China’s Relations With the Outside World: From the Silk Roads to Today 2/23/2022

  Рет қаралды 8,296

USC Center for the Political Future

USC Center for the Political Future

Күн бұрын

U.S. China relations have been continually redefined over recent decades, but these periodic transformations are only the latest version of a centuries-long learning process that has involved countless cultures from around the globe. A panel of experts joined USC Center for the Political Future (CPF) Co-Director Mike Murphy to assess the history, current state, and future of U.S.-China relations, including how it has reached a point as adversarial as it is interdependent, on Wednesday, February 23. In partnership with USC Dornsife Center for the Premodern World.
Featuring:
- Peter Frankopan: Professor of Global History, Oxford University and Associate Director, Programme for Silk Roads Studies at King's College, Cambridge
- Valerie Hansen: Professor of Chinese and World History, Yale University; Author, "The Silk Roads: A New History"
- David C. Kang: Maria Crutcher Professor in International Relations, Business, and East Asian Languages and Cultures; Director, USC Korean Studies Institute, USC Dornsife
- Michael D. Swaine: Director of East Asia Program, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
- Mike Murphy (Moderator): CPF Co-Director; NBC Political Analyst
- Jay Rubenstein (Welcome Remarks): Director, USC Center for the Pre-Modern World; Professor of History, USC Dornsife
Learn more about the Center: dornsife-center-for-political...
Learn more about this event: dornsife-center-for-political...

Пікірлер: 55
@peter434
@peter434 Жыл бұрын
other than David Kang, the other five are just waste of time, clueless and ignorant, surprised prof Kang is so reserved and polite
@bearpolo3618
@bearpolo3618 Жыл бұрын
In the 15th century, Admiral Zheng led a big fleet (about 30,000) sailing to many countries, as far as to Africa. They only traded with those countries, did not colonize any single one. Given how western countries have treated China in the past 180 years, how could you expect Chinese to trust them?
@foodparadise5792
@foodparadise5792 Жыл бұрын
How can a debate of China not involving Chinese scholar?
@pahatpahat9566
@pahatpahat9566 Жыл бұрын
Indeed! Most "outsiders" are unlikely to really understand a Confucian society. In most of these debates or discussions, "outsiders" are likely to impose those perceptions based on their own societal scenario on China or the Chinese people. Well, in a manner, maybe it is better that such scenario to continue as they are unlikely to really understand a Confucian society.
@donkruuz3903
@donkruuz3903 Жыл бұрын
@@pahatpahat9566 To be fair, few can argue better for China than David Kang. You should see how he demolished that John guy in kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZLJdKBpm9J5bdU
@thechloromancer3310
@thechloromancer3310 Жыл бұрын
@@donkruuz3903 Mearsheimer opening statement basically paints the US as an evil empire intent on maintaining its hegemony with reckless militarism. Not a good look. He also points out that the US has a history of putting down potential peer competitors (Imperial Japan, Imperial Germany, and then Nazi Germany. That ignores the fact that other countries (particularly the USSR) did the heavy lifting for defeating Nazi Germany. It also ignores the fact that the US' economic position during the entirety of the 20th century was immensely stronger than it currently is: a rising and economically dominant USA was indeed capable of meeting those past challenges, but the current debt- and deficit-ridden USA is no longer in such an advantageous position. Kang did miss the opportunity to properly answer Mearsheimer's question though: "Why should we even have troops in the region?". The answer to that is simple: under the Mao regime those troops were very much necessary. However, post-Mao China is a completely different country. There is no longer the risk of a China led by an unpredictable leader threatening the territorial integrity of neighbouring countries. The regional dynamic has changed, but the US has failed to take that into account... or more accurately, the US leadership doesn't want to let go of the justification for funneling more money into the MIC and the resulting kickbacks they get as a result.
@pcsing2006
@pcsing2006 Жыл бұрын
Pertinent point and well taken.
@pcsing2006
@pcsing2006 Жыл бұрын
@sunny sunnyday This Swaine bloke is an unmitigated neocon and cold war avid fanboy. Don't know why he's invited. The other three speakers are the open minded unlike this biased and prejudiced so-called 'think tanker'!
@whiteknuckles
@whiteknuckles Жыл бұрын
Interesting discussion about China without a Chinese participant from a Chinese perspective.
@Yongxian-pv5sl
@Yongxian-pv5sl Жыл бұрын
love to see more Prof Kang's videos
@humbleforest
@humbleforest Жыл бұрын
Choose China you have Peace and friendly trade exchanges with more of your countries' revenues collected and many infrastructures modernised.
@pt20829
@pt20829 9 ай бұрын
Every government absolutely should have historians in its midst when formulating foreign policies. Thank you all!
@supahsmashbro
@supahsmashbro Жыл бұрын
Can't stand these western "China experts" besides Kang
@markshiao2743
@markshiao2743 Жыл бұрын
The South China Sea is the passage for China to import oil. China has to secure the route for its own national survival apart from territorial claims from centuries ago.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 10 ай бұрын
China remember June 1941, how US embargo Japan from oil, materials from this same sea channel. China does not want to be place same on it's trade route by USA. How many don't know why Japan attack USA Dec 7, 1941 and invasion of Indo-China (oil) it was because USA sign embargo in June 1941 of Japan resources.
@wazzup4u
@wazzup4u Жыл бұрын
History got lost in contemporary geopolitics
@yananneteoh9818
@yananneteoh9818 Жыл бұрын
Peace, 💓🇨🇳❤️❤️🎶🇲🇾
@wazzup4u
@wazzup4u Жыл бұрын
I’d my comments get lost?
@evergreennj8950
@evergreennj8950 Жыл бұрын
Or got deleted / censored? Try reposting.
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 10 ай бұрын
you could have been "censored" ... wow, not even chinese.
@ducaleadan39
@ducaleadan39 10 ай бұрын
Take 0.5 KZbins
@chriswong9158
@chriswong9158 10 ай бұрын
Wow, a debate about China, with not a single input from a Chinese. Did they even try to find one. You tell me, they could not have one "Chinese" to join them. Closes was a No. Korean translate whom since birth, had not step back, oh my. Wonder would a college in China hold same, debating America past, present and future intend... No, waste of time...
@youziyi
@youziyi 7 ай бұрын
Schools in China talk about US all the time.. the real question is would anyone be all sensitive and butthurt about it. The answer is no.
@ducaleadan39
@ducaleadan39 10 ай бұрын
You Are KZbinrs , When I Listen You You Get 0.5 Not Other You Are
@ducaleadan39
@ducaleadan39 10 ай бұрын
You Zre Not All Of Those it Is What You World To Hunt And Destroy . World Has Grow up As It Was .
@ducaleadan39
@ducaleadan39 10 ай бұрын
You have Gotten Alot Of benefits . KZbins
The Silk Road: A New History
1:09:57
Williams College
Рет қаралды 87 М.
Eastern Powers: China and India
1:06:10
Cliveden Literary Festival
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Жена киллера  #непосредственнокаха
00:50
ЗАЧЕМ ОНА ЭТО СДЕЛАЛА😂😂😂
00:14
Chapitosiki
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
Kevin Rudd: Understanding How China Sees the World
1:11:05
Asia Society
Рет қаралды 746 М.
Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order by Ray Dalio
43:43
Principles by Ray Dalio
Рет қаралды 47 МЛН
#36 - David C. Kang on international relations in historic East Asia
47:51
Korea and the World
Рет қаралды 6 М.
U.S. Presidential Election-The Clash of Great Powers: China’s Rise and the Challenge to U.S. Primacy
1:39:52
The University of Chicago Hong Kong Campus
Рет қаралды 123 М.
Dr Peter Frankopan - The Silk Roads: Questioning the Eurocentric view of history
1:13:42
Liverpool John Moores University
Рет қаралды 44 М.
Peter Frankopan on History
10:44
Hay Festival
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Debate: Should the U.S. Seek to Contain China?
1:02:50
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft
Рет қаралды 95 М.