I have always prefered Times new roman, simple but easy for me to use and read. I've found using some fonts that the words tend to be either to big or to small I feel that for me personally times new roman is the perfect middle ground.
@t0dd0002 жыл бұрын
Try Garamond next time. There a reason publishers avoid Times and Garamond is probably the most popular. Very readable, but more elegant.
@Lasherluke2 жыл бұрын
@@t0dd000 I've already picked my new font moving forward.
@JoeyPaulOnline2 жыл бұрын
I generally use Arial when publishing but font varies for drafting!
@BoundByWords2 жыл бұрын
I definitely choose a font based off my current mood. lol
@t0dd0002 жыл бұрын
Arial is great for emails and shopping lists.
@t0dd0002 жыл бұрын
Most novels use 1.5 line spacing, or thereabouts as you stated. There's a regional literary magazine here that uses singlespacing and it looks so crowded. I hate it. They do it to save paper, but, come on. Ugh.
@Dawn802211 ай бұрын
SAMPLES PLEASE
@t0dd0002 жыл бұрын
Garamond. Which is pretty much the default font professional publishers start with. If in doubt use that. My default for better presentation is Crimson Text. The better publishers include a colophon identifying the typeface. (And if you self-publish, you should as well.) Times New Roman is fine for manuscripts, but I roll my eyes when I see a self-published book using TNR. Ugh. Lazy. Amateurish. Just incredibly boring. It's the dry white toast of typefaces. Don't use Times New Roman. And sans-serif? No. Never. Have I seen a professionally produced book ever use sans-serif? I don't think so. I'm sure there is one out there somewhere though.