Causation # 2 - Legal Causation

[@Demetriiuz]

You sir, may have saved my from my criminal law exam tomorrow morning!

[@yepok6520]

May i say that *YOU ARE AMAAAAZING* at explaining things thoroughly and in depth. I'm sure we all appreciate it! Please keep it up!

[@dell-annejnolewis5212]

I am watching from the introduction of Actus Reus all the way to the end, and I am so thankful because I was not prepared for my criminal law exam next week. Thank you so much for the help, great approach !

[@TheLawBank]

Hi Sophie, For there to be legal causation D's action have to be both operating and substantial. By operating it means are the D's action currently operating on the victim. As part of this process of deciding if the D's actions are operating you can also take into account that the D's actions do not have to be the sole cause providing they are a cause. The case here of course is Pagett. Although it was the police who shot pagett's girlfriend and their bullets that actually caused the girl's death you have to ask if Pagett's actions were operating on the situation at the time that the police shot her. The court decided that because he had used her as a shield then his actions were operating at the time of her death (the police would not have fired back at him if he had not shot at them and at the time he had used her as a human shield). He argued that the police were the cause and the courts said that providing he was a cause he did not have to be the sole cause. So he was an operating cause even though hew was not the sole cause. I hope that makes sense and has not confused you more.

[@sophievoir1150]

That's exactly the answer I was looking for! Thank you very much:)

[@cyshen541]

you save my life from criminal law exam ....by the way...i am a Chinese, but still can easily understand your lecture....i have to say you are really good teacher..

[@SeemaDevi-fv7xd]

Thank you for your videos. With Covid, my eyes are weaker for the moment. They are a great help and a welcome alternative to going through the heavy texts.

[@csillabrimer4408]

Flow chart is brilliant, love the cases, gold presentation!

[@MrAbonzi]

Thank you for talking time to make videos like this, they really do help!

[@msmrepo3271]

Excellent video and a big help for me as I am representing myself in a civil case. Been studying CPR to, taught by a 36 year serving lawyer who has shown me the layman's way to file cases, causation, discovery etc. I think it's a big issue that money stops us getting our rights, makes it a system for the rich. The only way I see combating this, besides another glorious revolution which I'm sure non of us want ( it was a very peaceful revolution really) the only way is to learn it ourselves. It's not that hard once you get the swing of it, break it down into understandable sections.

[@ashlynpinkney7747]

Your vids are so clear and helpful. Thankyou so much!

[@jimmystringbean86]

Thank you, have recommended this video to everybody in my class

[@TheLawBank]

You are welcome guys. The Law Bank Website has hundreds of resources to help your revision too.

[@leekolvik1284]

Great videos. Well presented and interesting. Makes a difficult concept more manageable.

[@sally-annehungwe5757]

thank you so much for the lectures they really helped. i couldn't understand causation now i understand. thank you very much

[@MultiGleni]

very clear, very straightforward, great video.

[@bobashawty6644]

Thank god he is back, year 13 here. These videos save me from this mini exams

[@TheLawBank]

Good to hear! subscribe to our newsletter at www.thelawbank.co.uk

[@sophievoir1150]

I have a question: First you say that when looking at legal causation, there are two key concepts: 1)the act must be substantial and operative cause of outcome 2)the cause must not need to be the sole cause, it can be a cause. Later you say that operative means that is has to be A cause, not the sole cause So maybe with the two key concepts you meant 1) substantial 2) operative I'm a little confused here, sorry

[@laurawiseman3931]

Thank you for your videos they are so good and it has helped me no end!

[@andreware6492]

Do you have to put such graphic picture up? Otherwise great video

[@farahmetallo]

Hi, I really enjoyed this video. I have a question about legal causation.

[@SahilSanjan]

you sir, have my respect

[@jayjau0]

This is genius!!! I owe you massively!!! Thank you so much!!!

[@odlaneR15]

This an amazing breakdown

[@brigoose7945]

if you cant achieve factual causation do you just move to legal causation? and then see if you can achieve substantial and operative causation?

[@funkherinthecat9350]

if i shouted as a prank and scared A causing A to run away and A push B over and B breaks his leg, what am i liable for if anything?

[@mehrkhan2038]

excellent sir xyz

[@vrgomez2349]

really good and detailed video

[@TheLawBank]

You are welcome Luka glad to be of assistance

[@MrRaja53]

Any lecture on theft and fraud

[@AquafinaFlow32]

Great video! Thank you.

[@87licorice]

best teacher

[@ramonfraser1871]

Thank u very much for your explanation it really helped me

[@TheLawBank]

Thank you Chelsea

[@lmosidze]

Thank you for sharing this videos.. made everything clear ..

[@allyourcode]

That injury photo seems excessive for this presentation...

[@harryrushton5270]

The text book I got fror this is not in the slightest bit clear

[@makatforoma9796]

Thank you

[@boxy8673]

our college should be paying you, this is how we are being taught in corona lockdown haha

[@orinanaph4626]

you are a savior

[@TheLawBank]

Thank you again

[@hickomode7643]

Very good 👍

[@TheLawBank]

Thank you 👍

[@rebeccadrake6134]

Really helpful

[@nqobilemalunga7184]

i'm writting Delict tomorrow