Class 12 Physics | Photoelectric Effect | #9 Effect of Variation in Frequency | For JEE & NEET

  Рет қаралды 35,294

Physics Galaxy

Physics Galaxy

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 46
@anmolempire1197
@anmolempire1197 4 жыл бұрын
On increasing frequency not absolutely not impilies current increase...As one photon (hu>∅) can only & only ejected single electron..As increasing frequency means more stronger wavelength will incident on metal surface and hence it will eject the electron with more KE and not more than one electron i.e.2e..As one can uniquely eject one electron only provide (hv>∅)...
@iuoyo4707
@iuoyo4707 Жыл бұрын
If u have doubt that why current doesn't depend upon frequency even if it increases velocity of electrons , Refere here : I = Q/T Q = e × no. of electrons per unit area × area on which they are incident So Q= no. Of electron per unit area×k Where k is constant, I = no. of electrons per unit area ×k/T And no. of electrons per unit area /T is photon flux which is constant So current= k' , which means it is constant. So mathematically this was explaination.
@shr1126
@shr1126 3 жыл бұрын
After a lot of research I made my mind to understand! Here's what in my mind Think red light (donno wavelength nd frequency, think one number 😅 950 and 620 think) If red light ejects an electron, Arre vo work function ke equal energy deta hai raklo! Then one wave aake ek electron ko marke uda diya ek sec me If voilet light radiates to same surface usko jyada energy hai red ke bhi jyada think 850 frequncy, vo red ke jaise hi hit karta hai in same time per that area where it is hitting! But after hitting aur 330 frequency ka energy bacha hai na usse vo fast chal tha h , yaha photo current, electron vo surface se bahar aana, dono me same time pe same hi baahar aata hai, aane ke baad violet ka fast chalta hai We all think after increasing frequency vo bahar jaldi se aata hai na, vahi distance ko tej se cover kar rhe na, usko photo current bolenge, but it's wrong usko nhi Surface se electron bahar (I told just surface se) vahi time hai jo red aur violet nikaltha hai ise photo current same kahenge , but after ejection violet ka tej bagtha hai but use ham nhi kahenge current! 😅 Ye tha mera view Sahi hai to like nhi reply karo! 😅 Nhi samaj aaya tho, doubt poochlo! 😅😅
@pavanbhat3861
@pavanbhat3861 3 жыл бұрын
It's right. One photon can uniquely eject one electron corresponding to it's work function and the remaining energy is used to increase the kinetic energy of the electron. The reason photocurrent changes on increasing intensity is because you are providing more photons itself in the first place. So the rate of ejection will also increase thereby increasing photocurrent. It's not the same case on increasing frequency because the RATE of ejection doesn't change.
@arandombeing7262
@arandombeing7262 2 жыл бұрын
Your comment is correct. I also thought exactly this only. But i got confused when in the animation, the electrons in the wire is moving fast. The animation over here is wrong. The electrons in wire WON'T move faster when frequency is increased.
@alphaiitd1
@alphaiitd1 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@yashagarwal9080
@yashagarwal9080 8 жыл бұрын
let suppose 1e is passing through ammeter in 1sec before increasing frequency of light ,as after inc frequency k.e. of electrons is increased so 2 electron (say) are passing in 1 sec ,therefore current must be changed ..please correct me sir.
@physicsgalaxyworld
@physicsgalaxyworld 8 жыл бұрын
+Yash Agarwal if in one second total 10 e are ejected from the cathode then maximum 10 e can reach the anode so current is 10e no matter at what speed they are moving... if ejection rate is fixed, current cannot increase... think again carefully... its just they are reaching early but fix nos in one second....
@theexperiment9105
@theexperiment9105 6 жыл бұрын
How the photo flux can be constant on varying frequency
@iamcomputernerd1239
@iamcomputernerd1239 6 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld But persecond there will be higher no. of en hence current
@anmolempire1197
@anmolempire1197 4 жыл бұрын
@@iamcomputernerd1239 absolutely not...As one photon (hu>∅) can only & only ejected single electron..As increasing frequency means more stronger wavelength will incident on metal surface and hence it will eject the electron with more KE and not more than one electron i.e.2e..As one can uniquely eject one electron only provide (hv>∅)...
@shr1126
@shr1126 3 жыл бұрын
@@anmolempire1197 thanks brother 🎀💓💓💓🎀
@kumarsambhav6844
@kumarsambhav6844 8 жыл бұрын
Sir just curious to know, How much time does it take to make one animation ?
@physicsgalaxyworld
@physicsgalaxyworld 8 жыл бұрын
3 hrs to 30hrs...
@zyro9922
@zyro9922 8 жыл бұрын
Thank you ∞ sir.
@arunteltia7888
@arunteltia7888 7 жыл бұрын
Really omg!!!!!!!!!! Thank u sir i love you sir u are the best
@CristianoRONALDO-nw8hr
@CristianoRONALDO-nw8hr 4 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld you are great sir.
@sejalsangole2527
@sejalsangole2527 4 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld Reallyy!!..Thanks a lot sir!!!!!
@gigachadkartik
@gigachadkartik 6 жыл бұрын
Sir if photons are ejected very fast then due to earthing electron from earth will come very fast to neutralize the metal and as current is defined as time rate of flow of charge then it must also increase isn't it?
@physicsgalaxyworld
@physicsgalaxyworld 6 жыл бұрын
Current is limited by the photon flux of radiation beam... as no of photons per unit time incident are constant so current will also remain constant...
@cricobug9778
@cricobug9778 4 жыл бұрын
@@physicsgalaxyworld could not understand sir,but time rate of flow is decreased current should increase
@parallax75
@parallax75 4 жыл бұрын
@@cricobug9778 same doubt 3 years later
@fatimaseliya8801
@fatimaseliya8801 3 жыл бұрын
@@parallax75 one photon can remove one electron so number of photon incident on metal remains same so the number of electrons ejected also remains same. Even if the electron are moving fast as velocity increase but the metal surface is not ejecting electron. Bhai bhale hi car fast chal rahi hai par car ek particular time me ek point se nikal ne wali same number me hi hai
@kumarutkarsh1248
@kumarutkarsh1248 3 жыл бұрын
Sir why frequency does not affect number of electron emitting out I mean if we increase the frequency then electron in the metal sheet will have more KE and therefore those electron that were not able to emit out due to internal collision will now be left with some KE even after collision so number of electron emitting out must be increased
@Future_iitian_
@Future_iitian_ 6 ай бұрын
Same doubt
@warriorbjyt9535
@warriorbjyt9535 2 жыл бұрын
sir if photons are ejected fast we can say that their drift velocity is more so by I= neva current should be more pls explain
@slightlybettertoday6204
@slightlybettertoday6204 2 жыл бұрын
My doubt is... On increasing frequency shouldn't the quantum efficiency increse. I mean, previously there were electrons which let's say after n collision didn't have enough energy left to leave the metal surface... But now since it had more intial energy than before, it could be possible for that electron to leave the metal surface after the same n number of collision ...thereby increasing the quantum efficiency.
@adilh3908
@adilh3908 7 жыл бұрын
sir plz upload dual nature of matter and radiation plz
@aspiringscientist1616
@aspiringscientist1616 4 жыл бұрын
No
@SUSHANTSINGH-bh4ef
@SUSHANTSINGH-bh4ef 6 жыл бұрын
Sir this is sufficient for jee mains
@rmishra1000
@rmishra1000 5 жыл бұрын
More than sufficient
@vinayvinnu9808
@vinayvinnu9808 4 жыл бұрын
@@rmishra1000 for neet???
@ayush1643
@ayush1643 4 жыл бұрын
sufficient for advance also additional things that you need to do watch advance illustrations and do lots of practise
@shivanshpandey7957
@shivanshpandey7957 3 жыл бұрын
😇😇😇😇😇
@rmishra1000
@rmishra1000 5 жыл бұрын
Sir, if photons of frequency v are falling on metal surface then n no. of electrons ejected per second,is all of them have same maximum kinetic energy if yes then(collision of different e is different and they loses different quantity of energy while collision time interval, so they also posses different Max. K. E.). If no then why?
@zyro9922
@zyro9922 8 жыл бұрын
I think everybody watching got this doubt "Why doesn't photoelectric current increase with frequency of the incident wave?" physics.stackexchange.com/questions/222359/why-doesnt-photoelectric-current-increase-with-frequency-of-the-incident-wave This helped me.
@physicsgalaxyworld
@physicsgalaxyworld 8 жыл бұрын
current is rate of flow of charge (coul/sec) and by one incident photon one electron is emitted... if you increase frequency, it does not change the photon flux (no of incident photons per unit area per sec) thats why current is not affected by frequency variation....
@zyro9922
@zyro9922 8 жыл бұрын
It was a very easy concept but still it took time to grasp it.
@anitamalik1151
@anitamalik1151 4 жыл бұрын
Mst samjhaya iss link na
@parallax75
@parallax75 4 жыл бұрын
Ali hassan bro thankyou so much💯🔥
@shr1126
@shr1126 3 жыл бұрын
@@RaviRanjan-wx8vm bhai samaj aya kya?
@soumitradas8463
@soumitradas8463 5 жыл бұрын
All those who are not able to understand why current didn't change. I think sir wants to mean that photon flux did not change hence rate of ejection of e- will remain same but i guess the speed at which electrons go away becomes faster. Again, u can understand like this," e- gets ejected just like the previous frequency and some natural extra force comes in and gives it a push for higher speed hence the process of ejection in the case of both frequencies can be considered similar and current remains constant in both cases. Sir pls correct me if i m wrong..
@physicsgalaxyworld
@physicsgalaxyworld 5 жыл бұрын
Upto some extent you are correct... as frequency increases it gives electron extra energy so ejected electron KE increases (but not due to any extra force) and as photon flux is constant no of electron per unit time remain constant so charge/s or current remain constant...
@roneet9027
@roneet9027 2 жыл бұрын
thank you sir
А я думаю что за звук такой знакомый? 😂😂😂
00:15
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
ТВОИ РОДИТЕЛИ И ЧЕЛОВЕК ПАУК 😂#shorts
00:59
BATEK_OFFICIAL
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Sigma Kid Mistake #funny #sigma
00:17
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
You don't really understand physics
11:03
Ali the Dazzling
Рет қаралды 258 М.
16 - Class 12 - Physics - Wave Optics -  Polarisation
10:01
Scholarswing
Рет қаралды 425 М.
8 Times SHELDON Went TOO FAR!!! - The Big Bang Theory
26:40
Shelly&Penny
Рет қаралды 828 М.
I never understood why electrons have spin... until now!
15:59
FloatHeadPhysics
Рет қаралды 735 М.
How to STUDY so FAST it feels like CHEATING
8:03
The Angry Explainer
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Chase becoming House over the years (House MD)
15:38
Athena
Рет қаралды 4 МЛН
What *is* a photon?
23:22
Looking Glass Universe
Рет қаралды 219 М.
А я думаю что за звук такой знакомый? 😂😂😂
00:15
Денис Кукояка
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН