3:06 "100% mechanical efficiency" - from now and on will not believe to any word on this video.
@SvyatoslavKonev5 жыл бұрын
Они имели ввиду высокий КПД планетарных передач, до 99,6% Естественно 100% быть не может...Видео в целях рекламы, а не описания
@paull77754 жыл бұрын
You are right. I had to go back and listen again. For some reason I took it to mean 100% mechanical not 100% efficient. I think there is little question that mechanical is more efficient than hydraulic but nothing is 100% efficient.
@nonyadamnbusiness98874 жыл бұрын
@Bobby Sue "we achieve 100% mechanical efficiency" is exactly what it says.
@mitzvahgolem83669 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Looks like fun to rebuild someday...lol
@nicholasfry86954 жыл бұрын
ya don't rebuild it, ya buy a new one. lol
@interman77153 жыл бұрын
These seem to be one of the better cvt's but I'll still take a powershift or partial powershift.
@connerbrandl51032 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@MetrologyEngineer3 жыл бұрын
2:51 Don’t let their wording deceive you when they say “100% mechanical efficiency” that’s doesn’t mean the transmission is 100% efficient. It’s more like it’s 100% of its maximum efficiency and its maximum efficiency is definitely not 100% ‘energy’ efficient (for lack of a better word).
@randallbyrd19733 жыл бұрын
Very nice TY for sharing
@halflife1033 жыл бұрын
gonna need one of those 1950's chevrolet videos to explain this shit
@devairfranciozi22388 жыл бұрын
Hello could make a video of how to calibrate the ranges of the case ih magum 235..
@HanifEFIMechanical2 жыл бұрын
Good work air
@alexfernandolevandowski31546 жыл бұрын
transmissão perfeita
@ADRIAAN10075 жыл бұрын
Nothing is 100% efficient. There will be heat and friction loss in the transmission.
@connerbrandl51032 жыл бұрын
They said mechanically, idk how that works
@austinpaxman5035 ай бұрын
@@connerbrandl5103think of a solid shaft. An engine rotates that shaft at 100rpm. That shaft then rotates a pulley at 100rpm. Since the shaft is solid and both turn at the same speed it’s 100% mechanical efficient. Same concept here once they match speeds they are 100% mechanically efficient
@connerbrandl51035 ай бұрын
@@austinpaxman503 thanks for reply, I’ve actually gone to fox valley and learned in pretty good depth from cnh how the cvx/cvt works. This last year, I hadn’t when I commented.
@涂寒冰10 жыл бұрын
Good ! Thank
@actorzone8565 жыл бұрын
Its a electronic powershift transmission, same as the rest except the Fendt CVT,
@brianschulz42718 жыл бұрын
Fendt CVT is way simpler, with no clutches,and no shifting ranges..
@motorist02788 жыл бұрын
yes but it need more power from the engine
@bartdereu8 жыл бұрын
You would think so, but several tests have shown that it's the most effecient CVT in total. Some CVT's will win this in some area's of speed, but overall the Fendt Vario will win.
@ukaszsiwik74105 жыл бұрын
Fendt 0 case 1
@omartavano7835 Жыл бұрын
Credo sia zf costruzione
@bledlbledlbledl5 жыл бұрын
"Hydrostatic" ?? is that the same thing as a variable-displacement pump such as the adjustable-tilt-plate pumps some mowers have? Or is it more like what a torque-converter does? or something different altogether?
@Sausketo10 ай бұрын
This would most definately be a swash plate type pump with all the cylinders, its the only pump you can "throttle" at a constant rpm
@AndyFromm2 жыл бұрын
Why isn't this making its way into commercial trucks?
@ccclc61592 жыл бұрын
some cars have cvt but I suspect in trucks expense and reliability issues would be the 2 biggest reasons, another issue could be the truck slowing down too much when the transmission is trying to find the most efficient speed? if the truck maintained the speed or flow of traffic any efficiency that might have been gained is lost?
@AndyFromm2 жыл бұрын
@@ccclc6159 if it would hold up, I'd think it would be idea. Hold the engine at peak efficiency or power during acceleration and peak braking on deceleration.
@fransboshoff77005 жыл бұрын
Beyond expensive to repair..
@MrMarkguth3 жыл бұрын
Why did case decide to put their fwd/rev in such a weird spot? It’s awkward
@nkagisangsiane38110 жыл бұрын
can i please know a basic power transmission of CATmachines
@mitzvahgolem83667 жыл бұрын
nkagisang siane hydrostatic in excavators different
@25gwolfable7 жыл бұрын
I don't understand why it's called a CVT when I don't see any form of CVT belt chain or otherwise I'm just saying
@tedkahler97387 жыл бұрын
Constant Variable Transmission.
@bartdereu7 жыл бұрын
It's not using a belt and a variator like you know. It uses a variable hydraulic pump and motor to change the speed of the outer ring of the planetary gear. That way, mechanical power transmission goes from 0-100% in the range .(0% at start, 100% at full speed of that range). When it shifts to another range, it starts again in that range from 0% mechanical to 100% mechanical. Therefor , you can drive at 8km/u 100% mechanical , but at 9km /h only 10% mechanical. In a fendt vario , the procent mechanical power transmission is constantly increasing with it's speed, according to on of the two ranges (0-25 or 0-50 kmu)
@Bad-eb1dv5 жыл бұрын
ED 25 there is more than type of cvt
@nonyadamnbusiness98874 жыл бұрын
@Bobby Sue What are you about 13 years old? Practicing to be an asshole when you grow up?
@nicholasfry86954 жыл бұрын
You see Cvt means continously variable transmission, there are many designs for powershift, who said there is one set design for cvt
@nagyandras88579 жыл бұрын
i rather trust a simple 4x4 snychromesh.
@JCB411abuser7 жыл бұрын
Nagy Andras imagine having no synchros to fail or shifting forks or linkages. these new boxes have more reliable components that shouldn't wear as much if looked after
@nicholasfry86954 жыл бұрын
maybe but imagine trying to unload on the go with that, or do many other tasks that these do easily, we plant with a cvt and do odd jobs with a different cvt tractor, this transmmision makes a powershift look like garbage
@nagyandras88574 жыл бұрын
@@nicholasfry8695 i do odd jobs, with an 18 forward 4 reverse manual gearbox. and its not even synchro. had a tractor with cvt. the cvt was the first thing that gave up the ghost. glad it suits you, but it does not suit me ;)
@nicholasfry86954 жыл бұрын
@@nagyandras8857 Yah for us cvt is way better
@interman77153 жыл бұрын
@@JCB411abuser Wtf useless idiot would break syncros or forks?
@armedfarm34293 жыл бұрын
AH, what that der yer talkin?
@cruisingdanny49746 жыл бұрын
The think apart from being so expensive if this transmission fails I dislike most, is the fact you are no longer being challenged to become a great driver. Nowadays you just hold the throttle, thats it. Where is the challenge into mastering the skills of driving? Quite boring to be honest.
@Bad-eb1dv5 жыл бұрын
Cruising Danny we’re the standard Me and your tracker transmission with for ranges and for gears in each range
@nicholasfry86954 жыл бұрын
Who said that we need to be challenged while driving, these are way better than any outdated powershift
@damgnj3 жыл бұрын
Good animation, poor explanation !!!
@jason.arthur.taylor3 жыл бұрын
Neither is any good boss. It's not even clear to me that this is a CVT.
@Americkslander4 жыл бұрын
John Deere is Better
@Americkslander4 жыл бұрын
@The Tool Guy I’m not talking about the engine.
@Americkslander4 жыл бұрын
@The Tool Guy fair, but its all a matter of opinion anyway.