure the 24mm might be great, but so is the 150mm... and it's way cheaper...

[@hbp_]

Well, I'm surprised that it's so cheap compared to anything of similar quality. Take for example ZEISS LWZ.3 that will cost you more than a double and it's not even FF. Ok, it's parfocal and has zero breathing etc, so you'll actually get some value for the money, but it's not as fast or lightweight. Canon's previous attempt in EF was toneh 4. What else is even available that is comparable and compatible? Angénieux EZ series perhaps, but those are 10..20k lenses and you'd need two to cover the same range. However, I only have an EOS R and I don't think I want another RF mount camera.

[@dantecooper4705]

24-105 is greatly priced! Think about it this way. This is the first of its kind that can go on a camera and never come off. I shoot weddings with a 24-70 2.8 and the 135 1.8. This lens literally will replace these. The difference between 105 and 135 is like 2 steps back or forward. Those lenses cost about $4500 together. 1 lens $1500 less Canon just said here ya go we just did you a favor. Now my R6 will have the 35 1.8 for macro work and the 16 2.8 for tight rooms but, this lens will not leave my R5 body

[@malekith13]

@@dantecooper4705 Pretty sure a portrait shot at 105mm F2.8 would look nothing like a 135mm F1.8 though ^^ And we can clearly see you think only with a mindset of someone using a closed mount, on other mount you can have a tamron 35-150 F2-2.8 for 1999€ or nearly the same with samyang for 1349€... while the canon is 3599€... I know third party are usally cheaper than first party but still that's quite a lot there to call it a "greatly priced" lense ^^

[@hbp_]

@@dantecooper4705 yeah, they are getting closer to the B4 ENG lenses. Now add an integrated 2x extender and that's it.

[@przybylskipawel]

Properly corrected for astigmatism and LaCA mirrorless version of the Sigma 8-16mm lens would be a dream!

[@JoATTech]

Thx for the fan noise in the background :P

[@victor.ivanov]

OK, I’ll say that: I’m not often laughing during lens review videos. Today I laughed

[@JerryWilliam63]

"Gerald Undone couldn't undo that."

[@WestVirginiaWildlife]

8:49 haha, that's me

[@daveinportland]

With that mic I keep waiting for you to announce the next song or to start taking callers.

[@warn0245]

I love the aesthetics of the old school mic, and Kasey sounds great with it. Gotta get me one of thiose - affiliate link, Kasey?

[@cameraconspiracies]

Affiliate link to the rescue! amzn.to/40qEJ6g

[@paulthomas8986]

Pounce on that Nikon Z30. I don't know what you did but the skin tones actually looked good, unlike the usual pork color skin tones Nikon usually delivers.

[@earthpond8043]

Damn 200-800 shiiiiit I’ve only ever used the 400

[@NARFALICIOUS]

I watched your entire pre-video-ad. it was for an automatic cat waterer.

[@mixdown78]

Video Wish, could you please do a video or a list with Lenses with 3d-popp that you've had in your Hands? Thank you so much

[@stingforever]

5:45 It was blasphemy!!! 🤣🤣🤣

[@corykphotography]

Nikon Z 30, is it secretly amazing?

[@joelbeets]

Can you explain glimmer glass a bit more. Can you stack multiple GG filters for extra glimmer?

[@cameraconspiracies]

They come in different strengths, no need to stack them. Slightly better than a mist, less hazy.

[@joelbeets]

Is it an iridescent effect?

[@TungstenOvergaard]

There is a noise in the back (a hum, all video). Is that the water distiller?

[@cameraconspiracies]

It was super loud too. That's why I had the mic pointed away from it lol.

[@TungstenOvergaard]

:-)@@cameraconspiracies

[@PeteBreen]

The HAMMER!

[@spyder000069]

I have the 100-500 and 1.4x tele and the 800F11. In my opinion the 100-500 on its own is a great lens but for birding often its not enough reach. The 800F11 has helped me get some great shots on my R7 but you need the light and I have been caught several times where a bird perches 10 feet from me and I can't get the shot because of the large minimum focus distance of the 800F11. The 100-500 with the 1.4x tele brings you to F10 and 700mm so you lose a little reach over the 800F11 and basically not much difference in light. Comparing that combo to the 800F11 with the image zoomed in to the same size the quality I saw was very similar. Now, the new 200-800 I think is going to be a good middle ground pricewise and at the long end still has more reach and F9 over the L series and supposedly has a much shorter minimum focus distance so it will be more versatile. Not to mention being cheaper and less worry if you drop it or it gets stolen. I think its going to be a big seller.

[@MonicaHolly143]

Can u test the 20-40 f4 sony, i feel like its the most versatile lens in sony lineup

[@hikertrashfilms]

That lens sucks..too dark and heavy vignetting

[@JamieFurlong]

20-40 most versatile?

[@cameraconspiracies]

There's no such lens. There's a lame Tamron 20-40mm f2.8, or a heavy boring Sony 20-70mm f4. Neither fulfill my desires for more Voigtlander pop :)

[@Afriqueleblanq]

Lions don't brush, their breath is a bit stale. Which is why I can see where that 800mm Canon bazooka can work for me. Have Canon, will shoot. 😂

[@TheYouTubeMechanic]

nice 2qt mason jar

[@PrimalShutter]

Those low apertures are like m4/3 competitors, basically the olympus 150-400 for 1/4 of the price They just dropped the ball on the thinnest focus ring ever and not being an internal zoom, of course they couldn't make it perfect

[@romanpul]

Oh look, Canon made a portable darkroom.

[@przybylskipawel]

Thanks to Sony not being external zoom it can enhance your breathing by its own focus breathing. At close focus it angle of view @600mm is actually below 400mm! BTW Canon zooms out by about 9cm, so you can calculate the size.

[@frankluo230]

Canon is truly pushing lens design boundaries like no others. Look at pricing on Nikon 800f6.3 or 400f4.5 I don't see why 200-800 was criticized being expensive. Literally cheaper and lighter than 180-600 or 200-600 with 1.4x You get equal f9 at 800mm. Meanwhile 24-105f2.8 is like a dream lens, cheaper than any ordinary cine f2.8 zoom let alone ff cine zoom with par focal and focus breathing control

[@andrewdoeshair]

I’ve always thought a 24-105 F2.8 would be the one lens that could make me happy to own one lens, but I had no idea it would be so huge and expensive 😂 I guess be careful what you wish for. I can’t own that thing after all.

[@9Mtikcus]

800mm F/9 is not great for low light in forests etc but it has reach... Internal zoom is great however the ability to push/pull to zoom on some lenses allow for quick adjustments (not sure if this is possible on canon lenses).

[@ledheavy26]

Who has made a push/pull zoom lens since the late 90s or early 2000s?

[@9Mtikcus]

@@ledheavy26 sigma 100-400 contemporary lens, quite a few others can be zoomed by pulling the lens too (even if not officially supported)

[@ledheavy26]

@@9Mtikcus Oh, you're literally just yanking on the lens that's designed to use a twisting motion on a ring and not an actual push pull zoom mechanism? I don't know about that lol, but you do you.

[@9Mtikcus]

I wouldn't call it yanking.. but here is sigmas official info "Push/pull zoom mechanism incorporated For quick control of the angle of view, the zoom ring incorporates a push/pull mechanism in addition to the regular twist mechanism. The exclusive lens hood has also been designed to accommodate push/pull zooming and overall lens manoeuvrability. By making it possible to adjust the angle of view instantly, this lens gives photographers an even better chance of getting that crucial shot."@@ledheavy26

[@cy9nvs]

Hey, 14:04 that up there is just a rubberized surface, no movable ring! The focus ring is lower, between the Nikkor lettering and the zoom ring, similar placement to that on the Sony lens.

[@cameraconspiracies]

That's what I said initially kzbin.infoUgkxg2NKdU412foNnjQjpILcDvWmc1pZXMVu?si=Q2pAxwSwg3tQhVWl Then some Nikon guy corrected me and said it was near the end.

[@epicedventures]

Olymipcs are coming 🎉… olympics of cameras.

[@Wildridefilms]

The canon R100 has a huge 1.55x crop in 4k, making the crop factor 2.5. So even the 10-18 would be a 25-45 equivalent lens, and be a little tight for vlogging. Not to mention, if you need digital stabilization, it crops even more. So it's not as practical as you make it out to be. Something like a GX85 with a 12-32 will be slightly lighter and you get 4k and IBIS. If you don't want IBIS, the G100 is even lighter.

[@cameraconspiracies]

1080p exists.

[@Wildridefilms]

@@cameraconspiracies 1080p on those cameras are terribly line skipped and thus soft, aliased and noisy. Coupled with a slow lens like the 10-18, you'll have terrible noise. You'd genuinely get a much better image out of a smartphone than 1080p on the R100.

[@OfficialSushiSystemAmbassador]

Your video has so much pulse in it, sheesh. It almost feels like you would see Nikon’s heartbeat visually crawling into your stream, and I swear, I didn’t take any LSD.

[@JaredDoyle76]

Congratulations to Canon. They now have 3 more lenses to add to the handful of RF glass 😂😂

[@ChadsGarage1]

If you don't buy the DJI Pocket 3....... I STG!!

[@yukolos]

canon is a grower, sony is a shower. pls accept both

[@hkm5757]

Ill stay with the zuiko 100-400mm.

[@spelunkerd]

The most annoying thing about my old Canon L glass is that the IS motor makes too much noise to mount a shotgun mic on the camera body.

[@jaywbus]

I’ve been on canon for a year plus. I’d saw Sony has better options. Crop and full frame and smallest lightest lenses. In my way out and to Sony.

[@JaredDoyle76]

You are on the correct path to enlightenment 👍

[@Yupthereitism]

Sony is the better system at the moment

[@m11kan]

And the sweet spot of the 200-800mm f6.3-9. Is that now the wildlife lens of choice over the 100-500mm?

[@hikertrashfilms]

I agree, Canon is killing it with lenses, so has Nikon. Sony has been pushing hot trash the last two years.

[@JaredDoyle76]

Ok 🤣🤣

[@m11kan]

Why do you have waterbottle on your table? 😁

[@cameraconspiracies]

I find it hydrates the body.

[@enerbot283]

why is the focus on the mike instead of your head? Are you prettier in the blur?

[@vukhuat4251]

I feel poor for Canon APS-C users. If Canon had made the same move with Nikon, they would have the better option, Sigma 10-18 F2.8, instead of this super slow F4.5-6.3 lens.

[@cameraconspiracies]

Sigma isn't stabilized though. Would be much heavier if it was most likely.

[@infiveg]

Да ты достал меня уже! Хватит уже пилить столько классных роликов. Мне свои нужно монтировать, а тут ты со своими приколами

[@andyrotchadl6433]

If you adjust that white balance with the max settings you'd have a nice rack of lamb going on there

[@ottenburg]

The hammer is back! :-)

[@philsmeanderings7991]

Nikon is pretty darned good. Wouldn't under estimate picture control settings on the say Z50. For myself flat profile with only a fraction of saturation , nothing else, comes up well , as well as in Davinci Resolve where the sharpness actually is usable. Got myself the Z180-600. On the Z50 gives 900mm. Internal Zoom. Not too jealous of these other lenses. Always entertaining , good stuff.

[@derJackistweg]

there is nothing more fun than MKT BS: "3D pop" - who got popped? (which = in German language f***) "Canon skin colors" - whose skin? White skin I assume ....? but my favorite is: "Microcontrast" - THAT is great. If something is THAT tiny that you need to call it "micro", it is probably BullShit. It is like a "micro" salary raise. When your boss tells you "you will get a mico-salery-raise" - you know you got BSed.

[@louisgaarphotography4249]

You make me want to shoot videos; shame on you. I'm just a lowly photographer, like a sloth seeing the world one frame at a time between blinks. You're a bad influence. Now I must transform to a video creature. Thanks for your videos - I think. :)

[@xmeda]

200-800/5.6-8 would be more interesting lens. And yes extending zooms arw weird for hi-end lenses. I have 50-500 Brigma where the 10x zoom ratio is too big to have it in single barrel, but for shooting outside I prefer 100-300/4 that does not extend at all. 24-105/2.8 is very nice range. It will be cute to have similar 14-70/1.8 for APS-C :D

[@OfficialSushiSystemAmbassador]

Hello, the Canon lens extended so much that it broke the top of my display. Where can I get my money back?

[@ledheavy26]

The 24-105 relies on digital camera corrections for being parfocal and for distortion correction when zooming, and from what ive seen it looks bad. They also only sell a PUSH BUTTON servo option that is more than TWICE the cost of their other servo zoom that uses a proper rocker. The Canon cripple hammer hit that one hard.

[@FlatWaterFilms]

The PZ-E2B Power Zoom Adapter from Canon enables complex zoom control for the RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z lens. Zoom speed of the DC motor can be adjusted via a dial in a stepless manner to allow rapid and low-speed zooming.

[@ledheavy26]

@@FlatWaterFilms Still inferior to a rocker that does that in one control at your fingertips. Try zooming slow and then fast on the fly during one zoom movement, and smooth while turning a dial on the front of the control while pressing a button on the side.

[@FlatWaterFilms]

@@ledheavy26 Yup, canon cripple tech.

[@kniferideaudio]

Nice flat earth map! Birds aren't real!

[@houserhythm]

Nikon 180-600 doesn't have a dedicated focus ring. It's just the super thin control ring that does focus by default. But that part at the very end is not a ring, just looks like it is. But the control ring is smooth and easily reachable.

[@cameraconspiracies]

That's what I said initially kzbin.infoUgkxg2NKdU412foNnjQjpILcDvWmc1pZXMVu?si=Q2pAxwSwg3tQhVWl Then some Nikon guy corrected me and said it was near the end.

[@joelbeets]

My friend told me that his cousin, who works for Panasonic, told him that the GH7 is going to have a Sennheiser microphone array. Possibly 12 internal microphones. Do you think this idea will backfire?

[@adz-ql6kv]

my friend's cousin's Aunty's neighbour's daughter's school teacher's boyfriend's mother's father in-law... used to work for Canon but nothing to do with photography. if I recall correctly he used to be a salesman for Canon inkjet printers. then he had a heart attack after he was made redundant. but he still worked for Canon and he was closer than you or anyone ever could be to these lenses.

[@joelbeets]

Was he vaccinated?

[@peterb.7437]

Lol😂yeah you do hates these new releases ha ha.

[@przybylskipawel]

And nothig can beat the Sigma S 60-600mm. This lens kicks ass!

[@TerryKontopoulos]

Check again where the focus ring of Nikon is you blogger😢

[@cameraconspiracies]

kzbin.infoUgkxg2NKdU412foNnjQjpILcDvWmc1pZXMVu?si=Q2pAxwSwg3tQhVWl I said it was here first, then some Nikon guy said it was the giant thing near the end.

[@warn0245]

@@cameraconspiracies U were right the firsttime, the Nikon guy that told u otherwise didn't know what he was talking about.

[@sagetheowlfatfeathery2083]

Note that the wide lens is an APS-C lens, so not the best on your EOS R.

[@cameraconspiracies]

EOS R 4k crop is 1.745x.

[@jukeboxjohnnie]

The 24-105 F2.8 will seriously SUCK! They cant even design a sharp 24-105 F4, wish I hadnt gone to them from Sony...

[@jameshenry6855]

😂 Walk like wildebeast

[@bestcameralens]

F9 is way too much. F7.1 would have been the limit. But unfortunately Canon still Apple of the cameras...😢

[@WestVirginiaWildlife]

At 800mm your options are limited. 7.1 would balloon the price and weight.

[@lumixS5M2]

But need pay near 3000,00 to buy a plastic or alu pipe with glas i it. Its lot money to take a picture with my R10.

[@tunamelts7875]

🚨Anima lie detect 🚨

[@derJackistweg]

90% off - off what? 12 months ago I bought a GH6 with 400€ "off"/ aka cashback. Though the price of the GH6 went UP before 200€. So don´t be idiots, and check the price of the last 3-6 months.

[@KungPowEnterFist]

Canon 100-500: I feel that there must be two versions of this lens. Camp A says this lens is super sharp, amazing, best lens ever, yadi, yadi. Camp B says this lens as merely adequate sharp but only in full or near full Sun, its a dust and moisture vacuum, bad AF performance, ridiculously long zoom throw, poor quality/durability overall, not good with TC's, and a few other minor cons. I have used it on an R5, and I am in Camp B. The AF performance is horrible, the sharpness is not good, the zoom throw is way too much, TC's are a total no-go, and on the whole its a kit quality lens that should only cost maybe $1200. When I see pictures people post online it is obvious that this lens has inferior resolving power, and folks are having to do heavy denoise, post bokeh, and post sharpening to get the images look at least ok. It is more expensive than the Z 100-400, Z 180-600 and E 200-600, while being clearly inferior to all three of those options.

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

Hmmm… I do hate the way the RF100-500 handles TCs but oh boy, it does capture extremely sharp pictures. The AF surely is fast but not always quick enough to capture the subject when it is not positioned ideally (e.g. bird on a branch and lots of distracting other branches surrounding it). I do like the RF100-500 simply due to the fact that is my favorite travel lens for hiking and birding as it has a close focus distance, so I can also take macro-ish pictures of insects, flowers, etc and 100mm is also great for portraits of my kids/wife.

[@siljuholtet]

The 100-500 is extremly sharp. That is the truth.

[@KungPowEnterFist]

@@siljuholtet Then I think you'll love the RF 200-800, as it will be "extremely sharp" to you. I will reserve judgement until I get to try one. From very few reviews with image samples I have seen so far, it looks to be a spectacular white turd. Not just any white turd. Spectacular!

[@siljuholtet]

Lets hope so, i have ordered one.@@KungPowEnterFist

[@ivo_17]

Get rid of all your stupid zoom lenses, and buy just primes, and use the Sony Clear Image Zoom, which is almost lossless, since it's cropping on the high megapixel sensor (your a7S III has a 48MP sensor). If you get a 300mm f/2.8, with CIZ you can have 300-600mm f/2.8 (photo & HD) or 300-450 f/2.8 (4K)! You are welcome! Just have in mind that the CIZ works only before pixel binning kicks in ("dual ISO"), otherwise it's just a stupid digital zoom!

[@1000ПОДПИСЧИКОВБЕЗВИДЕО-ш9э]

Sound very noizy ...why?

[@MHarvey-tp5km]

I'm not impressed by a 24-105 f2.8 when tamron already put out a 35-150 f2 months ago. If you want lens selection go with Sony or Nikon. Canon is for suckers who want to be trapped into buying only Canon gear.