🎹 Casio PX-S7000 vs Roland FP90X - Digital Piano Review & Demo 🎹

[@just-a-human-i-am]

I l-l-love your reviews. So much information on the action and tone, great tone showcase, honest and serious personal opinion. Thank you so much. You are the piano reviewer I could never even dream of listening to.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! Thanks so much for tuning in! We really appreciate your kind words and support of our channel. We're glad you enjoy Stu's awesome reviews and comparisons! :)

[@josephshatrowsky]

I ordered this instead of a clavinova 735. It comes tomorrow. I looked at the overall package and felt I’m getting more for my money with the Casio. And it looks like art. Love it

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats on your new Casio PXS7000! I think you will be very pleased with what it offers both musically and aesthetically! Thanks for tuning in and enjoy your new piano when it arrives! :)

[@Lluchito]

A well waited comparison. This was perfect for my decision making. Definitely going for the Casio, since I'm an intermediate home player who likes to play with different sounds and samples. Excellent video, thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! We're happy to hear that you found the comparison helpful! :)

[@jimkost2002]

I’ve liked the Roland Slab Pianos for both sound and action, but damn the Casio SOUNDS richer and fuller! I can’t wait to try one…. I think it’s a real competitor! If that action is up to par, it may surpass MANY pianos in its class!

[@MerriamPianos]

The Casio PXS7000 is definitely a force to be reckoned with. It should definitely be brought into the equation for any piano shopper looking for a top-tier all-in portable digital piano. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

It's pretty easy to see that many people feel it is very good. I think it is a good predictor of the future of digital pianos. All of them are going to be really great in the not too distant future.

[@davidmcnicol5322]

You could make any keyboard sound amazing!!! You play so beautifully 😍

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for tuning in and for your kind words! I will be sure to pass them along to Stu! :)

[@patrickpaolicelli8808]

I have a lot of respect for your opinion Mr. Harrison. Thank you very much! I will soon be getting the ps 5000. Very impressed with sounds on both.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for supporting our channel! I will be sure to pass on the very nice words to Stu on your behalf. Thanks again and happy playing! :)

[@Svarthok]

Happy for you! What are you playing on now?

[@JoeLinux2000]

Probably a very good choice. I like the 7000, but find it pricey. In the second video I posted with the girl playing, she's getting some very nice combination sounds out of the 7000. I'm not sure the 5000 is as versatile, but it may represent better value overall.

Very useful and detailed review thank you. And my opinion is that the casio has more warm and natural sound . Also l think their aim is more like classic piano look and feels for the player. Roland is a bulletproof action machine and more like for a live session players . Boths are awesome ..casio more classic..😍

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for the kind words! We're glad you found the review useful. I definitely agree with your notion that there is a time and place for both of these wonderful instruments. :)

[@brassgal5039]

I just bought the Casio. I’m a former RCM grade 9 but just starting back after decades & wanted a quality but also fun instrument in terms of tones & functionality. Living in a condo, it also works (smaller) & I plan on practicing with headphones so the less powerful built in speakers are not an issue. I have a concert pianist across the hall from me… so too embarrassed to share my clumsy practicing! 😂 I’m pretty sure that this S7000 will last me a long time.

[@MerriamPianos]

Congrats on your PXS7000! They are excellent instruments! Beyond their attractive aesthetic, they have a very rewarding tone and touch. Casio's piano sample sets are exceptional. :)

[@themastermind4967]

I always loved the Roland's tones but I must say the Casio tones are beautiful and right up there. Just like I really love Kawai's tone very unique tone and I am hoping to own it one day soon. They are all beautiful, I guess if you can have all 3 then why not. : ) I enjoyed the playing and listening to the Steinway and Bechstein samples, they are really special.

[@MerriamPianos]

I agree with the sentiment! While I understand that many shoppers will have to commit to just one for budgetary reasons, but the ideal situation would be to have all of these models at your disposal. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@MerriamPianos How close in tone is the Casio to the Roland LX-708? I did play an FP-90X at the local store and was a bit disappointed. It was not as good as what I'm playing at home. The one piano that stood out for me was the LX-708 which is very similar in sound to what I'm playing at home. Action seems to be an extremely subjective issue. However, if Stu says an action is playable, he should know. He's obviously a very fine pianist.

[@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12]

@@JoeLinux2000 personaly I wouldn't say an action is great without trying it out for my self because as you know action feel can ve quite subjective. Stu likes Roland's PHA4 not all of us like the PHA4. Stu doesn't like Yamaha's GHS not all of us dislike the GHS🎹🎶

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12 For me, the tone of a piano has a lot to do with how you perceive the action. If it sounds good you will feel the action is good.

[@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12]

@@JoeLinux2000 I see. For me it's different. I value both sound and action because I play for oures, and at times also play on acoustic pianos🎹🎶

[@Bell-st1fo]

Thanks for that description! I am an advanced classical pianist and was going to get the Casio PX-S7000 to play classical music on but am glad I heard you talk about the action/pivot. Do you think it would be any less of a problem for someone with smaller hands? The furthest my hands can reach is from C of one octave to D of another octave. Music stores near me do not have the Casio Px-S7000 in stock, so I'm going to try other Casio models to see if I can tell the difference in the action/pivot compared to other pianos.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in! I don't think having smaller hands or a smaller reach will have much bearing. With that said, I definitely suggest trying to find a showroom that has the PXS7000 on the floor to test it out. Tone and touch preferences are a very personal and subjective thing. :)

[@rolexmarcelo3218]

What did you get finally?

[@Bell-st1fo]

I actually got the Casio AP Celviano 710. It was offered to me new at a huge discount (half the price) and it made the most sense to me. I've really enjoyed it and it does everything I want. @@rolexmarcelo3218

[@dougmarkham]

Nice comparison video Stu! My question to you concerns the brightness of the Casio. The Casio tones sound excellent but pretty bright. Is this your perception too? Have you tried any sound modification (EQ, mic placement)? Also, you mentioned that you were going to take the Casio PX-S7000 to a 2-hour gig to see how the action would fair during extended playing. If you've done that, how was it? I did fully test the Roland FP90X recently in a small room with the P-515, ES920 and ES520, FP60X, Nord Grand, Korg Nautilus and Kawai MP11SE. Be intersection to hear if others agree or disagree with my experience: A few comments about the FP90X. Joint second best action (equal to the RHIII in the ES920) but a good clear step below the Grand Feel action in the MP11SE. The PHA50 was very sturdy in feeling but the key bottoming out was not reflective ie, my perception of the key return felt slow, but otherwise it felt to me excellent. There are two main weaknesses of the Roland modelling which kills it for me as a piano simulation: 1) The sound feels as if its coming from a distance compared to all the other pianos in the room, and the dynamic range feels compressed as if the sound is muffled ---a bit too much to make it competitive. This is maybe why Roland's PureAcoustic modelling is for piano players a bit like what marmite is to sandwich spreads. Even their earlier SuperNatural full modelling sounds to me like it's more present and feels like there is plenty of grunt if needed; whereas, the PureAcoustic modelling to my ear is to piano playing as a ventriloquist dummy talking is to normal human talking---although I'm exaggerating the point, it seems to me like there is a significant boxiness quality to the sound in both headphones and speakers compared with the other pianos. It does have some positive qualities too, but like a person farting badly in a lift, the good stuff is overpowered. 2) The bass notes of the FP90X are the opposite of warm and reverberant. This needs fixing badly, although issue 1 is more pressing. In my albeit limited testing of only a few hours with the FP-90X, I would say these two elements need a bit of work from Roland R&D, as at present, Pianoteq IMO just sounds significantly better. Although many people appreciate things differently, my impression of the models from an overall piano playing experience POV (action, sound, dynamics, pedalling etc), I felt the models ranked thusly: Kawai MP11SE Kawai ES920 Korg Nautilus (Italian Grand) Nord Grand (White Grand would be higher but for poor ppp dynamics) Kawai ES520 Roland FP60X Yamaha P515 Roland FP90X Caveat: I feel that the Roland goes to joint second if used as a controller for a decent VST such as Ravenscroft, Garritan CFX or VSL-D274 and perhaps a well set-up Pianoteq. Also on the P515 and ES520: Both have ultra light actions which make them feel a bit difficult to control without turning the touch curve settings to Heavy (which I don't like). Also The, the NWX action has a super fast key return---both good in some circumstances but less piano like IMO. CFX in the P-515 is also superbright so better for pop. Maybe my ears are accustomed to a deeper tone though. The current CFX sound quality (sound detail) is now not quite as competitive IMO as the other newer sample engines, so hope that Yamaha really improve their sampling for the next model. However, without a better weighted action, the P515 is going to suit players who love lighter actions much more than do I. The Korg Nautilus would be better as a piano-experience but for the RH3 action (ok but not the RHIII or PHA50), but the dynamic expression of the Italian Grand was good and the sound was really subtle and pleasant to play IMO. Having played the LX708 in 2020 at a Dawsons store (now sadly closed), the FP90X played in the silent isolated portable pianoroom at Bonners in the UK really confirmed to me that my earlier dislike of the PureAcoustic engine wasn't just a reflection of the noisy Dawsons store messing with my perception. I've noticed however that some people love the sound, so I don't want to put people off---please try it in case you love it. This video shows that the Casio is lovely sounding, although the Roland seems to sound better via direct lineout on KZbin to me than I felt it sounded playing it in person. Many people however will buy the FP90X as a controller. My feeling is that a used RD2000 is a better buy for that in terms of value for money, unless you dig the PureAcoustic tone.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in, supporting our channel and sharing your insights with our piano community! We appreciate it. As you've pointed out, for many piano consumers, there is a delicate balance between tone and touch that should be considered when selecting the best piano option for their personal needs and preferences. With that said, I am personally a huge of all generations of the Grand Feel action. The MP11SE blew me away when I first had the opportunity to try it. It is also exciting to see more and more digital piano manufacturers really taking the task of action authenticity more and more seriously. One can only imagine what will be available on the market a decade from now. :)

[@sailorickm]

You describe the p515 action as being ultra light. When I was shopping, ultimately buying a CA79 and later adding an ES920, I tried the p515 literally for just a few seconds. With its short keystick length, the weight required near the fall board (as for middle fingers when thumb and pinky on black keys), seemed unbearably heavy to me. I'm new to this so would be interested in hearing your thoughts.

[@dougmarkham]

@@sailorickm I would say some factors affecting perception of action downweight include: 1) How heavy the downweight and the inertial force required to move a key ie, that your current instrument requires compared to the demo instrument---eg if your own instrument downweight is super light, heavier downweights might feel too heavy and vice versa. 2) What touch setting the demo instrument has been set at----often if someone with big hands who is used to playing a heavy action comes along, they might set the action touch setting to heavy. Another person comes along not realising, and ends up feeling like they have to play very loudly to generate a comparable sound to their current instrument. 3) How new the demo instrument is: all new digital instruments often feel stiffer for the first few months and once you play a digital action in, this feeling subsides gradually. If you play an instrument for a long time and then play a new demo instrument in store, it can feel heavier to play. Conversely (and more often) a demo unit has been overplayed after years of service, and feels lighter than a new instrument. The buyer then complains that the new instrument has a stiff unplayable action lol, not realising it will loosen off. 4) Differences in technique and type of music style normally played. People with good technique focusing on classical music might rely less on strength and thus feel changes in downweight more. Couple this with a heavy touch curve... Over a decade ago now, I played a Yamaha CP4, and came back from the store to tell Pianoworld how heavy I thought the NWGH action felt. Nobody who had played it agreed with me at all. The most likely scenario was that the touch curve was set to heavy and I never checked or reset the instrument. The MP7SE I own feels much heavier than the NWX action, and the RHIII in the ES920 felt identical to my MP7SE. I reset the P515 and all the instruments before testing so ruling out touch curve settings. However, there is always the possibility the demo unit I tested was old with a well battered action. So something along those lines might explain different perceptions. I also play a folded action, so I'm used to playing close to the fallboard on the black notes.

[@DavidIzquierdoAzzouz]

Thanks for the nice report, do you really lile the FP60X over the FP90X? I found the PHA4 nice for soft playing, some jazzy chords and stuff but not really for demanding classical music passages, the hammers hitting underneath your fingers while playing is a very unpleasant feeling, also the sound, supernatural doesn't seem to me much better than the pureaccoustic.. I have to say that I'm considering the FP90X as a MIDI controller as you well pointed out, I found the MIDI output on it to be really consistent and full range, action is very playable, a little tad sluggish maybe but not really critical at the level I play at least, sound is also not bad, I like better the sounds on the MP11se generally, also on the P515 they're nice but I don't find the sound on the FP90X "unlikable" especially that you can tweak it until you make it a complete new sound, just my opinion of course

[@hyperseah]

The Roland looks huge next to the PX-S5000! Sidenote - Stu looked more serious than in videos from a few years ago. You guys are overworking him. I almost saw a smile @ 2:32. 😂

[@MerriamPianos]

The Roland FP90X is certainly a significantly larger than the Casio PXS7000. In fact, the FP90X is 20 lbs heavier than the PXS7000. Haha I think that is just Stu being in "the piano zone"! ;)

[@rolexmarcelo3218]

A Casio PXS7000 vs Kawai ES920 showdown is also highly anticipated!

[@MerriamPianos]

That is one that we plan to tackle eventually! :)

[@rolexmarcelo3218]

@@MerriamPianos Goodie!! Eagerly awaiting! Thank you so much!

[@campesino93]

​@MerriamPianos did you guys ever do this?

[@jgmedium]

Another excellent review! Thank you. Man, that Berlin Grand sound of the Casio is to die for. It would have been nice if it was included in the px s6000. 👍

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! I certainly agree! It is a wonderful and impressive piano tone! :)

[@winterheat]

Berlin grand, if it is Bechstein, it is one of my 4 choices of pianos in the Pianoteq Pro purchase. I chose Steinway D, Bechstein, Bluthner, and K2. I didn't choose YC5 because I already have a DGX-670 with CFX sound

[@winterheat]

that's a bit interesting PX-S5000 and 6000 both have 1 German grand, and PX-S7000 has 3: Hamburg, NY, Berlin, so I think that means Hamburg Steinway D, NY Steinway D, and Bechstein. You'd think they can put all 3 into PX-S5000 and 6000, considering a 128GB microsd card is like $17 and a 256GB one is like $26. Oh my goodness... if memory size can double every two years, that means 15 to 20 years later, people reading this post would say: "it costed $26 for 256GB? Now it is like $26 for 64TB"

[@IvanEDaza]

The Berlin piano on the Casio definitely touched me, thanks for showing that tone on your review, had no idea this new model had that one tone since most youtubers seem to like the New York one which imo sounds cheap, like the sample from the CDP-S line and just show that one or the hamburg one than other time.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're welcome! The Berlin piano tone is quite beautiful and captivating. I am happy to hear that you connected with it! :)

[@andysjazztopics]

hi Stu, thank you for your fine body of work in piano reviews in general and your pointing to the significance of the pivot length of a piano action. according to the lever principle there is an inverse proportionality between the key dip at any point where you touch the key and the force you have to apply to press it. Given the standardized length of the visible/playable part of the white keys of 148 mm, and the key dip at the outer end of 10 to 11 mm, i did some serious measuring on my pianos - acoustic as well as digital ones. - - - Yamaha grand piano S-400 (190 cm total instrument length): pivot length from outer end of the white key to the pivot point inside the piano: 250 mm. key dip 10 mm in from the outer end: 10.4 mm, key dip half way in (74 mm in from the outer end, 25 mm in from the start of the narrow part of the white keys): 7.7 mm, key dip 138 mm in (near the fallboard): 5.0 mm. - - - Kawai upright piano KS-3F: pivot length: 195 mm. key dip 10 mm in: 10.4 mm, key dip 74 mm in: 6.7 mm, key dip 138 mm in: 3.0 mm. - - - Yamaha digital stage piano P-115 (= P-125 as i guess): pivot length (didn't dare to open the piano, therefore estimated by using pencil/paper): 172 mm key dip 10 mm in: 10.7 mm, key dip 74 mm in: 6.5 mm, key dip 138 mm in: 2.2 mm. - - - by the law of physics this means that on a studio grand piano you will have to apply twice as much force to press the white keys near the fallboard compared to what's necessary on the outside (ratio 1/2.1). on an upright piano the ratio will be 1/ 3.5, and on my P-115 stage it will nearly be 1/5 (1/4.9 - almost impossible to perform a forte there). [[touching the key half way in, the ratios will be half as much (1/1.6; 1/1.8; 1/2.5)]] edit: half-way in the differences in ratio are not that distinct (1/1.35; 1/1.55 ; 1/1.65) Now, concerning the significance of these ratios for the player: in my 4 decades of giving piano lessons i've watched especially beginners avoid using the narrow parts of the white keys at any cost - which results in awkward movements of fingers/wrists/elbows/arms. if beginners use digital pianos with short pivot length, this tendency of avoidance should even be higher due to the amount of force necessary. also i would estimate the percentage of cases where you will have to touch the narrow parts of white keys way higher than 3% - and not only in piano pieces of highest complexity. best, andy

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi Andy! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks so much for the kind words and support of our channel! Also, thank you for this incredibly comprehensive and compelling write-up about correlations between performance and key dip/pivot length. The impact on players (particularly on beginners) and the way in which they play and interact with the keyboard is also quite fascinating. We sincerely appreciate these insights and contributions to the conversation! Thanks so much and happy playing! :)

[@jimkost2002]

Andy, you should see Leon Thomassien’s video re: the action of the new Casios (5000/6000/7000 all have the same action). He puts it thru several tests and even plays an excerpt from Liszt’s “La Campanella” ! He concludes it has met and surpassed every test he’s given it.

[@jeffreyreid6981]

I like both of them but Casio sounds really good,and it was my first keyboard ever

[@MerriamPianos]

It is definitely a hard choice! So far, it seems really down the middle (a 50/50 split!) from our community members.

[@cresshead]

Piano sound - prefer the Casio.

[@MerriamPianos]

The PXS7000 certainly has a lovely piano tone. :)

[@DavidIzquierdoAzzouz]

That's been quick! Kudos for Merriam and Stu 👍

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you! We appreciate it! :)

[@winterheat]

22:41 Keyboard action comparison

[@MerriamPianos]

:)

[@victoriadingli4378]

Your review is so informative. I am now convinced and happy I made the right choice! I love the Berlin Grand sound and the retro/contemporary look of the Casio. Thank you so much.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! We're glad you found the video helpful. Congrats on your PXS7000! It is a splendid instrument! I know you will be quite thrilled with it. :)

[@mangoldm]

Love the Casio form factor.

[@MerriamPianos]

Absolutely! It is a very attractive instrument! :)

[@anthonysilva5312]

Best head to head comparisons on KZbin.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks a million! We appreciate that! :)

[@anthonysilva5312]

@@MerriamPianos question about the privia; is it easily removed from the stand if you wish to gig it?

[@AlbertoSegovia.]

Wow, Stu really has Gabriela Montero-level piano improvising and prodigy playing capabilities! Awesome work, almost encyclopedic in spirit, reviewing pianos on KZbin.

[@MerriamPianos]

I completely agree! Stu is multi-talented to say the least and we are lucky to have his knowledge and musical expertise! :)

[@Cowdog1]

I've watched this review again... my ear isn't as discerning as most others' and I like both pianos a lot. But, that Roland is so big and the Casio just looks so nice. I am looking to trade my PX-S3000 in to upgrade to the -7000. I'm no pro, either. Cheers, again from Texas!

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks so much for tuning in! The PXS7000 is an awesome piano and Casio is definitely knocking it out of the park these days with aesthetics and portability, which are both important factors when using an instrument for performance/gigging.

[@VulcanicCloud]

Thanks for this review and comparison, love how in depth you go. I currently own a Yamaha P-125, and while it does the job, there is a lot more to be desired. I'm probably like an intermediate level hobbyist for piano playing, and the Casio looks like an excellent choice for an upgrade down the line. I especially adore it's clean and compact design. My main question about it: do you think the shorter pivot length on the Casio would be better for someone with hands on the smaller size such as myself?

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in and for the kind words! We appreciate it. :) The PXS7000 is a fantastic instrument with tons of perks. The combination of its portability and the amazing piano experience it provides makes it a really attractive instrument. In terms of the shorter pivot length, I don't think the size of someone's hands/fingers will make it any more or less suitable. The exposed portion of the key is not altered, of course. With that said, it comes down to a matter of the preferences of the player in terms of whether they connect with the touch that the PXS7000's action provides.

[@alexniculaescu6157]

I like the casio s7000 and was wondering how it compares to the new kawai cn301. Can you do a comparison?

[@MerriamPianos]

Thanks for the suggestion! I will add it to our list of possibilities of course, but we typically tackle comparisons between models that have the same form. In other words, consoles versus consoles and slabs versus slabs. We will do our best to cover it though! :)

[@Svarthok]

Many were looking forward to this one 🙂

[@MerriamPianos]

We had many requests for it, so we're excited to be able to deliver it finally. :)

[@adamglinka1]

You do absolutely excellent job....Thank you....

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in! :)

[@cragar55]

Great review, and objective comparison as always. Thank you!

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! We're glad that you enjoyed it! :)

[@donkenorn]

Hi Stu. Your reviews are the best. I need to replace my very old Yamaha Clavinova. Your other great skill is the music you play when comparing sounds. In this review I would love to learn to play any or all of the samples you played. Are you playing your own creations? Is there a way you could identify the names of pieces they came from? They are gorgeous!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and supporting our channel! We really appreciate the support. :) I would have to check with Stu in regards to what he is playing specifically in this video. Sometimes, he is playing specific songs/pieces, but, other times, he is improvising. As I'm sure you have come to realize from his playing/videos, Stu is a monster improviser and can play absolutely incredible music off-the-cuff. :)

[@sobbsaroonie]

Thanks I've been waiting for this review but still was hoping Stu would have said which he thinks would be better for gigging and singing. The only difference I heard was that Casio=32 Watts and Roland =60 watts. 1. Which mic amplifier is better? Wish he did a demo on the mics for each. 2. Which would be better gigging and singing with built in mic. 3. Can the Casio be used for a small venue compared to Roland or would Roland be better. Obviously 32lbs vs 52lbs is a big difference but is the portability of the Casio better? Lastly how long would the Casio's keys hold up over time vs Roland. Does Stu have an opinion? Thanks so much Mj

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi MJ! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and supporting our channel! I can't speak on Stu's behalf in terms of his preference between the two models for the specific use of gigging. With that said, you can definitely expect more demo/comparison videos that feature these two models in the future. We appreciate the feedback and suggestions and will definitely do our best to tackle these subjects in future videos. We have received several requests to do a comparison of microphone sound quality for the pertinent models that have this feature and it is on the list of potential topics for future videos. Stay tuned and happy playing! :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

For a gigging musician the Casio has to be a top choice. Lighter is better if the sound is similar. At my age (80) a 50 lb. instrument is really hard to move, plus it's easier to pick up something that is narrower. The DGX is a beast, and I had trouble just getting it up on it's stand. Of course it would be easier for a younger guy, but still I think you want the lightest instrument you can get that will do the job. That said the mic amp performance could be a deciding factor, if the Roland was actually a lot better in that aspect.

[@sobbsaroonie]

@@JoeLinux2000 yes but the Roland has 60 watts and the Casio only 32 watts. I do like the fact that casio runs on batteries and is only 32lbs vs 52 lbs for the Roland. I think the Roland is good because you won't be lugging an amp around for coffeehouse playing etc. Also I like the idea of having the mic controls on sliders vs going into a menu. But the Casio may be loud enough I just can't find one to check out. But I'm old and don't want to lug stuff around to do nursing homes and busking. So I'm really torn on this one. Your right the mic options and speakers are holding me back.

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@sobbsaroonie You need to get to store that has one. It would be ideal if you could rent a Casio to use on one of your nursing home gigs. I tried the FP-90x at the store, and was not that impressed. In my opinion it's not the super instrument some people claim. I would go with the lightest instrument that could do the job. Also it's easier to carry two lighter items than one single heavy one. My DGX which weighs as much as the Roland is real beast to move around. Even with two people it would be difficult. You will need a hand truck for sure. The sell bags for the Casios.

[@sobbsaroonie]

@@JoeLinux2000 Thats the problem no stores in my area have one. I was able to locate the Roland Fp90x and play it and use the microphone. I thought it was good just heavy. Again its got more power on the speakers. Until this line of Casio (flagship) pxs6000,7000 I wasn't crazy about Casio. I have a cdp s350 its light portable, battery operated etc. Just not crazy about the action. I'm wondering how the action is on the 7000 and wondering if it will hold up. I've had a Roland F140 R for 4 years and love that action. Although I'm still a beginner to intermediate. Not sure how this new hybrid Casio action will be over time. Only way to get one is order and buy it from guitar center they let you return items within 40 days. But I don't want to buy it just to try it out then have to return it. I'm waiting for stores to get one. Thanks for all your advice.

[@Cowdog1]

I've connected two nice studio monitors connected to my Casio. Sounds crazy nice.

[@MerriamPianos]

That's fantastic! I must say - I did some experimentation with running the Casio PXS7000 through various high-quality keyboard amplifiers and the presentation of the instruments piano sounds were quite wonderful! :)

[@creativekeyspianostudio6695]

I would have never thought that once I will say that Casio wins over Roland. That Bechstein sample is just stunning. After several years using Roland products I bought my very first Casio instrument, the PXS5000 and I really enjoy it. My other favourite is the AP470 with the open lid, it makes a big difference. So I think, sampling over modelling is always wins, at least for me.

[@MerriamPianos]

The high-end Casio PXS sample sets are amazing and incredibly authentic sounding! I'm glad you have discovered their fantastic tone! Thanks so much for tuning in and all the best!

[@toniferic-tech8733]

How repairable are these devices? Longevity is important to me. Repairabiliy means that parts are replacable, spare parts available, circuit documented. Ideally the sound generation engine should be upgradeable.

[@MerriamPianos]

Both of these models, along with virtually all digital pianos from major manufacturers, include factory warranties on parts and labour. In our experiences, Roland and Casio are both incredible when it comes to post-sale and service support. :)

[@marcosoliveirasantos3243]

Casio is definitely wonderful in everything, with a much superior set of keys and with an action that simulates hammers that impresses.

[@MerriamPianos]

Casio has certainly drawn a line in the sand with the PXS7000 model. It has a spectacular tone, touch, and array of features. With that said, the FP90X is also a fantastic instrument. Its touch is a bit heavier, which may be the preference to some players.

[@mfurman]

The action of PX-S7000 is much more bouncy than PHA50, especially as far as black keys are concerned I cannot imagine bringing FP-90X to any gigging - its weight was too much for me when just moving within my house. I did not use any of its features so it was an overkill for me (I am missing PHA50 action though).

[@MerriamPianos]

There are certainly some concessions that need to be made when choosing a gigging instrument. Most of the portable and stage pianos with advanced actions are quite heavy, which, as you pointed out, makes them difficult to tour/travel with.

[@TheHornoxx]

...sehr gut! - Danke 👍

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you kindly! :)

[@jamnee]

I own the Casio PX-S3000 keyboard and love the sparkling quality the grand piano sound has. With this S7000 the sounds are even better. I prefer the slightly brighter sound to the Roland which seems a bit muted. I think Stu is correct that for beginning and intermediate users the Casio works really well. Much more portable which is a big deal to me as I do not have a dedicated space.

[@MerriamPianos]

The Casio piano tones have a beautifully brilliant sound and the portability factor will be a major pro for gigging players. With that said, in either case, you really can't go wrong as these are two top all-in portable digital pianos from two of the most reputable companies in the industry. :)

[@markhaskins8179]

Thanks for the excellent demonstration Stu. I have a question about this versus the Kawai ES920, it took me a while to settle on that after comparing it against the Roland FP-90X and Yamaha P-515. I have asked the store to order one in but it has been delayed, so this Casio could be a possible competitor against my original choice of the ES920 from Kawai. What would you say about the two and the differences, I don't mind the extra spend out on the Casio.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question! It really comes down to a matter of personal preference as the Casio PXS7000 and Kawai ES920 are very different musical offerings. I have personally not had a chance to play the PXS7000 so, unfortunately, I cannot comment firsthand on the feel of the action in particular. With that said, I think a vide comparison between the PXS7000 and ES920 would be a fantastic idea. I have added it to our list of potential videos for the near future. Thanks for the idea! :)

[@markhaskins8179]

@@MerriamPianos Hi Brent, thanks for getting back to me and yes please, if you could make a comparison of the two that would be great. ATB, Mark.

[@rolexmarcelo3218]

First! Ive been waiting for this comparison, specifically how the key actions compare.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you for tuning in and for your patience! ;)

[@amirprog]

Please review Studiologic Numa X Piano GT (piano like grand touch) . They say its new fatar tp400wood is overall better than the roland pha50, and for a cheaper price. Also, compare it with pha50

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly for the suggestions! We'll definitely add them to the list of potential topics/products for upcoming video reviews/comparisons. :)

[@bhaveshmistry3255]

I love NumaX-GT and it would be really great if Stu can do the review and comparison video of Numa vs Kawai/Yamaha and Roland. Numa X-GT is value for money product. I am not a big fan of Fatar key action but on this they have used new TP400 action which is interesting, I hope it will be responsive like a Japanese pianos. Thanks!

[@JoeLinux2000]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iX_WYYGwiJ6AhrM Absolutely a great sounding instrument. It seems easy to control in a live setting. I find the Yamaha DGX to be very kludgy as far as the the interface is concerned. The Numa X sounds fantastic to me. Lot's color variation and a fat sound. Not sure how easy it is to recall set-ups.

[@gregorywhite9095]

These reviews, although very useful, remind me of seeing TV ads on TV. "The colour on that RCA set is amazing. Much better than our TV."

[@MerriamPianos]

We're glad you're finding the info useful! Thanks for tuning in.

[@cliffordsy4249]

Here in SEA region, it seems Casio has been lording it over with the units being sold. One youtuber reviewer also says that 90 percent of keyboards/digital pianos (who are subscribers to his channel) being sold are casio's although most of the units being sold are at the introductory ones. Is it safe to say at the north americas Casio is the most units sold as well? Not satisfied at the mid level range (pxs 1100 to 3100) they are now up there at the high end gateway.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Unfortunately, we do not get to see all of the North American sales numbers for all manufacturers. It would be to tough to speculate, but the numbers would definitely change when you factor in less-than-88-note unweighted keyboards and the likes as there are a few companies in particular that dominate that category with Casio certainly being one of them.

[@cliffordsy4249]

@@MerriamPianos Hi Brent thanks for the reply. Keep up with the amazing work. You don't know how much your channel has influenced a good number of people here in deciding their first pianos. Hope Stu would do more tutorials as well in the near future. :)

[@winterheat]

24:03 I am wondering what if a classical piece is like intermediate level, but your fingers just need to be closer to the felt... I am not familiar with many classical pieces' hand position, but it seems for Moonlight Sonata 1st Movement, it already may be so: my thumb and little finger need to go on the black keys at the same time, so my middle finger on either the black or white key now would need to play further closer to the felt

[@MerriamPianos]

As Stu mentions in the video, there are some situations where the shorter pivot length may be felt by more discerning players. It ultimately depends on the playing style and hand positioning tendencies of the specific player. The recommendation is always to test these actions out at the showroom to see if they connect with your particular preferences and playing style.

[@winterheat]

@@MerriamPianos I noticed Stu pressed on some keys at a point that was close to the felt too, starting from 5:10. So maybe he felt it was a little bit harder to press, so that's why he later on gave the comment about advanced classical pieces

[@MERCEDES-BENZS600GUARD_V12]

Now this is interesting🎹🎶

[@MerriamPianos]

:)

[@tell-dtruth5470]

Thanks for a great demo and comparison. Sounds like :) Casio has better warmer grants.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! It is definitely a tough choice between these two exceptional digital pianos. :)

[@brunopereira3640]

I love Casio! I Love samples: steiway B !

[@MerriamPianos]

Casio is certainly doing some impressive things with these latest offerings into the PXS line! :)

[@jeki6035]

Hi there. I'm mostly interested in classical sounds such as piano, harpsichord , church organs, celesta, forte piano, glockenspiel etc. LESS interested in pop instruments, choir, honky-tonk stuff. Which has better sound profiles? Is there another model or even brand that would better fit the bill for the same price point of an FP90X or the Casio 7000?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! The PXS7000 and Roland FP90X are both incredibly versatile instruments that offer a plethora of instrument/piano sounds that are appropriate for both classical and pop playing. With that said, you may also want to check out Kawai. The ES920 model in particular is commonly compared to the two models featured in this video. Some players find the tone to be a little warmer and more authentic sounding, which is quite appropriate for classical playing. :)

[@vidarw73]

There was a time I thought a casio was only for cheap watches and calculators. Those days are gone :) Im getting my PSX-s6000 very soon and Im looking forward to it. It has the same action as the 7000. The roland is also very good,but I find the other sounds very cheap and boring. If you like strings,organs +++ you’d be disappointed but the piano part is really good.

[@MerriamPianos]

The new Casio PXS models are spectacular, especially the PXS6000 and PXS7000. The onboard sounds and features are fantastic. Plus, they are ultra-portable and have a really cool aesthetic. Enjoy your PXS6000 once it arrives! :)

[@Hvvjsfu]

分かりやすい比較。ありがとう！

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thank you for watching! :)

[@stevekstevek-yl9yx]

Thanks Stu, for another helpful video. I am just starting piano lessons and listening to your inspired playing is half the fun of your informative videos. I also watched the PX-S6000 reviews and, given that it has "only" the Hamburg (you said here that the "Hamburg" is your third choice of the three samples on the PX-S7000), am wondering how much "worse" the Hamburg is than the Berlin? Am I being overly obsessive? Others have indicated that the Hamburg was the best of the three, but I overwhelmingly trust your opinion, so ... if I have to live with just one, will the 6000 sample suffice? I understand marketing and product placement, but Casio doesn't make it easy! I'm just getting started with piano lessons and am probably not even worthy of the 6000, but I can afford either the 6000 or the 7000 so want to make a choice I can live with for the next three or so years. Perhaps a nicer Kawai then... Thanks agian!

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and sharing your kind words! At the end of the day, it comes down to a matter of preference. I am personally a big fan of the Hamburg sample, but I do concur with Stu that there is something just a bit sweeter and more expressive about the Berlin grand. However, this is a highly-subjective topic of course. The best bet would be to test out the pianos in person to see which sound you gravitate towards more. :)

[@stevekstevek-yl9yx]

@@MerriamPianos Thanks Brent! Ok, back to the actions. My sense is that, all things considered, the PHA-50 is still the better key bed? From a physics point of view alone, it seems obvious? I think the sounds from the PX-S7000 are great, but if I plan to get into VST's down the road, does the Roland, with the arguably better, more proven keyed, make a better choice? I just want a keyboard that doesn't limit me down the road as I (hopefully) improve. Thanks again!

[@jeffreyburley4033]

Just an observation about the presentation. It would be nice to hear the same music played on both units. I noticed you played a few very low keys on the Casio but not on the Roland. By playing the same music on both, I feel you can get a better earful for comparison. I would be very curious how the lower registers sound on the Roland. Or did I miss something?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you for the feedback. I will be sure to pass it along to Stu and our production team. In terms of the low register on the Roland, we also have a dedicated review video on the FP90X exclusively. There are additional demos of that model in that video, which you might find helpful. :)

[@Lincandoubtyou]

Stu, I have a question. Is conclusion from this video is that Roland is better for classic music because of the precision and sensors? 😊 please answer my comment because I’m about to decide which one to get. I love playing classical music and would love to have feelings of instrument expressiveness.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question! It comes down to a matter of preference of course. That will always be the most important consideration. With that said, the FP90X has a bit of an edge in terms of its action in my opinion. The heavier touch, pivot length, and escapement simulation makes it feel a bit more like a real acoustic grand piano. Thanks and hope this helps! :)

[@Lincandoubtyou]

@@MerriamPianos hi Brent! Thank you for quick response 😇. Yeah it make more sense to choose fp90x over casio. Thank you very much for help and content you guys providing🥳. I’m your biggest fan 😊. Have a lovely day !

[@Asahi_Rikuya]

What's the style that Stu is playing? I want to learn how to play like that

[@MerriamPianos]

Stu is an extremely versatile player, but his favourite style/genre is jazz! :)

[@JKopp-if9bd]

Unrelated comment: why doesn't Stu use one of those round swiveling piano stools to more easily switch back and forth between two opposing keyboards.

[@MerriamPianos]

I will definitely pass on the suggestion to him! ;)

[@qwe1231]

They both sound very good. I was waiting to hear that Roland 'metallic' sound and it was almost completely absent (at least to extenal speakers on a KZbin video). Interesting that the Casio is more expensive (at least in the US), wasn't expecting that.

[@MerriamPianos]

That is very interesting as the Casio PXS7000 is priced a little lower than the FP90X here in Canada. They are both fantastic piano offerings from two of the giants of the digital piano industry. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@MerriamPianos Roland has made some dynamite instruments in the past, and makes some very good ones now. CASIO has always be a leader in the value market. The have always delivered a lot for the price.

[@Хотятлирусскиевойны-н2г]

Dexibell H10 and H5 - Casio 510 ?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! It is tough to come by Dexibell pianos here in Canada. We aren't dealers and we don't tend to get them come in on trade, but we will do our best to tackle those reviews/comparisons for you if at all possible. :)

[@rs232killer]

Why is Blue Tooth audio too slow (latency) for piano playing, but Blue Tooth midi is apparently fine? Unless the BT MIDI is only for recording a MIDI stream, and not for driving a VST or something. Did I miss something in the discussion?

[@MerriamPianos]

There are a few reasons, but one of the biggest things to consider is the size of the data itself. MIDI information and files are very small. Audio files (particularly higher-res WAV and AIF files) are quite large. Audio files require much larger bandwidth compared to MIDI files.

[@ACE-sx8mo]

I have a question that is literally never addressed in keyboard comparison videos: If you play each of these two keyboards through the same external amp and speakers with similar (as possible) volume settings, how do the overall sound qualities compare?

[@MerriamPianos]

That is a good question and, perhaps, one that we can explore in an upcoming video. Because the onboard sound of a digital piano is based on a combination of the internal speaker system and tone engine, it would be an interesting comparison to isolate the tone engine from the onboard speaker system. With that said, to some extent, this is already accomplished in our comparison and review videos by taking a direct line out from the piano to capture the sound from the tone engine in as transparent of a way as possible. :)

[@Sibupiano]

Have you done the Yamaha S500?

[@MerriamPianos]

We have not done that review yet, but have received a few requests and added it to the list of potential candidates for upcoming video reviews and comparisons. :)

[@Sibupiano]

@@MerriamPianos thank you for your reply. I have a CP4 and P515 which I loved, just wondering if the new S500 is a worthy addition.

[@Sibupiano]

Can you tell us the levels of dynamics of each, or levels of velocity

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I am not entirely sure to how that could be quantified exactly as I do not believe these companies share the number of different velocities that are sampled for each note. I could be mistaken though. Perhaps, someone from our community here may possess that knowledge and those specifications. :)

[@Sibupiano]

@@MerriamPianos understand. Appreciate your musicianship. I’m most concerned about the velocity levels for expressiveness

[@Sibupiano]

@@MerriamPianos the gradation of tonal level of each note would be vital for classical pianists. What is the technical name for this aspect?

[@HonorV2ultimate1tb]

great video...but sadly the videography really did no justice to the casio psx7000 which i just tested today..... its a great functional piano....and really really looks great as well.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you for tuning in and for the feedback! I do agree that the PXS7000 is a really attractive instrument. Casio makes some of the most aesthetically-pleasing instruments on the market these days - that is for sure! :)

[@blindjusticeandcommonsense2786]

Just had a random thought wondering if some actions suit thumb under playing whilst others are better for thumb over? I suppose that might be better phrased to be whether some actions are more forgiving for thumb under than others?

[@MerriamPianos]

While it would come down to how a specific individual's technique would respond/interact with an action, you may very well find that some actions cater more towards your specific style of play and implementation of thumb under playing.

[@JoeLinux2000]

I've never heard of "thumb over." I cross my 4th finger over my pinky on some black notes.

[@blindjusticeandcommonsense2786]

@@JoeLinux2000 It's one of those things where people use different words to mean the same thing. Thumb over is just moving the whole hand across. So instead of passing the thumb under the fingers/palm you shift the thumb and the whole hand over.

[@converse5874]

samples still convey more character compared to the modeled Roland sounds in my opinion

[@MerriamPianos]

Some of the more sophisticated and detailed samples are extremely difficult to beat. With that said, there is a time and place for both tools. The modelling engines' flexibility can be quite useful in certain genres of music. :)

[@markus9541]

Please forgive my ignorance, but what's the name of the piece that starts at around the 10:27 mark? Thanks in advance :)

[@MerriamPianos]

That is a very good question! The tune sounds very familiar to me too, but I can't quite put my finger on it. I would have to ask Stu as to what the piece is. With that said, perhaps one of our knowledgeable community members will be able to chime in and help out. :)

[@HabaneroSpiceRack]

Assume you already found it, but incase others see and wonder the same. It's the Chopin raindrop prelude

[@Gearsandco]

I just can't make up my mind on the PX-S 6000, should I sell my RD-88 for it? I also have the Kawai MP7SE in mind which is a totally different piano. I'm just lost because, non of those piano are available to try at my local music store and this really sucks.

[@MerriamPianos]

Sorry to hear that you aren't able to test out these models in person. The PXS6000 and RD88 are both excellent instruments. There is certainly a lot of crossover there (i.e. plethora of built-in sounds/features, portability, etc.). They are similar offers, so the choice would really come down to what your overall preference is in terms of instrument sounds and action. The RD88 has a much heavier touch with escapement, which plays quite differently than the PXS6000/PXS7000's action. If you are a fan of a heavier touch, the RD88 is likely going to be the strong preference.

[@gertzpalma]

THANKS!

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! :)

[@jamesnewberry2945]

is the visual key length the same on both keyboards I have seen some keyboard lengths 1/4 inch shorter than others

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi James! Brent from Merriam Music here! I would have to check and compare them when I'm at the showroom again, but I don't believe there is a substantial difference between them based on my recollection.

[@jamesnewberry2945]

@@MerriamPianos thank you I think this could be a game changer for a few buyers

[@amilixutube]

Thanks for the comparison video. I'm just listening to the sound without watching the video. I feel that the Casio sounds more acoustic than the Roland. The Roland sounds more digital and even the fingering doesn't have the heaviness of the keys of a grand piano.

[@MerriamPianos]

You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in! Both pianos will have their fanbases when it comes to tone and touch. With that said, in both cases, you are getting a truly wonderful, top-tier digital piano that provides a very satisfying musical experience. :)

[@Instrumental-Covers]

I think Casio's Multi-dimensional Morphing technology is, in its website description, closer to Yamaha's Grand Expression Modeling than what Kawai mentions in their SK-EX Rendering engine. When you read the details and look at the diagrams of the Multi-dimensional Morphing technology and compare it to the Yamaha's Grand Expression Modeling, the similarities are more apparent. While Yamaha uses a 2-dimensional diagram and Casio uses a 3-dimensional one, it seems they are referring to a sort of function in two variables. If we represent the function as z= f(x, y), then we have: 1) Casio Multi-Dimensional Morphing z= f(x, y) x= time y= keyboard pressure z= volume and timbre 2) Yamaha Grand Expression Modeling z= f(x, y) x= touch speed y= keyboard pressure z= tonal variation (volume and timbre) It looks to me as if Yamaha chooses to make a friendlier version of the 3-D representation by removing the "z" axis in the diagram and giving instead a verbal description using terms like "deep solid", "powerful brilliant", "warm mellow", and so on. Kawai's SK-EX Rendering doesn't really mention this sort of things, it rather seems to focus on the resonance part. I am sure Kawai has some of these interactions built in on their engines, but they don't seem to make it as explicit as Casio and Yamaha in their website descriptions.

[@MerriamPianos]

It is interesting that different companies choose to prioritize different aspects of their pianos. The same is true within the realm of acoustic pianos. There are companies that go into great detail about where the wood for their soundboards is sourced and how it is cut and fitted within the piano, etc. while others simply say "solid soundboard". This is even true of some upper-mid level instruments and manufacturers. In a perfect world, all manufacturers would be as detailed as possible in terms of communicating the specifications of their instruments to the public/consumer, but I suppose they must have their reasons.

[@waleedsoliman887]

I prefer Casio's 3 Main Samples but over the GP SERIES with the cabinet resonances and the Bechstein Keys and Action but here , the Roland sounds better and cleaner tone

[@MerriamPianos]

These are both extraordinary instruments in their own regard, they simply offer a bit of a different musical flavour and touch. In an ideal world, players should have both of these instruments in their arsenal. ;)

[@winterheat]

Stu, you know the network effect? If there are 10 pianos out there, then you need to do 10 x 9 = 90 comparisons. If there are 11 pianos out there, you need to do 11 x 10 = 110 comparisons. So it is like n² ... fortunately, we may not compare pianos if they are totally different, but let's say, if it is $700 to $1300 pianos which are like the intermediate 88 keys portable pianos, there already can be easily 8 or 9 models to compare

[@MerriamPianos]

There are certainly a lot of models out there. While we do our best, it is virtually impossible to tackle every possible comparison.

[@winterheat]

@@MerriamPianos I know... I am just saying it is hard work for you

[@winterheat]

@@MerriamPianos guess what... you don't have to be defensive... I am just saying it is quite hard working for Stu to make the comparisons, that's all

[@Instrumental-Covers]

Good idea, but are you sure the math is correct? Assuming you compare 2 items in a video, if you have n digital pianos and "combine" 2 of them per video, the formula to be used is nCr, which is the number of combinations of n items taken r at a time. In this case, if you have 10 digital pianos, the formula would be: C(10,2)=10!/(2!8!)=45. The general formula is C(n, r)=n!/(r!(n-r)!). Your calculation would lead to n(n-1), not n². However, this would count "X vs Y" and "Y vs X" as two separate videos, when in reality is the same pair of instruments. If you take combinations 2 at a time, this is what happens: C(n, 2)= n!/(2!(n-2)!) C(n, 2)= n(n-1)(n-2)!/(2(n-2)!) The (n-2)! cancel each other out because one is in the numerator and one is in the denominator, so you get: C(n, 2)=n(n-1)/2 In the case of the 10 digital pianos, n=10 and r=2, so C(n, 2)=10*9/2=45 😃

[@winterheat]

@@Instrumental-Covers sure, the computer scientist usually is concerned about the order of growth rather than the "constants"... for example, if n is 20 or 100, they are concerned with 400 or 10000, rather than, it should minus n or it should be divided by 2. The important factor is n². The other factors are less important. It is actually an official term, as in wikipedia: network effect

[@LenoxMusic-wu3uy]

If my much of my experiences have been with the Yamaha warm sound, and enjoy experimenting with synthwave lush string sounds, would you think the Casio will satisfy those preferences? I’ve always thought of Casio as cheaper sounding but the aesthetic of the 7000 along with this video is persuading me. Any words are appreciated as this price point is sending me into a research k-hole lol

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi there! The PXS7000 is a very impressive instrument in every regard. While the action is quite rewarding to play, it is on the lighter side as far as fully-weighted digital actions go. Tonally speaking, the PXS7000 has a very nuanced, authentic piano sound. It is also a very feature rich instrument, which makes it quite versatile. Casio has certainly stepped things up with their new PXS and AP models. :)

[@LenoxMusic-wu3uy]

@@MerriamPianos appreciate the info!

[@Jason75913]

The Roland has a deeper, better sound through my monitors. Both sound compressed versus the Korg SV2, especially the Casio. The Casio is too bright, too, though that is likely to be beneficial on stage.

[@MerriamPianos]

These are all wonderful stage pianos and, ultimately, serve as different tools for different jobs. Thanks so much for tuning in and sharing your thoughts! We appreciate it. :)

[@maximilienb7718]

Lots of approuve for the casio tone. But for me I’m not « blow away ». I first found it a bit crunchy and equal and I was a bit disappointed, because it is beautiful sample. But something’s missing on casio compares to Roland when you hear stu’s interpretation. I think it’s in the sensitivity. I personnaly find the Roland much more subtil in the action, and it make the interpretation more interesting to ear. For me the casio sound a little bit « mecanical ». It is just my feeling by earing with good headphone. And it was the same conclusion for the comparaison between fp30x and s5000.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thank you so much for taking the time to check out the video and for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate it! Different players will connect with different tones and actions. It sounds like the Roland is something that resonates with your ears. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

Quite possible.

[@geoguitar1950]

The Casio pianos are lovely. Roland is metallic.

[@MerriamPianos]

The PXS7000 is a really special sounding instrument. It looks gorgeous aesthetically and has a truly wonderful tone. :)

[@jsfbay1]

High notes on the Casio sound like they have virtually no sustain - they just play then die out quickly. I get that high notes don't sustain as long but I'm uncomfortable so far with the Casio high end.

[@MerriamPianos]

Every player has a different set of demands when it comes to piano tone and touch. With that said, there are always some signal processing work that can be done to increase/enhance sustain if needed.

[@f800ssss9]

Unlike everyone else here, I prefer the Roland piano sound. The upper registers on the Casio are so dry they lack resonance. Despite being sample based, Casio sounds more digital to me.

[@MerriamPianos]

It all comes down to a personal preference of course! These are both wonderful, top-tier pianos. It is natural for different players to gravitate towards different tonal profiles. :)

[@ULTRALIONE]

Hey Stu, kind of unrelated but how would u compare the key action and feel to say a Roland F701 or RP-701? Tried the Casio PX-S1100 yday and i hated the feeling of the keys, they were very spongy to me. You think overall the 7000 has a great realistic piano key feel? Or Would PHA-4 feel better in that dept your opinion?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for the question! It really comes down to a matter of preference and subjectivity of course. The PXS7000 has a really great feel in my opinion, but it is a bit on the lighter side compared to the PHA4 and PHA50 actions. The other thing to consider is that Casio's actions do not have escapement, which will provide a very different touch as well. Thanks and hope this helps!

[@JoeLinux2000]

Latency with Pianoteq? As for tone, I feel my computer is most likely a limiting factor. I'm hearing my computer tiny laptop speakers not the voice of the piano you are playing. These instruments sound good, but not quite a rich as my Yamaha DGX combined with the Pianoteq. By the way I'm now playing three voices simultaneously: Yamaha (alleged) CFX, Hamburg Steinway D, and Petrof Mistral of concert grand size. I'm looking forward to playing the Casio someday at the piano store. I like Casio because of it's comparitively light weight and compact size. As everyone knows, a Yamaha DGX-670 is big heavy beast similar to the FP-90x. It's hard to move, and I did extensive modifications to the height of the pedal system and also added an upside down kitchen spoon to the sustain pedal which makes it more similar to a standard concert grand as the spoon extends the length of the pedal.

[@JoeLinux2000]

Privia PX-S7000 meets Hayato Sumino (Cateen)｜CASIO kzbin.info/www/bejne/oqOqfJ58gKyZgM0

[@MerriamPianos]

Casio has definitely done some amazing things in terms of optimizing the portability of their pianos while still maintaining a wonderful touch and tone. While it is important to find the exact sound and touch that you connect with, if you are gigging heavily or needing to transport your rig regularly, a lighter-weight piano that gets you most of the way there in terms of your overall satisfaction may very well be the best option. :)

[@jimkost2002]

@@JoeLinux2000 Hayato Sumino is an absolute monster! With his transcendental technique and concepts, the instrument SHINES brilliantly. I’m looking for a change in instruments and the 6000/7000 might just me next for me!

[@JoeLinux2000]

@@jimkost2002 Latency is the biggest using for me, at least presently. Combining the DGX voices with Pianoteq Pro voices really ends in a superb acoustic piano tone. Another Casio tone demo: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqute2Ouo66Ml5I Even another demoL kzbin.info/www/bejne/bpXTh4N9bLhsqdU I find the Casio tone very acceptable for most purposes.

[@Zoco101]

Wow. Interesting! Listening through my headphones I liked Casio's Hamburg Steinway & Bechstein patches the best. The treble on the NY Steinway was a bit lifeless IMO. And the FP-90X just doesn't keep up - not in this price category. The lower end is too boomy. It lacks clarity.

[@MerriamPianos]

We're glad you enjoyed the video! So far, it is a very even split between the Casio and Roland camps. They're both excellent instruments, but every player will have their own personal preference in terms of tone and touch.

[@Zoco101]

@@MerriamPianos Yes, I know what you mean, and I was only talking about the tone engines. I imagine that the action and the speakers on the FP-90X are impressive, and it is a less expensive instrument than the Casio PX-S7000. Except for the weight, I'd rather have the Roland FP-90X on a stage gig. Better still, the RD-2000, which Stu sometimes uses, I understand. For me, the PX-S7000 would be foremost a practice instrument, but on an ad hok tiny gig with power supply issues, it would have a distinct advantage. Either instrument would be appealing at a restaurant gig, and for different reasons.

[@MajorTomMusic]

Why do you always play in the D# key?

[@MerriamPianos]

That is not always the case, but many players have favourite keys that they tend to gravitate towards. And the key of Eb is a wonderful sounding key on the piano. :)

[@Lee_Adamson_OCF]

Wow, I am surprised that the Casio of all things sounds so much better than the Roland. I guess I remember all the awful low-end Casio electronic keyboards that all us kids had back in the 80s and have trouble connecting Casio and Quality together in my head. But it really does sound very good! O_o

[@MerriamPianos]

Casio has really stepped things up in recent years. Their new generation of products from PXS, AP, and GP lines are extremely impressive. They all deliver exceptional piano tones and wonderful cost to value ratios. :)

[@dennispena5496]

Avoid buying this piano if your ears are sensitive to mid-ranges. The piano sounds and all the reverb modes on this piano have very high mid range EQ which hurt my ear. It is adjustable only by using their Casio App. However their app is super buggy, and whenever I try to use its Tone adjustment feature, I am sent back to the main menu. It seems other users are experiencing issues with the app as well. So I would avoid this piano for its high mid-range EQ and wait for Casio to fix the app. Which I doubt they will do anytime soon. I really want to like this piano. =_=

[@MerriamPianos]

I am sorry to hear that you have experienced some issues with Casio's app and the PXS7000. In my experiences, it is a gorgeous sounding instrument and I have not personally run into any issues with the app. One thing I discovered with the PXS7000 is how well it worked in conjunction with a keyboard amplifier. In addition to giving you equalization options that can help tame some of the frequency bands that you found fatiguing, I was incredibly impressed by how well the core grand piano samples were presented through a more robust speaker/amplifier system.

[@mpanocha]

I have Roland FP90, not happy at all with grand piano sounds despite all the posibilities to tweak it. All other sounds and features are fine.

[@MerriamPianos]

I am sorry to hear that you're not resonating with the grand piano tones. With that said, if you're happy with the touch and other elements, you can always use the FP90 as a controller for VST pianos. There are a plethora of options out there, so I am confident you will find a few that you connect with. :)

[@JoeLinux2000]

While I only played it briefly, I'm inclined to agree with you.

[@Kontrabass66]

The Casio pianos sound so much better WOW

[@MerriamPianos]

They are both excellent pianos. But, I do agree that the Casio PXS7000 has a wonderful tone! :)

[@田中庄一-l8c]

pxs7000 vs csp255?

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! The PXS7000 and CSP255 are very different offerings with very different feature offerings. We will do our best to tackle it for you, but we generally stick to comparisons of instruments that are in the same category. Thank you for the suggestion! :)

[@abelvaleriogonule]

La razón me dice Roland, pero el corazón me dice Casio...

[@MerriamPianos]

It is a tough decision between two wonderful instruments! :)

[@JoseTorres-ft4xk]

What beautiful dilemma to have.

[@adamyohan]

Great video as usual. Have you guys considered doing a 200$ comparison between the Casio CTS1 and some Yamaha keyboard? There's a huge market for both and I really want to hear Stu's take.

[@MerriamPianos]

Thank you kindly! It is definitely on the ever-growing list of potential review/comparison video topics. We do our best to tackle as many as possible, but, as I'm sure you're well aware, there are a lot of manufacturers and models to cover. :)

[@adamyohan]

@@MerriamPianos 👍

[@rolexmarcelo3218]

My family likes Concert Mellow the most.

[@MerriamPianos]

That is definitely a very nice piano sound! :)

[@edwardyu833]

Sound wise Casio way better, more authentic. Roland is more digital like esp the base, it’s too much that sounds non acoustic

[@MerriamPianos]

It is ultimately a matter of taste. Many players that are accustomed to the tone of an acoustic piano will naturally gravitate towards tone engines that are more firmly based in samples opposed to modelling. With that said, as other genres like pop, EDM and alternative continue to evolve, there is a higher demand for "new" and more unique piano sounds to be used opposed to traditional piano samples that merely sound like a very nice acoustic grand or upright.

[@Instrumental-Covers]

@@MerriamPianos I think sound authenticity (in the sense of being a closer imitation to a real acoustic piano) does not necessarily compete or contradict taste/personal preference. For example, I prefer fake vanilla extract over real authentic vanilla. Fake vanilla extract is not even extracted from vanilla beans (I think it is a different process), but I like it. However, I still recognize that vanilla beans are the real authentic flavor. In the case of digital piano emulations, some digital pianos produce a more realistic emulation of the real acoustic sound than others. That does not contradict the fact that different people will have different preferences or needs. Funny event: while I was watching Stu, I was interrupted by an advertisement. They were using a very fake, simplistic piano sound for the background music, but it sounded very adequate for the advertisement because it provided the appropriate vibe for it. So, I agree that it is ultimately a matter of taste, personal preference, and needs of the user. But once again, that is not in contradiction with the fact that some digital piano emulations are simply more realistic than others when it comes to emulating the real thing.

[@grainfrizz]

Casio acoustic piano tickles the back of my head

[@MerriamPianos]

The Casio PXS7000 certainly has a lot to offer musically! :)

[@Biozene]

FP90x looks so much better in black!

[@MerriamPianos]

I am a fan of both colour options, but some people definitely have a preferred aesthetic, especially when it comes to use on stage. :)

[@robertmichalscheck3072]

Does the Casio have midi in & out ports?

[@MerriamPianos]

The Casio has MIDI capabilities via the USB connection, but it does not have 5-pin MIDI IN and OUT connectors.

[@nizman1000]

both sound great - but, even though it's not cool , the casio sounds more natuaral , Listening with okish studio cans..

[@MerriamPianos]

I'm not sure what you mean by "not cool"? The new Casio PXS models, namely the 7000, are fantastic instruments that are very much worth consideration, especially for gigging players looking for a solid digital piano that is also highly-portable. :)

[@nizman1000]

The 'not cool' tag is not mine.. I think they look better than nearly all the offerings from the competition and sound, in my opinion, more natural.. It's the naysayers such as that forever piano Sawgrass guy who is trying to dissuade potential casio customers. There are also too many trolls out there perpetuating nonsense like cadio should stick to making calculators and watches.. I'm about to buy the 3100..

[@joytekb]

I loved Roland and than i heard Bechstein

[@MerriamPianos]

For sure! They are both powerhouses. The ideal situation would be to have both at your disposal. ;)

[@floridaessene]

Sounds like the high end on the PX-S7000 lacks realism, the notes fade out too soon. I'd have to hear it live to see how much my view translates to reality.

[@MerriamPianos]

Hi! Brent here! I have had quite a bit of time to play the Casio PXS7000 and was personally quite impressed with the authenticity and musicality it had to offer. With that said, when it comes to tonal preferences, it is all a matter of personal preference. Thanks for tuning in! We appreciate it.

[@macphil1111]

Same, for piano sounds, I prefer Casio. Very clear sounds. Some a very close to my sauter acoustic piano ( heard in Shop). For key action : it is harder at the top to play the kind of Ravel pieces I like with hands superpositions… but you can clealy get used to it. I’m not a professional pianist.

[@MerriamPianos]

The PXS7000 has some wonderful and versatile piano sounds onboard - that is for sure! At the end of the day, these are both fantastic instruments that offer something a bit different to the player.

[@Kinnor.Home.Studios]

Why in the world Casio doesn't have a 5-pin midi port ?

[@MerriamPianos]

We are starting to see the the 5-pin MIDI connectors being used less frequently, particularly for models that are being pushed as at-home or all-purpose digital pianos. With that said, thankfully with MIDI hubs and MIDI-USB converters, there are a lot of workarounds and options to use most digital pianos in conjunction with virtually any hardware/software interface.

[@Kinnor.Home.Studios]

@@MerriamPianos Thank you dear.