CE 326 webcast on Terzaghi's consolidation theory, part 1 of 2 Section 11.1
Пікірлер: 13
@m.sahrulrizki299Ай бұрын
Love your video respectable sir, i hope you're always in good health so you can teach us more about soil world 👍
7 жыл бұрын
And there was evening and there was morning. And i am going to pass my Geotech exam.
@Ryze1076 жыл бұрын
"Buckle your seatbelts and sharpen your pencils; here we go" -The very thing I am gonna say when my exam starts. Thank You, sir! Great explanation!!!
@chandrankartarsingh88549 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation
@gopalpangeni68263 жыл бұрын
love from nepal
@chandrankartarsingh88549 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much
@walidsalhab99678 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Good banter too :p
@ammarsohail76865 жыл бұрын
You are so cool!
@TheAncientColossus3 жыл бұрын
6:40 Why is this equation used instead of the coefficient of volume compressibility, mv (m sub v)? Would mv be a general case? While 2.3*sig z is a special case of changing soil conditions? And if so, how do we solve this?
@TheAncientColossus3 жыл бұрын
This is the only textbook that computes the coefficient of consolidation in this way. Every other textbook uses the coefficient of compressibility to compute the coefficient of consolidation. Which is the outdated method?
@vaibhavpatil6488 Жыл бұрын
Well, if you haven't found the answer yet... Mv assumes linear relationship between void ratio and effective stress which isn't the case. But when you plot change in e vs log of effective the curve flattens out hence Cc method is more accurate.
@AmitSingh-og2mu4 жыл бұрын
I have surpassed the god as I rest all 7 days a week.