BioChemist Argues God Exists... Using Biology, Dr. Sy Garte // CCv1 Session 3

[@DAVIDMONDAY-fd8bd]

I am a molecular biologist with two masters degree in Biology. I hold a bachelor degree in biology and I can say categorically that I am still fascinated till date at the genetic code. The more I study molecular biology, the more I come to believe that God is real.

[@gilbertengler9064]

I am also fascinated but what has God to do with it? Billions of years is what you need, not GOD. You may have a bag full with basic scientific knowledge but you are missing the point concerning evolution. Don't worry, you are not the only one! 😊

[@conanthegreat4418]

@@gilbertengler9064 The Universal Prime Force ("God") has EVERYTHING to do with it. Even the Bible says it. "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground (abiogenesis), and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul (imbued a spiritual essence, or "soul"). Gen. 2:7 DNA had to have been CREATED by an intelligence, because it could not have possibly been created randomly. The very fact that DNA exists AT ALL, suggests an origin: the Universal Prime Force, or Force of All Forces. It is a scientific precept, LONG before it is a religious one.

[@gilbertengler9064]

@@conanthegreat4418 Oh my GOD can be used here!

[@conanthegreat4418]

@@gilbertengler9064 Indeed...

[@tom-hy1kn]

@@gilbertengler9064 Do you get houses, cars, refrigerators, toasters or computers from billions of years? The chemicals that make up life break down after days or months. The chemicals that make up life that would come together by chance break down soon after they are made.

[@brianhart5317]

A scientist who acknowledges God can achieve so much more than one who denies even the possibility of his existence, just my opinion.

[@JesusCreatedAllThings]

Mine too. Thanks for sharing.

[@bluemastermage4874]

I just found out about this guy and I absolutely love hearing his views and ideas because they are so in line with mine. How he talks about God, science, and Christianity going hand in hand is fantastic!!

[@justaway6901]

I don't think that's how it works my friend

[@JesusCreatedAllThings]

@@justaway6901 Please explain why you feel that way. I’d like to understand your point.

[@markita.hardenhome]

AGREED!

[@beeinthebodytorahclass2002]

Mankind can never answer how God created the universe and life, that kind of knowledge is beyond human understanding. God created man to walk by faith.

[@gilbertengler9064]

how can a human being that probably went to school and had some basics of "the scientific method", can say things like that. Humanity will disappear soon from ignorance!

[@daniellegeorge4526]

AMEN

[@harryhill5999]

"Mankind can never answer how God created the universe and life," This is probably true because mankind will never be able to answer the question what is god, what caused it, how does it do the things it is said to do. Mankind however will eventually be able to answer how the universe and life began, because we are adding daily to our knowledge about these things and have many plausible hypotheses.

[@michael-ramirezKJV]

If you make heaven, you can ask him yourself!

[@gilbertengler9064]

What a stupid conclusion

[@Graceglory1]

This is wonderful to see and hear!! UC Irvine 1976 grad in BioSci, Honors in Biochemistry. Christian now 45 years. I am in the 11% of redeemed biologists!!

[@asunder6797]

It appears however you should have devoted more time for Academic Biblical Scholarship.

[@blueskies7357]

You are wise. "For his (God’s) invisible qualities are clearly seen from the world’s creation onward, because they are perceived by the things made, even his eternal power and Godship, so that they are inexcusable" - 9 Romans 1:20

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

Redeemed? You mean the 11% that not only have no contribution to science but actually spreads misinformation?

[@PaulChater-z9t]

I’m an atheists but no one should say there isn’t a god. The truth is, there no proof or evidence. Only personal opinion. That also goes for design, there isn’t conclusive evidence. One person guess is has good as another.

[@kathleenherrmann436]

​@@PaulChater-z9tyou don't believe some theories have more validity by nature more than others? I'm just curious

[@megalopolis2015]

The more I get to know Sy, the more I appreciate him and am blown away by his intellect. He's awesome. ❤

[@mcmanustony]

Have you tried listening to or reading people who actually work in the relevant areas? Garte hasn't done any science in a while. It's been all Jesus for some time. This is just pitiful rubbish. "future science of the gaps"? WTF?? What does he think science is? What does he think scientists do? Work on problems that are already solved?

[@megalopolis2015]

@@mcmanustony His doing science actively led him to belief in Christ, not him believing after retirement or something. If you wish to have Christianity go away overnight, find Jesus' bones. No one else was able to do it, including Roman guards, whose lives depended on it, but you're probably way more clever, so go for it.

[@mcmanustony]

​@@megalopolis2015 "His doing science actively led him to belief in Christ" - which seems to have ended his interest in science- and intellectual honesty. This is just drivel. Dishonest shameful drivel. He misrepresents Origin of Life research to the level of utter absurdity. "I call it "future science of the gaps" ".......what the fk does he think science IS or what scientists DO? Should they be working on problems that are already solved? You're blown away.....good grief..... Where are Herod's bones? Joseph of Arimathea? Any ideas? You have a story. That's all. You're welcome to it....and thankfully, these days, I'm free to dismiss it without fear of being murdered. Try reading some science.

[@barn_a]

@@megalopolis2015 Sy seems to be lying and preaching to this crowd, as he specifically states that "self replication is a property solely of life, in fact its a property solely of living cells." This is a very clear lie, as he is ignoring the existence of autocatalytic RNA (ribozymes) which are capable of accurate self replication, and are not living cells or organisms. He has to do this, as their existence alone provides a solution to his talking point where he states that evolution is a circular reasoning fallacy, because there is evidence that ribozymes could have formed spontaneously prebiotically, and thus no evolution was required. Gradually these molecules would have mutated and through natural selection of molecules, the first protocells would have formed. He is basically ignoring years of origin of life research in order to defend his fragile world view.

[@mcmanustony]

@@megalopolis2015 you have translations of edited accounts of stories about people who heard from people who heard about people who heard from eyewitnesses….allegedly. I’ll stick with what can be observed.

[@Popslolli]

All for The Glory of God. 😊

[@barn_a]

The person who did this talk doesn't know what they are talking about.

[@johnlennox-pe2nq]

Sy Garte. Evolution/Darwinist, even worse than Hugh Ross. He doesnt hold fast to Scripture or believe Adam was first man or brought the Fall, by sin; My reading: ''advocates soulless hominids (who exhibited human characteristics of painting, burying dead, etc.) before Adam and Eve.''. Blocked when asked questions of Creation on Twitter. He was re-posting ''Noah and the Flood... child's fairy tale'' and didnt seem to want to explain his position...maybe since he has thousands of X followers who also buy his advertised books. I confronted him on his colleague [pictured arms around each other] who has been grafting rats pelts/fur on to aborted babies'; ignored the truth & blocked States geological earth is billions of yrs old. AiG, look up any expose

[@marissacapitin2852]

God bless scientist they introduced Gods super power, existence and creativity. To God be the glory

[@ulftnightwolf]

Amazing u got all that without studying any scientific theory apparently.

[@Andrew-un8tx]

which god? There are thousands to choose from.

[@GreatDivideSven]

​@@Andrew-un8txallah

[@Andrew-un8tx]

@@GreatDivideSven The plagiarized verson of Judiasm? LOL. That's one of the goofiest of them all. Not much different than Mormonism or Scientology.

[@vhawk1951kl]

does not your mister god not already know how fcuking wonderful it is or does it *need all that fawning crawling and sucking-up? If the characteristics are imaginary is not whatever is the sum of its characteristics also imaginary?You might as well lie when you are certain you cannot be contradicted, so you do, but must you lie so poorly? You keep chanting your lie Elsie, maybe you will convince your self.

[@karieclingo8328]

My Dad, who is a Nuclear Physicist, and a Christian, states that "Atheists have to have Faith to believe their theories...." He has proven scientifically that evolution is a false theory. No one can prove that God doesn't exist.

[@royster7170]

Amen!

[@projectkordamye1361]

The occurence of evolution is a scientific fact, the theory of evolution actually only pertains to whys and hows regarding its occurence. Atheism is actually the opposite of requiring faith as the only thing inherent to atheism is the lack of belief in a deity, attributing more than that to atheism is actually dishonest.

[@joanhyde1745]

As a biochemist with a Ph.D. And a firm Christian, I am delighted to hear other scientists explain why there is evidence for aGod.

[@MamaMama-sv3b]

But atheist want to encounter god through science

[@mcmanustony]

@@MamaMama-sv3b No they don't. That makes zero sense.

[@gunterra1]

Is there such a thing as CHRISTIAN BIOCHEMISTRY. I have never heard of it. I think it would be much wiser to let everyone believe what they want to believe instead of calling for the authority of science to prop up some people's shaky faith by proving that God exists. If people need such proof to have faith, then their FAITH is useless, in my view.

[@MamaMama-sv3b]

@@gunterra1I m Muslim we don’t believe evolution we believe Adam and Eve

[@wbshappy1]

The problem with science is scientists point of view. Scientists don't realize that all they can do is examine God's creation; and understand what what He's done. That's how this Christian knows God is smarter than me and you. Science's examination of God's cration doesn't disprove God's existence, any more than learning how some extremely complex work of art was done. Would you believe the artist didn't exist, because you figured out how he did it, or would you marvel at his genius? As Christians, we marvel at God's genius in all of creation and welcome scientific discoveries. But we don't adhere to scientific blasphemies (ie., God doesn't exist) because He's proven His existence in our minds and hearts. We wish, as He does, that you would decide to humble your hearts and accept His love and the Savior (Jesus)), so that your eyes could be opened to the spiritual vista that is all around you. The only thing that would change is your point of view. Except for tinkering with God's creation in genetics, there's nothing wrong with science. BTW... Mathematicians and Physicists are proving that dimensions exist beyond our limited scope. There are KZbin videos discussing this, If you are really interested in learning it. So, if you want proof you can buy into, check out Dr. Chuck Missler's video on angels and physics. The math is way over my head, but he should give you a start, if you're really intellectually honest; it would be worth an hour or two to hear him. @@gunterra1

[@nadzach]

I have a strong childhood memory of holding my puppy and enjoying his puppy kisses and breath. I had looked up into the bare branches of our old oak. They was no religion whatsoever in my family. I knew there was God. I think all children have a sense of God, but something changes around the age of 12. There comes a time when we want explanations and we look to education. Immediately we become convinced (by educators) that we are a species in the animal kingdom. Everything builds from there. I remember an important phrase from my teens, "God is dead." In a weird way, this confirmed that knowledge buried deep within. I rebelled. God was not dead--not in me.

[@kathyhorvath1471]

Check out Ken ham and creation in genisis also Christian apologists like Dave hunt, ray comfort. U r correct, we have to equip our kids with scientific defence of God and there is plenty.

[@nadzach]

@@kathyhorvath1471 OK, I will. I had a kind of epiphany as I was thinking things through. The spirit of God was "brooding" on the face of the waters when God said "Let there be light." I could see, in a way, the brooding of an eagle over its nest. The soft fluttering of wings like purring. And from those cold icy waters there came light. Like when warm air rises through the high snow clouds creating LIGHTNING. We used to recite the Apostles' Creed in church. Jesus was "Conceived by the Holy Spirit." I thought about the Holy Spirit coming upon Mary. Perhaps a good word would be "brooding" over her...creating the son of God. It made sense to me, then, and the Spirit of God brooded on the face of the deep. And God said, "Let there be light." I can see how atomic particles can be created from light/photons. When matter collides with antimatter, both are obliterated...leaving only light. I can't say in what way the word is light, but I know it is. All things are created with Christ and are of Christ. He is in everything. Blessed be the name of the Lord! (TY for the referral. I'll check it out)

[@alexluthiger731]

To lose the connection and reverence to one's own God or declare God's Wisdom and Intelligence for dead is a silly and irrational self-punishment aiming at spiritual and moral decay of the spirit-denying beings. They get drawn away from spiritual evolution and the peace of the Lord by their own evil thoughts and deeds. It's God eternal and just Judgement and won't be reversed by the Christ Jesus from Nazareth. 🍷😘❤️‍🔥

[@nadzach]

@alexluthiger731 when I think of only two cells coming together with enough code to ultimately create a man, I know there was a programmer that must be a God. Those two cells create 30,000,000,000 cells all coded with individual purpose. Evolution is a joke.

[@br.m]

@@nadzach If I may offer my own opinion... Try not to get too dismissive of supernatural things. There is no need for it. Atomic particles, light photos, matter anti-matter. Sure these things are interesting... Just make sure that you don't let science bump theology out of the picture. You don't want to end up like for example, people who waste their lives pretending the star that led the wise men to baby Jesus was anything less than supernatural. They try to say it was Jupiter in regress or something when it was obviously a supernatural entity guiding them.

[@patrickpease1394]

I love it when science and God are presented together. May Jesus bless you. Amen. And thank you

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@Patrick Pease, then you should love science refuting the Genesis I Creation Myth, and the Genesis Flood Myth.

[@patrickpease1394]

Already seen that junk. Holes in it everywhere. Did you know that there is more evidence for the biblical flood than anything else ever found. Science facts over scientist.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@patrickpease1394 " Did you know that there is more evidence for the biblical flood than anything else ever found." LOL Not even close. "Science facts over scientist." Science refutes the Genesis I Flood Myth.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@patrickpease1394 Tell you what, you go ahead and present the single-most-convincing piece of science that (allegedly) shows the flood as described in Genesis actually happened. You claim there is so much, so surely picking out a really good one should not be a problem.

[@patrickpease1394]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger if you try to find the evidence online, it's there. Start with my everest and the sea fossils.

[@reneesantiago6496]

Praise God!!! I’m praying for BRETT WEINSTEIN to see the LIGHT next!!!🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@godsdozer]

As a bulldozer operator, I'll have to watch this 12 more times LOL

[@shanetlogan]

Hey man, I bet it takes a lot of intelligence and skill to drive those things. I’m sure not just anyone can do it. Btw, I need a fishing pond built. Where do you live? Lol.

[@riverofthewood]

Nothing wrong with that. I was one of those too. But make a plan to go to school. That equipment wrecks your back, and you only get one meatsuit.

[@godsdozer]

@@riverofthewood LOL I went to university for 5 years. After school I got on a bulldozer to build a golf course and loved it. I'm 57

[@riverofthewood]

@@godsdozer I guess it's not so bad if you're only ever doing finish work. It is fun, I must say. But I still want to warn young people.

[@gregw74]

@@godsdozer You got out just in time. It’s typically after 4 or 5 years of college when people start losing their common sense and the ability to think critically.

[@marcialaguinaldo1071]

for over 40 years after college graduation, the same concept...I give the glory to God alone!

[@hook-x6f]

My grandmother put that in my head and I never forgot it. Give the glory to God.

[@maryfrankralls9985]

Thank you so very much for standing tall and sharing what you know to be true!!! I really enjoyed you lecture!!! Thank you, thank you, thank you!!!!

[@SplashyJoe]

God, the Supreme is and has our blueprint.. How wonderful it is to know of the existence of this great God. We'll have all the answers when we meet Him😊

[@monicatorres4965]

as a CHRISTIAN BIOLOGIST I love this!

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

Why do human embryos have a postanal tail and a vestigial yolk sac?

[@shipwright6122]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger There are no vestigial organs. You deny God because you are afraid. Repent and accept Jesus as your savior and no more fear.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@shipwright6122 The yolk sac of humans embryos is vestigial.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@shipwright6122 "You deny God because you are afraid. " LOL. Saying an atheist is actually afraid of god is like saying the Japanese are actually afraid of Godzilla.

[@shipwright6122]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger Your pride hides your fear. No God, know fear. Know God, no fear. ✝️

[@michaeloretuyi1538]

Everything points to the existence of God.

[@markstevenson1646]

Nothing points to that, in the whole history of human existence there is not one shred of actual evidence, not one, believers always fall back on well I have faith, that's not evidence

[@markstevenson1646]

Ps design is a man made concept

[@scottiescott9297]

False. When you wear “god glasses”, sure; everything points to a god. However, when your mind is in reality, nothing points to a god. ZERO.

[@michaeloretuyi1538]

There's nothing called God glasses. In fact, it takes more faith to believe in the theory of evolution than the existence of God.

[@asunder6797]

Let's say it did, it still wouldn't point to any god in particular out of the 360,000,000 estimated gods.

[@chrisa-95]

20:00-21:36 I’ve been trying to understand how DNA is actually a “code” for a while, and this helped a lot!

[@riverofthewood]

He didn't show very much at all. Nothing about protein structure, either. You would be better off learning that from actual science channels, like Crash Course or Bozeman Science.

[@VictorHarrys]

@@riverofthewood The audience wasn't prepared for a lecture on protein structure. His point was a natural DNA sequence contains information that is decoded/translated (via tRNA and Ribosomes) from sequences discrete symbols (specific triplets of DNA nucleotides) into functional sequences (polypeptides/proteins). That's the most they would ever need to know to grasp the existence of a "code". Structure must be discussed to understand grammar and implementation.

[@riverofthewood]

@@VictorHarrys He did not say any of that. It's abundantly clear that he either does not know how transcription and translation work, or he does not want the audience to know. He acts like it's a mystery, but it is not a mystery. Also, DNA is not "information". It's a molecule.

[@afamilylifeoutdoors751]

@@riverofthewood you are hilarious

[@riverofthewood]

@@afamilylifeoutdoors751 Not sure what I said that's funny...?

[@tm75_88]

"they have eyes, yet they don't see; they have ears, yet they don't hear"

[@samiasamia8208]

dear mr austin, if one has eyes and ears, he can see the signs of ALLAH ( GOD in your language) in everything around him. Even in the voice of a singing bird, your heart witnesses the existence of ALLAH. from the deep inner core of earth, to the heights of the vast universe, every single particle tells you that someone created it. even your own body tells you. scientists are still researching on many things, the secrets of human brain and psychology still need to be unveiled, similarly in other fields of knowledge. we need to ponder ,we need to reflect, we can see our body, but we can not see the soul. but we know that soul exists. so where did the soul come from? , i could be a particle of sand in the desert, i could be a rock on the land, i could be a wave in the ocean, but i am made a human being. i have been given life . why? we can get all the answers in Quran. the last revelation of ALLAH and the perfect life of Muhammad ( last prophet of ALLAH. ) SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WA AALIHI WASSLLAM ALLAH knows best ❤

[@PaulChater-z9t]

Definitely talking about believers because they’re unwilling for another’s viewpoint/comments to exist. Censorship starts with those who can’t face the truth.

[@ja31472]

"they have a mind, yet they don't think". Creationism is a circular, faith-based fallacy. It says "complexity, information, codes require a designer but fails to realize, test and demonstrate what designers need: naturally-grown, naturally-operated brains with the same parts they claim needs a designer. Thus ID/creationism is circular and has faith in some unobserved alternative to brains.

[@larrycarter3765]

see and hear what?

[@matthewstokes1608]

@@larrycarter3765God - the Great Father - the reason why you’re here.

[@chenyansong]

When my wife was working on her PhD of biochemistry during 90’s, her adviser told her if she did not believe in evolution then she could not work in this field. She was not deterred, for over 20 years she worked in the field of biochemistry, molecular biology, analytical chemistry and health science, never need the assumption of evolution in her job. 😊

[@Misty-hl2qk]

My husband went to a community college that auto mechanics instructor wasn't helping females or a deaf guy who enrolled in the class, so my husband help them out because the instructor was a fraud. In fact he was using his father's certificates and degrees and even my husband had to take the classes over again with a different instructor to be certified, himself. In a lot of cases teachers teach because they can't do the work. Not all of them, I was blessed with a lot of great teachers and so was my youngest daughter. But the biology and geology instructors, nowadays I don't see how their students are learning anything since how can you teach what you don't know? Especially the ones at UNM! I ran across someone who said they had got their degree from UNM and I didn't mean any disrespect but I did say something and they agreed with me! They had to read a lot more than the required textbooks and were not offended by my blunt observation.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

Yep, there is no need to try and shoehorn darwinism into the Bible. It has no basis in science or scripture.

[@hamstergodfufurufufu8842]

Cannot be a PhD in biochemistry without believing the facts of evolution, it's essential in the field.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

@@hamstergodfufurufufu8842 You said u cannot be a PhD in biochemistry without believing in the facts of evolution? The only way one can rightly know that no one with a PhD in biology rejects darwinism is if he or she has some means of knowing what every biologist thinks. Atheists are not qualified to make that assessment. A person can earn a PhD under the impression that evolution is factual and then change their mind after working in the field can't they? If a biologist stops believing in evolution will they no longer be able to do biological research? Darwinism is not essential to biology. It fails to meet the standard of the scientific method. It is patently unobservable, unrepeatable, untestable, unverifiable, and untenable. No scientist has observed the transition of a nonhuman to a human. All we can observe is that humans produce more humans just like Genesis 1 says God designed them to. So while observable biology defies darwinism every day it verifies scripture every moment of every day. Darwinism has a 0% success rate while Genesis 1 has a 100% success rate. Please accept observable science and documented history; declare Jesus as your Lord, believe in your heart that God raised him from death and you will be saved (Romans 10:9).

[@Misty-hl2qk]

@@hamstergodfufurufufu8842 did you not read it?

[@LiamSeeksTheLord]

I’m studying second year biochemistry, what a relief to finally have an accurate portrayal of evolution blended so seamlessly with Christianity. Excellently put, thank you so much for making clear a few thoughts that were bumbling about in my mind! God bless you.

[@Lukewarme]

Many of the claims he made are very wrong according to an evolutionary biologist point of view

[@jas2819]

That's a bit of a sweeping statement. Care to elaborate? 🤔

[@christianpulido8360]

@@Lukewarme But Nobody has ever witnessed evolution in reality. How did you arrive into existence if it wasn't God?

[@Lukewarme]

@@christianpulido8360 and what are exactly your concrete evidence for god? Also if you do some research you'll find out that there are experiments that were performed to prove evolution. And also many other evidence in real life that prove evolution things that were actually seen. Darwin didn't just popped out a hypothesis base on his thoughts

[@christianpulido8360]

@@Lukewarme What designed your mouth, tongue, and teeth so you can eat and talk with? What designed your ears so you can hear? What designed your nose? What designed your eyes so you can see? What designed your brain so you can think? What designed your arms and hands so you can work and write? What designed your legs so you can walk? What designed all your organs and heart? What designed your bones etc. Please don't tell me that all of this just appeared out of nowhere without a creator. That's impossible to come out of nowhere. Since the beginning of time we have been born from our mother's womb from sperm. And that is the way God designed us and created mankind to arrive into existence. When we witness the sun, moon, stars, oceans, trees, plants, animals etc. We can witness God's creation. Science experiments are nothing but Models and assumptions and they are not considered reality. Darwin and Alfred Russell Wallace had never observed the process whereby organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and produce more offspring. Darwin had never observed the process through which populations of living organisms adapt and change over long periods of time in reality. Nobody has ever witnessed the process in nature by which organisms better adapted to their environment tend to survive and reproduce more than those less adapted to their environment. Piltdown man also called Dawson's dawn man, proposed species of extinct hominin (member of the human lineage) whose fossil remains, discovered in England in 1910-12, were later proved to be fraudulent. Piltdown man, whose fossils were sufficiently convincing to generate a scholarly controversy lasting more than 40 years, was one of the most successful hoaxes in the history of science. Darwin was a fraud and a paid liar when he was alive. Now answer the questions ok? How did mankind, animals, and plants arrive into existence? Where can we witness evolution in reality,? You have never witnessed evolution in reality.

[@LIOTBs]

As a Christian and a biochemist I find some of the things that scientists put out there so hilarious. The actual scientific accepted terms from genotype to phenotype is transcription and translation. Thus inherently a code. The general science itself calls it that.

[@forrest7050]

"The general science itself calls it that." It's a metaphor, LIOTBs, a metaphor! THAT'S why they call it that. Do you not understand that. It is the easiest way to get people to understand the "CONCEPT". But it definitely does not mean it is an actual code. Take away the language, take away the letters, the names, take away any human interpretation of what is happening, and what have you got? Try it, open your eyes , just try and see the world outside your box, and you will see it is not a code.

[@danchokonstantinov6735]

​@@forrest7050 a game of words. pre B cell / lymphocytes use somatic hypermutation of selection of gene exons, as a way of generating antibody diversity of the magnitude of 10 ×16th, by way of errorness copy and paste , and this is existential to the individual, but mutations in all other cells are harmful / lethal for the individual . Medics have mapped numerous mutations causing many diseases . If you argue for some ' positive' mutations, consider the huge living organisms expenditure for one alleged improvement, I.e billions die for one individual improvement. This is eco unsustainable.

[@matthewkelly3896]

@@forrest7050 It is a code in the sense that other organisms must communicate with it for it to function. Multiple organisms existing simultaneously which create and design new cells is phenomenally complicated. It seems utterly ludicrous that anyone can believe that such highly organized structures can arise by chance.

[@forrest7050]

@@matthewkelly3896 Mathew, no one is saying that these organised structures arrived by chance. Hold on, that's not quite true. Many creationists say this, but this is something they have just made up because apparently they haven't understood the science. You HAVE to get your head around this before you go any further. Highly organised cells did NOT arrive by chance. " It is a code in the sense that other organisms must communicate with it for it to function. ". Not quite sure what you are getting at here. Are you saying other organisms design new cells using the DNA of another cell? What do you mean by "multiple organisms"? Your comment is not at all clear.

[@peterzinya1]

@@forrest7050 Youre just flapping your gums. You dont want to call it a code because that admits a coder. DNA is a language and its a digital code. You want to believe everything is a happy accident.....be my guest. It doesnt mean you are a bad person. I used to believe in evo.

[@simonbassett818]

The idea that everything is a part of God would reconcile all our differences.

[@222ableVelo]

I enjoyed this talk very much, although I disagree with Dr. Garte on a few issues. I would love to be able to ask him some questions too. But overall it was amazing to see how a hardened, "militant", atheist can arrive at a theistic conclusion through lots of study, logic, and evidence. Thanks for sharing this talk.

[@vhawk1951kl]

Those that say your god fsntasy simply ask you for evidence that is not fantasy- *Evidence* not self serving circular arguments. Saying that there is god is like pointing to a table with nothing on it and saying "look at that dog". All we are saying is what fcuking dog?There is *nothing* on that table no dogs no books, *nothing*; if you say there is a dog on that table, all we say is *Show* me the dog or let me touch it and smell it.et me touch the dog and when you keep insisting that there is dog on that table, we begin edging nervously towards the door. It's an invisible intangible dog that can only be seen heard and touched by raving lunatics that suppose there to be a bloody great great Dane on a table the size of a matchbox? And you wonder why your interlocutors re loking so nevvous and are edging their way to towards nearest door and are looking up mental health services in the phone book. All they can see is tiny table no bigger than a matchbox and a few loons bowing down to said tiny table and saying" oh mister dog you*are so wonderful.. It's the old invisible aeroplane scam is it not?You point to any random bit of empty sky and say "*There*is the invisible aeroplane for which you paid so many bilions, you did want an invisible aeroplane did you not?" So how did you arrive at this invisible dog idea? Did you come in one day and say" fcuk me there is an huge great Dane standing on that tiny matchbox-sized table or did someone_else* **tell you there was a fcuking big great Dane standing on that tiny mstchbox-sizd table to which you replied " "Of course how silly of me a fcuking big great Dane standing on that tiny matchbox-sized table if you tell me that you will burn me at the stake unless I agree with you, *Now* I see it.. Nobody else does or can, presumably because they have little or no experience of invisible intangible dogs on tables that are smaller than the dog itself, they of curse not realising that their(and the entire population of the world's) inability to see hear touch or smell or otherwise apprehend said dog is down to some shortcoming or sin on their part. *That* is your problem you point to a table half the size of a dog and declare that there is a huge dog twice the size of the table standing on what is to-all-intents-and-purposes is a tiny table with*Absolutely_ nothing* on it. Beginning to see your problem? Not only *Is* there *absolutely_nothing on the table there *could-not-be* a dog bigger than the table on it. What puzzles the sane ids from where you could have got the idea that there is a dog on that table? Is it the idea of just one loon or a group_loon fantasy?

[@kamelsaadaoui1399]

A great scientist , yet very humble .... all my respect. "سنريهم آياتنا في الآفاق و في انفسهم حتى يتبين لهم انه الحق"

[@cosmic4037]

i agree with you.

[@ClifffSVK]

The most important moment of the video is at 24:56 How quickly he is to brush off the "I don't know" answer. That's how science works. If you don't have an answer (yet), you simply say "I don't know" instead of believing in something that might not be true. This is the difference between believers and non-believers. Believers just need answers no matter if they're true or not.

[@bharat1876]

Instead of saying 'I don't know ' he should have said "I know that I don't know", and for you: Do know that You don't know.

[@hansweichselbaum2534]

You could say "we don't know yet". Chances are that science will find an answer. However, there are questions which science cannot answer.

[@Andrew-un8tx]

The issue here is this buffoon is mixing science and philosophy. Science answers how. Philosophy answers why. When one intrudes on the field of the other it's always comical. Trying to claim that his scientific background qualifies him to mix the two is sheer idiocy. Only someone blinded by the illogic of religious faith could even make this mistake. @@hansweichselbaum2534

[@rustalisin8950]

​@@hansweichselbaum2534..science cannot answer? U mean evolution has not reached a stage set for an acceptable answer. Whats wrong with god in man is egoism has not faded sufficiently to be replaced with truth. This monkey still plays in the trees, cant control emotion, is a joke to existance.. & u think his science is in tune with all reality?

[@electricityofmind6300]

he may not know the full mechanism but not knowing also includes the possibility of God's work. The difference between you and him is you wouldn't even allow for this possibiloty in your "I don't know". What you're essentially saying is, with complete conviction, it cannot be God, while he believes and shares why many areas in science point to his belief working alongside science

[@copernicus99]

We don't fully understand how life began. Therefore, God exists. Very convincing argument!

[@nictrammell23]

God is amazing

[@juul4277]

thanks

[@johnmakovec5698]

The god concept? Sure. It's a main characters in lot of stories people make up

[@jameybobamey7343]

@LeoB nope

[@Jmrabet]

We have much he's not and you do not

[@aurynwestwield1682]

the creator is an experience junkie and the sentient lifeforms are nothing more than information conduits....but the void is coming and it will take it all back after enough time has passed.

[@csmoviles]

Thank you both for your ministry ❤❤❤❤

[@byronyadao5550]

Behind all the complexities of Nature is the hand of God fulfilling its purpose.

[@JustMe-wo8lg]

Baseless assertion

[@pzm2461]

"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” -Carl Sagan

[@martymcfly1776]

That sounds an awful lot, like you're describing the influence of religion.

[@normanthrelfall2646]

The Miracle of the Atom The Laws of physics that exist are due to the activity within the atom, which is finely tuned in order for us to exist and as we know atoms are required for life. The main energy level occupied by an electron during orbit is dictated by its fixed distance from the nucleus of the atom. This is relative to electron and proton attraction. There are constants within the atom, like the size of the electric charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the protons relative to each other. All orbitals that have the same value “N” being the main energy level relates to the quantum number and are said to share the same shell level. Protons are subatomic particles which are charged in relation to the nucleus, electrons are attracted towards them because they have opposite electrical charges; this fine tuning keeps them in orbit around the nucleus making the development of life possible as we know it. The atom is a miracle of design not an accident waiting to happen. Everything is made up of atoms which are finely tuned for the building blocks of life and also they create the environment necessary for the existence of life. The conditions on our own earth in particular are finely tuned being described as biophilic in which life as we know it can flourish. If any of the fundamental constants like the speed of light or the strength of gravity were to change just a little, then life as we know it would cease to exist. This realization has led some physicists to argue that our universe is intelligently designed, made especially for us, no accident waiting to happen. We live in a finely tuned universe perfectly primed in order to support life. There is irreducible complexity within the atom never mine the cell as atoms make up cells and are responsible for life as we know it. Atoms are unique and their atomic number dictates what substance or chemical property they have. Carbon for instance has an atomic number of 6 positively charged protons in the nucleus. Atoms are essential building blocks of life, for example the body contains fat which is made up of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen atoms. Carbon atoms because of their unique make-up also bond strongly to other elements such as hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen because they have branches or rings of various sizes that contain thousands of atoms, carbon is quite accommodating with other substances. These have unique atomic numbers that make life possible. Atoms suffer from irreducible complexity because all the electrons, protons and neutrons must be present at the same time in a particular number and order, for the atom to function as a designated substance. This knowledge dispenses with the idea of mutations and natural selection relating to chemical interactions. Life on the earth is based on carbon chemistry. Carbon is used in organic matter such as our bodies for instance in order to maintain life. They silently carry out important chemical reactions within our bodies and they are essential to life on the earth. Carbon atoms make up the sun, stars, comets and the atmosphere of most planets. Carbon is found in coal, oil, diamonds and natural gas deposits. The atom is clearly designed and many physicists now recognise this, but they won’t use the word God or Creator, they would sooner believe aliens were responsible, but the question is then begged who made the aliens? The term atom really means invisible unit or uncuttable, and for a long time it was thought that the atom could not be split, but when they did, it produced the atomic bomb. An infinite intelligence made the various atoms which are so small and are measured as being one tenth of a billionth of a metre across. They are so small that they cannot be seen under a powerful microscope. We are led to believe that all our sophisticated atoms are derived from an invented primordial complex soup of chemicals which then produced the first living cells. Remember each atom is unique due to its composition and arrangement of subatomic particles relative to the number of protons in the nucleus. This is no accident waiting to happen! A primordial soup is purely fictitious and based on fantasy and imagination because men do not want to retain God in their knowledge. Jesus did not lie to us concerning him being the Son of God and the Saviour of the world. He said that men shall give an account for every idle word spoken, except they repent of their sins!

[@pzm2461]

I am no intellectual, but I am referring to religion as opposed to a god existence. For me, religion is just cult, the basis for all wars and authoritarian rule. As far as a god, nobody can prove there is or isn't. If we look hard enough we can find evidence of ANYTHING and mold it to fit our belief. Why wouldn't a god reveal himself, wouldn't it calm us down quite a bit?

[@pushpinderchhatwal7602]

Sun THE SUN IS NOT MADE OF CARBON. The UNIVERSE is self created. Not God. Jesus as son of god means ...each & everyone is also. Not just JESUS. You're off the mark. Hooraah!

[@pushpinderchhatwal7602]

Atom is not a MIRACLE

[@davidr1620]

I’m currently reading Why Evolution is True by Jerry Coyne. Terrific book. As solid as the case he makes is and as wonderful the book is, Coyne’s strong anti theist bias gives a certain flavor to the book as if all mysteries of biology are in principle scientifically explicable. It was nice to hear this lecture and be reminded that as amazing as evolutionary biology is, it essentially opens up Pandora’s box. And inside this box just might lie the fact that God’s mind is so much more beyond our ability to fathom than anyone has even suspected or dreamed.

[@riverofthewood]

///as if all mysteries of biology are in principle scientifically explicable./// Can you give an example of one that is not?

[@les2997]

@@riverofthewood There are many. Not one irreducibly complex system was shown to be evolvable via an experiment or computer simulation. We have absolutely no experimental data showing that a material process may create a code such as the DNA, or once the code is in place, we have no evidence that the proposed evo mechanisms are able to generate a significant amount of biological information. Basically, the theory at this point is just storytelling with little no no empirical backing.

[@les2997]

>>> Why Evolution is True LOL This is just storytelling book for adults.

[@davidr1620]

@@les2997 have you read it?

[@les2997]

@@davidr1620 Why would I read a book which is pure foolishness?

[@kikinorthington680]

He’s absolutely brilliant . As a archaeology student I must meet him one day !

[@ferninthewild8584]

Hey I’m an archaeologist too! Woo

[@CrackerJack-uv1nx]

@@carsved9554science

[@richardmakarewicz2302]

Sex underground?@@carsved9554

[@CuffeeProperties]

They dont where white people come from or how Africans design and build the pyramids or the true life of the earth or ocean and many more and he trying to find god

[@alantasman8273]

@@carsved9554 They are sciences that work in conjunction to corroborate each others findings. For instance...Carbon 14 dating can be used to help date archeological finds.

[@MyMy-tv7fd]

as a Christian who dated biologists in my university days, I was shocked at their general inability to think for themselves, and in particular to challenge evolutionary and philosophical dogma they were taught. But the better of them would get worried by the inherent problems. Eg, and I quote: 'You can't say the liver has 'function' because that's teleology. But how can you not take about liver function, all doctors do.'

[@kathyratino962]

Wow. Science is dogma now. You considered yourself superior in your ability to "think for yourself"? Christianity depends on people NOT thinking for themselves. That's what faith is, right?

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

Function and purpose are different things: function does not require teleology. When biologists speak of the liver performing a function, they don't mean that some alleged supernatural being poofed the liver into existence so that it would fulfill certain purposes he had in mind. Also, is silly word games your best anti-evolution attack? I

[@MyMy-tv7fd]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger - 'function' was taught to them as a teleological no-no. Function = purpose to their professor. (And this from the university that invented genetic fingerprinting!) The even more horrible truth was that if you challenged any tenet of evolution you got a high school level repetition of what is available in that level of textbook to this day. As if I had never heard of natural selection or gradual mutational change.

[@kathyratino962]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger It's the fallacy of equivocation.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@MyMy-tv7fd Function in biology doesn't require teleology. You can repeat your life all you want, it won't magically make it true.

[@danieldanfoxworth9528]

I'm very happy to see that a scientist can reason his way to the truth of our Creator.

[@JustMe-wo8lg]

Truth is demonstrable so demonstrate this creator.....

[@SC-rb2jr]

It’s very rare to find a scientist who believes in a god, it’s really impressive that you found one. The vast majority don’t as it conflicts with their need for real evidence.

[@kevincockburn2228]

Indeed, but ironically the need for definite evidence seems to elude the atheists view of the world too. Else they couldn't nail their flag to a mast.

[@wbmstr24]

but these scientists, who believe, are using REAL EVIDENCE....

[@jimhughes1070]

Not as rare as you might think... Of course you probably figured that out by now. Scientists become believers... Because of the evidence... All the same old theories are still in the literature... Because they hit the "wall of impossibility"... When A Mind creates physical Law and physical matter, searching through that matter only get you so far... Rite up to the part where the only question left is... "how did he do that?" 😎... Anyway, just my two cents 🙏

[@flyinghorseknuckles]

I am thrilled that Dr. Garte has embraced Christ as his Lord and Savior! I've often wondered how any scientists involved in studies of astrophysics (the very large), or particle physics/microbiology (the very small) have been drawn by their chosen field to find faith in a creator God. One thing that I disagree with concerning Dr. Garte's understanding, is the belief that evolution nonetheless is the answer to the abundance of life AFTER an Intelligently Designed origin. The opinion that mutations are able to cause evolutionary jumps to new KINDS is fraught with problems. The book "The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism" by Michael J. Behe takes on the evolutionary process by showing its incredible limitations. Using the Malaria virus as his example (due to its ability to both mutate and reproduce at lightening speeds), he argues that the most evolution can do via mutations is to "burn a bridge", degrading the host rather than upwardly enhancing it. The sheer astronomical odds of tier three mutations lends no support for the evolutionist view. I hope that Dr. Garte would soon understand that adaptation, rather than mutation, is more robust, more believable, and more sound than evolution. God created KINDs in the beginning. Each of those kinds has a genome with an immensely broad range of adaptive possibilities. Yes, tigers are vastly different than lions, but both likely adapted from the identical KIND, created by our Lord so long ago.

[@rdendelacruz4332]

Not only him... All i know even jordan peterson embraces christianity too

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

"The book "The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism" by Michael J. Behe ..." LOL A book aimed at the general public, written by an anti-evolution Intelligent Design Creationist; a book whose general "finding" was trounced by scientists.

[@2fast2block]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger "a book whose general "finding" was trounced by scientists." Well then show us your science how this all came about naturally. How did you get around the first verses of the bible with God creating and giving life? Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@2fast2block More long-winded blathering, and more failure, by you. You still didn't save the Genesis I Creation Myth from being refuted by science, in multiple ways. You still didn't show that the Genesis Flood Myth isn't refuted by science. You still didn't provide any valid, objective, positive evidence that your god actually exists. Fail, fail, and fail.

[@davidmeyr4558]

With all due respect, and I mean that, Dr. Gart or Michael Behe etc... write books and then I read a variety of rebuttals by biologists saying that they're wrong because they're ignoring this and not accounting for that and so on. Dr. Gart presents his views and page after page of replies indicate that viewers feel assured that biology and their religious beliefs dovetail perfectly, because, well, and I'm certainly not immune to this, "He's a scientist" and what he's saying fits my beliefs. "Who cares?" Whether it's a scientist or a minister, the first question we all should be asking is, "How do I determine that what I'm hearing is true?" The second should be, "Why do I accept or reject what the speaker is saying?" If the answer is solely that it fits my beliefs, we need to stop short and re-address those two questions. There are undoubtedly trained scientists who are able to evaluate the views of these gentlemen, although they need to keep the same questions in mind. I am not one, so I have to rely on the views those who are and when the large majority lay out large numbers of specific reasons why creationist view are incorrect, that's worth paying attention to, particularly among laymen like myself. Acceptance of what we hear based primarily on our beliefs, even forcing it to fit them, happens far too frequently. It's good religion but it's bad science.

[@mikesorensen1981]

I love listening to such an intelligent person ! I don’t understand all the particulars but from a scientist to say it points to a creator GOD is refreshing in today’s world 👍

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

So the logical fallacy of appeal to authority is convincing to you, even though you can't understand what is being said???

[@hook-x6f]

Quantum mechanics is another way of explaining spirituality. QM is the study of matter and matter is how we perceive reality. If you affect change in matter, you change reality. Therefore, QM reveals the nature of reality itself. The quantum observer effect is a proven concept in science and tells us that matter does not have standalone existence. Matter manifests reality only upon observation and the sole act of observation affects matter and outcome, reality itself. When we focus and interact, when we observe and show intention we affect matter, reality and outcome. These quantum effects have been shown to be weak and probabilistic, but the anomoly does exist. Statistical analysis shows focus and attention brings a higher probability of a desired outcome. The increase in odds is just above chance, and events are never repeatable because they are probabilistic in nature. Any ritual, like say a prayer or a rain dance is an example of focus that increases the likelihood of a desired outcome. This is one reason why people create sacrifices, rituals, religions, and other beliefs. Also, there is quantum entanglement. QE shows all matter is entangled. All matter everywhere in the universe has the potential to be entangled and share information instantaneously faster than the speed of light indicating the universe is connected as one. Oneness is at the heart of many religions. The Hindu and Buddhist have always considered mind and matter to be one and all of the Abrahamic religions have some degree of this same belief of oneness in spirit. Science knows God and he loves us. This is why he shared this knowledge with us. Knowledge shall increase. Many shall run to an fro.

[@Andrew-un8tx]

He's a buffoon trying to mix science and religion. Science answer how things happen. Religion answers why. When one tries to take the other's job they look foolish. He's mixing the two as if he's accomplishing something other than displaying his own religious faith and the illogic that it brings. He's a well educated moron.

[@johnlennox-pe2nq]

Evolution/Darwinist, even worse than Hugh Ross. He doesnt hold fast to Scripture or believe Adam was first man or brought the Fall, by sin; My reading: ''advocates soulless hominids (who exhibited human characteristics of painting, burying dead, etc.) before Adam and Eve.''. Blocked when asked him questions of Creation on Twitter. His close friend Francis Collins, he promotes, also a liberal 'christian' grafts the pelts of rats onto aborted babies in his experiments. Also a denier of Genesis account.

[@myragomez3346]

Thanks!

[@mohammadkarimzai8057]

From the smallest atom to leaving thangs including animals and humans are created by a universal power which created me also that power is my God and I have submission to. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@shipwright6122]

When I realize that there were people who witnessed the resurrection and still chose not to believe, it’s easy to see why people also choose not to believe that DNA is code. It means that they might be held accountable for their sins. Period.

[@glenliesegang8935]

The same infinitely intelligent being who could envision how all the pieces of living organisms could work together to build a Caterpillar and then disassemble it and create a butterfly, and encode it all also made Himself unprovable to the willingly blind.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@glenliesegang8935 And what about human anencephaly? Google images of it. Then tell me how wonderful your alleged god is.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@glenliesegang8935 Some 30% of newly synthesized proteins are defective, and are immediately degraded. Imagine a designer who created a long assembly line, like at an automobile plant, and when the cars come off the end of the line, 30% are defective and have to be destroyed. That designer would be immediately fired for incompetence.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

"When I realize that there were people who witnessed the resurrection and still chose not to believe," That was an okay story in the bible, personally, I like the Terminator 2 better. As long as you are going to read or watch fantasy, it might as well have cool cyborgs in it.

[@shipwright6122]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger The Bible has eyewitness testimonies to the resurrection of Jesus. What’s the terminator got?

[@dwanemarsh4378]

I had no intention to watch this, as I just accidentally clicked on it when roaming around. But, he said something that caught me about evolution, and there being a God, or Creator, not actually going AGAINST each other! What I usually hear is that someone believes in God, or in evolution, but not both! I, personally, believe in God, as there are just too many things that even science, or biology, have no answers for. He hit a LOT of them, and actually gave me an even BETTER understanding of the bigger picture! One of my many questions has always been, whether you believe in the Big Bang theory, or chemical evolution, has always been; "That's fine! But WHERE did all THAT come from? Chemicals are "coded", so where di that code come from originally? In science, there is no way for it to have come from simple evolution. A few answers lead to even more questions, and, in the end, we don't know SQUAT about much!

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

So, science cannot currently explain it, therefore an invisible, immortal, eternal, all-powerful, all-knowing sky wizard exists? That is horrible "logic". Also, such God of the gaps arguments are one of the worst faring forms of argument across human history. All kinds of things that could not be explained at the time were attributed to an invisible magic man in the sky, only to later be shown to be explainable naturally.

[@markb3786]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger And yet the most preeminent apologists regularly engage in god of the gaps arguments.

[@AncientWorldWonderz]

@@TonyTigerTonyTigerif humans are so smart and are able to figure out how to build a large hadron collider, that explains the way the universe works/became , how come we don’t know the answers to the origin ? if we can prove gravity , we should be able to have explanations ..

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@AncientWorldWonderz We don't have evidence past a certain point going back in time, and our labs can't go back to "time 0" (which may not have been literally time 0). We have the CMBR from about 380,000 years after the "time 0", and we can't observe farther back in time. Our best technology today can study conditions that would have existed less than a second after "time 0", but they cannot go back to conditions at "time 0". That is different than studying gravity, which we can directly experiment with today.

[@AncientWorldWonderz]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger if god wasn’t real, science would be able to prove and explain the origins of life, becus if we have explanations for all the laws of nature and etc. if it was really nothing that made the universe, then that nothing had a intelligent mind ! Also science is a form of witch craft, se watch it up, rumours say science was taught to mankind by demonic beings . Like cern Hardron collider - entities showed humans how to bring them into our dimension!

[@KiamatChange-ke8nd]

Science is so complex for current human brain. So, his argument make sense.

[@asmrreviewer8696]

As a Biologist myself, or at least soon to be a biology doctorate hopefully, I can say I have no idea how anyone can use it as evidence against God. The laws of Cell Theory and Evolution follow such a strict and complex pattern that it seems un-feesable to think it can just happen. This is not a "God of the gaps" because it would seem more likely, no matter how minute, that Atheism is true BEFORE such discoveries in biology.

[@molkien9928]

It's not a "God of the gaps" argument, but it is an argument from incredulity.

[@asmrreviewer8696]

@@molkien9928 Not exactly. Is it possible that there are natural explanations to the laws that govern Biology and Physics? Sure. However it is extremely improbable that one could claim it is impossible, though I don't necessarily agree with that. Nothing we have experienced even comes close to explaining the origin of our physical laws or any laws of science. This point actually gets more obvious when we think about non-physical laws such as math and logic, but that is not the topic at hand.

[@asmrreviewer8696]

@@Nickesponja My argument is not out of thin air. If our chaotic world yielded these laws, then that would bring forth certain paradoxes. Essentially we have two choices for our universe: either it had a beginning or it did not. If it did have a beginning, either the universe created these laws or the laws existed before the universe. Neither make any sense. If the universe never had a beginning and is eternal, that has its own set of problems. However, if a God existed and decide to create the laws that govern us, then things start to make more sense.

[@esbensteen5412]

What do you mean "evolution follows a strict and complex pattern"? ^ For a Biology doctorate "hopefully" it seems like you have a pretty bad understanding of what evolution is. Evolution doesnt follow any pattern at all...

[@asmrreviewer8696]

@@esbensteen5412 I probably could have expressed that better. What I mean is the laws and function of Evolution is extremely predictable and strict. We know natural selection will weed out weaker organisms. We know that organisms tend to adapt to their environment. We know that animals can and do change over time. This is a very orderly way of how life goes on. This should not and frankly would not happen in a world brought about by pure chaos. The way biology works is quite fascinating when you study how exactly it operates.

[@constructivecritique5191]

Great distinction. It's not just intelligent but divine!

[@constructivecritique5191]

Something the science and atheist communities seem to be ignoring is that everything already exists! All we can do is try to understand it all. Can we create artificial life or gravity without giving respect to the goverence of them and live in that artificial fantasy world? Yes! Many do!

[@cnault3244]

All we can study is this universe and what it contains. Suggested prior to this universe is unknown. Also unknown is whether or not there is anything outside of this universe. Anything being said about what existed prior to this universe, or said about what may exist outside this universe is sheer speculation.

[@constructivecritique5191]

@@cnault3244 well then keep studying the universe so you know what it is your in.

[@jdos5643]

@@cnault3244 well God created everything. If he did certainly he would let us know and indeed he does. He gave us his word. He answers prayers.

[@cnault3244]

@@jdos5643 "God created everything." That's the claim. Now prove it. "If he did certainly he would let us know and indeed he does. He gave us his word. " Prove he gave us his word. "He answers prayers." Present evidence for an answered prayer that would require divine intervention. A prayer to get a promotion at work, or that a loved one survives serious surgery doesn't cut it. Someone who is missing a limb having that limb miraculously be restored would be a good one.

[@claubit32]

Simply put, nothing can never create something!✝️😊

[@HackingIsDope]

Who created god

[@bubbythebrow153]

Nothing created god. Something has always existed there has never been nothing so there is a first cause with no cause.

[@HackingIsDope]

@@bubbythebrow153 same for the universe so God is not needed

[@MrWeezer55]

Nobody ever said it did.

[@mathiasrryba]

@@MrWeezer55 Christians did. Christian mythology explicitly states that the universe was created out of nothing. With magic but out of nothing.

[@dharmaambesa2730]

All Glory... and KINGDOM To JESUS CHRIST.

[@DF-ju4cw]

God is there! ❤

[@jesusfan8504]

Thank you for sharing...The continuation of life is also REAL indeed. Nothing to fear and comforting to know, we will after crossing over, experience the Light and Love of Jesus...and our loved ones too.

[@stevepierce6467]

Can you reveal to us heathens a single solitary instance of someone dying and "crossing over?"

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

"he continuation of life is also REAL indeed" Oh really? Okay, then have Einstein come say hi to me.

[@alejandrovargas7592]

Only if they are truly saved.

[@tomteacher5885]

Interesting questions raised by an actually knowledgeable person. Great stuff.

[@rodzalez3549]

Confirmation bias

[@tomteacher5885]

@@rodzalez3549 oh for sure it's not evidence; if there was going to be hard evidence we probably wouldn't have to search that hard for it. But still, interesting questions

[@fabianblackman2159]

You know science is all speculation that is why it always changes

[@KazAngela]

Not boring at all. Absolutely engaging. Your presentation gets the message across clearly.

[@wrongperson1692]

i had a biology teacher in 9th grade who was a christian and believed in creation. however, because of her job, she of course had to teach every one of her students that we came from evolution. she wasn’t allowed to mention “religion”. though, there was this one day near the end of the year where she let people write questions on papers and at the end of the week she would pick randomly and answer them, no matter what the question was (school appropriate tho). and someone asked her “what do you think is the meaning of life?” she answered truly, to help people get closer to God, and to heaven, etc. ive been a christian most of my life, but that class, and that unit on evolution had a powerful influence on my view of the world. thankfully, it helped build my faith stronger, and i know a lot more than i did before. i sometimes think back to her and feel bad that teaching people lies is her job. i pray that when she teaches, it doesnt turn any christians in the wrong direction, like it almost did to me. it destroys me that schools wont even mention God anymore, and instead replace it with an all atheistic view.

[@isidoreaerys8745]

Your faith is incredibly weak if you need to reject science and deny reality to preserve your beliefs. My biology teacher was a church choir director. She understood evolution and taught it well. Someone who really thinks they are teaching a lie can’t possibly “understand” the material in order to teach it. You understand something or you think it’s a lie. You can’t do both.

[@wrongperson1692]

@@isidoreaerys8745 you can do both, actually. and i didnt just reject science, i looked deeper into both perspectives. and my faith also grew from personal experiences. my bio teacher still believed in creation. she had her reasons, and she understood both sides. and God bless you, i will be praying for you. im sorry you’ve been lied to.

[@therick363]

@@wrongperson1692 what lies was she teaching?

[@wrongperson1692]

@@therick363 i was referring to the lies of evolution

[@therick363]

@@wrongperson1692 I’ve heard creationists claim that many times, but I’ve never gotten a straight answer or evidence to support it. What are the lies of evolution?

[@cafeespresso99]

As a Muslim, I endorse this message.

[@DarkAngel-cj6sx]

Have you watched Christian prince videos?

[@rizkhan3368]

​@@DarkAngel-cj6sxDo not start a Missionary argument, Muslims, Jews and Christians believe in the same God, but obviously other than that there are differences of beliefs and so on. Christians say Jesus is a God, which the Bible denies , because Jesus Preyed to the GOD. Jews believe that Jesus the Messiah has not come , and wait and prepare for him still. Muslims believe Jesus to be a Prophet , the second last one, and not a God. having said that everyone is free to believe what they want, God will eventually decide on Judgement day who goes to heaven who does not.

[@attiatkeddis1375]

First of all Muslim , Jews and Christian don’t have the same God Muslims god is the moon god as Arabs used to worship before Islam Muhammad took all the practices from them and some fakes about Christianity and Jewish to deceive peoples that he fellow the same what a big difference

[@Acoustic-Rabbit-Hole]

ALL Prince music videos are Christian because Prince was a Christian . (Oh, you mean Christian Prince? I’ll look him up now!) @@DarkAngel-cj6sx

[@babablacksheep4234]

As an observer, i see islam as being the most destructive ideology ever invented.

[@chrisxavier1848]

Intelligence is the ultimate origin, and evolution cannot replace intelligence.

[@danhouseholder6784]

"We don't know," what a refreshing phrase! I wish more theologians would employ it. Thanks for the video, it was interesting to this layman!

[@sandracopenhaver3230]

I'm always blown away that people have spent thousands of years specializing in and discovering the genius of the universe and after every thing we've accomplished all they can come up with is we are no different from animals, my question is "how?" I mean if you ignore everything but the basic ways our skeletons and number of limbs are to one type of animal, but look at it we are physically similar to animals they assume have been here longer than the human race ever has and have not accomplished even one percent of the achievements the human race has accomplished in a very small fraction of the time. I think they lost touch with reality is what I think, they isolated themselves from reality and forgot the reality to see how ridiculous the statement, "we are animals," Really is. The only similarity we have with animals is what is essentially the creative signiture of God, if you paint or write or create anything you understand.

[@isidoreaerys8745]

Are you a mobile, multicellular eukaryotic organism which eats other life to survive? Then you are an animal.

[@jjevans1693]

No we are different from most animals. We have the most evolved and largest brains per body size of any animal. That's probably why we have the highest level of consciousness.

[@MrBombsniffer]

@@jjevans1693 which is why we have imaginations and thats what we used to make up the idea of God.

[@MrBombsniffer]

Crocodiles have been here 300 million years and modern humans 200,000 and we will be lucky to make it another 10,000 years and that might be generous.But we are not special from other animals in that we go to some fairy tale heaven and they don't.

[@VoiceTotheEndsOfTheEarth]

@@MrBombsniffer the very word "imagination" comes from being made in the "image of God". Same goes for the word inform which goes back to the Genesis account of the creation being "without form and void" and through His Word, imparting the information it needed to separate the formless creation into functional subsystems. Likewise, humans define and categorize existing matter in order to create a new form.

[@hfchin8854]

One of the biggest problem we face today is that Evolution is taught as if it is a scientific fact!

[@James_Austin]

This man doesn't disagree with Darwin's biological evolution. Just chemical evolution, which makes sense to me. Biological evolution is pretty much a scientific fact. You're an advanced ape.

[@larrycarter3765]

It is a fact.

[@marculatour6229]

It's quite painful to realize that evolution has apparently passed some of us without a trace. Actually, we have already overcome the stage of stone age man. But some of us still believe that an invisible alien from the 5th dimension created us, that they are not dead after dying and that snakes can talk. Yes, it's pretty easy to believe all this when you've been brainwashed since childhood, but it's also pretty stupid.

[@flyingtime5501]

​@@larrycarter3765no it's not! your textbook even said evolutionary theory. You just took it as fact! Now that's a fact! People do this all the time n it's so irritating. Go back n look at the books from school n college.

[@gordonlynn8300]

nope it's a fact not theory anymore @@flyingtime5501

[@compassandradio6261]

When he said he didn't call it intelligent design because this is way beyond intelligence, I literally shouted. Yes, yes, yes! This is exactly what I've been saying! It's why I use the call sign "compass and radio". The compass can do nothing without the magnetic field of the earth, the radio is useless without a broadcasting station and our intelligence can not exist without a source, an outside influencing agent that, by necessity, has to be greater than the intellectual affect it creates.

[@stevepierce6467]

We actually know that a magnetic field exists and why. We actually know how radio transmitters and receivers work and why. We have absolutely no knowledge of an outside source, an influencing agent, ie. a god. All we have for that is the argument "Some things are complex beyond my ability to understand or willingness to learn about, therefore god."

[@squarebearderry]

@@stevepierce6467 if somethings exist and are more complex beyond human understanding your argument against an anti-logical god or just believing in that beyond logic is obsolete with all due respect, you have been reading science again and not thinking for your self

[@stevepierce6467]

@@squarebearderry There are many things presently beyond human comprehension. Why, just a few years ago machine flight and self-propelled carriages were beyond human understanding, not to mention germs causing disease, galaxies existing beyond our range if vision, the earth being a globe, organisms passing on traits via DNA, lasers, computers etc. I prefer to follow the thoughts of people who look at their world to understand it, instead of saying, "there is stuff I don't understand, therefore god." Just to let you know, when I was born (1949) there were no personal computers, no internet, no cell phones, no lasers, no DNA testing, no satellites, no space telescopes, no jet airliners...............

[@squarebearderry]

@@stevepierce6467 dude your missing the point, if such things can be understood that defy human understanding and comprehension then why the hell cant you fathom a god? to make metal fly we had to study nature to realise the aerodynamics of flight, the mechanisms came after the leap of faith and belief that such a thing could exist, the same applies for God,, youve just been psy opped to such an extent you believe objective reality, as the totality, ie reality of known atomic structures is the only reality possible is kinda daft and im gonna say stupid, just because instruments acknowledge atoms tangible validity does not and cannot rule out the possibility of a god existing, it might seem less likely but it still cannot rationally rule it out, this is why Einstein was agnostic, because he realises the short comings of knowledge and actual possibility..science has not ruled out god at all, its simply refusing to try and find him, and may i add with simulation theory taking hold in the scientific community who do you think is running these simulations if they theoretically exist? exactly; because even prevailing scientifc data points to intelligent creation your just too much of idiot to see that.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@squarebearderry As an avowed atheist but a dedicated human, I shall refrain from personal insults such as you have directed at me. We atheists do not rule out the possibility of a god existing (common error of thought among religious fanatics). We merely assert that no compelling evidence has been shown to justify a belief in one. There was no "leap of faith" leading to the first flight or other scientific advances. People observed the real world, did experiments and tests to verify their observations (as you intelligently point out), some tried different configurations and some were killed in the process, and then some succeeded. We can now proudly say we know and understand many things about the real natural world. You are exactly right in saying that modern science cannot rule out the existence of god; there has never been any evidence of any kind to analyze and say definitively that there is no god. But that same lack of evidence means also that no one can truthfully say definitively that god does exist. People created gods from the beginning of recorded history to explain the vast unexplained mysteries of the universe, but now many of those mysteries have been solved. I will bet that even you understand that god does not send rain, lightning, thunder, wind, hail, storms, but rather that naturally occurring atmospheric convection is 100% responsible.

[@Hugo-h3l]

When somebody knows a little about science, he may turn into atheist, but when somebody knows a lot about science, he runs back to God!

[@AMC2283]

What degrees do you hold, doctor?

[@polarbear1713]

That's just simply not true.

[@hansslane7080]

The con known as consensus is operative in many subjects. Group thinking uses social manipulation to produce what is wanted,and needed to continue careers,and relationships.

[@edwardwalsh5477]

" @hansslane7080 3 months ago "The con known as consensus" so very appropriate. 😄 Being raised in democratic society makes it easy to actually believe that the majority is always RIGHT. Wrong on all levels.

[@eifnhoj7722]

Truth is stranger than fiction

[@senseijuan3230]

Great honest and open discussion

[@IgnoranceBegetsConfidence]

How did you determine it was honest?

[@Xingqiwu387]

WOW! What a fantastic speaker with incredible knowledge.

[@benaiahwright937]

Thank God for life. I really like this guy's approach.

[@apinojilazul6571]

97% DNA function is light and sound, 3% protein, the world says is 100% protein, for human dont discover his born skils, natural talents, paranormal, psychic powers, extra sensorial experiences, heart mind receive and send information , vibration frequency energy, see truth in any dimension, affect reality with feelings thoughts, same power as angels aliens ETs., but evil people use this powers with arrogance, and good people use powers with love that has responsability maturity strong heart mind and empathy on brain, free from narcisistic psychopatic desires behaves. love is most powerful thing in universe, thats why evil people in power of our planet do things for people dont access love, only feelings believing it is love, but love is let go feeling for decide edify life in what is truth wisdom justice for everyone even to enemies , everyone is mind blocked controled by evil secret organization , and every people that is not born as narcisist psychopath, can have heart mind free to receive and give love, flow life with human essence, because we not born to be liers killers rapers hookers , we are humans because born to be light , genius talented intuition perception of truth , not to work, but to enjoy life, no born to do jobs works, be someone employ or be owner of company, not to be religion leader, not politic leader, not military leader, not money leader, no need books schools, hospitals, computer television, we have food on nature for never be sick, we have paranormal mind powers to talk to others using mind, we have mind power to affect matery of nature so no need technology, can travel universe dimensions using heart vibrations mind, so no need tech, our genius power is not math, but is love that access the laws of universe , study a little about heart, the mind of heart toughts of heart vibrations of heart goint to brain , DNA function 97% light and sound, if study all things of existence using love, science + spiritual only with love, and the love that does not make dogmatic doutrinari fanatic limited brain , but who open to test, compreend, experiment life of everything and see what real and lies, and not fight with liers, shadow you no need punsh, just turn on the light focus on good people focus in edify life thrive prosper, not be the Jonh who tells king herodes he is having sex with woman of his son, be the human that listen what Jesus says, take care of my sheeps, not go to wolfs teling they are wolfs, make weak e be strong, stop waste time teling bad people are bad, make your life useful to people who realy need, and in doubt just be patient and wait meditate relax.

[@jmlfa]

Which one? There are more than 5,000 !

[@KelliAnnWinkler]

@@jmlfa There's only one. But, there are many interpretations of the one.

[@studygodsword5937]

@@jmlfa The God that has a book with over 1200 fulfilled prophesies, including 300 about *HIS SON JESUS !* (THE BIBLE)

[@metropolis8807]

Thank You Sir for your trstimony. I just learned about you today. Your message is very timely for a generation that is not grounded. JESUS will help our Children

[@stevepierce6467]

Don't think so. More kids are being exploited, using drugs and committing suicide than ever before.

[@Synder619]

I'm enjoying Dr Garte's talk! I don't see how biolog'ts can divorce purpose in design.

[@alantasman8273]

Hint, its about getting Federal grant money to do research into only what the government deems to have merit. If the research tends to discount evolution...the research will not be funded.

[@asunder6797]

Another form of the Watchmaker's fallacy which I call the Appearance of being designed.

[@alantasman8273]

@@asunder6797 To be consistent you should also discount the design found in man made objects as they have the appearance of design while being much less complex than the design found in nature. You wouldn't question design being attributed to an object such as an auto but you attribute random chance to natural objects and processes whose intricacies and fine tuning exceed the capabilities of man. I submit that your thinking is inconsistent. Scripture says the double minded man is unstable in all his ways.

[@asunder6797]

@@alantasman8273 Ah, the argument from complexity or Watchmaker's fallacy. You find a watch in the sand picking up and realizing its complexity and think someone must have designed this. You'd be right, we have evidence that designers of watches actually exist and companies who hire these designers to create watches and people to make them. We don't have evidence of god. As you clearly have said the capital g God and quote scripture which refers to the exact thinking you attribute to me. I just sipped from my coffee cup and I know once again although the design is simple I recognize that a person designed it.

[@mcmanustony]

@@alantasman8273 you are a liar and a smear monger. Get out of your gutter and try to do better.

[@jb-qi8fz]

Excellent presentation. I want to suggest that for a very in depth study of this subject, the book "Signature in the cell" is an excellent source as are his videos on various topics of his research.

[@Sunnydreamer1470]

Thank you!

[@SS-pw8en]

Thank you

[@janelleyurosky4688]

When science finally reaches the peak of the mountain it will find God has been standing there all along... (excerpt from the movie Creator).

[@atheistcomments]

Ahhh, the dumb things christians say.

[@Glasstable2011]

Which God?

[@janelleyurosky4688]

@@Glasstable2011 There are many " gods" but only one God. I was speaking of the one God!

[@Glasstable2011]

@@janelleyurosky4688 Allah? Zeus? Quetzalcoatl? Brahma? Ra?

[@janelleyurosky4688]

@@Glasstable2011 watch the movie !

[@Brickeh]

Love all the B-roll from the conference, wish I could have been there!! Hopefully I will be able to attend CCv2

[@apinojilazul6571]

97% DNA function is light and sound, 3% protein, the world says is 100% protein, for human dont discover his born skils, natural talents, paranormal, psychic powers, extra sensorial experiences, heart mind receive and send information , vibration frequency energy, see truth in any dimension, affect reality with feelings thoughts, same power as angels aliens ETs., but evil people use this powers with arrogance, and good people use powers with love that has responsability maturity strong heart mind and empathy on brain, free from narcisistic psychopatic desires behaves. love is most powerful thing in universe, thats why evil people in power of our planet do things for people dont access love, only feelings believing it is love, but love is let go feeling for decide edify life in what is truth wisdom justice for everyone even to enemies , everyone is mind blocked controled by evil secret organization , and every people that is not born as narcisist psychopath, can have heart mind free to receive and give love, flow life with human essence, because we not born to be liers killers rapers hookers , we are humans because born to be light , genius talented intuition perception of truth , not to work, but to enjoy life, no born to do jobs works, be someone employ or be owner of company, not to be religion leader, not politic leader, not military leader, not money leader, no need books schools, hospitals, computer television, we have food on nature for never be sick, we have paranormal mind powers to talk to others using mind, we have mind power to affect matery of nature so no need technology, can travel universe dimensions using heart vibrations mind, so no need tech, our genius power is not math, but is love that access the laws of universe , study a little about heart, the mind of heart toughts of heart vibrations of heart goint to brain , DNA function 97% light and sound, if study all things of existence using love, science + spiritual only with love, and the love that does not make dogmatic doutrinari fanatic limited brain , but who open to test, compreend, experiment life of everything and see what real and lies, and not fight with liers, shadow you no need punsh, just turn on the light focus on good people focus in edify life thrive prosper, not be the Jonh who tells king herodes he is having sex with woman of his son, be the human that listen what Jesus says, take care of my sheeps, not go to wolfs teling they are wolfs, make weak e be strong, stop waste time teling bad people are bad, make your life useful to people who realy need, and in doubt just be patient and wait meditate relax.

[@Sam-bc6sr]

Praise to you O Lord our God. ✝✡☪

[@BLFJobs]

Love this unity and acknowledgment of submission to One Divine God! ❤

[@troywalstra9300]

The word gospel means “good news,” which is the message of forgiveness for sin through the atoning work of Jesus Christ. It is essentially God’s rescue plan of redemption for those who will trust in His divine Son in order to be reconciled to a just and holy God. The essential content of this saving message is clearly laid out for us in the Bible. In the apostle Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians, he lays out the content of the gospel message, “Now, brothers and sisters, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand. By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures” (1 Corinthians 15:1-4). In this passage, we see three essential elements of the gospel message. First, the phrase “died for our sins” is very important. As Romans 3:23 tells us, “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” The reality of sin needs to be acknowledged by all who approach the throne of God for salvation. A sinner must acknowledge the hopelessness of his guilt before God in order for forgiveness to take place, and he must understand that the “wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). Without this foundational truth, no gospel presentation is complete. Second, the person and work of Christ are indispensable components of the gospel. Jesus is both God (Colossians 2:9) and man (John 1:14). Jesus lived the sinless life that we could never live (1 Peter 2:22), and, because of that, He is the only one who could die a substitutionary death for the sinner. Sin against an infinite God requires an infinite sacrifice. Therefore, either man, who is finite, must pay the penalty for an infinite length of time in hell, or the infinite Christ must pay for it once. Jesus went to the cross to pay the debt we owe to God for our sin, and those who are covered by His sacrifice will inherit the kingdom of God as children of the king (John 1:12). Third, the resurrection of Christ is an essential element of the gospel. The resurrection is the proof of the power of God. Only He who created life can resurrect it after death, only He can reverse the hideousness that is death itself, and only He can remove the sting that is death and the victory that is the grave’s (1 Corinthians 15:54-55). Further, unlike all other religions, Christianity alone possesses a Founder who transcends death and who promises that His followers will do the same. All other religions were founded by men and prophets whose end was the grave. Finally, Christ offers His salvation as a free gift (Romans 5:15; 6:23), that can only be received by faith, apart from any works or merit on our part (Ephesians 2:8-9). As the apostle Paul tells us, the gospel is “the power of God that brings salvation to everyone who believes: first to the Jew, then to the Gentile” (Romans 1:16). The same inspired author tells us, “If you declare with your mouth, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9). These, then, are the essential elements of the gospel: the sin of all men, the death of Christ on the cross to pay for those sins, the resurrection of Christ to provide life everlasting for those who follow Him, and the offer of the free gift of salvation to all.

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

Here is a description of the easiest-to-understand form of speciation, called allopatric speciation. A population of a particular species exists, but it comes to be geographically split. The split could occur over extremely long periods of time (such as by 'continental drift'), or relatively quickly (such as by a river becoming diverted permanently by a flood), or over an intermediate length of time (such as might occur if a population heading south encounters a north-south-running mountain range hundreds of miles long and some individuals head west around the range while other individuals head east around it). Whatever the case, the population becomes geographically split into two populations. With the two populations geographically separated, there is no gene flow between them. Therefore, each of the populations' gene pools will evolve (accumulate genetic changes over time) independently of the other. So, for example, genetic drift could cause certain alleles to be lost from one population but not the other, while also causing some alleles to become fixed in one and not the other. In addition, new genes could arise in one population but not the other, and/or the regulation of genes (such as developmental genes) could change in one population and not the other. Further, since the two populations will be experiencing different conditions due to living in different environments (one environment might be hotter, drier, more elevated, and have different vegetation and predators than the other), natural selection will also shape the two populations’ gene pools differently. As more and more time passes, the two populations' gene pools will continue to diverge more and more from each other. Eventually, even if the two populations were to somehow come into contact with one another again, it is possible that they could not successfully interbreed (individuals from one population could not mate with individuals from the other population, producing viable offspring, which themselves could reproduce). At that point, the two populations would be reproductively isolated from one another, and are no longer just two different populations but rather are two different species.

[@dryfox11]

Ahh evolution. If only they could grasp that this would likely take 5 million years and not 2 weeks.

[@peters1783]

Out of nothing, nothing comes... In order to evolve you must exist first..

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@peters1783 I am talking about biological evolution, so, life already exists. What part don't you understand?

[@peters1783]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger .. Good.. so , then you believe in a Creator..

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@peters1783 I didn't say that. But I guess as long as you trying to stuff words into my mouth, I will return the favor. So you say you like kissing little boys.

[@sheree6542]

GOD BLESS YOU PRECIOUS CHRISTIAN MAN!! WITH YOUR TITLE , THE LORD WILL BLESS YOU FOR SHARING THE TRUTH, AMEN !!! THANK YOU FOR BEING HONEST AND SMART, AND BOLD !!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@John777Revelation]

During an interview, when asked if the genetic code is really a code, Dr. Richard Dawkins answered, *_“It [the genetic code] IS a code. It's definitely a code.”_* (Source: Jon Perry - Genetics & Evolution Stated Casually KZbin Channel Interview with Dr. Richard Dawkins on 4-2-2022. Dr. Richard Dawkins is widely regarded as the world’s foremost expert on Darwinian Evolution)

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

And then does he say whether it is a natural code or a supernatural one?

[@wbmstr24]

what is a natural code?@@haggismcbaggis9485

[@bobveklotz7914]

As a computer programmer if my boss told me to add some extra functionality to the code I am responsible for and I tried to use the evolutionary process and the code didn’t work any more I’d be fired. To add the new functionality I actually would have to think and not randomly type on my keyboard. Since DNA is a code the obvious end of random changes to it means extinction not betterment of the organism.

[@relinquishedforever8505]

Underrated comment

[@khalidislam5422]

Beautiful explanation of the intricacies of the origin of life and evolution - thank you for presenting this for all to know. Dr Garte's explanation of teleology - all life having a purpose to worship the Almighty brings home a deeper meaning of two Qur'anic verses: 51:56: I did not create jinn and humans except to worship Me 17:44: The seven heavens and the earth and all that is therein praise Him, and there is not a thing but hymneth His praise; but ye understand not their praise. Lo! He is ever Clement, Forgiving.

[@rustalisin8950]

BS.. only man likens to worship, after conquest.. on any level, even dominos. Religion only leads to war. WHAT in hell is there to worship about? Rejoice when an animal learns to speak, from that point on only trouble .. a million years until language is true.

[@johnlennox-pe2nq]

S Garte. Evolution/Darwinist, even worse than Hugh Ross. He doesnt hold fast to Scripture or believe Adam was first man or brought the Fall, by sin; My reading: ''advocates soulless hominids (who exhibited human characteristics of painting, burying dead, etc.) before Adam and Eve.''. Blocked when asked him questions of Creation on Twitter. His close friend Francis Collins, he promotes, also a liberal 'christian' grafts the pelts of rats onto aborted babies in his experiments. Also a denier of Genesis account.

[@NavesNiche]

Loved it, thank you!

[@laymantheology4674]

Great video. Thanks Cameron. I’ve Been struggling with questions about evolution and this helped a lot.

[@riverofthewood]

Have you tried reading some real science books that aren't written by people with a religious bias?

[@felixsiswanto8561]

@@riverofthewood I mean Newton's principia is definitely religiously charged, but i would not consider it less scientific than any other science books. I think that it is a bit arrogant to assume and generalize that only science books that is written from irreligious perspective is valid.

[@riverofthewood]

@@felixsiswanto8561 ///but i would not consider it less scientific than any other science books./// Say what? All the science textbooks on my shelf have 100% of their pages dedicated to science. If they put in 1% religion, then it becomes only 99% scientific... and if I am correctly understanding the math, that would make a book *less* scientific, would it not? ///I think that it is a bit arrogant to assume and generalize that only science books that is written from irreligious perspective is valid./// It's not arrogant. It's a matter of simple fact. We don't do science from a religious perspective. That is actually what we call doing religion. When we go into the lab to do an experiment, we don't make offerings or prayers for a successful experiment! We start at the assumption that there is no magic interfering with the science, and so far, that assumption has never been broken. I'm not trying to be mean here, but religion is not science, and it does not belong in science. Full stop.

[@ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630]

@@riverofthewood I think you're so atheistic that your atheism is a religion. You are looking at science through the filter of your atheistic mind. In case you didn't know virtually every last founding father of science was a devout Christian.

[@ibelieveitcauseiseentit9630]

@@riverofthewood Just try googling founding fathers of science and christianity, it will take you days to read through all of the founding fathers of science. The founding fathers of science believed that the only reason you could even do science it's because the world was created by a logical being, that's since the world was the product of a rational mind we should be able to do science. If the universe were not the product of a rational mind then the universe would not be rational and we would not even be able to do science. That's what the founding fathers of science believed. Science is not at all anti-religion. But a lot of atheists think science is a safe place to hide from god, it's not. And he is not putting religion into science. If using science I discover a microscope, and using a microscope I discovered DNA, and looking at DNA I see there's a code in 🧬 and I come to the conclusion that there is a creator. I did not put religion into science, but through science I can realize that there is a God. Not that we need science to know that God exists, we can know through our own personal experiences

[@dgilmanjm]

I used to be an agnostic. One of my reasons for saying God exists is the the fact that life as we know would not be possible if DNA did not appear with its complex repair system, not only that, the DNA that forms must have the code for its repair system.

[@jamesgardner9583]

Science and DEVINE coming together: THE WAY THINGS REALLY ARE.... Brother James 🙏🦉

[@schmetterling4477]

Or are they? :-)

[@ronniebirosak2521]

Awesome stuff . Thank you sir

[@BuddyNovinski]

The nun who taught me biology in high school never doubted it. However, we were in biology class, not moral/social guidance (religion in disguise). We had biological science curriculum study, which started after Sputnik.

[@abcmaya]

The video ended perfectly. Evolution is one of the laws but it doesn't tell us everything.

[@alantasman8273]

Macro evolution is a myth..it has never been observed in nature and the fossil record is devoid of transitional fossils.

[@patrickhowell5382]

The word of God said that the heavens declare the glory of God. I am also a scientist and science also brought me closer to God and His Son Jesus Christ. God is a God of Order, Design, and Purpose. I am so glad that Dr. Sy Garte has made it into the kingdom of God. Even when man discovers his maximum intelligence he hasn't scratched the knowledge of God. One day we will know all things and have a perfect world. Heaven will be so beautiful and perfect.

[@andrewthomas6312]

I don't know if you'll see this, but I'm really great to hear an alternate form of Dawkins' statement.

[@Enigmatic_philosopher]

Here is a philosophical and scientific critique of the arguments presented in this video: Philosophical Critiques: - The argument from improbability of life arising by chance commits the logical fallacy of appeal to probability - just because something seems hugely improbable does not mean it cannot happen by natural means. Extremely improbable events occur all the time in a large universe. - Asserting a supernatural intelligent designer is required to explain life and complexity is a form of the argument from ignorance fallacy. Scientific explanations like evolution and abiogenesis may be discovered in the future. Lack of a complete current natural explanation does not prove design. - The anthropic principle undermines the fine-tuning argument - of course fundamental constants are right for life, because we're here to observe them. Other universes with different constants could exist. Scientific Critiques: - Darwinian evolution fully explains the complexity of life and apparent design without any supernatural guidance needed. The speaker does not address modern evolutionary science in sufficient detail. - Abiogenesis hypotheses like chemical evolution of self-replicating molecules provide plausible naturalistic origins of first life. The speaker's calculations of probabilities ignore these models. - We now know of natural non-biological mechanisms like stellar nucleosynthesis for explaining the origins of elements, undercutting the design inference. The video does not provide scientifically rigorous proof of God's existence, as there are numerous viable natural explanations the speaker fails to address. There are also philosophical flaws like probabilistic and argument from ignorance fallacies.

[@rbailey3309]

I am not a scientist but I can not fathom not believing there is a God when globally we see varieties of natural beautiful wonders.

[@jhoynaberubin4711]

Sir good explanation God bless you.

[@danielmuenchau9006]

Brilliant and yet understandable presentation. Thank you sir!

[@spartybob1]

Forwarded this terrific video

[@Quick-n-eg쿠이크앤이지]

Same equation (scientists and priests). They are not God but proclaim with certainty; their position is perfect. Universe is changing constantly. Thank you for the presentation.

[@BenyRubinstein]

Outstanding, brilliant and fun presentation. Very insightful

[@johnmcclain3887]

I've been a mechanic most of my life, I sat below my mom's sewing machine and watched my dad reset the timing cam for the needle, as it came loose, a number of times, and by three or so, would tap my mom on the leg when I heard the sound of it coming loose, and she'd stop and I'd reset it, and did so till I fixed in in my teens, making a flat on the shaft, where it should've had one. I didn't so much learn this, as realize the understanding, and have believed most of my life, we have talent unique to ourselves, and we come with intelligence, aimed it own certain way. I was raised in an absolute atheist family, yet I've believed the facts of life demonstrate the "intelligent, even beyond man's capacity" for design beyond our own understanding. I was born with my left eye crossed so much, my iris wasn't visible, got surgery on it in Barcelona, Spain, at a year and a half, 1959, and had 2-15 vision from two to 40, dyslexic to the extreme, barely graduated high school, but have worked in electronics, mechanics, engineering without schooling, but have pursued natural skills, and a predilection that seemed to be inherent in my own nature. I've studied biology and evolution since my four or fifth grade, while "DNA was put before the public", and the code inherent has always been visible as a language of its own, demanding the means of coding and decoding, the multiplicative necessity to go from DNA to the final product, and reproduce the correct code in the offspring. I am reminded of my eye, constantly, with the notion of perfect accuracy in replication, and the certainty accuracy fails periodically, with bad results, which only hamper, not prevent the next generation. At sixty five, I'm still at a loss to explain any of it, absent God as creator. Thanks so much for putting this forth as a presentation.

[@glenliesegang8935]

The willingly blind have an impossibility organized creation shouting to be seen, but choose to deny an Organizer. And, though evolution does occur, I challenge every atheist to tell me from where came the code for an asexual caterpillar make a chrysalis, be dissasmbled, body recycled, and rebuilt as a brilliant butterfly with nanoscale structures creating iridescent wing colors. Nope. God is an artist.

[@larrycarter3765]

rubbish!

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

"I've studied biology and evolution since my four or fifth grade, while "DNA was put before the public", and the code inherent has always been visible as a language of its own, demanding the means of coding and decoding, ..." Metaphors. DNA is not a code, it is only somewhat something kinda sorta like a code. DNA is not a language, it is only somewhat something kinda sorta like a language.

[@jameson2916]

@@TonyTigerTonyTiger Why do you say it's not a code, only "like" a code?

[@TonyTigerTonyTiger]

@@jameson2916 ​ Because it is not an actual code. If you feel otherwise, then just show it. 1) Provide a single definition of "code". a. The definition must come from a reliable source: A dictionary will be fine, but you making up your own definition will not be. b. The definition must be one that applies to human-made codes, such as Morse code, ASCII code, Unicode, etc. 2) Show that DNA actually meets that definition. a. DNA must actually meet the definition, literally, not just metaphorically or figuratively.

[@kg5521]

I just love Dr Garte . I love hearing him speak and he's views about God.

[@kaerligheden]

"His" not he's (he is)

[@kg5521]

@@kaerligheden Yes, How embarrassing. Iv'e been doing this a lot lately !! Scares me, I maybe getting dementia . I've been known for my letter writing. Yikes , Your comment depressed me.

[@kaerligheden]

@@kg5521 oh, I'm so sorry, I thought it wasn't your language, and i was trying to help😔 I'm so sorry!!! I hope is nothing bad, just stress!

[@kg5521]

@@kaerligheden I so appreciate your apology . I've been doing this for the past year as well as spelling errors in my text messages. I Just hope my fingers are hitting the wrong letters. I'm not old either. Only 60. But interestedly enough, I have been stressed out. Sold our business , Financial problems and in the process of selling our house, all which causes stress. So I pray it's only that. 🙏 However , you are very sweet to apologize to me. God bless you

[@kaerligheden]

@@kg5521 I'm sure it's only stress,the brain is so tired, he can't function well! Take care! God bless you!!

[@j-robertdrouin4871]

He has given us a beautiful testimony of his beliefs; they are only beliefs.

[@ElephantWatchtower]

Managed to make it here before the comments are filled with lazy "God of the gaps" accusations. Sy Garte is the man!

[@2fast2block]

Well then do clue is in. How did you get around the first verses of the bible with God creating and giving life? Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God. So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally. Life only comes from life. Law of biogenesis. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k

[@martinlag1]

As a biologist, I know what the 90% of us understand about our field that theists miss, or dismiss. Daniel Dennet understands that the 'design' in life is shown to be bottom up. Dawkins understands this too, and shows it in his series of scientific books written befor the God Delusion. The appearance of design is by natural processes. The strong inference that the aparrent design is entirely natural and bottom up explains complexity. The other beauty and power of biological evolution is that it provides a mechanism. Theism assumes pre-existence of complexity/intelligence. This is why biologists are overwhelmingly naturalists. Abiogenesis is not worked out. This is presented to biologists disparagingly but it is what it is. The objection by the speaker, that evolution is not possible in abiogenesis is almost certainly wrong. Abiogenesis is too complex to be explained by random processes and requires a system of progressive changes to have occured. This is where Sy argues for God. This is a gap in understanding, not a good argument and not really even an objection in my view.

[@DaniAlbaracin]

How humans arent dead without mouth,lungs ? Animals, insects, trees are machines

[@albin2232]

Whenever my wife has a baby, I always do a DNA test just to confirm that she really is the mother.

[@AustinandJax]

😂good one!

[@fragrancefilms8367]

Incredible Human Being ❤❤❤ Thank You so so much professor! I'm a Fan...

[@AMC2283]

your bible doesn't mention dna. nowhere. at all. by any stretch of the imagination.

[@marionmarcetic7287]

As A Christian Woman I Agree Wholeheartedly With You! I Got Into An Argument With My 6Th Grade Teacher About It. I Said Maybe Your Ancient Ancestors Were Descendant's Of Ape's But Mine Weren't. He Got So Mad At Me For Saying That. But I Stuck To My Gun's Anyways.🌺🌺🌺🙏🙏🙏🇨🇦🇮🇱♾️🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🗽‼️

[@rac7773]

You KNOW his ancestors were monkeys, with his kind of vapid thinking. 😊

[@sarahjames505]

Not sure he is saying that I think he is saying we did evolve from other mammals (we have fossil records of other humanoids who may have come from apes type ancestors ) over a period time due to micro evolution, which over billions of years looks like macroevolution. His point is that the first cells could not just have come into being by evolution/ chance alone but had a divine creator who then may have endowed living matter with a teleological drive (end purpose) to eventually produce man via evolution. Some Quantum physicists are starting to think the same and even that matter itself may be conscious, building ever more complex conscious forms. Take a look at Jude Currivan The Cosmic Hologram - Information at the centre of creation or Rupert Sheldrake the science delusion. Both think that the Earth itself may have a form of consciousness, they call Gia, the ensuing climatic disasters we face may be the planet's reaction to the harm we are causing. At fundamental quantum level it would appear matter makes decisions when it collapses from a entangled state of superposition.