Casimir Effect - What causes this force?

[@RichardKCollins]

See the Pattern, To represent 3D fields, it is relatively easy to find many orthogonal representations. For atoms and molecules the groups often start from the Schrodinger equation, or the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. It is also possible to use 3D Fourier and wavelets. There are many choices. Those "plates" are the wrong shapes and likely the wrong properties for real nanoscopic, picoscopic and femtoscopic objects and regions. But there are mathematical and computational methods for any shapes now. The Coulomb force in 1/r^2, but the magnetic dipole force is 1/r^4. And the magnetic force is a vector. But it is well understood and documented. The corresponding potentials are 1/r and 1/r^3. At close distances, the forces between two particles having electric charge and magnetic moments usually required calculating the full multipole expansion. If you think of the 3D fields involved, then the time dependent field at ever point can often be represented in one of the many orthogonal basis sets. And often those are readily available on the Internet, and often packaged in to many of the tools. Python seems to have gained popularity, but there are many more. I hope you will look more deeply at tools and data people are using when they do "real" calculations. The energy density of the Earth's gravitational field is about equal to the energy density of a magnetic field of about 380 Tesla. In black body terms, that is roughly 1500 electron Volts per particle, so it has a peak in the soft x-ray region, extends through the XUV, but covers all frequencies. As you found the frequencies larger than the object are not so easy to use to represent the fields of those small things. But, you can use two large wavelengths (very close in frequency) where the difference fits into the right range. The "high harmonic generation" methods are what people use for laser and plasma excitation of energy densities in the XUV and soft x-ray region. And all of those are candidates for directly measuring and modifying fields, which I classify under "gravitational engineering" methods for the Internet as a whole. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation

[@mortyrickerson6322]

The level of detail you divulge to us is exquisite. Thank you so much for sharing

[@Andrew-rc3vh]

I have news for you. The full explanation is probably a full postgrad course on QFT and it is all maths. The trouble is the model used to understand it has its own issues, such a renormalisation.

[@prietjepruck]

If you are able to follow this explanation you already know the Casimir effect.

[@LeNoLi.]

i agree. i wanted to know more about it because it was so confusing, and now i'm just as confused. i guess this topic is not for amateurs.

[@nikolaveljkovic428]

​@@LeNoLi.Neil Tyson explained it simply as allways.

[@thenabilamrani]

This is so simple and easy but youtubers like this guy want to use boring 20th century vocabulary

[@jekl3loodmoon642]

@@thenabilamrani Its always others the problem never yourselft i guess this generation of dumbs will never go nowhere XD

[@robbie8142]

I didn't need to look at the comments to know how precisely popular your channel is, but of course I did. ....... Absolutely Outstanding!! 👻🚀

[@justanotherguy469]

The Van Der Waals force is fundamental because it does not depend on the phenomenological microscopic parameter, the dielectric constant. Simply brilliant.

[@giles5966]

macroscopic

[@justanotherguy469]

@@giles5966 TY

[@curiousmind9287]

Thanks!

[@pukulu]

This is an excellent presentation without vague generalizations.

[@austincali510]

I just found your channel looking for info on Plasmoids. Amazing content! Now i get to binge watch for a while!

[@SeethePattern]

Welcome aboard!

[@OrpheoTreshula]

Gold rush.

[@JoeDeglman]

You should check out an Anthony Peratt video 'Peratt and Petroglyphs' as a starter video.

[@MatthewHolevinski]

No don't listen to Joe, check out the precession video list first :)

[@JoeDeglman]

Actually, the precession series follows the Jim Weninger idea that the Sun and other stars orbit around Arcturus and around our local Chimney, or a plasma model in the spiral arms of the galaxy. Stars orbiting around the local chimney or Arcturus, and the observations of star forming beehive clusters, is a place that would fit the idea of a Marklund convection that would match the Plasma Universe models to the procession model. If you assume that there are up to 9 standing waves nodes along each spiral arm and that the star forming beehive clusters orbit those nodes, as Jim Weninger claims for his precession or Artcurus model, then you can compare and contrast the two ideas. In My Opinion, Jim's idea and precession does fit right into the Plasma model presented by Peratt. Both are a good place to start.

[@lawrenceleske3470]

Cosmologists have shown that the "vacuum energy" must be a bit smaller than theory suggests: about 10^-120. This is a bit too close to zero to measure presently. Thanks for the clear presentation wrt van der Waals!

[@googleyoutubechannel8554]

I suspect the better we get at measuring 'vacuum energy' the more it will remain a bit smaller than theory suggests, unless theory finally suggests zero...

[@thenatureofnurture6336]

The "heuristic shortcut" is a great way to explain the majority of 'understandings'.

[@curiousmind9287]

You are a bonafide genius of popularization for extremely difficult subject matter. 😊

[@andrewferris8169]

The Van der Waals picture is almost identical in that the force is still ultimately caused by virtual photons, but emanating from the charge exciting the vacuum, instead of the boundary conditions of the vacuum as a whole. It also includes the resonance of the charges around the molecules as you mentioned. In the papers you pointed out, it's mostly just arguing that the force comes from the Interaction Hamiltonian instead of the pure EM Hamiltonian. The boundary condition view is a way of thinking probabilistically and adjusting probabilities based on what interactions are even possible based on the situation. Because the situation can limit what's allowed. Van der Waals doesn't immediately capture this, but ultimately does predict it as well, so both pictures are 100% valid as of now. I wouldn't say Van der Waals is more detailed, but it does explain from the bottom up, rather than top down.

[@barrydysert2974]

Gareth, It is the graphics, so precisely timed to Your narration, that allows me to understand these heretofore impenetrable topics. i barely passed Algebra and Geometry with a D. i am convinced that was only out of the goodness of the teacher's heart! i have been with you for perhaps three years now and the EU folks five years longer. You and Your team are gifted educators! God bless You for showing me more and more of the pattern. You give me courage to face my remaining years !:-) 💜🙏⚡️

[@SeethePattern]

Thank you kindly!

[@soheil527]

@WeekendTradesman AI algorithms created by the elite

[@mr.tinkertrain8510]

@@SeethePattern casimir effect is a fake, there's no demonstration proof on the internet at all

[@andrewbodor4891]

There is a simpler explanation. The dense aether near the earth causes micro gravity pressing the plates together. The same dense aether around the earth creates the gravity that we experience on a grander scale. In both it is dense impermeable space or the aether at work. Matter pushes the aether aside; the aether presses back with "gravity". Matter, mass, can not occupy the same "space" at same time so the aether stretches like a girdle around the matter. This affect also causes what is incorrectly called "time dilation". Time is NOT dilated; the movement of the atoms constituent parts are slowed down. Refer to a cesium clock running slower. Time did not slow down, the clock did.

[@imwelshjesus]

In other it's the woo used by the baby jesus and his lying bottom feeding followers.

[@bigoptions]

I agree Andrew; "The Ron Hatch model of gravity from GPS data, he develops the "Modified Lorentz Ether Gauge Theory." He suggests that the force of gravity and clock speed are both a function of the ether density gradient." Maybe your information came from him, originally, but mine didn't. Believe me, he's right!

[@JJbm4233]

I’m not gonna say this Lightly. This is an important statement from anyone who in the 80s want to do is trying to be in BIGBANG cosmology to the modern shall we say electric universe cosmology. Thank you for continuing the legacy of Wal Thornhill! God bless you, Walt and everyone in the thunderbolts KZbin channel as well as See the patterns.

[@mcasteel2112]

Ive been sharing this channel everywhere I roam. I see a jump in subs!

[@fkeyvan]

Nice job. You covered many disparate theories of the Casimir effect which is not covered in popular media

[@LobsterHorde]

This of course shouldn’t be confused with the Kashmir effect, which is caused by Led Zeppelin.

[@mrbutish]

😂😂😂

[@zzyzx2297]

Cant wait to drop this one on my professor!

[@ExistenceUniversity]

Report back on how hard he laughed at you!

[@TheOoorrrr]

Finally some quality condensed matter physics on KZbin 🤩

[@JoeDeglman]

According to Nikola Tesla, charged particles are condensers of the ether medium; and Charles P. Steinmetz, charged particles are condensers of a dielectric. Per plasma double-layer theory a double layer sets up between the two, at close range, keeping the two charges apart. CERN experiments show that when trying to get a so-called antiproton to merge into the spherical boundary of a positron requires an auto resonant frequency. An energy input at a specific frequency to get the charged particles to overcome that boundary or double-layer force that keeps them apart. Quantum computing experiments also show a magnetic bubble exists around all charged particles and atoms that can be controlled by electric forces, as a 'qubit.' It seems that when you try to model charged particles and coulomb forces at short range, without accounting for an ether medium condensation around such charged particles, a paradox always occurs. So even in a vacuum there is always an aether medium that will permeate said vacuum that must be accounted for at close range as force to be dealt with. According to a government document, 'Successes and Failures of the Constituent Quark Model,' charge doesn't migrate out of the nucleus per the quark model, with election decay, but charge manifests outside of the nucleus, per the Nikola Tesla model of an electron as a charged particle with a magnetic medium condensed around it. An interesting video to watch on this is What is a Mole? The relationship of Avogadro's number and particle charge by Jeff Yee ... At Energy Wave Theory.

[@bigoptions]

" Quantum computing experiments also show a magnetic bubble exists around all charged particles and atoms" Can you see that there is no need to talk about charge; just about magnetism. I know that this is just a list of theories. I have combined more than that. The photon slit experiment clearly put me outside of the box as a senior in high school. Nothing pulls. In my box, everything is field pressure mediation. I watched some ewt videos; without knowing what gravity, matter, and the basic structure of an atom are, everything will remain a big mystery to people like him. I will help them soon, and be done with it. I don't want to have to work when I'm not at work, but look at the incredible amount of time they are wasting! I will show everyone what gravity is, without any equations. Then it is easy to define what matter is. From there they should be able to work on or understand the basic structure of an atom. You must know that all of those quantum things aren't particles. Do they ever give definitions for what they are talking about? Lets make one now; light is a wave which is the movement of the ether, and when the frequency or frequencies are high enough to cause a disturbance in the ether that is stable, you have a particle. And because I know what gravity is, a stable particle is a proton which, with its field, is an atom.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@bigoptions one caveat to the idea that there is no "charge." David de Hilster has a similar model where particles only "push but do not pull.". He claims then charge doesn't really exist. However, in such a scenario it fails to explain why a lightning strike and other plasma discharge events always have a return stroke of charge that is opposite to the leader stroke. It also fails to explain why CERN can capture and store both an electron and a positron and keep them in isolation etc. they obviously act differently. Also in the article "Successes and failures of the constituent quark model" it shows that charge doesn't come from the beta particle that decays out of the nucleus. Nor is there any charge exchange between the nucleus and the decayed electron. Indicating that Nikola Tesla was right, charge comes from the environment or ether that forms around the particle after the beta decay occurs. Since the evidence from CERN is that both positron and electron beta particles decay out and create both positions and electrons, which act differently, this requires a "smart" form of pressure mediation that knows which direction to push a positive vs negative particle, wrt to a magnetic field or in an electric circuit or discharge for example. For example when an atomic bomb explosion test occurred in the Earth's upper atmosphere there are particles which are propelled distinctly towards each pole of the Earth's magnetic field, clearly distinguishing the "charge" of the particles positive from negative. So all the de Holster model is doing it trying to explain charge without using the term "charge" and must replace it with a smart type of pressure medication that replaces that term by performing the same action as charge. I.E. electrons and positrons, and positive and negative chunks of the nucleus, are different and the ether particles that perform the action must have a dipole to them to create opposite charges. Said ether particles must be able to reorient their dipole around individual types of charge in an atom in order to engage in flux cancellation to neutralize the charge of an atom unless it is ionized or missing an electron, for example.

[@bigoptions]

​@@JoeDeglman ​ Within the last 10 days I just formed the picture of an atom in my head that was needed to explain my very top down approach of gravity; it is clear that I will figure out more about atomic behavior. Figuring new things out has caused too many delays. Once I make the video, hopefully there will be thousands of people expanding the theories. A video that explains gravity and why the planets are in orbit was just an easy way to get views for other videos that I thought were important. The initial 2 pictures will easily give me some credibility and then more viewers. But, as I started to try to explain, I learned more; making the videos more important and costing me more time. The return bolt of lightning or static charge is easy to explain, not because I know everything, but because that is my main interest. Which is to produce a new source of electrical power from the static charge produced by the clouds. I wasn't planning on putting that in any videos. Electrical flow has momentum as shown by RCA's equipment blowing up when they tried to just shut off their large test equipment. Dollard explains that. So, just thinking outload, could the static charge in the air attract more flow than it needs to become neutral? Sounds right. Under Steinmetz's magneto-dielectric model, which is how I'm picturing an atom, for now, I don't see the need to picture the dielectric which is the hyperboloid/hourglass shape that is the inverse of the magnetic field. But, I also wasn't trying to figure out the behavior of electricity yet. So, the magnetic field has a north and a south pole which obviously behave differently when they are different types of atoms, for example, conductor, non-conductor, and ferromagnetic; and then of coarse there would be different behaviors in molecules and as the atoms group. Here is something simple, that you might already know, that doesn't have to do with my theory, that explains why a magnetic field has to be moving near a reflector to produce current; stick your hand in the water then move it to the right. That wave is current. Then move it back and forth; that's ac. Then hold it still in the water; no current. Easy. You didn't mention any of Dollard's work; I find it hard to believe that he would make like 10 statements, in a row, that seem to obviously be the truth, and then follow them up with what we think is a lie, just because it is hard to understand. "For example when an atomic bomb explosion test occurred in the Earth's upper atmosphere there are particles which are propelled distinctly towards each pole of the Earth's magnetic field, clearly distinguishing the "charge" of the particles positive from negative." Since there are so many waves that they call particles, maybe these were also waves in the magnetic fields. There is a test you can do or suggest to others to do; can you produce waves in the magnetic flux lines of say a strong magnet. There should be no doubt that the explosion produced strongly magnetized particles, fluids, and plasma. They could be considered to be temporarily magnetized. It probably also caused an imbalance between the earth's magnetic field lines. Was the flow of the particles split? Did the particles on the side of the earth's south magnetic pole go to the south and the ones on the north side of the blast go to the north pole? This behavior will be easier for you guys to figure out after you all see my simple explanations. As usual this discussion helps me understand more, but it doesn't help me geterdone. New word, put that in Wikipedia. OMG, I almost missed that statement about dipoles and flux cancellation! That dips into my video, but all magnets are dipoles, and a proton is one, I think, for now. And what is a neutron; the other end of the proton dipole? If I understand the use of that word correctly, and as such, if you put two magnets together- north to north and south to south, they will flip around, stick together and, like completely, cancel the flux between them. There will be more pertinent information in one of my videos. These thoughts about the internal behavior of atoms are new to me though.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@bigoptions Check out the new article from the University of Tokyo's mapping of the Milkyway's magnetic field. 'Our surprising magnetic galaxy The first 3D map of magnetic fields in our galaxy explains star-forming regions' - UTokyo Effectively also solving the failure of the beehive clusters and star forming regions to comport with Newtonian Gravity. Seemingly a Poincare model of mass function and inertia wherein the magnetic flux (or ether) acts as a fluid medium to move mass and planets around, while inertia is due to acceleration of a mass wrt the magnetic flux or ether. So, let's be clear, under the Newtonian Gravity models, used by Einstein, a galaxy nor a solar system ought to have an ecliptic plane. The ecliptic plane is a fluid magnetic medium that propels the planets around the Sun and the stars around the galactic plasmoid center. Dollard and Ken Wheeler claim that the center of a magnetic is due to counterspace of some sort, but experiment shows that the center of a magnetic is condensed flux (plasmoid storage) at a harmonic node at the center of a magnet due to an internal reflection within, or between the poles of, the magnet, aka a harmonic wave that sets up between the poles of the magnetic with a harmonic node and a ring current or pinch that develops around the center and a plasma ring current of free electrons around the pinch. just like in other plasmoids. You can read about read nuclear test that Peratt helped to get declassified at 'High-altitude nuclear explosion' - wiki The problem with the idea that just wave function or waves in the ether can create charged particles or atomic particles is that no one has ever created such particles without beta decay or atomic decay to create a place for the ether or quantum wave function to condense around to create the wave function or act like a standard charged particle. If Eric Dollard and Ken Wheeler were right, that electrons for example are created out of "counterspace" by a simple wave function without a based-particle or beta particle from the nucleus, then an ionized hydrogen atom or any another ionized atom ought to be able to self-create its own electron out of counterspace, but that has never occurred. There always must be a particle busted or decayed out of the nucleus to create the particle, then the wave function (or charge) is created around that particle. Also, if electrons were just wave function and not an ether condensed around a beta particle, then CERN would not be able to store such electrons and positrons, the wave function would cease when the motion stops, but it does not, they can reintroduce and electron or positron after cold storage. Ken Wheeler and Dollard did some major rewriting of Steinmetz quote and fully insert the term 'an electron' into a snippet quote from Steinmetz' book to make you think that Steinmetz rejected the idea of electrons and charged particles. But a full read of Steinmetz materials reveals that that is clearly not the case or what he was trying to convey at all. On flux cancellation. Electrons outside the nucleus of an atom have no known magnetic dipole moment and a perfectly spherical, but inside the electron shell there are different dipole moments or 'spins', for electrons, implying to me that the ether particles surrounding and electron (beta) are capable of reorienting their dipoles and reshape of the magnetic domain around the electron, per the environment that they are in, to try to cancel the coulomb forces of the environment between the proton and other electrons surrounding them. Electron spin is pure an environmentally induced feature of the magnetic domain of the electron, and charged particles for that matter.

[@JoeDeglman]

@@bigoptions Both the protons and the neutrons have a significant magnetic dipole moment and completely inconsistent with the magnetic dipole moment predictions of the constituent quark model. According to Eugene Winger, and others who have followed up on his version of the nucleus, experiments have presented significant evidence that the nucleus (and the proton or neutron, according to Norman D. Cook.) must by a crystalline structure of smaller dipole particles that all have magnetic dipole moments and are compressed into a stable crystalline structure or "non ferromagnetic" or crystalline arrangement. They claim that the 'spin' of ejected particles is consistent with the way a dipole particle will be ejected by coulomb forces due to how they are arranged into the crystalline structure in a crystalline manner.

[@trollmcclure1884]

Gotta binge watch everything on this channel once I have more time on hands. Sky Scholar became too difficult to digest

[@douglasstrother6584]

Sky Scholar is pretty meaty!

[@hanss1754]

Sky Scholar is complete pseudoscience. Is this channel a melting pot of EU cranks?

[@guytech7310]

Probably NOT *vacuum energy* but electromagnetic forces acting on the plates. Consider that in some materials, the Casmir effect is repulsive (From Wikipedia): "There are few instances wherein the Casimir effect can give rise to repulsive forces between uncharged objects. Evgeny Lifshitz showed (theoretically) that in certain circumstances (most commonly involving liquids), repulsive forces can arise." I suspect we have still have major mis-interpretations of this effect leading the wrong conclusions.

[@ExistenceUniversity]

No charge

[@pyropulseIXXI]

This doesn’t even make sense to me given the standard explanation. They say vacuum energy cannot be used to do anything, yet then claim this is the Casimir effect. Why can’t it just be electric induction? A neutral object can have an induced electrical charge Some even claim this is where ‘gravity’ actually is Also, Van der waals forces are merely electrical induction. An electric charge, or dipole, or n-pole, is induced. I don’t like the name van der waals force for something that should be fundamentally named We don’t call gravity ‘newton force’

[@dan.j.boydzkreationz]

Then it's the standard explanation that is clouding you. Remember cognitive dissonance is a strong deterrent to new hypothesis. Accepted quantum electrodynamics for example includes and ignores infinities.

[@deltr0n]

Great explanation. Finally clicked for me. Thank you!

[@jensanchez3646]

THANK YOU!! I'm SOO greatful for you! I've been trying to understand the Casimir Force, and you helped me learn so much in just a few minutes. ☺

[@alwayscurious413]

Thanks for this - brilliant job!

[@uplnejvypatlanec1692]

great explanation and clear English (important for us non-English speakers) ... I also feel a similar force when the walls of my stomach get too close together and it makes me hungry ;-)

[@barrywilliams991]

It would be interesting to conduct a similar experiment with superconducting plates.

[@kingofnothing2260]

It still works even if in a vacuum shielded from electromagnet interference because of virtual particle momentum, which wasn't talked about unfortunately

[@aryansingh7209]

Bro you're new but the quality is comparable to youtubers that are here for a decade. Another gem of science KZbin. Your gonna boom soon.

[@noneofyourbusiness4133]

Nope. Check his popular videos and scroll down about ten or twenty. Conpspiracy nutter. Do not trust a WORD he says.

[@laneesarey6616]

He has chat gpt right his scripts lol

[@bazoo513]

6:09 - "H" in "Hrvoje" is pronounced (as are all other letters - three syllables (yes, "r" plays a role of a vowel), six phonemes.) Not a very easy pronunciation for a native English speaker... Excellent video.

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

I always look to vacuum cleaners as the mechanical way to create attractive forces. You move air out of the way to move things into a vacuum cleaner. So you should move other things out of the way for other forces. Just move gravity out of the way, and scale down the Aether. If the Aether is the backdrop of space then its scale represents the smallest distance you can cross, and that would be your vector scale for a location. So as the Earth moves forwards the vectors move together, and you would have to cross more vectors at the front of the Earth's orbit than the back. This would naturally correct gravity, and stabilize the speed of light.. which is what Michelson/Morley saw. Then the smallest vector would work in the Casimir effect as the smallest distance you can cross being forced between the plates. Then you can also use that for Entanglement as the smallest distance you can cross stretched over a larger distance.

[@DeathValleyDazed]

Your comments makes sense but I’m not smart enough to say why exactly. I remain puzzled and fascinated by the Aether. I’m stuck keeping my fingers crossed that Gareth Samuel is really onto something while “Seeing The Pattern.”

[@ExistenceUniversity]

Vacuum cleaners =/= vacuums

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

@@ExistenceUniversity So? You should read what I wrote instead of making an irrelevant reply.

[@ExistenceUniversity]

@@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591 I did, none of it makes any sense. You are just saying buzz words you heard before in random ways

[@pinchopaxtonsgreatestminds9591]

@@ExistenceUniversity Such as? I mean you can't just say I used buzz words, as I don't see any buzz words in the text.

[@johnyrocket223]

thank you for explaining something a layman like me couldn't call out. When I first heard of the experiment for the casimir effect (only a month ago) the first thing I thought was "wait doesn't metal weld itself in a vacuum if you make the faces of two plates touch? why wouldn't you explain this casimir effect with the same logic(Van Der Walls force)? where does vacuum/negative energy come in?" don't get me wrong. I still believe that funky stuff will happen if you hold two "seas of electrons" close enough to interact but not touch. We may even find a new propulsion system out of such a configuration if it encourages an energy gradient. However I'm not holding out for a miracle.

[@AshersAesera]

Wouldn't you be able to prove it's related to the Van der Waals forces by bringing an EM field nearby? If it is Van der Waals, half the time the attractive force would be temporarily reduced due the molecules having to realign with the EM field when you bring a like charged end to the plate with the like charged outer face. Where as, if it was vacuum energy it's just induce a stronger attractive force via inducing polarization. Another method I can think of is to have 3 plates. Vaccum energy would push the same plates in just as much, where as Van der Waals would fascilitate a lower attractive force due to the distance of the two plates being further apart.

[@moddel]

Excellent presentation! In the Van Der Waals approach, what is the source for the energy of the polarization fluctuations? Is it zero-point energy? If so, then both approaches are based on the same energy source, but in one case they’re spread electromagnetic field fluctuations, and in the other case they’re localized.

[@peterhodgson3696]

The polarization fluctuations are the source of energy for the attraction between the two plates. i.e. the two atoms in a polarized state are in a lower energy state than they would be otherwise because opposite charges are closer together on average.

[@Corey_Brandt]

I just want to say that you have the coolest KZbin intro ever 😁

[@alexleung842]

I like the theory that Casimir = le sage push gravity = EM field fluctuations = strong force

[@DeezNutz-ce5se]

What are you trying to say?

[@Boogaboioringale]

Le sage shadow gravity theory is priceless

[@ExistenceUniversity]

@@DeezNutz-ce5se He is saying he doesn't know anything but buzz words

[@kingofnothing2260]

No mention of virtual particle momentum? Why not?

[@blorfkarpo]

Another explanation I read a long time ago is that virtual photons, being an electron moving forwards in time and a positron moving backwards in time are atracted to charges in the plates.

[@googleyoutubechannel8554]

Yes, you can suggest all sorts of hocus pocus when our best 'theories' don't constrain much of anything really...

[@andrewbodor4891]

Try looking at the force and the wavelengths as being caused by the bunched up or compressed quantum space around large masses. We call this gravity. Matter pushes quantum space aside and quantum space pushes back; they do not mix. The dense quantum space does not just push downward but also in ALL directions. The plates in the experiment initially repel each other but when close together the quantum pressures overcome the repulsion, pushing the plates together. You may call this having to do with wavelengths, but more likely having to do with the wavelengths of quantum space.

[@denzali]

Those name mentions across the top of the screen murder the experience I must say. But an amazing channel none the less 😊

[@xenphoton5833]

Very nice presentation 👍

[@omekafalconburn9202]

Would this affect help corroborate Wal Thornhills Dipole gravity model perhaps?

[@critical-thought]

Dumb question (I know nothing about this subject), are the experiments performed in the dark?

[@F.E.Terman]

Love the accent. And as a bonus, it will automatically get all the Dutch names pronounced correctly! 😊

[@rudypieplenbosch6752]

I worked in the same building, great to see it again.

[@dsm5d723]

This is the reason why Einstein and Relativity was more "viral" than ether-based explanations. The desire for a binary of the seen and the unseen is probably built into us by the nature of opposition in language. We say the absence of a measured quantity is itself a referent, like darkness is the opposite of light rather than an absence of light.

[@stephanboivin]

You should look at Milo Wolff articles that lead to Jeff Yee Energy Wave Theory. As neutrinos, electrons and nucleons generate spherical longitudinal waves. The interference between the two plates becomes significant when the plates are close and the point of minimum énergie is when the resulting amplitude is minimal creating a force that attracts the plates. In this theory the medium has Planks density, charge is the wave phase. So electromagnetic interactions are just interference interactions of the spherical waves generated by the charged particles.

[@vanhetgoor]

The Philips Natuurkundig laboratorium was one of the greatest achievements of the N.V. Philips Gloeilampenfabriek. The work they have done in this lab was astonishing and it was way above and beyond what ordinary technical research is. it is gone. Don't know where the remainings are.

[@Ramkumar-uj9fo]

How does string theory explain the casimir effect String theory doesn't directly explain the Casimir effect, but it can provide a framework for understanding the underlying principles that contribute to this phenomenon. The Casimir effect is a quantum mechanical phenomenon that occurs when two uncharged, parallel plates are placed very close to each other in a vacuum. The plates experience an attractive force due to the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. String theory, being a framework that aims to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity, can help in understanding the Casimir effect through the following aspects: 1. **Vacuum Fluctuations:** In string theory, the fundamental building blocks are tiny, vibrating strings. These strings have specific vibrational modes that correspond to particles, including the photon (the carrier of electromagnetic forces). Just like in quantum field theory, string theory also incorporates vacuum fluctuations. These fluctuations in the string vibrations can be connected to the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field, which are responsible for the Casimir effect. 2. **Quantum Gravity:** String theory provides a consistent framework for quantum gravity, which is essential for understanding the behavior of the gravitational field between the plates. The Casimir effect involves both quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field, and string theory attempts to unify these forces. 3. **Higher Dimensions:** String theory typically involves extra spatial dimensions beyond the familiar three dimensions. While these extra dimensions might not be directly observable in the Casimir effect, they could play a role in the overall picture of how forces between objects at small scales are mediated. It's important to note that while string theory can offer a more fundamental and unified perspective on the forces involved in the Casimir effect, it doesn't provide a specific calculation or prediction for the exact magnitude of the effect. The detailed calculations of the Casimir effect still rely on quantum field theory and the properties of the electromagnetic field, rather than being derived directly from string theory. ChatGPT ♥️♥️🌹🌹

[@GamesBond.007]

2:20 There is no external field present, except for the EARTH's MAGNETIC FIELD. Which is what causes the polarisation in the atoms of the metal plates. Basically when you move a conductor through a magnetic field, a current is induced in the conductor, which in turn generates its own magnetic field, turning each conductor into a temporary magnet. So because the direction of the magnetic polarisation will be the same for both conductor plates, on the inside of the plates there will be different or opposing charges, which will create an attraction force between the plates.

[@assemblyofsilence]

I’m trying to understand how zero point (assuming it exists) would NOT be a factor in the Casimir effect. If all space is permeated with energy of various wavelengths and boundary conditions filter some of this energy how could this not play a role in the observed behavior?

[@pehliks]

Because these virtual fluctuations do not exist in reality. You can never measure any virtual particle. It is just an artifact of theoretical calculations.

[@Talpiot8200]

It does exist. We just sit on the surface. the more you pull out, its instantly replaced like sucking water out of an ocean. Enough people have made overunity devices, enough people have patents on GWAV devices, enough people have studied exotic vacuum objects to lend credence that we exist in an ocean of free energy. This shits been known since Tesla, proven throughout the 70's and 80's, applied and engineered throughout the 90's and 00's. Most people are just fucking retarded and dont understand what it implies, so physicists and engineers have to couch their words appropriately bc some 120IQ physics publishing editor cant accept the reality that this stuff is at the cusp of pure fucking magic.

[@thebogsofmordor7356]

1:36 "Retardation due to the finite speed of light" is how I describe my childhood.

[@StephenGoodfellow]

The Casimir Effect challenges the most basic tenets of Galilean/Newtonian/Einstinian physics, in that these rest on the assumption that all objects fall at the same rate in a space vacuum. If what the Casimir Effect infers is correct, then the closing of plates must be an expression of pressure, anywhere in the Universe. it follows that there is nowhere you can roll two balls of different mass, where the larger mass does not arrive sooner than the lesser - providing you make the ramp distance long enough to see the effect. This holds true for the vacuum ball and feather experiment, provided the ball and feather are released a significant distance from a gravitational target. We will observe a measured difference in arrival time of the two objects, ball arriving before the feather.. Galilean/Newtonian/Einstinian physics work fine at 'short' distances, but the expected outcome breaks down over sufficiently longer distances. The argument that the effect is so small as to be insignificant would be an ill-conceived objection when one considers that the minute discrepancy observed in the precession of Mercury was a foundational observation in the verification of Einstein's paper on Relativity.

[@jacobfreeman5444]

A good question to ask is why they would think a value is too small to matter? What are they doing to limit outside interference that makes it possible to conclude something is negligible? Perhaps the answer to the paradoxes of our understanding is in our assumptions we make.

[@l0lzers1990]

Great video!

[@GamesBond.007]

The polarisation of the atoms is caused by the earths magnetic field...because when you move a conductor through a magnetic field a current is induced in the conductor which in turn generates a magnetic field which polarises the atoms of each side of the conductor, turning the plates into magnets (while they are moved). So because the direction of the polarisation will be the same for both plates, on the inside of the plates there will be different or opposing charges, which will create an attraction force between the plates...

[@philoso377]

There are three things in the universe. 1. Energy 2. Matter and 3. Vacuum-Aether. One and only one : - Energy : electricity only - Matter : subatomic particles. - Medium, Substrate : vacuum-Aether. All mechanical activities, gravity and inertia can be traced to 1, 2 and 3. Explicitly, matter isn’t energy and energy isn’t matter. Gravity is extrinsic of matter. Gravity is intrinsic of vacuum-Aether Aether attaches to all matter pulling them together with a tensile force = G = 6.67408 × 10-11 N m2 kg-2. Light is 1 and 3 and not 2.

[@uplnejvypatlanec1692]

E=mc2 => energy = matter

[@philoso377]

What does this differ from a well known effect by which finely polished prism flat surfaces pushed tightly to one another leaving insignificant air molecule in between will continue holding together in the ambient and in vacuum?

[@chaorrottai]

It honestly would not surprise me it it was a canderwalls force origin because it's an attractive force, but it would deppend on how irregular the attractive force is. I would place the plates close together and look for fluctuation, the vacuum fluctions should create small oscillations in the force of attraction.

[@Purple.mind...Honored.one.]

3:50 Because I've subscribed to the electric universe theory, This makes me think that all the Other forces Are various different wavelengths Of electromagnetism, After all lights is just on the form of Electromagnetism, And I don't exactly get how this strong and weak nuclear force Are a part of Electromagnetism But apparently that's a thing, And it hasn't been proving yet but it makes sense that gravi is as well.

[@briankleinschmidt3664]

The empty space between the valence shells is the void. It is the boundary between negative and positive. There is no room for it in space so it moves forward though time - pulling matter along with it.

[@seanhewitt603]

So , if two plates are separated by mere nanometers can produce an electric charge, could the tiny capillaries which allow for the passage of oxygen and nutrient molecules into living cells and their mitochondria also create an electrical charge?

[@ExistenceUniversity]

No charge

[@JanSalzman-m1i]

does changing the material of the plates change the observed force? wouldn't vacuum energy effects be independent of plate material whereas van der waals would be dependent? asking for a friend.

[@Velereonics]

5:24 the emphasis here murders me. One would expect it to me on "micro" as this contrasts "macro" but instead the emphasis is on "scopic" which they both contaon 😢

[@NullStaticVoid]

seems it would be easy to test this with an analogue. Put two plates in a tank very close to each other. fill the tank with a medium. Perhaps oil or water. Then excite the medium with a transducer using pink noise. If the effect is due to wavelengths "not fitting" between the plates, then they should move together due to the energy distribution of pink noise.

[@lexpox329]

I understood very little of the 2nd half of the video because I am not versed in anything but basic Newtonian physics, but it sounds like a video I could digest and learn some new things by googling the definitions and piecing together what I am missing.

[@charleswalker7010]

For some reason I kept thinking of gravitational interaction between two objects on a microscopic scale while watching this.

[@B2T7RID2QGLEHH5UZFB0T]

What happens if you put 3 casamir plates next to each other? like> ||| will the middle plate stay in the same spot or will it go to one side or the other? My guess is it will stay in the same spot if it's perfectly balanced but I could always be wrong

[@radinelaj3932]

It is like two magnets which pull each other. It there is a plate of metal or wood between two magnets they will pull each other ( in distance 1-3cm) the force of magnet penetrate the wood plate which is between two magnets.

[@davidpalin1790]

Interesting video Well done 👏

[@karljohnnyb5850]

does this explain to some degree the drop in temperature at center of a searl device? is the vacuum energy simply transformation of heat to electric energy, simplified?

[@scottchilds5726]

I would love to see the table of elements 500 yrs from now. Perfect

[@markfernee3842]

A very nice presentation with good referencing. It seems then that the detectability of the quantum vacuum falls to squeezing. The LIGO and VIRGO gravitational wave observatories use a squeezed vacuum to increase the sensitivity of their instruments. This would seem a little less contraversial as there would be no effect in the classical picture.

[@russhall856]

🤔🤔👍👍 Thanks, I needed that 👍

[@walter--]

how would the vanderwaals view be a solution here? Or at least there should be an explanation why there would be a consistent polarization over both plates that result in a next force.

[@DSAK55]

This seem like a major kick in the ass to the idea of vacuum energy

[@rustysawblade2591]

As a Manchester united fan, I can confirm that I have witnessed the Casemiro effect and it is indeed a powerful force! 😜 I think you would enjoy the "before the big bang" series on a channel called skydive Phil (I think that's the name). Lots of information about all the conflicting ideas of how we got here. I have been alternating between that channel and yours for the last few weeks for my existential crisis fix lol.

[@GamesBond.007]

But why do the plates have to be made from metal ? If these quantum flatulations existed, it should make no difference what material the plates are made from. They should attract even if they are from plastic. The fact that metal plates are needed to demonstrate this effect shows this is a pure magnetic effect.

[@claymore609]

Can the larger wave intergrate into the fields of the plates?

[@revimfadli4666]

So the vacuum energy explanation is analogous to modelling holes as actual positive particles vs the explanation that they're simply electron voids?

[@schmetterling4477]

We are... by erecting a potential barrier around free space. It's just one more effect of boundary conditions.

[@MikeSmith-cl4ix]

So if I understand you correctly we're not sure which force causes the effect but we believe it's one of these two what other experiments have they done in this area have they tried slowly bringing a third plate to the stack see if it changes the pressure between the original two?

[@seabeepirate]

It seems like the light theory for the Casimir effect is easily testable. The testing apparatus is simple enough, the measuring is the hard part.

[@mrhassell]

I wonder if this has any bearing on Malcolm Bendall’s Thunderstorm Generator. It certainly sounds like it.

[@curiousaboutscience]

This was a fun video!

[@Schtuperfly]

So its not gravity but gravity is mass attracted to mass so there is gravity between the plates. How much stronger is the Casimir effect than the gravity? And what about magnetism existing in the plates. Could the friction of the vaccuum energy have slightly magnetized the plates? All the positive and negatives seem to line up in a very familiar way. Could gravity, magnetism and the casimer effect be somehow related. I love how we know little about gravity. It's such an opportunity.

[@pixelpatter01]

At 7:29 you mention there is NO electric field inside a perfect (superconductor?). Has the Casimir Effect been detected between superconducting plates?

[@tamayoshi682]

If the spontaneous polarizations are indeed a superposition of both possible configurations (as represented in the end of the video), does it mean that the quantum superposition is synchronized between all atoms? This kinda has to be the case, otherwise one atom could be superposed in the opposite way and repel in the opposite way. It feels more intuitive to say that spontaneous polarizations are merely the result of an unstable state which inducts itself (once a small variation in the charges is observed, then the rest of the system will tend to align itself in one of either orientation. Maybe that's what was said in the video, or maybe I'm wrong?

[@00alexander1415]

I like your channels name, cheers.

[@GamesBond.007]

2:30 Look we just made some coloured flatulations in CGI to show how our Quantum Fart Theory works ! Virtual quantum flatulations appear out of a quantum vacuum and fill the entire chamber with a multitude of silent quantum farts. Because sound cant travel in a vacuum, so we can not hear how the quantum vacuum farts. But we can see it, because this animated video shows the quantum flatulations emerging from the quantum vacuum virtual rectum which shits virtual particles and flatulations all over the place. Just like in Dexter’s Lab, no one can doubt the scientific value of this animation. Nobel prize now !

[@GamesBond.007]

The plates could also attract because of their own gravitational field...right ? Because F=Gm1m2/R^2, so if they weight 1 Kg each, then when set at R= 0,000001 m, F=6,67*10^-11/10^-12=6,67*10=66,7 Nm

[@drdca8263]

The scaling with distance between them is different for this force than for gravitational force. I think proportional to 1/(distance^4) iirc.

[@arielperez797]

Even though they are not charged so do not have electromagnetic forces present....could it be possible that a small amount of magnetism is present because of the atoms that build everything up? And once they start to move towards each other....this strengthens the magnetism due to a charged particle in motion becoming stronger? So as it moves closer...the magnetism ramps up? Lorentz force i believe it is called.

[@ExistenceUniversity]

No, no charge

[@chrisdoge6547]

Every thing has a magnetic frequency. Mass attracts Mass. Mass repels Mass.

[@mikehannan8206]

Dear Mr See The Pattern, I wish you would have a look at Ray Fleming's work & books, "The Zero Point Universe", amongst others. I am more convinced by his unifying theories than any mainstream explanations and think his theories deserve a broader airing in public. Please, please, pretty please, just have a look?

[@fCauneau]

One more time : to be seen. Absolutely. Definitely.

[@davestorm6718]

Is there a reason why the plates are metal in these experiments? Would other materials exhibit this effect? Surely, they've done this with other materials, right? It would seem that, if the force were due solely via the van der Waals effect, then different materials would have differing forces (depending on the atomic separation in the lattice structure of the material). If the plates are metal and the wavelengths are in the RF range, wouldn't they impart the same momentum regardless of the distance of the plates?

[@mossig]

Nope, no vacuum energy. I'm curious to what happens at the openings between the two plates in both ends of the two plates at one nm? If there was vacuum energy pushing the two plates together and they where not fixated to a measuring device, there is no way they would join evenly at the same time. It would touch one end before the other because there can never be a even distribution of energy everywhere. The force between the plates should be bubble like at the end of the plate gaps. To take into consideration is also that the artificial vacuum chamber in it self if made of metal is and is a Faraday cage, that changes any electric or magnetic field present outside vs inside the test area.

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

Can't you put a insulator between the plates to stop electric effects?

[@friendlyone2706]

It would need to be VERY thin

[@DANTHETUBEMAN]

@@friendlyone2706 Did I just finally find a use for Graphine? 🤷

[@123Shel12]

This could be the reason that causes machinist’s gauge blocks (with nearly perfectly machined surfaces) to stick together when the contact surfaces are parallel and touching.

[@subdynoman]

That's due to the near lack of air gap, a good experiment that I have not seen is placing these machines parts in a vacuum to verify this.

[@sean_nel]

@@subdynoman Cody's Lab did one 6 years ago. It seems a vacuum makes no difference. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oH-op4aVl89-f9E

[@TheAechBomb]

@@subdynoman I have, but I forget exactly who did it. I'd search for it on youtube if you want to find it

[@jari2018]

so its not gravity but atoms that are in a sheetform - conected mabey the shared bonds provide the force like they have lower * when 2 of these sheet comes close enought low + low makes an effect - or maybe not