Ive never heard anything like this. Orthodox astounds me. Ive been following for a few months and have never been actual Christian. It makes sense , and follows history perfectly. I realized most people dont follow ALL of the NT only the first 4-6 books
@STMukr11 ай бұрын
Слава Богу за все. Спаси и помилуй Боже отца Петра. Помогай ему в трудах за веру и просвещение. Аминь
@henrybarrett129210 ай бұрын
Thank you, Dear Father!!! Blessings!!!
@YahshuaImmanuULАй бұрын
Love YHWH 👑
@johnotis676410 ай бұрын
Where can I buy the Greek version of the book?
@davidyess111 ай бұрын
Characteristics of Divine Revelation #7 was eye-opening for me. Just as a request, where can one purchase To Μυστήριον του Χριστού in Greek?
@ruhmuhaccer86411 ай бұрын
The Old English called the purely perceptive non-rational mind "sefa" which is akin to "sapor, sapientia" in Latin and "sophia" in Greek. Aside the fact that "nous" can have rational notion it appears that "heart, sense, wit" would have better correspondance to "nous" than "intellect" with todays vocabulary custom.
@Steppenwolf2878 ай бұрын
Interesting thoughts but as far as I know the best translation for nous is attention. The comparison that most Greek theologians use is that nous is to the heart, what eyes are to the brain. In other words nous is the eye of the heart.
@ruhmuhaccer8648 ай бұрын
@@Steppenwolf287 I would contend that attention has never acquired facultative notion, it is rather the result of the respective faculty. I am intrigued as to where exactly in patrology you caught that attention approximation up. Otherwise put: When you say X is to the heart is what eyes are to the brain then firstly the brain and heart become mear recepticles which in my experience it exceeds and secondly that X must be the perecptor, the door which lets notions in, which then attention does not seem to denote to me. So are we speaking of προσοκη or something else.
@Antreus7 ай бұрын
@@Steppenwolf287 Attention in that sense is one of the purest forms of generosity.