Casual Affair.

Рет қаралды 71,377

home alone.

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 59

@yahiahoal5040 Ай бұрын

For all those that read this, enjoy even the tiniest moments of your life.

@vitormachado8919 Ай бұрын

ahahaha thanks man

@demetriusjohnsonbartholomy3 Ай бұрын

Thank you dude.

@kabelomapokgole8258 Ай бұрын

❤

@reecesmith9143 Ай бұрын

Clinging on to them for dear life .. or trying to at least .

@GoronTico Ай бұрын

What a wholesome reminder! Thank you stranger

@Sofia-h7p Ай бұрын

I don't know what you lace these playlists with, but they're the only ones that make 3 hour study sessions fly by like they're nothing! Love the vibe of them as well🌺🎧

@tabitatarcuta2241 Ай бұрын

Such a delightful playlist 😌 feels like the water drops on your body after a long day at the beach, a little bit sunburnt and a face full of freckles, a colorful smile and mermaid hair filled with salt. ❤

@Teophic Ай бұрын

Loosing my mind to a degree while listening to these, absolutely worth it

@vincentmosienko4354 Ай бұрын

What a great channel. Every video gives me the ''I just discovered a goldmine'' feeling. Thank you!

@DerToSt Ай бұрын

this man always cookin the finest product in town 🔥

@paincup Ай бұрын

Agree 💯

@la.tropic 29 күн бұрын

Chill guy listening to this after bad day at work.

@matrosickles9659 Ай бұрын

Just what I needed today!

@Shouldeye Ай бұрын

Something that I needed but I didn't know

@kinrateia Ай бұрын

btw for anyone who doesnt know (i didnt until recently) this channel makes ai music! youtube just marks it all the way down. not an attack just stating a fact

@kikisdeliveryservice703 Ай бұрын

First comment!🥰love yalls channel

@ang-hell6627 Ай бұрын

the woman on the left looks like my mother in her wedding dress when she was young 🥺

@rlarbqlsxi Ай бұрын

미즈님 구독자가 정말 많이 느셨네요!! 내적친밀감.. 가진 저로써는 기쁜데 유명해져서 슬프고..근데 기쁘고..하하 영상 볼때마다 멜번 너무 그리워져요🥺🥺 미즈님은 앞으로도 계속 호주에서 사실 예정인가요?!

@MandhiraKhatri Ай бұрын

❤

@80snostalgia-02 Ай бұрын

In this life in which everything is relative, in which sometimes good is bad and bad is good, I want to wish you good luck and that the bad that happens to you be for the better.

@Shouldeye Ай бұрын

Oh that's sweet 🥲🥲💖💖

@80snostalgia-02 Ай бұрын

@@Shouldeye thank you🥰

@harulofi09 Ай бұрын

good vibe

@DiDaLaDee Ай бұрын

Noice!

@TheSeensca Ай бұрын

❤我爱你

@김동진-b3p Ай бұрын

good

@andreyegorov1152 Ай бұрын

Hi, really great job. What happened to your discord server? I just wanted to join it but the last link I found was broken(

@kenfaridabad Ай бұрын

get high at 55:37 thank you so much for this channel

@조환희-z6l Ай бұрын

ccc의 제목의 뜻은 무엇인가요? 궁금합니다..!

@jackooo999 Ай бұрын

Cool sounds ig but if you really want to make a good playlist you should actually listen to artists and credit them instead of titling AI beats. Might take longer but the community you want would stay around, wouldn't they? :/

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

I actually do some stuff manually before or after I use AI including extending original ideas, editing, re-arranging, FX for transitions or overall processing like tape/cassette emulations to change the sound or create a certain effect, mastering etc. I'm not so sure if picking finished tracks by other people and queueing them one after another as they are takes longer than I what I do but thanks for the advice.

@NegaNova Ай бұрын

The sound is good but the fact that this is significantly A.I. and you're selling it is very questionable. People work so hard to create music, I'd be interested to see the quality of your music that doesn't involve generative A.I. to compare.

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

I just wholeheartedly disagree with the ethics argument people have against generative AI in music but fair enough I'm not gonna try to convince you otherwise. As for my own music though I pay a lot of attention to details and I really like sound design/mixing and just messing with audio in general, sometimes probably to my own detriment, so I would hope the quality is better than what the current state of AI is capable of lol.

@NegaNova Ай бұрын

@@homealoneagain. The reality is that the music, although edited by you, has mainly come from other artists, artists you are not even aware you are taking music from, and you are selling it. In the Unites States, unless an A.I. work has been significantly transformed from its generated version, it can't be copyrighted. If I were to take the music from this channel, and sell it on my own channel, would you be able to sue me?

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

didn't I just tell you in a comment on another video that I do transform stuff and even extend original ideas, why are you trying to make this legal argument now? But to answer your question anyway, of course I could sue you, people can sue each other for the dumbest and legally most unsound reasons, the question is if I had a chance at winning and the answer is I don't know. Depends on what metric the courts would use to determine at what point something is transformative enough I guess. Also I'm genuinely curious, is your entire opinion on AI being plagiarism based on some youtube videos that showed you that you can recreate or at least get pretty close to songs that already exist with specific prompts or where do you get your information from? To be fair though I think udio does suck when it comes to regurgitating other songs and also putting out vocals that sound like specific artists but that's also the reason I don't use it. Suno on the other hand I find to be pretty original and it seems to be more in line with the general idea that they're not actually storing any of the data it's trained on, but rather the patterns it recognises, which means it wouldn't be regurgitating pre-existing stuff, but instead recognising patterns of millions of tracks which it then uses to create it's own outputs. I find it very hard to believe that they extract individual instruments from existing songs which they then use for their outputs, stem-splitting technology is really good at this point but not this good and I don't know how else you could do it. Sampling might be a thing, but I haven't really seen any examples of that yet so who knows. On the melody side of things I find it literally impossible to make something nowadays that isn't at least somewhat reminiscent of already existing music. In that regard human music has the same issue and is not exempt from theft and people are constantly walking the line between inspiration and plagiarism.

@NegaNova Ай бұрын

@@homealoneagain. Right, but from your explanation it didn't seem to me that you created the melody on your own in any concrete way, you solely use the generated samples and alter how they sound by altering the reverb, adding FX etc., you cut them and change where they occur, but that's still only using the generated music. I could be wrong because I'm unable to watch how you come up with the music, but that's what it sounded like. My opinion on A.I. plagiarism is based off of how A.I. technology works, it literally rips art online, learns patterns and replicates it with a bajillion other patterns that is ripped and replicated, but just because it's complicated doesn't mean it's not taking art and regurgitating it without consent. I'm not against A.I. as a tool, but when A.I. art starts getting monetized as the product, and I'm seeing channels now flood youtube with entire albums every 3 days and they all sound alike, that seems questionable to me, especially knowing how much work was put into making music from others, a single album could take forever, and it's their work that others are using to make albums every 4 minutes. It kind of just makes the internet crappier imo, like how you can't use google images anymore without only getting A.I. suggestions. If you're not sure if whether or not you would win in a court case because you don't know if it's transformed enough, that sounds like the A.I. isn't being used as a reference but probably as a strong part of the product itself. And I'm not saying the music you posted is bad, seems like a lot of people like it, I did as well,, but now I'm seeing channels like this everywhere and it kind of sucks now that I understand it's all mostly the same.

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

@@NegaNova I explicitly said "extending original ideas", what does that mean to you? No offense but from what you've been saying so far I can tell that you don't really know much about the features of generative AI in music or music production in general for that matter, which is absolutely fine, but don't you think it's a bit hypocritical to have such a strong opinion on something you know very little about? How would you be able to make a reasonable evaluation of the current state of AI in music, what it's capable of, where it comes from and the possible mechanisms that make it work, without knowing anything about the intricacies of audio production, let alone without even knowing what those intricacies are to begin with? Also you just dodged my question by saying nothing and instead you went on an emotional and self-righteous rant that doesn't do anything except score sympathy points with people who either already agree with you or are too lazy to get a better understanding of the topic and just use this as an opportunity to jump on the bandwagon of virtue signalling. Based on what I've read so far, the conversations I had, the conversations of other people in the industry that I watched, my experience with audio production and having used generative AI for a couple months now, I just don't think it's "ripping off" anything for the most part. In my opinion sonically it simply doesn't sound good enough and the range of variation when it comes to sound design, which you would have a lot more of if all of these outputs were ripped off from other songs, just suggests that there's gotta be a lot more going on. Besides people always make this argument about how AI music sounds generic, soulless, and the same, wouldn't that suggest that it's not quite replicating things from this infinite pool of copyrighted material (which has an insane amount of variety, even within the same genres) the way you think it does? Right now it's really good at general stuff like core ideas, arrangements and coming up with concepts for songs, what it is not good at is nuance, like at all. Based on what I've been hearing so far the theory of it actually just analysing huge amounts of data and recognising patterns that we seem to be doing over and over sounds a lot more reasonable than what you're suggesting. There are a lot of interesting conversations to be had about this technology and it also forces us to re-evaluate already insanely complex topics such as copyright, originality and art in general, but simply just throwing around a bunch of buzz words and having an opinion that isn't really based on anything but vibes is not contributing anything in my opinion. On that last point, I've never said that I claim for the music on this channel to be super original, I've even explicitely said that I don't know if any of this would qualify as original on a "philosophical" level I guess, but I also said that I don't think it matters. Sure I contribute original things, but I have no idea if that makes it original or transformative enough in the eyes of a court. I don't know what the threshold for something like that would look like.

@nathanlohnes Ай бұрын

Hey! I left you an email sent to the address on your channel page. I'm just asking some questions for a video i'm making myself. If its easier to respond in the comments, that works too, but otherwise I just wanted to get your attention here in case that's an unused email. Thanks!

@821VinylRecords Ай бұрын

Is this AI generated?

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

I use generative AI among other things yeah

@kinokazama Ай бұрын

Is this AI?

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

I use generative AI yeah

@kinokazama Ай бұрын

@@homealoneagain. oh

@homealoneagain. Ай бұрын

they don’t exactly come out like that, I do some stuff before/after AI comes into play but yeah the whole process evolves around generative AI

@kinokazama Ай бұрын

@@homealoneagain. you should do a process video

@johk2293 14 күн бұрын

@@homealoneagain. I (and many others) would appreciate, if you could actually put that in the description and not just claim this as your own work. I know generating content is a form of work too, but not in the pure "author/art" relationship.