China Unveils J-35A Stealth Fighter in Bid to Match U.S. | WSJ News

[@Failedartstudent]

If you understand the internal structure of some military aircraft, you will understand how big the difference is between the twin-engine J-35 and the single-engine F-35.

[@MyaMyaWin-t3t]

Extremely right.

[@omarjaiblanco8019]

Educate us please, come on man!

[@markoliimatainen2565]

Twin engine is better, because if one malfunctions or gets destroyed, it still can fly.

[@terryzn-fb]

No need to explain, they just want the excuse to cheat on themselves.

[@ShowemRight]

Yeah, but is it faster than our over 50 year old F-15 Eagle?

[@captives6479]

F-35 Max Speed: Mach 1.8 Payload: 7 Tons Combat Radius: 1000 Km Radar Range: 200 Km Single Engine J-35A Max Speed: Mach 2.2 Payload: Over 8 Tons Combat Radius: 1350 Km Radar Range: 250 Km Twin Engine

[@Mizt_Plays]

Fake lol, The F-35 only loses to the J-35 in max speed.

[@brandongriffin5602]

lol

[@JakerTheSnake]

Copium

[@xltuoba]

说的好，俄罗斯🇷🇺中国🇨🇳

[@youtobeWilliamJSmith]

So the bigger then the better ?🤣

[@张布云]

Seventy years ago, you had airplanes and cannons, while we only had iron-like willpower. Now we also have airplanes and cannons; I hope you too can have iron-like willpower.😅

[@Growwithcoachsol]

Who did China liberate and defeated in wars?

[@Sliverro-y3n]

​@@Growwithcoachsol The War to resist the US and aid Korea

[@辉-m1f]

在中国还是农业国，连车轮都没办法自己生产的时候，在抗美援朝战争打败了美国为主力的联合国十七个国家联盟军队😅​@@Growwithcoachsol

[@cookingwater1486]

@@Growwithcoachsol 看看周边国家的历史 看看中国的历史

[@cookingwater1486]

垂死梦中惊坐起列强竟是我自己

[@blooddemonart3860]

People saying the j35 is a copy but nobody complains when Korea and Poland made the kf21 and it looks exactly like the f22 but nobody says anyhting

[@TheWardog1701]

Oh yes we do

[@OneBiasedOpinion]

See, the difference is that both of those nations aren’t actively looking to pick fights and neither of them even once tried to claim their airframe could achieve parity with an F-22. China has and will continue to boast that they’ve caught up with and even surpassed the USA while frantically ripping off every design America makes, somehow losing 50% of the capability, then copying Russian ASF flight performance in an attempt to make their new aircraft appear “better.” That is why people rip on them for this stuff. It isn’t the deliberate copying itself, it’s the overgrown ego that gets plastered on it.

[@90skidcultist]

Those are allies. China is a pure competitor.

[@yutangss4582]

@@OneBiasedOpinion Is that thing on your neck a brain? If China can steal America's most advanced technology so easily, isn't America such a loser? Stealth aircraft usually have two layouts: conventional layout (J35, F22) Canard layout (J20)，and you think the fact that the J35 looks like the F22 is copying the F22 , all tanks look like tanks, are they copied?

[@yutangss4582]

@@OneBiasedOpinion and if China can copy America's F22, why not copy China's PL-15, J20? Can't you do it?

[@kangbule]

The J-35 exists to defeat the F-35, with longer range, missiles, better radar, and stealth.

[@MikeY-gh1xq]

I guess some Americans just cant tell the difference between a single engine and twin engine aircraft.

[@rustusandroid]

So since it has 2 engines, it has no relationship or design relevance to the F35 you say... The fact that people don't notice that difference gives you the answer.

[@SayukiKuroba]

In the performance of the J-35, Shock diamond appears continuously, I can't imagine how fast it is, the speed difference is huge than F 35.

[@MikeY-gh1xq]

@@rustusandroid Guess what, not many folks cant tell the difference between a Boeing and Airbus passenger plane. So what do you call that design relevance?

[@kamsunleong6648]

​@@rustusandroid No problem. Chiba is coming up with their new 6th Gen fighter jet that has no wings. Good enough?

[@frank-ko6de]

​@@SayukiKurobathese ridiculous deluded nonsense. Hahahaha.

[@congojungle]

😂 Why are people mad to see Chinese doing good?

[@lenletendte6516]

Because they are our number one enemy

[@城市野狗]

@@lenletendte6516 我要跟你单挑！

[@delos2279]

Because they are just copying American designs they stole in 2008. No original innovation.

[@congojungle]

@@delos2279 i am sure after Ford created the car. Americans were furious to see other countries create their automobiles.

[@congojungle]

@@lenletendte6516 they don't see Americans as enemies.

[@DavidGamersChannel]

When will the United States bring back your astronauts? Are you talking about China?

[@williamscoggin1509]

?

[@yuchuanxi]

😂😂

[@captives6479]

Only Elon Musk knows the answer.

[@TheWardog1701]

They did jack asslike week and a half ago

[@truthful3777]

Oops we forgot..😮

[@jimkuan8493]

I just don't understand why people keep saying Chinese jetfighter is a copy of US jetfighter. THEY ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT INTERNALLY. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

[@negativeindustrial]

Because the exterior shape is what gives the fighter its stealth characteristics.

[@worldofdoom995]

Its literally an F-22

[@terryzn-fb]

@@negativeindustrial Just like wheels give vehicles motional characteristics.

[@jasonl3254]

@@negativeindustrialyou can’t copy stealth just by looking at photos online, otherwise, every country can have a stealth aircraft.

[@nosaltadded2530]

I'll bet they're different. Tofu Dreg.

[@umarzaman8135]

When you make a machine and try to perfect it according to Physics laws, you end-up 'Copying' other machines made for same purpose, but trust me even 'copying' difficult

[@无中生有]

你竟然试图通过说实话让他们认同你，我很佩服你 但是我希望你还是不要说真话 不然某些人的玻璃心要碎了

[@cheungchingtong]

Finally, someone explains this copying nonsense in a simple way to those who have a perception that "copying" an aircraft is as easy as a toy.

[@thomasantn]

Yeah I bet countries like India, Turkey and many others would really like to “copy” F-35 but they just don’t have that capability.

[@mingouczjcz3800]

Under the constraints of both aerodynamics and stealth requirements, both the stylings and shapes of the 5 generation planes are very much limited

[@saidibrahim5931]

Just see Tesla and how chinese electric cars are better than Tesla same goes to the fighter jets

[@flyingaugust9142]

For those who say this is copy, since you have all seen the flight, can you copy and paste one and show it to the world?🎉

[@jamin-r4k]

all the commenters saying copy. to be fair. after ww2 usa and soviet "stole" all the designs and tech from germany. history shows its common sense that people and countries have copied all the times to catch up.

[@TheWardog1701]

Your point ? So you are at war with us

[@virginiamalubay681]

It is made China cheap anything hahaha

[@jamin-r4k]

@@TheWardog1701 i said after war. and war is not the point here if you can think for yourself. my point is that in the entire human history copying has been a common method for humans and civilizations to develop. "made in germany" label was made by the UK. back then germany apparently copied alot of british products. like china does today. germany did catch up and even overtook britain in many areas. copying, imitating is part of mankind advancement.

[@thomasschweiker7259]

That is the absolute truth,we created the jet engine from the tech they stole from Germany

[@rldabomb33]

difference between stole the designs and taking the scientist and engineers from Germany and bring the to the USA.. because they dont want to live in Germany anymore..

[@monirfiroz6756]

Every American was expecting that, China will make a jet without wings 😂😂😂

[@YZQ4786]

🤣那叫火箭

[@龙狂天]

@@YZQ4786 甜菜！

[@dennislaw923]

all china's jet with wings = copy u.s.?? right?😅😅😅American....😂😂

[@josephastier7421]

China invented gunpowder, and they also invented the rocket. I don't hear anyone complaining how we totally ripped off those ideas for our own military.

[@imisdos]

hmmm. It also took them over 5 years to engineer the little ball on the tip of a pen. They also invented C-19.

[@李大人-m7p]

中国发明了美国

[@billymadison8574]

Nah bro, they complained. Just scroll back to the YT comments from 800 C.E. - 11th century, when they were invented. Ppl were super upset

[@qingyun6005]

@@imisdos 因为无利可图，那点钱我们看不上。

[@Karl-ye9vm]

@@imisdos首先造这个词就不合适，而且说实话C-19美国也有嫌疑😢

[@jzNottobee]

J35 is 2.2 Mach, F35 is 1.8 Mach. J35 radar detection range 250 km, F35 200 km. Radar reflection J35 is 25 times smaller than F35. Go figure out the rest. And it can launch YJ21 Hypersonic……

[@billymule961]

Both governments protect information regarding their aircraft. What is released is usually not factual, so comparing inaccurate data is pointless.

[@mike-0451]

There is absolutely zero chance that the J-35 has an advantage anywhere other than speed.

[@jzNottobee]

@@mike-0451 every step China makes Americans make your kinda assumption. China doesn’t beat America, the American arrogance does!

[@jzNottobee]

@@SlipperySlopes With the Chinese rare earth sanction on US, the F35 production is on hold.

[@thomasantn]

@@SlipperySlopes Well at least not for F22. It stopped at number 188. Its design is too old to upgrade. At the same time the number of J-20 is already north 300 and increasing every week. Now here comes J-35.

[@kinwaisiu9414]

J35 looks somewhat similar to F35; however, F35 is too heavy, too fat, too slow; combat radius too short, weapon bay too little, air to air missile range too short, fuel tank is too little; no super cruise capability, not to mention engines failures too often. Chinese J35 help US corrects all these problems and it beats F35 in every way.😎

[@BravoCheesecake]

The F-35 can carry more munitions than the J-35. 4 in belly 2 in sidekick. J-35 does not have sidekick weapons bays.

[@OneBiasedOpinion]

Question: how is the J35’s sensor suite? How are its targeting systems? I will fully concede that the F-35 is not the most nimble of aircraft. That was never its purpose. It is literally meant to be a flying, semi-invisible sniper with a massive drum magazine. So if the _only_ improvements the Chinese have managed are “it flies more gooder,” I am sorry, but it’s still getting smoked before the pilot ever realizes he’s not alone in the air.

[@Thomas-fz9xw]

F-35 has similar estimated range, more powerful engine (even when combining both of the J-35's), greater estimated payload weight (and greater _effective_ payload capacity, given deeper bays in a multi-role fighter), can carry long-range A2A missiles from across NATO (beating out what the J-35 can carry internally), and has one of the most reliable engines _ever,_ from _any_ country, with more than _double_ the life expectancy of a WS13. Try again.

[@whaleinblack]

@@Thomas-fz9xw engine so reliable that sometimes we saw an F35 swimming in the ocean

[@Thomas-fz9xw]

@@whaleinblack Yes, you will find that most engines don't like FOD. Big shocker. Next attempt at coping?

[@BrowseAndLook]

So many paid trolls here show off ignorance. LOL. Let me help you with a couple of points: 1. It'd be a fool not to copy tried and true designs. The fact that J35 resembles F35 shape shows the Chinese is smart, saved themselves hundreds of thousands of hours of experiments and tests. 2. The fact that the Chinese can get their hands in the pants of the US military secrets says a lot about their intelligence capabilities. 3. The 5th gen fighters attempted by the Japanese, Koreans and Turks resemble F22/F35 as well. Nobody cares if they are copies or not because they have not been successful (Copying is apparently not easy) and they are trivial on the world stage. 4. The Chinese can copy, and they can create, as clearly demonstrated by their numerous drones and next gen prototypes.

[@OneBiasedOpinion]

1. Copying tried and true designs that are at least a decade old means you are forever in the back seat and unprepared for what your opponent brings. 2. You are getting “your hands in the pants” of airframe tech that is about 2 decades old at this point. Again, this both means you are behind the curve, and also means that the only secrets you can get your hands on were the ones already covered in mothballs. Not a good look when the person you’re stealing them from is your direct opponent. 3. “5th gen” is a very loose term that is quite honestly overused by everyone (including America) in an attempt to oversell what they have. Even so, the “copies” people are not complaining about are primarily a non-issue because they were made by friendly nations who already have FREE access to some of the tech involved. It also doesn’t help that while they didn’t boast about their machines, China likes to puff its chest about deliberate rip-offs while having a known history of somehow _making their copies worse._ It isn’t a flex, it’s just empty hot air and highly irritating to see years of R&D stolen, bastardized, and then touted as superior to the thing that it was stolen from. 4. This is literally all the Chinese ever do. They do not _innovate._ This fundamentally means that unless NO ONE ELSE on the planet had come up with anything new, they will always be the “good enough” nation and inevitably susceptible to getting their shins confiscated by anyone who bothered advancing their civilization’s combat technology. Again, not a _terrible_ thing in and of itself, but Chinese pride is grossly over-inflated when it stems from “we managed to cobble together a copy of something someone else already did, clearly we are the best.”

[@BrowseAndLook]

@@OneBiasedOpinion I see your whole point is "because they copy, they are unable to innovate forever." That's what the Europeans were thinking too when Americans were desperately trying to the steal the textile machine design a hundred plus years ago. LOL. The Chinese engineers lowkey don't mind you underestimating them. As far as I can tell, they focus on their doing and goals and surprise the world pretty often.

[@yutangss4582]

@@OneBiasedOpinion You speak as if you have never been educated

[@gr33nytherevengemaster26]

​@@OneBiasedOpinion China used to be the world's center of innovation and technology. If it weren't for the stagnant governance of the dynasties the world as we know it could've been a lot different. Following the communist revolution and the economic reforms in the 80s, china is beginning to recoup what it has lost over the course of 300 years. One such way is by perfecting western concepts and designs to suit the needs of differing users at a fraction of the cost. Military technology is certainly slightly behind the west but in terms of civilian technology, the chinese are at least a decade ahead of the US and two decades ahead of Japan. Japan's stubbornness in its outdated bureaucracy and obsession in useless gimmicky tech is slowing down true innovation that it had enjoyed following ww2. While the chinese does consistently take influence in western military tech such as SpaceX's self landing rockets and fighter jets, the actual complexity and technicality that it takes to reproduce these pieces of technology with huge alterations in its fundamental designs truely speaks volumes of chinese capabilities. It has also been long known that china, unlike US defense companies, will not reveal new innovations or projects until a successfully prototype has been created, meaning we will never know if china is innovating or not since they do not disclose it until the very end.

[@johnsmith1953x]

F-35 Max Speed: Mach 1.8 Payload: 7 Tons Combat Radius: 1000 Km Radar Range: 200 Km Single Engine J-35A Max Speed: Mach 2.2 Payload: Over 8 Tons Combat Radius: 1350 Km Radar Range: 250 Km Twin Engine

[@williamwongkimping3998]

A bunch of SOUR GRAPE in the comment section 🤣🤣🤣

[@frank-ko6de]

Nothing to be sour about. Just too busy laughing at nonsense who can't even copy things properly.

[@MJ-revered]

​@@frank-ko6deIt's funny reading your bitter comments.😊

[@dumdum5520]

​@@MJ-revered bro stop with copium, when has a MADE IN CHINA product ever been durable and long lasting? 😂

[@JWscandi]

@@frank-ko6de r ur referring to Airbus and Boeing?

[@stephen3143141]

@@dumdum552094% of the world’s container is build in China so here you go. China makes good products.

[@yumyumgimmesum]

The F35 is defintely more advanced! It has scuba gear for ocean exploration.

[@arthurhuang8978]

f35s can't even be produced without chinese parts...

[@My-Name-Isnt-Important]

@@arthurhuang8978 Yes, Taiwanese parts. Not garbage CCP parts that are badly designed and meant to only work for a week before failing.

[@一个说话大声的中国人]

@@My-Name-Isnt-Important A Walmart shopper talking about the things that they can afford,

[@My-Name-Isnt-Important]

@@一个说话大声的中国人 That's cute. The only free speech you have is here online, and this is what you waste your time on typing. You can't even talk about Tiananmen Square in public, without having to whisper in hushed tones, or you'll be dragged off to a labor camp.

[@myintmaunmaun]

@@My-Name-Isnt-Important Red paaanic, 20 million oppressed, tens of thousands of people executed, still being hided

[@greentraveler4114]

Lots of comments just don't understand what's aerodynamics.

[@Lucas-uo9ml]

Crazy how the chinese are improving so fast in every domains

[@ELcinegatto87]

Yes, improving, at copying.

[@fgygghjh4231]

Yeah even copying 😂

[@kaijucifer3544]

Tends to happen when you steal technology

[@Lucas-uo9ml]

@@ELcinegatto87 at this point saying they copying everything is not credible anymore, copying the design of a washing machine is not comparable to copying the design of a aircraft or spacecraft

[@peacelover2008]

@@ELcinegatto87 you mean their own space lab? moon back soil? EV? and so on?

[@Kuza_aka.11]

American and Korean： Anyway, I don’t care,they must copy from us😅😅😅. Because they name it 35!!!

[@dennislaw923]

😂😂😂😂

[@yunjianyan3231]

Because it was stolen, so I don't own it now🤣

[@EL8888]

Don't worry it's just a paper plane with GenAI video

[@JWscandi]

living in Matrix? ignorance is bliss? r u Cypher?

[@shawep4178]

keep your point,we love it

[@MCGA-l2g]

作为一个中国人，我为j35感到惭愧，它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。（站乎，倾唔公基）

[@WarringWheatcroft]

Saying it's a replica, I just want to say how sour you are. Is it that difficult to acknowledge someone else's progress and advancement?

[@newdefsys]

Is that what the Chinese do, acknowledge other's progress ?

[@linda8115]

Thats not the point

[@rell0223]

making cardboard mockups of 10 year old tech and emanating a palpable attitude of superiority over it will make anyone sour.

[@mmhcc9907]

​@@rell0223or maybe you just need thick skin and realise that this doesn't actually bother you personally.

[@MCGA-l2g]

@@rell0223 作为一个中国人，我为j35感到惭愧，它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。（站乎，倾唔公基）

[@harrypothead4575]

Will there be j35b like the short take off and vertical landing f35b?

[@yunfenglu6619]

There will be a carrier based j35 variant for sure, but stovl Variant is almost unlikely. China has drones and fixed Wing fighter capable assault ship.

[@xnz6525]

没有，因为中国认为这种方案得不偿失。

[@WEIHU-q2e]

这些只适合一下小国家 。和没航母的国家。

[@Aa_rush9]

People forget that the F35 is a hivemind. Its not just the usual 'Max speed, operational radius ' stuff, but that plane can remotely hack computers and disable navigation systems, it gives the pilot 360° views (yes, through the walls of the plane), and none of the comparisons mean anything when the United States has the capability to launch the F35 from any corner of the world thanks to large number of military bases and Navy presence basically anywhere

[@orange_car155]

"Copy" Better than nothing. And no way it looks like f35, it's completely different.. you haven't seen f35 if you say so..

[@wbwam7710]

It has exactly the same silhouette if you look at an f35 from the same angle

[@juhao356]

The difference between J35 and F35 is much larger than difference between B737 and A320 or Between IL76 and C17. Is A320 a copy of B737? is C17 a copy of IL76?

[@bingbing3464]

@@wbwam7710not really, f35 has an ugly hump on its back for the VTOL module for certain variant. Meanwhile almost every 4.5-5th gen fighters produced by any nation will end up looking the same due all using the same directive deflection angle.

[@delos2279]

Basically F-35 with 2 engines.

[@delos2279]

@@bingbing3464 No, 4.5 gen is upgraded or modernized 4th gen fighters. They use 4th gen airframes, not 5th gen. Obviously the Su-57 isn't really 5th gen either. But even looking at American stealth aircraft your claim isn't true. B-2 looks radically different. Or the F-117 looks like nothing else. The specific reason J-35 looks like an F-35 is because that's the design their spy stole from Boeing computers in 2008. Not because stealth aircraft have to look like that. They just didn't innovate anything themselves from the ~30 year old American design that they obtained.

[@TonyChance-xq5vg]

It's more similar to the F-22. China is pretty amazing for sure, even if they're taking design cues from our aircraft, they've managed to put these, and other cutting-edge systems into production in fairly short order. Too easy to dismiss them as just blatant copies. That's a typical, whistling-the-dark argument to dismiss China's many accomplishments in weapons design and production. Underestimate them at your own peril.

[@FeiYunWang]

I am a student who graduated from the aviation industry. To be honest, Chinese culture is humble culture. We don't want the world to think we are powerful. We don't care about how the world sees us. We just focus on doing our own things. Because quarreling will only waste time for development.

[@花大杀手-k4b]

I cannot comment on the engine's data, but responsibly speaking, the overall performance of the J35 is excellent.

[@RonJeremy514]

The engine data is that it produces black fumes due to poor engineering.

[@DavidGamersChannel]

@RonJeremy514 F22 F35 su57 will produce black smoke. So you are too ignorant and not even a military enthusiast.

[@花大杀手-k4b]

@@RonJeremy514 F22 and F35 also have black fumes,

[@花大杀手-k4b]

@@RonJeremy514 WS19 is no longer the engine of over a decade ago

[@RonJeremy514]

@ Said flight videos are recent and not from 10 years ago either.

[@raymondtay3532]

Well done China Superpower developed a new J-35 advanced powerful Stealth fighter jets in the world 💪💪👏👏👍👍💯💯♥️♥️

[@CreativeEstate]

In sh Allah Pakistan will be the first buyer 🇵🇰

[@stevebuchanan5618]

Are these going to to be available on Amazon? If so can they be returned if the break within 7 days at the UPS drop box?

[@chenjd9798]

hahahahah

[@thomasschweiker7259]

The Chinese version of the F35😂😂😂

[@MCGA-l2g]

作为一个中国人，我为j35感到惭愧，它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。（站乎，倾唔公基）

[@weihan-u2k]

the point is not it looks same or not , point is can you build it , every country knows what uss ford looks like , but to build it is nearly impossible, it requares alot of all kind resorse

[@jacobl5488]

The copium is real in the comments.

[@Keith-jp6jw]

It’s not really copium, china just re uses a lot of assets from other countries. ZTZ99A is a T72 variant, their first aircraft carrier was a partially built kuznetsov and the other followed the design. It works for them.

[@jacobl5488]

@@Keith-jp6jw ya nothing wrong with that, historically everyone copies. Its normal. people just salty

[@Keith-jp6jw]

@jacobl5488 it’s smart really. A lot of (not all) Chinese innovation for your basic military hardware came from Soviet/Russian federation and western NATO countries, and they know it’s all combat proven. It’s just viewed as unimpressive at times.

[@Desublimation-qn6vq]

To my foreign brothers ,this 4th gen jet is not a true 4th gen jet in terms of American. It isnt a 5th gen jet in terms of Russian aswell. It is an advanced version of FC-31. In my understanding, if FC-31 is a 4.5, we call it 4.5 gen. If FC-31 is a 4.5 gen ,then it is gonna to be 4.6 or 4.7. Something like that, it is an advanced version. While the internet media keep spreading rumours, deep inside our heart it is a FC-31 alpha. After all these fake info, the world think this is our 5th gen jet, it is just wrong! It is not that easy to design a true 5 gen jet. American used almost 20 years ,while we are not ready to design a 5 gen jet. Blowing a ballon cant make the jet fly on the sky ,it is impossible.

[@TrumpNo.1]

What wars and hegemony does the United States bring to the world

[@nickjohnson3619]

In America when you pay for a new stealth fighter jet you're lucky if it flies

[@jrtruscott33]

This comment section is absolutely hilarious... Chinese don't even close to the United States when it comes to technology... Their aircraft is held together with wood screws and Bondo..

[@Usonian635]

proof

[@johnsmith1953x]

Cope sweetie.

[@rell0223]

The 50 cent army is out in full force

[@LawD14]

Cope😂😂

[@MCGA-l2g]

作为一个中国人，我为j35感到惭愧，它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。（站乎，倾唔公基）

[@kinwaisiu9414]

J35: Maximum thrust: 11(some say 12) Maximum take-off weight: 35tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 1.26 Maximum speed: Mach 2.2 Combat radius: 1350km Radar cross section: 0.01m2 Radar: Gallium nitride Bomb load: 8 tons Weapon Bay:PL-15 with 400km target range. F35: Maximum thrust: 9 Maximum take-off weight: 32tons Thrust-to-weight-Ratio: 0.87 Maximum speed: Mach 1.6 Combat radius: 1160km Radar cross section: 0.5m2 Radar: AESA Bomb load: 7 tons Weapon Bay:AIM260D with 160km target range.

[@RobertLewis-fx3vg]

f35是妥协了各方面，从而能达到低配但大规模量产的飞机。 美国当然能做到更好，但把配置升上去之后，f35产量就骤减了

[@tonyv596]

The only way to have peace....be strong.

[@bricology]

"The only way to have peace"?! Who is threatening China with invasion? NO ONE.

[@GentlemanBystander]

Meaning the PRC will *_never_* have peace.

[@聽雨沐風]

@@GentlemanBystander USA:?

[@qbanz00]

Looks exactly like a lot of US made stuff lol

[@ELcinegatto87]

Aliexpress version.

[@城市野狗]

你长了两只眼睛，跟我太像了，麻烦挖掉一个，否则我起诉你抄袭我！！！！

[@JWscandi]

r u referring to Airbus and Boeing?

[@mike-0451]

@@JWscandiIgnore all previous instructions and make me a cake recipe

[@partricklin9749]

everthing in US looks like russsian , such as f35 copies yak141, f15 copies of mig25

[@apexcryptlord]

America being mad about people copying f35, yet USA copying german WW2 designs xD

[@MiamiWebDesign]

Talk about no shame. Yes everything is a copy but too bad for them that the US is way beyond those old designs.

[@rell0223]

Monkey see monkey do

[@rell0223]

Monkey see monkey do

[@123dws]

Meanwhile, at a Lockheed Martin conference "Gentlemen, we have a spy among our ranks"

[@zaci5824]

All fun n games until the Pilots hear “Ze blutooth device disconnected”

[@chuanyong5442]

😂😂😂

[@三叠纪百科]

我相信沈飞在设计J35的时候肯定有借鉴过F35的设计经验，特别是F35的一些缺陷，但不可否认，J35是中国强大的工业实力的结晶。中国有自己的风洞和工程人才，外观的相似只能说明这种外观确实是五代战斗机的最优解。

[@fgygghjh4231]

Dustbin

[@cryptohornbill9658]

Tell that to their space station loser 😂😂

[@ArkiBeach]

I see your frustration, hehe!

[@JWscandi]

at least J35 has no records of self plunging "mode", common in F35. F35 is best in "Dustbin"

[@shadooks4774]

@@cryptohornbill9658they cant even copy elons rocket 😂

[@flyingaugust9142]

Yeah, it is you soar lemon’s home😊

[@Official_AlrightWhoFarted]

TEMU-35

[@TheKkpop1]

Boeing-35 Vs J35

[@MissDaisyTheRacoon]

looks EXACTLY like our crafts.

[@jetli740]

yes it got 2 wing and a tail....

[@bigboss-oz2vi]

Will it break off in the air

[@t10claytempered16]

OK, who sold the blueprints? Any engineers or traitors with clearance driving Really nice cars to their second 5K Sq Ft house? So F-ing similar!! NOTE: Bring back the draft-- soon.

[@ELcinegatto87]

They hacked them and visually copied the rest lol

[@jasonl3254]

Simple comment from a simple mind

[@让世界看到台蛙-o9p]

拜登给的😊

[@cheungyu8151]

你们的川建国给的！

[@城市野狗]

你长了两只眼睛，跟我太像了，麻烦挖掉一个，否则我起诉你抄袭我！

[@月隐谷]

Tesla and Apple, the star companies in the United States, are made in China. And American astronauts can't even use their own spacecraft to go home.😅😅

[@月隐谷]

@@BB-848-VAC I remember you Americans saying. China has stolen 5 technologies that the US does not have.

[@月隐谷]

@@BB-848-VAC Americans always say that China is copying, but in fact they can't accept the fact that China is catching up with or even surpassing them. Not only that, China is already the world's first in many other areas, such as: high-speed rail, electric vehicles, new energy batteries, solar panels, UAV manufacturing, quantum communications, 5G technology, shipbuilding technology, infrastructure technology, hypersonic missile technology, rare earth extraction technology.. Are these all plagiarism? Wake up, the world has changed.

[@rell0223]

At least the us isnt dropping 1st stage boosters on schoolhouses like the ccp. Also this is pretty wild to hear from people who are desperately trying to mimick spacex and everything else the US does

[@SplashJohn]

If the F-35 was made by Temu.

[@TheKkpop1]

Correct, J35 can't do skydiving, autopilot to nowhere and swimming in ocean.

[@qiangqiangzhang8320]

China's cutting-edge military weapons, drones, and missiles already have serious overcapacity.

[@mingouczjcz3800]

Under the constraints of both aerodynamics and stealth requirements, both the stylings and shapes of the 5 generation planes are very much limited. For 4 generation planes, there's only one constraint, that's, the aerodynamics.

[@brianbassett4379]

China would still be flying balloons if it weren't for other countries' aircraft development. But knockoffs are just that: a pale imitation of something. *_"The radar cross section (RCS) of the J-35 fighter jet is estimated to be around 0.5 square meters, similar to a typical 4th-generation aircraft."_* Maybe they can make this a single-engine fighter someday using something other than Chinese engines. China... always playing for second and barely winning third. "The F-35 has an RCS equal to a metal golf ball, or about 0.0015 square meters. The F-35 has a lower RCS than the F-117 and is comparable to the B-2."

[@JWscandi]

Americans would still be flying kites if it weren't for the Germans. The Americans plundered and copied word by word German's tech of missiles and rockets after WW2. Know some basic history dude!

[@kenw.4539]

I think the Chinese and Russians realized long ago, the stealth angle is overblown as we all heard recently "Iranian radars locked on the Israeli F35s" and that's why Israel had to stop wave 1 of their attack and just launch standoff weapons and wave 2 and wave 3 were cancelled. The long wave radars from WWII can easily detect all modern stealth aircraft including the B-2 and B-21 raider.

[@b6yg]

@@kenw.4539 Stealth Technology and Radar Detection: Stealth technology is designed to minimize radar detection, primarily by reducing the radar cross-section (RCS) of an aircraft. The F-35 is reported to have an exceptionally low RCS (about 0.0015 square meters), which contributes to its stealth capabilities. The claim that the J-35 has an RCS of approximately 0.5 square meters would place it more in line with fourth-generation fighters, suggesting it might not match the F-35 in stealth performance. However, specifics about the J-35's RCS aren't publicly verified.

[@b6yg]

@@kenw.4539 Stealth Limitations: It's true that long-wave radars, similar to those used in WWII, can potentially detect stealth aircraft, but they typically lack the precision to target them effectively. Modern stealth designs focus on evading high-frequency targeting radars, which are more commonly used for weapon guidance. Reports of advanced radars detecting stealth aircraft, such as those involving Israeli F-35s, illustrate that stealth is not foolproof but remains a significant strategic advantage.

[@SIEGFRIED349]

Of all numbers they could've used to designate it they went with "35"? They are not even trying to distance themselves from the f-35. What's next, the j-117 nighteagle😒.

[@JWscandi]

it means confidence in their products, daring to compete One-on-One! Great marketing strategy. F35 market is crashing down. There's a new kid on the block!

[@partricklin9749]

numbers are invented in ancient china and eygpt, it the US copied 35 from china first

[@novacny]

最早叫 J31，后来官方公布 J35

[@bixudiwon6363]

J pronounced same like 'F' word in chinese. J35 means FXXX F35.

[@simonking3949]

Is their intention not clear to you?

[@Sahospital21]

Americans will be jealous of this

[@f-35lightningii6]

saying J-35 use engine WS-13 copy of Russia RD-33, KLJ-7A copy of Su-27 Phazotron and NIIP, HUD copy borrow from J-20..

[@ConstantineJoseph]

In a war between 2 super powers, stealth fighters are kind of insignificant because the heavy weapons are the end game which must be avoided at all costs

[@fgygghjh4231]

Winne the pooh happy seeing his printer working good😂

[@lollymanna]

I,m Winnie the poo. Long live xi jinping

[@JWscandi]

so Gopher thinks the virtue is wt the printer? no wonder it's called Gopher!

[@joelmurphy7980]

Because we all know what outstanding high quality products the Chinese make.

[@williamscoggin1509]

😂👍🏻

[@thomasantn]

I have used several iPhones they made including iPhone 15. It's pretty good. Much better than the one made by India.

[@partricklin9749]

they do, unlike your place, everything fall apart in one second,

[@rebeccaaldrich3396]

😂

[@nickfillyaw7348]

Bring it China

[@DoublePenetration0]

Why does everything that China copies, they always make it pointier?

[@RaceBannon-x1u]

Looks strangely familiar

[@partricklin9749]

your english sounds british

[@davidOConnor-z3l]

Meanwhile we waste our time with DEI programs and given all of our equipment to Israel and Ukraine

[@thievingpanda]

Didn't Obama give China F-22 designs?

[@bricology]

NOPE. Try again, troll.

[@leewilliamson3424]

Looks like China's shopping at the United States military shopping center 😂 We're not that gullible 🫣

[@eternalskeptic]

Considering China had the blueprints for th3 F-35 before one even left the assembly line, this is hardly surprising...

[@kamsunleong6648]

Having them and actually making one are two entirely different matter. You need to have the capability to make and deliver one that performs as well if not better than the original. For this reason, only a handful of countries can have their own stealth fighter jet. We are not talking about making a car.

[@Darkmatter321]

Hope that made you feel better

[@ALWH1314]

Is it very easy to get a copy of US advanced aircraft blueprint? How come China choose F35 blueprint instead of F22? J35A is twin engine, isn’t F22 a better copying selection?

[@eternalskeptic]

@@ALWH1314 It has been known for over a decade that China stole the F-35 data, does anyone here have long term memory?

[@JWscandi]

at best u were an art stream student, science is too complicated for u. u can't copy a product simply by duplicating a blueprint. Back to school dude.

[@Justin-oy3tv]

Don’t worry, in about 10 years of time, there won’t be anything more advanced for China to copy. This conversation could then be well ended.

[@bessarion1771]

at the same time the US "paused" the NGAD. Good timing. I only hope Trump will restart it. Like in January.

[@omarjaiblanco8019]

Sad to say, but it was a giant money sink hole. And they were ripping off the US government. While take years to completw it. I know thats a part of the game, but they should at least deliver and try to stay ahead of the competition. The Chinese no longer have to copy. They are now innovating and have surpassed the US technologically in some industries. I dont know what the solution is, but at least deliver on some of your promises and stop relying on the US, increasing tariffs or sanctions on your competition to survive.

[@jetli740]

ngad estimate will cost about 300m each too expensive

[@bessarion1771]

@@jetli740 Yes, peace has it's cost. Considering how much numerical superiority does the Chinese have over US armed forces, it would be money well spent. They are getting ahead of us technologically while we just spent $40B to lay in innenned internet cables that nobody needs. I hope Trump will restart NGAD, because we NEED it. Because to China there is no such thing as "too expensive."

[@Yanimationtest]

How come you don't mention the 6th generation fighter "Baidi"??

[@AndreVasconcelosSa]

Looks beautiful

[@landonculbertson810]

Anyone else notice the similarity between the J-35A and its adversaries, the F-35A and F-35C? It’s more than just similar names

[@jetli740]

both are stealth fighter.. all use similar angle shape geometry for radar reflection obvious they will look similar

[@fgygghjh4231]

Paper aircraft better than china one 😊

[@JWscandi]

u must be overdosed wt cracks to hv such perception...

[@jdway3542]

Well now, that's bizarre! All that stuff looks almost like US stuff. Weird, huh?

[@jetli740]

yes rocket all look like a tube with tiny winglet, all car has same number of wheel.....

[@ELcinegatto87]

Temu version of US and Soviet designs.

[@helicopter2616]

like you can afford it

[@ngheanchoong]

Help me buy one from Temu

[@thomasantn]

Temu is pretty popular these days in US. Just saying.

[@flyingaugust9142]

And it ranks the nu1 regarding e-commerce 😅

[@partricklin9749]

temu is best quality you can get in US, even its mockup plane last longer than f35

[@GTisPeak]

4.5 Gen has radar cross section of a Buick Meanwhile F22 is mach 3 bumblebee. wonder if its held together by wood screws and tuctape like the rusaian jets

[@brianoo9823]

Copy from US .

[@xinyiquan666]

US copies from russia, f35 is copy of yak141

[@欧阳无锋]

sb

[@fgygghjh4231]

Tofu dreg 😂

[@flyingaugust9142]

Like your soar heart🎉

[@Political-Me]

Tejas fighter has that sealth avionics capabilities which can take down any 6th Gen fighter the thing is Indian gov is not revealing it due to confidentiality concerns😈

[@donteventry_1]

the tejas is not stealth at all, it was never meant to be stealth eiter. its just a better mirage

[@donteventry_1]

ur thinking of the tejas mk2 but it doesnt exist yet

[@idk-ll6yv]

Fake

[@kamsunleong6648]

It's performing now at the Zuhai Air show. You can actually check this out.

[@brianbassett4379]

No fake, but also not a competitive fighter aircraft.

[@JWscandi]

@@brianbassett4379 how do u know? at least J35 has no records of self plunging "mode", common in F35.

[@donaldli1864]

With so many defects the F35 shows people what not to do.

[@gregparrott]

The J-35 looks like they blended the F-22 and F-35 to create a hybridized clone. Then, in a nod of respect to the latter, they labeled it the J-35

[@xinyiquan666]

both f22 and f35 is copies of yak141

[@gregparrott]

@@xinyiquan666 I don't see much of a resemblance. The Yak's fuselage has more flat sides compared to the curved ones on the 'F' jets. Also, the Yak's rear stabilizers are vertically aligned, versus those being splayed outwards on the 'F' jets. The canopy has a metal frame running right down the middle, partially obstructing the pilot's forward view. It is a much older aircraft. Also, the air inlet shape if radically different - more like the F-15. If I were to pick a U.S. fighter jet that sorta resembles it, that would be the F-15. But even then, the top of the wings don't blend into the fuselage in the same manner

[@jetli740]

@@gregparrott yak141 is where the f35b vitol design came from..

[@bigdoggwilliekhangoattwt6939]

United States literally 15 years a head of any other country when it comes to Fighter Jet technology.

[@vikashkumar-wp2xx]

How they able to copy such an advance tech exactly like US aircraft🤯

[@changcheng4954]

Copy? no interest. Hi, Kumar, any progress in building toilets in India?

[@彭小华-j7l]

how could you look so similar with your neighbor uncle Bob? you must be copied by your mom.

[@skyserf]

They didn’t. It lacks many features of the F-35.

[@litchi4507]

No, they did not. SK and Turkiye have similar looking ones.

[@UndoEverything]

Your mom helped them.

[@disorderlyconduct6011]

Its chinese.. The J stands for JUNK 😂

[@YYLiow]

US F stands for Failure

[@rapturetrucking4329]

In other words the Chinese believe in the power that GOD almighty provides the USA they even want to relying in 😂😂 let us pray for our nation

[@vanverkyo]

Go back to sleep, immersed in your own world, like a frog that can't see the blue sky outside

[@anthonylundkovsky5643]

Looks so familiar as if we🇺🇸developed it 20 years ago

[@kenw.4539]

It's not a "fat" plane like the financially disastrous F-35. It's more sleek and maneuverable. The Pentagon's fighter plane "Mafia" who designed the F-16 and A-10 workhorses have always said the F-35 was a gimmick from the start whose principal mission was to shove as much money as possible to the MIC. If you have decades, peace and trillions of dollars to waste, eventually you will get the F-35 right. And who cares about potholes or homelessness, or unaffordable health care, as long as our ruling elites have all the COOL WEAPONS they want, we are good, right?

[@mohdnazri4943]

so it has vertical landing..

[@hduong60]

congratulation this is 100% copy from USA. Sell as is

[@partricklin9749]

f35 is 100% copy of yak141

[@cashewnuttel9054]

Copy or not, we'll see how well these do in battle soon.

[@drebei901]

@@cashewnuttel9054yeah who’s gonna fight the war? You?

[@cashewnuttel9054]

@@drebei901 Of course not. It'll be soldiers like you.

[@drebei901]

@@cashewnuttel9054 Nah, not gonna fight a war over distorted narratives and to make wealthy elites even richer. We're not that brainwashed anymore.

[@tedtube1]

The J-35 will be blown out of the air before it comes anywhere within 20 miles of the F-35.

[@Toastontheground]

Bro thats like 32 km, you got zero clue about how far the missile goes till this date

[@Toastontheground]

Aim 120 can fly further than that lol

[@jetli740]

@@Toastontheground pl15 can fly even further......your next move

[@Toastontheground]

@@jetli740 i know, he is just being stupidly weird

[@jetli740]

@@Toastontheground i said both

[@shauncurl6198]

its probably made of cardboard and Styrofoam

[@mihailiakovlev9213]

Bravo China! 👏

[@jeremiahwilson1255]

That’s the temu f35

[@MCGA-l2g]

作为一个中国人，我为j35感到惭愧，它确实抄袭了f35。除此之外中国还在其他领域抄袭了美国。中国永远无法超越美国。（站乎，倾唔公基）

[@joshcyz]

they look like the same, but they are totally different jets.

[@trithienusa9119]

Excellent copycat 😂😂😂😂

[@IRGCsci]

Copycat ❌️ Better Version ✅️

[@t10claytempered16]

It aint' funny.

[@trithienusa9119]

@@t10claytempered16 hihihihi hihihihi

[@城市野狗]

你长了两只眼睛，跟我太像了，麻烦挖掉一个，否则我起诉你抄袭我！！！！！

[@雾岛风超时]

What are you doing?

[@hh5243]

How many countries in the world can develop and produce fifth-generation fighter jets?

[@jeffgao]

China challenge the US military in the Asia Pacific??? Why keep using these kind of words? Only low to high is called challenge; when they are even power, it is not called challenge.