CAT 2024 Slot 2 Answer Key | Slot 2 VARC Detailed Solution | Score vs Percentile | Cut Off

[@P27-b]

Sirr please raise objection for that carnivorous question, "If false....." You are our hope ♥️

[@abhishekgupta5920]

Cat authorities are correct with the answer choices. There is a good reason why they have sticked to their answers even when there were many objections. Here is why(?). It is stated by the author in passage that Climate change's correlation with human carnivore conflict is not established. So, climate change leading to or not leading to human carnivore conflict is not sure. In the above, case whether we say it has negligible effect or significant effect on such conflicts would be incorrect as there is no correlation established. So, both true and false statements are inconsistent as there is no surety. An important learning here, both true and false can be inconsistent. Falsifying the statement means "significant effect" which implies sureness, hence, it becomes inconsistent. Secondly, w.r.t the choice which is purported to be true in the video, consider difference in the phrases "instinctive fear RESPONSE " and "instinctive fear". Also, "reliant" is linked to losing instinctive fear response and not exposure to sources. Exposure may be necessary but may not be sufficient condition to develop reliance. A close choice may have been humans avoiding risky behaviour. But again the passage states "increase in LIKELIHOOD (probability)" and not about the actual happening of an event. If it was mentioned as "likelihood of the conflict incidents" instead of simply "conflict incidents" in the answer choice, it would have been correct. Hope now there is clarity.

[@yuvrajshuryavanshi6272]

Sir , you are our only last hope. We have fully relied on you for varc. Hope you raise objection on behalf of us two questions one is carnivore one and other European cuisine one. It will increase your credibility for new students as well.

[@manjeetdahiya4331]

1:38:22 Analyzing the Options: "While technological advances in the past have had innocuous or beneficial outcomes, more recent advances have the potential to be more threatening globally." The author discusses both beneficial and harmful unintended consequences of innovations and highlights the global threat posed by recent advances, such as climate change and biotechnology. The author supports this view. Incorrect. "The by-products of leaded fuel, rather than the fuel itself, were responsible for the build-up of carbon-related gases in the atmosphere." The passage does not suggest that leaded fuel by-products are directly related to carbon-related emissions. Instead, the author discusses Ethyl (leaded fuel) and carbon emissions as separate issues. This statement misrepresents the passage. Correct. "The emissions caused by the large-scale use of leaded fuel ought to have been addressed earlier than they were." The passage mentions that health threats from leaded fuel were evident as early as the 1920s, implying they should have been tackled sooner. The author would likely support this. Incorrect. "It has become far easier for people today to bring out innovations with dire worldwide consequences than it was earlier." The passage highlights modern advancements in biotechnology and materials science, which make it easier for small groups to create innovations with significant global consequences. The author would support this. Incorrect. Correct Answer: 2. The by-products of leaded fuel, rather than the fuel itself, were responsible for the build-up of carbon-related gases in the atmosphere. This is inconsistent with the passage.

[@anuragmukherjee8470]

What baffled me most here was in the penultimate paragraph, Ethyl is first mentioned as a leaded fuel in the brackets but then its mentioned as being unleaded during its second mention.

[@abhisehkpandey9230]

sir please raise objection for spices alurring question. none option makes sence and the ques should be revoked

[@UltraEsports]

even the passage 1 omniverse one also

[@himanshumanocha4433]

Guys lets raise the objection for both questions. SOmeone please describe the issue in a nicer way and we will put it in description while raising it.

[@P27-b]

Hi, we should form a group and contribute money

[@prathamsharma822]

First one is carnivores' 3rd one and which is the second one?

[@anunay112]

Hello sir, would you be objecting those two questions about the human carnivore conflicts and allure of spices, it would be great help if you could do so considering you are probably the best person who can provide relevant reasoning about why those questions have unreasonable discrepancies.

[@UltraEsports]

yes sir that will be really helpful

[@AV-te4lr]

Yes gezo sir, your inputs would be super helpful sir

[@AshishSrivastava-o8s]

I've also marked option 4. Sir please raise objection on behalf of all of us🙏

[@taranchaudhary8158]

Slot 2 me 4 marks boht matter krega

[@txnxcppp]

iim calcutta will show middle finger for objections in varc for past 8 years😂😂

[@vrajdani9089]

Let’s raise query and make a group

[@manjeetdahiya4331]

1:45:52 Last OOO Sentence 1 introduces the UK as a leader in developing cultivated meat and mentions an important milestone with cultivated pet food approval. Sentence 2 emphasizes the need for government investment to fully realize the benefits of cultivated meat, aligning with the topic of support for cultivated meat development. Sentence 3 discusses the regulatory status of cultivated meat for human consumption, indicating it is still under assessment. Sentence 4 highlights previous UK government efforts to fast-track approvals for cultivated meat, continuing the theme of policy and regulatory actions. Sentence 5 shifts focus to innovation reducing the negative impacts of intensive animal agriculture, which is related to the broader benefits of such technologies but diverges from the specific narrative of UK leadership and regulatory efforts. Conclusion: The coherent paragraph would be formed using sentences 1, 2, 3, and 4, as they focus on the UK’s role in cultivated meat development and related government and regulatory aspects. Sentence 5 is broader and less directly connected, making it the odd one out.

[@lmaolmaolmaoxd]

makes sense, objection daal do

[@manjeetdahiya4331]

@@lmaolmaolmaoxd gejo sir hi krenge

[@lmaolmaolmaoxd]

@manjeetdahiya4331 gejo sir ne toh direct bol diya ki 1-5 pair hai. Toh fir woh kyu dalenge

[@ishaanmalik2821]

Sir are you raising the objections for 21:55 ? Or do we need to raise it as well?

[@GauravJhawar-r8j]

sir will you raise objection?? It's a matter of 8 marks for slot 2.

[@UltraEsports]

yes sir please

[@ishaanmalik2821]

Which is the 2nd question? One is on 21:30, other?

[@surakshagupta7891]

​@@ishaanmalik28211:05:00

[@UltraEsports]

sir passage 1 question 3 should we raise an objection

[@yuvrajthakur3719]

Sir kindly object bot the questions on behalf of the students, we all are relying on you

[@Hermione-b3w]

Coincidentally I marked the spices question right as per IIM C answer key and got 4 marks already. How will my marks be affected if objection is accepted?

[@ankityadav6506]

if accepted then you will lose 4 marks but that not gonna happen

[@avisarkar1534]

very less chance CAT is going to accept that one - the other one Cat might!

[@kunalgupta339]

where is the VARC video for slot 1

[@xeynpai2965]

Removed

[@harshraj2064]

sir you are great ..your cource made a significant impact in my varc score....sir your are great ....thank you very much sir......please sir create a cource for xat 2025 varc section

[@aniclasher6186]

Should we individually raise objection for that carnivore rc question? Or if they fix, they will automatically distribute marks

[@pariaggarwal5940]

Pls raise objection for the spices ques, 4 marks matter a lot

[@Akshkid]

Hello sir, please look at slot 1 too

[@Hermione-b3w]

Please anyone reply. what about those who marked option 2 from the start and got 4 marks as of now? Will 4 marks be deducted from their current raw score if objection is accepted? or only 1 marks will be deducted?

[@abhishekkumar-gg1fl]

-4 will be there na

[@ishaanmalik2821]

Sit CAT denied

[@Ball07282]

Anyone pls reply to this .. if objection is accepted for carnivore question .. thn will only those who marked the recorrectd answer will get marks or everyone that attempted the question will get marks ?

[@subhasmitamallick9506]

I have also the same qn

[@AshishSrivastava-o8s]

Only those who marked recorrected one and got -1.

[@ashwin3880]

No ​@@AshishSrivastava-o8s

[@Hermione-b3w]

​@@AshishSrivastava-o8swhat about those who marked option 2 and got 4 marks? Will 4 marks be deducted from their current raw score? or only 1?

[@Hermione-b3w]

​@@ashwin3880what about those who marked option 2 and got 4 marks? Will 4 marks be deducted from their current raw score? or only 1?

[@debsarkar2198]

Sir please raise the objection sir please

[@akulavamsi-t6w]

Sir, the carnivore if false in consistent one, we cannot neglect, risky behaviour impact on reducing conflict being correct according to the passage, even though the carnivore instinct is going to reduce with consistent human interaction is correct. Please request you to not neglect the human risky behaviour option completely.🙏🙏🙏

[@txnxcppp]

Just curious what will happen if cat accepts that the question has disparity? will everyone get marks