Policy-Based Routing (PBR)

[@gerolejolegion8725]

PBR configuration starts at 6:46

[@singletakecovers9740]

yep. nice video. Great stuff. Straight and to the point.

[@PowerUsr1]

Great job Keith. Keep up the excellent videos.

[@rockinron5113]

Superb. Cheers Keith.

[@williamturi5393]

Keith is a True Champ

[@Daniel77379]

Good stuff and clear message/information . Keep up the good work

[@DillyDogSays]

Are the serial interfaces actually serial? Like SSH?

[@roy5721]

Can this concept applied to other routing protocols like bgp?

[@SudhaGanapareddy]

Route map is implicit deny then how the ICMP suceed without permit rule ?

[@miltonaldridge4170]

Needed this at work. thanks alot.

[@samuelkimani7672]

Thanks a lot Keith. Always helpful.

[@abiyottesfay3698]

nice explanation and lesson.thanks

[@haifa6004]

how to tell percentage of traffic forward in different route

[@DikiciBurak]

Hello, You have applied PBR to the fa0/0 interface on R1 for inbound traffic. What about the returning or response traffic from R3 ? I think the returning traffic use the link between the R3 and R1. It doesn't use the link between R2 and R1. And it couses asymmetric routing in this case. What do you think about this situation Keith ?

[@keithbarker4353]

Yes. If EIGRP is running, R3 would use the 512K link to forward traffic to the PC. So would R2. :) It this topology that indeed would result in asymmetrical routing as the reply path would be different from the initial path.

[@shujathmohiuddin264]

what do we need to do to change the return traffic?

[@twanaosman1]

thanks Keith, it was so clear and useful

[@ShowMeTheLyrics]

Thank you Keith

[@bunleangmeng4995]

Nice explain thanks Dear

[@ZUMBIDAF800R]

you could make a video of how to configure vyatta or vyos closing a BGP session

[@anwarahmed5342]

Great job👍

[@sebas.av25]

thanks, helped a lot :)

[@cbtnuggets]

Glad it helped, Sebastian!

[@MarwinSatriaAnanta]

Nice !!! Can i use this in bgp ?

[@tejendra53]

keith here i stuck, what if router 3 has pc hanging on router 3 and you want to route traffic to reach PC 1 on router 1 will the traffic goes R3>R2>R1>pc1 ? i have tried but the traffic goes like this R3>R2>R3>R1>PC1 how can i change this behavior

[@Hot-1LE]

Traffic from router 3 PC should go R3 > R1 > PC1 since it has the faster link. If you wanted it to use the other path R2 > R1 then you would need another policy route to specify so

[@sv0079807]

Outstanding explanation ..but what will happen if S2/1 of R2 goes down ? will drop all the UDP packets or it will use another link for UDP ?

[@anwarahmed5342]

Good question, Will not drop UDP packets, instead it will use the normal path, which is for both UDP and TCP traffic in the regular path.

[@Abdulla449]

Thank you Keith for the great video

[@sait5489]

Thanks Keith :-)

[@cisco-ponlork2689]

Nice to see that!.