Thanks a lot for these videos man, You are a great help
@TheRuz1238 жыл бұрын
Perfectly explained. Thank you very much.
@ChiragBansal8 жыл бұрын
Rufus Varghese welcome. Support appreciated. :)
@Cartmein8 жыл бұрын
Engineering Made Easy I encountered few problems related to 4bar mechanism can I've ur email id?
@ChiragBansal8 жыл бұрын
+raza S Post it and il take care of it :)
@Cartmein8 жыл бұрын
Engineering Made Easy kindof solved now thanks btw.
@ankushrathod22426 жыл бұрын
Awesome content very helpful
@bhavyaraniu6 жыл бұрын
Very well explained, thanks
@rachububna5094 жыл бұрын
Good explanation
@cesaroswaldomusic8 жыл бұрын
thank you very much... pls explain other topic of kinematic
@ranjithnileshwar61767 жыл бұрын
Grt work good explanation
@sanketkhose83166 жыл бұрын
Thanks broo love you keep growing
@hamanverma966 жыл бұрын
Best video ever sir 🎉🎉🎉🎇
@hamanverma966 жыл бұрын
Best video ever sir🎉🎉🎉🎇
@orange89187 жыл бұрын
Thank u it was very helpful
@zohadulhaque37665 жыл бұрын
Formula used in Chebychew is wrong there should be plus in between?
@himanshuakodiya94495 жыл бұрын
thank you for a nice explanation but you should improve your holding of that camera .
@fcstatusking54406 жыл бұрын
Radian mode explain. Please because I used 180/π but could no t get answer
@pratikshingare20367 жыл бұрын
It's helpful for me
@kannudeol7 жыл бұрын
Bro i need help urgent, chebyshev vale formula se solve karna hai par ques mei starting angle of mech nahi diya hua baaki sab kuch diya hai.. how do i find the starting angle?
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+Jaskaran Deol drop in mail id
@kannudeol7 жыл бұрын
Chirag Bansal jaskarandeol@rocketmail.com
@kannudeol7 жыл бұрын
Chirag Bansal should i mail you the ques?
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
that should be appropriate send me the question
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
bansalchirag31@gmail.com
@OfficialRK4985 жыл бұрын
Thank u Sir...
@raghavaggarwal54127 жыл бұрын
great bhai
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+Raghav Aggarwal :)
@kirtibansal83798 жыл бұрын
nice one
@amitjoysmith90487 жыл бұрын
Radian mode in fx 991es how ? reply . Its urgent
@kusumthakur82077 жыл бұрын
go to shift then setup and then press 4 i.e Radian
@amitjoysmith90487 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@pranitnazare74957 жыл бұрын
Good good.....nice guy
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+Pranit Nazare hello thank you
@murthy20196 жыл бұрын
Guys let me know the links in which have more solved problems on this chebyshev spacing.
@ajayaravindan43387 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro 👍
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+ajay adhavan always man :)
@ganeshpradhan97566 жыл бұрын
Sir you recommended anup goel but which one? He has authored a lot of books.
@ChiragBansal6 жыл бұрын
For the particular subject your are looking for :) he has written over 50 books all over India
@ganeshpradhan97566 жыл бұрын
for velocity, acceleration analysis , four bar link analysis, computer aided analysis of mechanisms
@dailyupdates72825 жыл бұрын
Sir please make video on dynamics of machinery DOM I've failed dom at 5th attempt 😭😭it really sucks
@k.r.adithya7647 жыл бұрын
Gud video
@RajatKumthekar5 жыл бұрын
Thanks Bro.
@arunkumarvenkatadass50016 жыл бұрын
Bro semma masss
@ChiragBansal6 жыл бұрын
Didn't get you
@sohail77286 жыл бұрын
Bro the scale is not 1:2 it is 1:4 because you were supposed to take 8cm as diameters and you took it as radius which makes 16 as diameter
@pranjaldas80377 жыл бұрын
everything was ok ..but finding fi1 and fi2 u made mistake fi1 is 216.12 degree ..fi 2 is 267.16 .. but nice explanation..thnq..
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+Pranjal Das sure :)
@chanchalrathor62233 жыл бұрын
can you please make it all videos in hindi
@Rambowayne6 жыл бұрын
helpful :)
@muhammedshameel45595 жыл бұрын
It should be regular polygon
@chetanpathode33225 жыл бұрын
Wrong graphical method
@kundanprasad24077 жыл бұрын
polygon should be regular na sir
@ChiragBansal7 жыл бұрын
+Kundan Prasad i didnt get you prasad. Can u please elaborate.
@yashphirke36096 жыл бұрын
This video was completely exam oriented. He just gave chebyshev precision points formula, well we can get that stuff from books, but how did that formula came (well that's not in the syllabus so no need, right). In the last video, what the hell is with your hexagon man? 45, 90, 135? What's wrong with 30, 90, 150, couldn't you get a better hexagon and more accuracy from that? And brother just google it what exactly the compass, protractor and divider are. You have made this 25 min looooooooooooong video, and couldn't even explain how does that chebyshev formula came "because_it's_not_in_the_syllabus". Curiosity kya tel lene gai hai kya Sorry to be rude, but I came with a hope to understand why precision points are calculated by this formula and how does it satisfies its given definition. I know it's not in the syllabus but you know...... there is something called as curiosity. I thought since it's such a long video maaaaybe somewhere my doubt will get clarified, but no it's not in the syllabus. Suchhhhhh an exam oriented video, even marks were told....
@ChiragBansal6 жыл бұрын
:P
@EssenceRJ5 жыл бұрын
Do it better yourself then. There are not many great videos on this topic. He sure has made a few mistakes, but he did a more than decent job.
@Vishwesh23 жыл бұрын
Even if he did explain that, you wouldn't understand because you can't even understand how he got the angles 45 , 90 and 135 . Wanna know how? Do 180/4. Use math. Not your broken logic 🤡
@sudharsanvj85318 жыл бұрын
It''s log of the number to the base 10 . You told something like log of 10 to the base of that number !