Thanks for your appreciation Satyam, please subscribe and tell your friends.
@satyamsingh94924 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld sure sir😄
@vasunith96824 жыл бұрын
@@satyamsingh9492 this is not sir himself...you know...
@satyamsingh94924 жыл бұрын
@@vasunith9682 so who's that ?
@vasunith96824 жыл бұрын
@@satyamsingh9492 channel coordinator....to give replies and stuff
@SoumilSahu7 жыл бұрын
I don't understand the procedure. On one hand, you have used Toricelli's equation, which considers the value of v1 to be 0, but on the other hand, you've not neglected v1 in order to find dy/dt. Why?
@physicsgalaxyworld7 жыл бұрын
Here we are considering the area of hole to be very small compared to the base area of container...
@anirudhvarma18153 жыл бұрын
Sir if the area of the hole is negligible, why do we consider the velocity v1? Isn't v1 also negligible?
@SheryanKumar Жыл бұрын
@@anirudhvarma1815 Since in the question they have given area of efflux as 'a', we will have to consider that the hole's area and top's area doesn't have much difference, therefore efflux velocity has to be taken into account here Hope this helps
@TheVataneАй бұрын
@@anirudhvarma1815 Kucch bhi
@Vishwa__2224 жыл бұрын
respected sir , The final answer should come as ...............( A/a)*[(H/g)^0.5](root2-0.5)..... maybe your final answer is wrong......... pls do reply if i am correct ......
@kshitijvispute67923 жыл бұрын
Yes
@HarshvardhanNigam119 жыл бұрын
sir thank you so much. really helped
@tanishq96947 жыл бұрын
How did you take the velocity of efflex to be root of 2gy, is it not true only when area of hole is
@vanshmishra71197 жыл бұрын
yeah its considered
@kamisama79706 жыл бұрын
Apply Bernoulli equation and then you will get v=√2gh
@nareshsir19743 жыл бұрын
YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT BUT WHEN WE NEGLECTED AREA IT IS FOR VELOCITY RELATION WHERE WE DID SQUARING SO SMALL BECAME MUCH SMALL,,HERE IT IS JUST ONE UNIT SO WE CAN CONSIDER THIS MUCH.RIP M Y ENGLISH
@anirudhvarma18153 жыл бұрын
First of all should it not be root of 2g(H-y), am I right?
@satvik_srivastav2 жыл бұрын
@@anirudhvarma1815 no
@anirudhvarma18153 жыл бұрын
Sir , why is the velocity of efflux root(2gy) , is it not root(2g[H-y])?
@seemachatterjee43893 жыл бұрын
Becoz the free surface is at a height of y from the hole
@SaurabhKumar-us3ty6 жыл бұрын
Here can we use v^2 - v1^2 = 2gH/2??
@SumanDas-qs1qh5 жыл бұрын
Why -dy/dt y is also decreasing in downward direction
@VARUN-pk7xq4 жыл бұрын
Look only dy/dx is decreasing becoz of the the water is getting out from the small hole so to show that it is decreasing we put "-" negative sign ,
@tuhinanshuchatterjee4716 Жыл бұрын
Sir isn't the derivative of 1/√y = 1/2y√y? Sir you took 2√y as derivative of 1/√y., is that a mistake or ami I missing something?
@mehak-rg9dz7 ай бұрын
integration of x^3 is (x^4)/4 not (x^4)4, as -1/2+1=+1/2 it will come to be 2√y only.
@skm57795 жыл бұрын
why cannot root 2g(H-y) instead of root 2gy
@osaidfirozkhan35052 жыл бұрын
No because we are taking the height "y" above the cross sectional area and we know That H-y is the height above the ground and is b/W the surface of ground and cross sectional area (H-y) is the reference point in Bernoulli's theorem
@skm57792 жыл бұрын
@@osaidfirozkhan3505 😂 I have not expected answer after so much time. Thank You 😂 because physics is timeless.
@someone-wp8dj Жыл бұрын
@@skm5779 which college are you in now?
@sonuarorafoamstore97784 жыл бұрын
Sir From which book you take question.
@stardustjr68984 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir 😄
@MacNDroidSolutions4 жыл бұрын
This is true when a
@deependragaur49914 жыл бұрын
Amazing🤩🤩🤩
@suchitramaurya74577 жыл бұрын
it is root2 only
@physicsgalaxyworld7 жыл бұрын
it is √2 and it is already account and the final result is correct...
@ayushsaxena11646 жыл бұрын
Dear sir how v=2gy^1/2 , because sir here area of hole
@physicsgalaxyworld6 жыл бұрын
v = √2gy is valid only when area of hole is very small and thats valid here... watch the previous videos in proper sequence for the derivation...
@ayushsaxena11646 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld alright sir😄🙂
@hellobrother31737 жыл бұрын
Sir suggest a method without intigration n diff.. Little bit confused sir please
@vijayvyas50756 жыл бұрын
i dont think there exists any.
@Shivam-wg2dt6 жыл бұрын
Try to learn integration and differentiation.. You can't run from them if you want to learn physics.
@benkenobi0079 жыл бұрын
Sir, isnt v1= (-dy/dt) dimensionally incorrect? shouldn't it be v1=A*(-dy/dt)??? thanks sir!
@physicsgalaxyworld9 жыл бұрын
+KTiwari998 Here we are taking v1 as the velocity of the surface not the volume rate so this is correct...
@vasunith96824 жыл бұрын
Chinese army killed 3 indian army officials in ladakh today😐😐😐 16 june 2020
@anmolempire11973 жыл бұрын
4 April ,2021 25 Army got martyr, and many heavily injured in *BIJAPUR* operation 😭😭😭
@harshsameer94403 жыл бұрын
@@anmolempire1197 August 9 2021 neeraj chopra won gold medal at olympics
@men.are.braveeeee12 күн бұрын
@@harshsameer9440 4th June 2024 NTA fucked NEET aspirants