I just want to appreciate how you end most of your videos with scenes of the aircraft actually flying safely, as if the accident/incident never occurred. It's a gentle shift into a safer reality, and it's soothing and peaceful to contemplate.
@Qboro662 күн бұрын
It's as if it's flying up to heaven...😢
@fubarmodelyard13924 ай бұрын
This has become my favorite airliner channel.
@kikastra4 ай бұрын
I'm not the biggest fan of text based channels like this, but I agree it's pretty good.
@SinergiaAlUnisono4 ай бұрын
@@kikastra Mauricio Rocks !, that said, he might incorporate audio with AI in the future I guess to make even more people happy about your regards... but still great content and recreations
@kikastra4 ай бұрын
@@SinergiaAlUnisono he doesn't have to. It's still good. I was just expressing my preference. I still watch because it's good, and I'll still watch if he doesn't use AI nonsense for voice. I like the content.
@michaelmcguire97492 ай бұрын
Amazing how they find out about the years of problems only AFTER a catastrophe. Great Videos!
@Flies2FLL4 ай бұрын
This was an American Airlines airplane. 707-323 denotes 300 series, 23 denotes American Airlines specification.
@adotintheshark48484 ай бұрын
originally it was
@Stormwarningjeep4 ай бұрын
Extraordinarily well done. The best new flight channel out there.
@MPCFlights4 ай бұрын
Glad you think so!
@flyingtigerline4 ай бұрын
Your videos are visual works of art.
@MPCFlights4 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@laszloilles56634 ай бұрын
You made a very very cool ambience for the video with these real life audio. Good synchronization. Keep up the good work.
@mjd1114 ай бұрын
Someone or somebody's should have been held accountable. Not just simply going out of business. This was criminal!
@46bovine4 ай бұрын
Our government…what can I say?
@jonasbaine35383 ай бұрын
No one seems to care when it’s just cargo pilots not passengers.
@badcompany-w6s4 ай бұрын
I like this channel. No talking. Just sound.
@anthonyo.4604 ай бұрын
Great video as always. Thank you
@Rob612534 ай бұрын
29 years old and maintenance deficiencies, what could possibly go wrong….great job on the video 👍
@josephszot55454 ай бұрын
I worked at MIA, I was on the cargo road and saw MA- 406 on outbound flight to UIO coming out so I backed up some to be safe. I looked right into the face of the C/P he gave a wave for the back-up. I still see his face when I hear about this crash.
@djpalindrome4 ай бұрын
Loss of a single engine should never result in a crash
@MODECHARLIE4 ай бұрын
Especially if you have four (4) engines.
@MODECHARLIE4 ай бұрын
Especially if you have four (4) engines.
@MODECHARLIE4 ай бұрын
Especially if you have four (4!) engines.
@mii7473 ай бұрын
Without knowing the circumstances behind this crash, it would appear that on the face of it, the engine out climb performance was compromised by excess weight. Something that should have been picked up in the preflight. Dumping fuel would be for reducing the aircraft weight for landing in normal conditions as the maximum landing weight is usually lower than the takeoff weight. However, an overweight landing can be done in an emergency using emergency procedures.
@daftvader42183 ай бұрын
Something fishy about the cargo weight.... And it wasn't fish !!😮
@perfectscotty4 ай бұрын
Awesome video as usual. Thank you.
@jemaha5894 ай бұрын
Awesome video!! Love the visuals! Thank you!! 😊
@nommadd57584 ай бұрын
Good video, terrible crash! Thank you!
@gregfolland65694 ай бұрын
Awesome visuals! … This is very nicely done! … 👍
@hesslein0074 ай бұрын
Incredible, this plane was allowed to fly.....
@pacolavin4 ай бұрын
Very impressive visuals!! I loved every bit! You got a new subscriber.
@MPCFlights4 ай бұрын
Welcome!
@Eric_2004 ай бұрын
The takeoff roll was so cool. Excellent simulations.
@r.o.13304 ай бұрын
.....a planeload of frozen fish. the cleanup must have been a magical experience!
@waynetompkins30062 ай бұрын
Those poor fish died in vain. They were never eaten.
@afterhourshotrods68824 ай бұрын
I worked in kmia during that time as an AMT and Millon Air had 3 or 4 Clapped out 707's they had ALOT of incident's @ MIA there was a joke on the Airfield about getting outta the way when they'd line up for T/O due to 2 to 3 out of 4 Engines compressor stalling while on T/O roll! It was bad over there!!!! I'll bet you any thing that they were grossly overweight too cuz that was what went on back then. The fright handlers would build a pallet and say it's weight was 4500 Lb's when it was 1500 to 2000 Lb's heaver X 13 positions and the other 3 Engines were not exactly healthy maintenance wise!
@glennbzt4 ай бұрын
Love the animation good job🤙🏻
@petrusbaldamus11054 ай бұрын
Very good video !
@LuizFernandoLessa-f4q5 күн бұрын
Muito bom video. Ao terminar, a plataforma coloca por cima a propaganda, de tal forma que não conseguimos ler nem os comentários. Agradecido.
@Quinnysings4 ай бұрын
There must've been a dog onboard ... you can here it bark 3 times at 3:05 .... Another excellent reconstruction 👍
@Lauriedriver4 ай бұрын
That “dog” is the brakes.
@Quinnysings4 ай бұрын
@@Lauriedriver ah it’s this new hearing aid 😂 thank you
@Lauriedriver4 ай бұрын
@@Quinnysings 🤣👍
@kikastra4 ай бұрын
@@Quinnysingshey it does sound like a dog though 😂
@46bovine4 ай бұрын
It wasn’t an animal it was the aircraft barking because, as shown, it was a dog!
@Howyegoin4 ай бұрын
Their present website states: “In every area of our operations, Million Air works to exceed regulations, industry standards, and, most of all, customer expectations. From the moment you taxi onto our ramp, you’ll see Million Air’s professionalism at work. Your aircraft will be guided into position by experienced line personnel with military-standard hand signals. Their crisp performance, professional decorum, and attention to detail exemplify our priorities: safety, service, and excellence are the foundation of The Million Air Experience”……I wonder how the owners and bosses are doing….??
@rhanemann91004 ай бұрын
Million Air is a US-based (Houston) FBO company these days. I do not believe there is any connection to the now-defunct freight operator and the FBO operation.
@waynetompkins30062 ай бұрын
The airline was "Millon" with one i, which is how it is spelled in Spanish.
@nigeleast-jg7yv2 ай бұрын
Yeah. Blah blah
@OldWolflad4 ай бұрын
I'm being picky but the imagery shows a turbojet powered 720 or 707-120, this was a turbofan powered 707-320C.
@pascalcoole27254 ай бұрын
streching to the edge, and beyond.
@sludge85064 ай бұрын
The impossible turn. 1. It’s not a 180 degree turn. 2. Turning drastically alters the plane’s stall speed.
@valdez577004 ай бұрын
Beautiful plane with that green stripe :)
@MRFELIX3504 ай бұрын
Nice vid
@THELIFEOFPRICE4 ай бұрын
Man thats terrible, great video tho!
@Flies2FLL4 ай бұрын
Modern certification requirements state that an airliner in part 121 service must be able to climb at a 2.6 degree gradient after the loss of one powerplant. The way this is met is by limiting the payload; The more payload, the more difficulty making this requirement. A twin engine airplane loses 50% of its power but 80% of its performance; A four engine airplane loses 25% of its power but about 40% of its performance in an engine out situation. Here's a little piece of information: Airlines do NOT lose your bags. You see those tags with barcodes? There are conveyor belts that take the bags to the cart and then to the airplane, and there are lasers all over the place reading those barcodes. Airlines always know precisely where your bag is at. They simply leave them behind in order to make these required performance specifications.
@Flies2FLL4 ай бұрын
"A possible overload"
@46bovine4 ай бұрын
Yeah, WTF?
@peterlazuric56414 ай бұрын
Why did the crew not shut down engine # 3 and deploy the fire agent bottles to put the fire out. Then start to jettison fuel which would reduce the weight of the aircraft and give them more time to at least make the coast or maybe back to the airport.
@PJay-wy5fx27 күн бұрын
I was wondering the same thing. Lazy video making imo. At least address why this did not happen.
@robr23894 ай бұрын
If you're into cutting corners when it comes to maintenance, you have ZERO business operating an airline or air freight outfit. Just my thinking.
@jonmartin6451Ай бұрын
I used to fly on a old 707-300 series for a outfit called Buffalo Air out of Waco Texas, that dam 707 scared me to death the few times I was on it in the pacific, I heard months later it was in a mishap but not serious.
@ouroboris4 ай бұрын
It would be interesting to know why the #3 engine failed, and why the plane could not climb out on the remaining three engines.
@margiewillis5714 ай бұрын
The first officer's father also died in a plane crash. 😭😭
@arthurwoodend77604 ай бұрын
See. Same comment from last video. No maintenance at all
@WestPac-ny9vi3 ай бұрын
Right turn into the dead engine, I knew right away it would crash.
@benc11034 ай бұрын
Probably way over max gross wt. Losing one engine on a 4 engine jet is not a big deal. If one of the other engines was having a problem, the flight engineer would have caught it. Without knowing the particulars of the investigation (like speeds, configurations, what they did in the cockpit, etc.), did the FO actually raise the gear? Or did he get distracted (easy to do) when the fire bell sounded and forget to raise the handle? Did they (flight engineer) increase thrust on the other 3 engines? Did they level off and try to get the flaps up? Fuel Dump rate is pretty low to help much at such a low altitude. It takes a long time to dump a significant amount of fuel. But the FE should have been on top of that. It's a normal briefing item. A good FE would have had that done before the gear made it into the gear well. Never heard of a min dumping speed, and I used to be a B707 instructor pilot and type rated in type rated in 11 jets, mostly Boeings. and Douglas. That big long streak of fire trailing the number 3 engine is a video feature. Not a real life thing. The F-111 is the only jet I know that could dump fuel and light up the vapor trail with the afterburners, on purpose for fun. Sometimes you just have to look at the jet and the operation and say, "No". Especially if you can't trust the weight and balance info.
@mrojas68694 ай бұрын
Maybe overloaded? It should have been capable of maintaing a shallow climb without one engine if it were between the envelope, and at sea level🤔
@markr.19843 ай бұрын
This animated depicted aircraft looks more like the shorter Boeing 720 than a 707. The 720 was a shorter range aircraft based on the 707 but had several differences. Such as a re-designed wing, weight saving structures and the use on only two turbocompressors rather than three the 707 had. Also was shorter and stubbier. The 707 300 series was actually longer than most earlier 707s. So it just didn't look right to me.
@davidmccann98114 ай бұрын
Why was it still losing speed/height on three engines?
@jaym15124 ай бұрын
Why didn't they raise the gear?
@rapman57914 ай бұрын
They did raise the gear immediately after takeoff . The “Landing Gear” warning was to remind them to LOWER the gear, as they were descending and the plane didn’t know it was an emergency or just a regular landing, so it was a reminder to lower the gear because the sensors will alert the pilots after reaching a certain altitude during descent.Something they never do when ditching an aircraft into the sea (as they were attempting to do). The landing gear would have acted like spikes in the water and cause the plane to cartwheel or break apart as soon as it hit the water. I hope that helps . 👍 If you remember they were attempting to reach the coast to ditch in the sea. Also the landing gear creates drag and that’s the last thing they needed when losing altitude.
@jaym15124 ай бұрын
@@rapman5791 Thanks!
@eucliduschaumeau88134 ай бұрын
Flying “bucket of bolts” style. Sure miss the old 707s though.
@adotintheshark48484 ай бұрын
The airline went out of business to keep from being sued, most likely.
@bunglejoy36454 ай бұрын
Why didnt they deploy their fire bottlesand shut the engine off
@SinergiaAlUnisono4 ай бұрын
I was gonna say that with 2 out of 4 engines would need to be enough to maintain altitud but... , so many more factors adding against the final result that make my initial thought process redundant... so... nothing... I think that most planes nowadays with only 1/2 engines failures can still climb nevertheless ... (hopefully)
@iansavage16664 ай бұрын
Interesting video thank you but please add an audio commentary in future
@fernandosalas85893 ай бұрын
Poor maintenance. If I was the pilot I would've not flown it knowingly it's poor conditions
@lobowynnTV4 ай бұрын
Gamble with lives because the lives gambled were not theirs ….30 yr old airplane with issues all the time
@Bheman7454 ай бұрын
No word on what happened to the fish
@oneworldawakening3 ай бұрын
...ending its 12 years of DISservice.
@Realfrenchie4 ай бұрын
With 3 engines the plane should have be able to gain more altitude.....
@GBEdmonds-j1i4 ай бұрын
It still should have been able to climb, no information as to why? Just guesses? Even if they werent getting max power out of a second engine, two at togo and a third giving you half is plenty to keep this bird in the air. Alas given the country it crashed in you probably weren't gonna get much by way of an investigation. No black box info no fdr no cvr??? This video has really limited info for a plane this size.
@badcompany-w6s4 ай бұрын
I know you gotta do what you have to do to make a living. However if I were the pilot I would not fly that death trap.
@BobHolepit2 күн бұрын
Shouldn't an airplane be able to fly on three engines. ?
@hj82724 ай бұрын
Typical for third world countries. Planes flying without maintenance, in most cases overloaded with cargo. Four engine plane should not crash with one or even two engine failures.
@46bovine4 ай бұрын
It was registered in the United States, not a third world country !
@daftvader42183 ай бұрын
@@46bovineAnother great job done by the FAA.......
@margarita84424 ай бұрын
a clapped out old 707
@3ppcli4 ай бұрын
Everything has an expiration date, why not aircraft.
@sludge85064 ай бұрын
Everything, champ??
@bobmillerick3004 ай бұрын
Free fish for the villagers
@David-d4k9k4 ай бұрын
A turn on a bad engine.
@Oregon6969694 ай бұрын
Which is why I won't fly in South America.
@samrad2224 ай бұрын
I hate computer generated bullshit.!!!
@JuliusUnique3 ай бұрын
destroyed a church? Seems like god does not like religion haha
@vegasdutch4 ай бұрын
There is no such thing as a Columbian-American. A person is either American, or Columbian.
@rapman57914 ай бұрын
Not in this current environment. You can be whatever you want to be. Science, common sense or truth be damned!!! It’s the new woke agenda in action. 🤷♂️
@pacolavin4 ай бұрын
Many countries grant their citizens with double nationalities. You can be Mexican- American , Chinese-American and so on. Also, FYI, Columbia and Colombia are two different places. British Columbia and Colombia in South America.
@vegasdutch4 ай бұрын
@@pacolavin I don't buy such bullshit thinking. This is part of the reason western countries are failing. There are no absolutes anymore, and that is FUCKING DANGEROUS.
@waynetompkins30062 ай бұрын
You're right. They are Colombian, not Columbian.
@rudybriskar52674 ай бұрын
Too lazy to actually narrate your video? Very little background information. Not worth my time. 2:17
@arturo4684 ай бұрын
US citizens, several tons of cargo? Try harder next time, better channels are available.
@TheRealNatNat4 ай бұрын
wtf is your problem ??
@cogitoergospud14 ай бұрын
Always a guy like this in the comments …
@sludge85064 ай бұрын
@@cogitoergospud1 arturo wants to be a pilot. 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
@waynetompkins30062 ай бұрын
Down voting this comment even though it's already at the bottom.