CIGAMATIC CASE (1962): Immunities after Engineers and Melbourne Corporation | AUSSIE LAW

[@audreyngoi5663]

You're the best sir! Much more interesting than our lectures, and I can see that you're really passionate about this area of law. Please keep it up :) !

[@__nina]

Thank you!

[@leilacosta269]

Parabéns! Excelente!!!

[@AussieLaw]

SUBSCRIBE to AUSSIE LAW: kzbin.info 0:00 - Intro and Recap 2:31 - Facts of Cigamatic 4:27 - Question before the High Court of Australia 4:51 - Decision in Uther and Cigamatic

[@innocentbystander2673]

So, is the Melbourne Corporation a trading company and if so, why was it allowed to continue?

[@bartbarry2662]

According to the public records of the UN Charter of founding members, the Commonwealth of Australia didn't not exist in 1945 at the time it signed the charter agreement and it was signed as .Australia

[@JamesVCTH]

Because Australia is the name of our country. The Commonwealth of Australia is the long version. Both are correct. Like the United States vs the United States of America