The Stars My Destination isn't considered a Masterpiece....it IS a Masterpiece.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
🤙
@Kim_Miller9 ай бұрын
Modern authors who don't hold your hand. 1. Hannu Rajaniemi. "You have hands?" 2. Alistair Reynolds. "If I can write it like this you can read it like this." 3. Gene Wolfe. (OK, perhaps no longer modern.) "What do you want me to do, write another book just to explain this one?"
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Both Wolfe and Reynolds are on my list of authors I'd like to explore
@Kim_Miller9 ай бұрын
@@bookjackWolfe is a hard nut to crack. My pretend quote up there references a conversation he had with his publisher. The publisher said he would only publish The Citadel of the Autarch, the fourth book of Book of the New Sun, if Wolfe promised to write a sequel to explain the whole series. So Urth of the New Sun came out a few years later.
@Kim_Miller9 ай бұрын
I've not read The Stars my Destination but when you put up the pic of Bester's Tiger Tiger I noticed The Demolished Man on there. Hey, I said to myself, is that the one with the mind readers? Yep says wikipedia. I read that when I was a teenager in the 60s and am a surprised that a bit of the memory is still with me.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Glad I could spark it :)
@haxxy409 ай бұрын
I'm sure Project Hail Mary along with The Martian will be considered a masterpiece 50 years from now. Maybe The Expanse series also? People also seem to like The Three Body Problem, which I did not enjoy that much. Although I haven't read them, but the Silo series seem very popular, so also this series maybe?
@DataDad2069 ай бұрын
Such great book recs! Do you have a Goodreads or storygraph?
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
I do not. Haven't even heard of Storygraph actually 😅
@PuppetMeat19 ай бұрын
Blindsight probably has the best shot of being remembered as a modern sf masterpiece, at least among what I've read. I wasnt quite as into it as a lot of people are, but it sure gets people going which is probably the best indicator of its staying power.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
It does seem to be a divisive one. Loved it personally
@tokenblack79839 ай бұрын
Silverberg writes like butter…effortlessly delicious Just started Thorns…after just finishing Downward to the Earth…which was fantastic…best soft Sci Fi Author perhaps
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
I'm lucky to have so many of his books ahead of me
@gaileverett2 ай бұрын
You haven't read Le Guin then, I guess.
@tokenblack79832 ай бұрын
@@gaileverett I have two of her book on the shelf…just a matter of time
@bartsbookspace9 ай бұрын
Hyperion/Fall of Hyperion are, to me, examples of a modern SF masterpiece; House of Suns and Fire Upon the Deep as well.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Agree with Hyperion although I'm not sure what the cutoff date for Modern is
@bartsbookspace9 ай бұрын
@@bookjack That line is likely arbitrary, if it even exist outside this conversation lol. I think Hyperion was published in 1989, and to me it feels like a modern book in a way that SF books from the 60s and 70s do not. So, let’s “officially” set the masterpiece line at 35 years back. 🙃
@stevenlamb87269 ай бұрын
I found an old omnibus copy of Hyperion Cantos at my local used bookstore the other day, an amazing find! Can’t wait to dig in. I read The Terror by Dan Simmons earlier this year and absolutely devoured it so I’m excited to get back into some Simmons. Carrion Comfort is on my TBR for this year as well. Cheers!
@bartsbookspace9 ай бұрын
@@stevenlamb8726 Nice find! 🙌 I definitely want to read Terror this year.
@civoreb9 ай бұрын
Love Silverberg. The man doesnt know how to write a bad book imo
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
I haven't come across one yet
@tamerlaaane7 ай бұрын
His early work is pretty bad. Just try The 13th Immortal (you can get it for free from Project Gutenberg), that one is awful.
@phaedrus26339 ай бұрын
"Dhalgren" was a book, I don't think I ever got my orientation in.
@Tetsujin-289 ай бұрын
12:03.Young Jake Paul on the cover. "Energy Vampire". Sounds like a Gen Z diet sparkling water. We All Died at Breakaway Station (Richard C. Meredith). Masterpiece.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Lol so true
@B0BsBooks9 ай бұрын
I rarely read introductions. I have never bought a book for an introduction. I think I've maybe gone back and read the introduction after I finished the book if it was good 1% of all total books I've read in my life.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
I thought I had learned my lesson after getting spoiled a few times but I guess not 😅
@cojaysea9 ай бұрын
I remember reading in one of Isaac Asimovs books that he said Alfred Bester was a much better writer than he was . But of course no where near as prolific .
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
I'll agree with that. Asimov has mind-blowing ideas but the delivery is usually dull
@stevenlamb87269 ай бұрын
Me being obsessed with 90 Day Fiancé….am I an energy vampire??
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Maybe just the subject of one? It's definitely a grey area when filtered through a screen
@brettrobson57399 ай бұрын
Smith (Linebarger) is a genius. Just sayin, is all.
@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd9 ай бұрын
you're right bester is of one of those fifties authors I think of as being stodgy (does he really have a character named jizz? omg!) but still might read stars my destination if I can get a shiny modern edition. Silverberg's dying inside is on my bucket list cause I keep hearing it described as a dark classic also totally agree the martian is NOT a classic and a canticle for liebowitz is. As for kant use/be used I made a firm decision never to read him after I found out he not only died a virgin but argued masturbation is worse than suicide haha. As for a book in the last two decades I'd call a classic I can't think of a SINGLE one now but if I do I'll get back to you⚛😀
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Didn't know that about Kant 😅 Interesting take. And Dying Inside is next up for me too whenever I come back to Silverberg
@BobCanRead9 ай бұрын
I think you're being too stingy with the term "masterpiece"! Or maybe I'm just too liberal with it. 🤷♂🤣
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
Probably both 😅
@phaedrus26339 ай бұрын
I just didn't care for that type of really pulpy science fiction such as "The Stars My Destination" . And, I don't like the totally cerebral sci-fi like "Roadside Park". Something in the middle is my best kind of sci-fi. Yeah, Gully is a very flat character, and the ending quite non sequitur.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
The ending is totally bizarre which I like but jarring when it's not leaned into it. I definitely lean towards the more cerebral but navel-gazing can get pretty dull
@ifihadfriends4379 ай бұрын
I've read A Time of Changes and Downward to the Earth. While he is a geat writer, his portrayal of women in both of these was lacking.
@bookjack9 ай бұрын
True enough. Thorns wasn't too egregious on that front at least
@tokenblack79839 ай бұрын
Yes yes why didn’t he write the book I would have written…🙄…just get over it and enjoy the fiction