Is This The Most Aggressive Player EVER?!

ALL Episodes: • RISK: Global Domination
RISK: Global Domination: store.steampowered.com/app/11...
_______________________________________________________________
Subscribe if you like! + bit.ly/3iNTVoU
Become a member! + bit.ly/37EFCha
Help keep the channel alive and well over at Patreon! + / cg_plays
_______________________________________________________________
#RISK #CGPlays

[@Biditchoun]

Ithink being so agressive only worked because of the fog of war. I am pretty sure they were very low on troops at 11:25, their elimination (or at least, crippling their bonus) would have been easy.

[@michaelpelikan94]

Hello, CG, love your videos, how did you get so good?

[@CGPlays]

Played hundreds of matches of risk, and thousands of hours of pvp games (throughout my life).

[@ScottTurner-nw5gt]

By any chance did you play a game named as anti matter, and teamed with a pink player

[@_TheI3est_]

That +4 Salt Marshes bonus is mega sus ඞඞඞ

[@0creature0]

Anyone able to explain why you want to send the minimum amount of troops to get 100% success? Why not just send the full stack?

[@Skykbo11]

I think he said that there was a weird bug where when you send more troops than necessary you could loose more.

[@ADudeWhoDo]

The amount of troops on the slider is the amount of troops that you can lose, changing the slider to get 100% success will minimize the number of troops you can lose while still guaranteeing you win the territory.

[@matheusGMN]

If you send more you run the risk of more troops landing lower dice and therefore losing more, no need to send more than necessary for 100%

[@shawnruby7011]

Because you never actually have a 100% chance of winning. The game just rounds it to 100%. Also rolling a 1v1 as an attacker is about 42% chance to win not 37% as they say so they have a different calculation. Using the slider takes advantage of them rounding.

[@montgomerymontgomery8819]

First

[@jacobmiller7934]

Sir this is CG plays we don't really care