Cascadia Landmarks Board Game Solo Review & Playthrough

[@nigeltinning8713]

Great video. Very informative and helpful.

[@SpecificallySolo]

Thanks for watching! Glad you liked it!

[@markdandridge4433]

I hit subscribe based on your channel name alone. I am watching now.

[@travelinwithTODD]

great playthrough and explanation of the new expansion. everything made sense and understandable, thank you for this video. keep up the great work with the channel.

[@SpecificallySolo]

Thanks for watching! Glad you liked the vid!

[@Wonderflonium]

Great video! Appreciate the analysis!

[@SpecificallySolo]

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it!

[@superspecky4eyes]

You mention that when playing Cascadia (base game), you are really only concerned with the animals. However, I have found that when it comes to tallying points, players are generally tied on animal points and it almost always comes down to habitat points to decide the winner.

[@SpecificallySolo]

That’s a good point, usually it does affect scoring a decent amount! I do like how the expansion makes you focus on it a little more though and keeps it more top of mind.

[@superspecky4eyes]

@@SpecificallySolo Yeah, its the main reason I am thinking of getting tge expansion. Although we love playing the base game so much, I dont want to ruin it by making it more complicated!

[@Klim_Chugunkin11]

Hi, I have found that you've ben confused with "line of sights". North and south hawk have no line of sight(LoS). Because LoS should be perpendicular to the tile side. If the south hawk tile be one-step to the left - there will be LoS (or two steps to the right, but then hawk card requirements will work as 0 poits for all your hawks)

[@SpecificallySolo]

Thanks for the clarification. I’ll be honest, line of sight for the hawks trips me up in Cascadia more than anything else!

[@superspecky4eyes]

@@SpecificallySolo If you just think of the tiles as rows or a grid it makes more sense, to me at least!

[@docbun]

@@SpecificallySolo Another way to phrase it is: the line you trace between the hawks must be (exactly) parallel to one of the (6) sides of the tiles. Or if you think of it as a grid, then the hawks must be in the same "row" (3 rows contain a tile).

[@SpecificallySolo]

@@docbun This is an easier way to think of it for sure! Thanks!