Chronograph or Three Hander? (Omega Chronoscope vs Omega CK859)

Omega CK859
511.12.39.21.99.002
39mm case
12mm thick
46.2mm lug to lug
20mm lug width
30m water resistance
Manual Cal. 8926 w/ 72 hour power reserve
• Omega CK859
Omega Chronoscope
329.30.43.51.02.001
42.9mm case
13.4mm thick
48.3mm lug to lug
21mm lug width
50m water resistance
Cal. 9908 w/ 60 hours power reserve
• Omega Chronoscope - Si...

[@bandarjehaidli]

Thank you Brad for this episode, nice question, I always go to clean dial 3 or 2 hands No chrono No complications No date 😎

[@frankmirandosr875]

The CK is beautiful, Simple classic Design.

[@brentmillertime8778]

Couldn't agree more, thanks for viewing!

[@dennislim9885]

I bought the CK859. I love it and wanted to get one for my brother. Unfortunately, my AD said they are no longer accepting orders as it’s been discontinued.

[@sebastien6483]

I'm amused that you found one of the busiest three hand dials as an example. For work I don't mind busy dials but for time off I find a simpler dial makes for less hectic viewing. I'd almost say two hander for a weekend watch so I don't have to constantly be reminded of the pace of time slipping away. That said I have a few speedmasters on my wishlist. I'm just not sure I'd ever make use of the complication.

[@MrTamoil]

I like three hand too.. so symmetric

[@bdg5593]

IF a 1 watch collection is the goal and IF it's just between these 2 then a 3 hander.

[@tantu2395]

I love the small second 3 hands more than the chronograph, that would be an ideal single collection for me ☺️.

[@brentmillertime8778]

We just got one more CK859 in stock. Will likely be our last one since they have already discontinued it.

[@Mac2437]

Perspective is amazing … I love the chrono and I find that CK so boring

[@andrpers14]

Ck! ❤️

[@gmshadowtraders]

That Omega Sector should have been 38mm and 100 WR. Hard pass but stunning otherwise.