Climate Change: How does it really work? | ClimateScience #1

[@GreenGlowNews]

Understanding climate change is crucial for our future . The impact of greenhouse gases and global warming highlights the urgency to find and implement long-term solutions. Great to see organizations like ClimateScience leading the way with education and action! 💡👏

[@thepeopleplaceandnaturepod8344]

Who’s watching this for school? ✋

[@otoogladys5096]

Me

[@mahendrabadgujar5038]

Me ✋

[@ricktd6891]

It's all les and fear mongering.

[@ricktd6891]

@@otoogladys5096 You should sue your school for communist indoctrination.

[@ricktd6891]

@@mahendrabadgujar5038 You should also sue your school.

[@joycejeong-x4b]

Community engagement and participation amplify the effectiveness of climate initiatives, fostering a sense of shared responsibility and collaboration essential for navigating the complexities of climate change.

[@MaximumEfficiency]

CO2 = greenwashing

[@anthonymorris5084]

This is what keeps us safe from almost any threat you can come up with: Economic growth, wealth creation and inexpensive reliable energy.

[@citationsloth]

Lead in gasoline Literally hurt all of those things to get rid of it Think about that

[@anthonymorris5084]

@@citationsloth Lead was removed and nobody demanded the end of fossil fuels because of lead.

[@HoleInTheFire50]

I'm here for journalism practice on sci tech. This helps a lot!

[@VũThanhHuyền-w8f]

素敵なビデオと説明! これはおそらく私が今まで見た気候変動に関する最高のビデオです!

[@marcosherrero2782]

Lo mismo digo

[@penislicker9093]

私はピニスリカです

[@KyriaHappy]

Amazing video! ❤ I'm here starting my studies for the Olympics!

[@_king_manuel652]

I Believe In Mother Nature We need to Save Nature .

[@PipinhoSnow]

Even if you do not believe in global warming (I do not know how it is possible in 2024...) we have to change radically to have a cleaner and greener planet earth.

[@SedonaVonGeczy-Hamberlin]

Another huge aspect to this issue is deforestation. Not only does it release massive amounts of carbon from the soil when trees are cut down, but there are less plants to fix the and therefore trap the carbon. If all the huge unesessary lawns were replaced by food forests, global warming would be significantly slowed, hunger issues irelivant, and industrail agriculture unecesaary.

[@SaradinduGhosh-q4d]

This gives only preliminary ideas about global warming and is considered sufficient for commons .

[@SH0T__GUNZz]

Tysm I understood rn you have good skills keep it up!

[@PlanetCents]

Hey we love this video over at Planet Cents, Inc.! I hope it's okay that I repost it onto our channel :)

[@seadreameducation]

Yes! I've only just seen all these lovely comments - Very Happy for you to repost - and Happy New Year to you! :)

[@camis.f.3466]

Talented creators here!! Excellent #teamearthly

[@ClimateScience]

Thank you so much, Cami :)

[@ricktd6891]

All les and fear mongering.

[@ricktd6891]

@@ClimateScience You and the other alarmists are responsible for millions of animal and human deaths because of your global warming scam.

[@Jason-o5s]

Cheer~~the weather conditions prevailing in an area in general or over a long period.😊

[@DegrowthPlaylists]

Wonderful video yet again!

[@ricktd6891]

Wouldn't you rather have the truth?

[@tawheedmazhar748]

Amazing video!

[@SelfSustainableCity]

The earth breathes, and we must hear, Its cries for change, both far and near. In warming winds, in skies of grey, Return to nature-find your way. For when we live with root and ground, A sacred peace can there be found.

[@FemTsukasasWife]

i cant be the only one watching this 1 day before my final science exam 💀💀💀💀

[@ABMAbid]

Tomorrow us the last day for the Olympiad. I'm prepping from the crash course.

[@marcosherrero2782]

Lo enseñare en el cole😁😁

[@jesusreyessantillan6888]

Sigan asi 🌟 quedo increible 👍

[@silviashefa4097]

As the climate heads into greater extremes globally, how can we best deal with future climate crises? The short answer is that we cannot deal with them unless we take care of nature's inner balance. We live in a tightly-closed and interdependent system in which everything boomerangs back to us. While living in such a system, we need to reconsider what we want and think, and how we treat each other, because our human connections are the primary influence on how nature responds to us. It is common to think that climate is dependent on factors outside of us-whether it be balances between heat and cold in the environment, or the effects of various kinds of pollution we emit-because we lack a complete picture of how our attitudes to each other bring about the strongest responses from nature toward us. No creature distorts nature the way that we people do. And it is not simply a matter of switching to renewable energy sources, electric cars and the like; it is a matter of how we relate to each other. If we truly wish to witness more balance throughout nature and not have to deal with all kinds of cold waves and other natural disasters, then similarly to how we have electricity, water and gas meters in our homes, we should also have meters that count how much evil we emit into the world from our negative attitudes to each other. What I mean is that if we could feel the extent to which we emit negative forces into the world, which negatively ricochet back to us, then we would wish to change this negative driver within us. We would want to switch it to a drive that makes our human connections positive, and which harmonizes us with nature. In simple terms, when we get up in the morning, we should first and foremost consider what we need to do in order for all people to have it good. Developing such an attitude is not so simple, yet we will need to seriously work on it as we head into the future. A life of increasing blows from nature or a life of peace and harmony depends on the extent to which we impact a shift in our attitudes to each other-from negative to positive.

[@ricktd6891]

You write too much and know too little. Maybe you should catch up to the fact the hypothesis has been debunked several times already.

[@C-Here]

Unfortunately 99% of people won't understand this... 😥

[@melissaferman5768]

Love the animations!!

[@ricktd6891]

All lies and fear mongering.

[@amandasuarez8539]

amazing!! ✨

[@ricktd6891]

Les and fear mongering over a global scam.

[@rosnenynatzir6377]

The factory and industry have to back steps from while during climatr change🎉🎉🎉

[@leilaliz4364]

Excelent work! excelente trabajo :D

[@ricktd6891]

A bunch of lies and fear mongering.

[@terenceiutzi4003]

Man's CO2 contributions to our atmosphere are less than a fart in a hurricane.

[@terenceiutzi4003]

@gregheffley-kq3bo you do know that when Mt. SAINT Hellens erupted in 1980 she pumped 1,000 times as much CO2 into the atmosphere as industrial man has since we started. You do know that man's biggest carbon contribution is from 8 billion people each exhaling 2 KG per day!

[@terenceiutzi4003]

@gregheffley-kq3bo how much CO2 do you think it took for the volcano in Indonesia to blast that cloud of ash the size of North America 8,000 feetbinto the air?

[@terenceiutzi4003]

@gregheffley-kq3bo that is CO2 driving that ash into the air! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqvQXotjbNNjoNksi=K0ro-WaekQaobOoK

[@citationsloth]

No The carbon you breath is net zero Volcanoes emit about 1/50th of what we emit yearly You really didn’t know what you are talking about and it shows

[@terenceiutzi4003]

@citationsloth Bull shit!

[@polypoly2023]

save our planet

[@maroonmaroonmaroon2985]

Ew a tree lover go away

[@buzzlightyearlight1247]

Mawnitor

[@sundarapandian18]

Something more important 😇

[@lavidaesbella3687]

The weather now is horrendous, we need an ice age ASAP

[@citationsloth]

We are in an ice age me actaully we’re suppose to have a bit of cooling recently Just a degree But we screwed that pooch

[@maroonmaroonmaroon2985]

You probably think ice ages are good

[@marktwainboatrestoration-j1600]

I have a comment but it is too long to post. Is there an email address?

[@ricktd6891]

It's all les.

[@marktwainboatrestoration-j1600]

@ricktd6891 what a disappointment. You claim to be scientific yet you dismiss solid counter arguments, personal observations, and facts as "lies". This is why you are not successful winning people to your way of thinking

[@ricktd6891]

@@marktwainboatrestoration-j1600 What sold arguments? What facts?

[@Rayanna-LeighJames-k2q]

For the people that are hating on the video why you click on it and how about you make your own since this video is all lies and whatever since your so smart or genius like Albert Einstein

[@Honda234_Trabant60]

What If we put giant catalyzators on factories and everything which produces CO2?

[@Captain_Ahab_Hermannmybeloved]

That is being done. Sadly, not really efficient.

[@魂の輪迴]

Ptaah: 77. The population of Akart however no longer exists since the year 2007, because in the only 32 years from 1975 to 2007 their total population had increased to 34 billion (34,000,000,000), when through their stupidity, like also is apparent with the terrestrial population, nature and the climate were completely destroyed, when, in the end, an oxygen collapse and an atmosphere collapse occurred, as you have described this. 78. As a result all life was wiped out on that planet. Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_476 Ptaah: 39. An oxygen collapse, respectively, an atmospheric collapse, arises as a result of a massive over-impregnation of the atmosphere by the molecule CO2, which enters the atmosphere, as well as the oceans and other bodies of water, as well as the soil of the Earth, and radically alters the climate. 40. An oxygen and atmospheric collapse would be evoked by a massive excess of CO2, which means a bad fate for the entire Earth humanity which would evoke a threatening catastrophe consisting of the destruction of life itself. 41. This is caused by the incessantly growing overpopulation, through which constantly more monstrous amounts of CO2 are produced and, with that, not only the air is impregnated, but actually everything up to the highest heights of the mountains and the deepest depths of the oceans is impregnated. 42. The molecule already exists in dangerous amounts everywhere on the entire Earth and unfolds its dangerousness which does not only express itself in the destructive manner, being climate change, with all the natural catastrophes which more and more take the upper hand, which always demand more and more human lives and cause destruction which cannot again be repaired in a practical amount of time. 43. And actually, all of that is founded singly and alone in the overpopulation of the Earth-humans, who senselessly multiply like noxious vermin and thereby also produce more damaging material of all kinds, and CO2, and thereby impregnate the atmosphere and reduce the oxygen content. 44. This, along with all other destructive machinations like the logging and clearing of the rainforests - the green lungs of the Earth - and, bound to that, the creation of infertile desert areas. 45. Naturally the Earth has always contained the molecule CO2, but the CO2 content has drastically risen through the irrational pushing ahead of the overpopulation which constantly burns more fossil fuels, such as coal, petroleum and gas, principally through the internal combustion engines of road and marine vehicles, work machinery, and aircraft engines, as well as through nonsensical kinds of motor sports. 46. In addition to that is still the enormous overproduction of animals, which are bred as means of nourishment for the humans and which exhale, and release from the colon, horrendous amounts of methane and other gasses. 47. But also, due to the thawing of the permafrost, enormous amounts of all kinds of dangerous gasses are released which enter the air. 48. Further, it is also the Earth human himself who puts CO2 in the air through his exhalation, and indeed already in dangerous amounts, as a result of the monstrous overpopulation. 49. Every year, in this way, the Earth human is to blame that millions of tonnes of dangerous materials are produced, along with other poisons, and are blown into the air, and that increases as the incessantly growing overpopulation increases. 50. And actually today Earth humanity stands on the brink of the serious threat that everything is leading to a collapse, as was the case with Akart. 51. And if a stop, in a rational way, is not finally ordered to the overpopulation then it all increases more and more, and faster, whereby, finally, nothing more can be saved. 52. If, therefore, the CO2 content continues rising unabated, then the catastrophe is no longer avoidable. 53. And a rapid reduction can, singly and alone, only come about through the prevention of overpopulation, because actually only in that way does all the nonsensical production of CO2 also rapidly decrease. 54. But if that is given no heed then the oxygen content and the atmosphere of the Earth would be so overburdened by CO2 that a collapse would unavoidably result. 55. And if the concentration of the molecules climbs in this manner then the respiration of all relevant life-forms on the Earth would be so impaired that it would no longer be possible for them to take up sufficient oxygen. 56. When inhaled, the CO2 concentration already becomes deadly for Earth-humans, and for the other actual oxygen-breathers, when it only amounts to eight percent. Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_481 Ptaah: 91. The overpopulation of the Earth-humans and their machinations produce more and more dangerous substances which are released into the nature and the atmosphere, causing enormous changes which are also reflected in the density and formation of the clouds. 92. All the dirt produced by overpopulation and released into the atmosphere as aerosols from the Earth, together with space dust and cosmic radiation, are the factors responsible for cloud depletion. 93. Depending on the intensity of the sun, which forms a stronger or weaker protective shield for cosmic rays, the intensity of cosmic rays that reach the terrestrial spheres where clouds form also changes. 94. However, it is not only the Sun but also the Earth's magnetic field that is of great importance, because depending on its strength more or less cosmic rays penetrate the Earth's atmosphere. 95. And for a century now, the intensity of the Sun's and the Earth's magnetic field has been very strong, so less cosmic rays penetrate the Earth, thus thinning the clouds. 96. So along with the actual cosmic rays, the Sun is also a decisive factor that must be taken into account in relation to the greenhouse effect, but this does not detract from the fact that the main factor is all the dirt, carbon dioxide and toxic gases, etc. that are thrown into the atmosphere by Earth-humans. 97. And the greater the mass of overpopulation becomes, the more all these destructive substances are released into nature and into the atmosphere, etc. and cause tremendous changes. 98. The clouds are being supersaturated with aerosols from the Earth, causing enormous masses of water vapour to bind to them as raindrops or ice, which then fall down to the Earth in floods and cascades. 99. And the fact that this results in violent reactions in nature, which lead to elemental storms, which bring real floods or ice storms and hailstorms, rests in the law of nature, when the clouds are inevitably emptied. 100. The whole thing also leads to a clearing of the clouds by emptying the clouds, which means that they become thinner, allowing more solar radiation to penetrate the Earth and, together with all the irresponsible, destructive machinations caused by Earth-humans with regard to Earth, nature, life-forms and climate influence, this causes the greenhouse effect. 101. So, in principle, more and more constant clouds would have to hover over the Earth, which is normally regulated and kept in balance by cosmic rays, which would allow less solar radiation to penetrate and avoid a greenhouse effect, but could also be cooler. 102. If not for all the dirt from the Earth that enters the atmosphere and forces the clouds to open their floodgates to real floods and ice storms and hailstorms and cause tremendous storms, the clouds could normalise together with the cosmic rays, thus allowing more clouds to enter and reduce solar radiation and the greenhouse effect. 103. This, however, would be a lengthy process over a very long period of time, which would also require, first and foremost, that overpopulation be drastically reduced by a worldwide and far-reaching birth regulation. Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_512

[@RadhikaShantanusKitchen]

Love it 😊

[@ricktd6891]

You love lies and propaganda?

[@thaotran6213]

really wonderful

[@ricktd6891]

All lies.

[@redredred8408]

@@ricktd6891all lust night lights*

[@buzzlightyearlight1247]

Buzz light year😊

[@jennipherbwalya4120]

Wow amazing thank you

[@ricktd6891]

Stop thanking traitors.

[@ErnsonBrunache-hb2qf]

Hi👍👍

[@Esteemed0]

I AM FROM LANDAN AMERICA

[@GeorgeKwong-i2h]

The population is increasing every year. wasting a lot of natural resources and producing a lot of toxic waste. How can we solve climate change from the root cause of population expansion ? Thanks

[@maryamhuseynova8993]

Anyone for COP 29

[@mattyk82]

when is the sea level meant to rise?

[@epicchocolate1866]

It has risen.

[@mattyk82]

@@epicchocolate1866yeh by about 1-2mm per year

[@citationsloth]

About 4 mm now and increasing Looking like 3 ft by 2100 And massive increase in storm surges

[@mattyk82]

@@citationslothaccording to the two longest running tide gauges in Australia it’s .73mm and 1.78mm. As for what’s going to happen 75 years from now I’m not going to pretend to know.

[@citationsloth]

@ you can do basic math on thermal expansion and aborption rates Look for global average You can always find a low points You shouldn’t be using tons since that’s a factor of Location not thermal expansion What are tides 20ft at some points then 20 miles easy 5 ft

[@digitalwolf9582]

This is good, but I need one more dumbed down to share with Climate Change deniers. More... more....more dumbed down than that.

[@ricktd6891]

P.S. There's no such thing as a "climate change denier." You use that slur because you were told to. Pitiful.

[@digitalwolf9582]

You're the worst kind of idiot. The kind that says I'm sorry, while the boat sinks, as if that helped in some way. @@ricktd6891

[@C-Here]

😅😅😅 Bingo!!

[@lloydsingline340]

Climate alarmists always play the "denier" card when challenged.They can't comprehend that unique planet earth revolves around the sun tilted at an angle of 23.5 degrees to the vertical.This ultimately determines global climates from EQUATOR to the POLES ( seasons etc ).DON'T kid yourself you will change this MUCH.

[@kimlibera663]

I think these young kids have never noticed that summers are pretty hot & that we have had plenty of 90 degree days before. In places like AZ/NM/Palm Springs, this is there biome so 100 is normal.

[@glory3339]

Why do we still have central means of electricity production? When the solution is already available. Solar panels + Solar Battery (I have this already and in summer my electricity use is 100% solar powered) on every house, building, warehouse, school, rooftop etc. All new cars are Electric cars immediately, the ones with or without solar panel rooftops (already available). Just bring it in, never mind the inconvenience - all new cars must be electric by 2023. All new small trucks must be something like a rivian or tesla cybertruck or equivalent. All new heavy trucks must be hydrogen or electric trucks. That would be a huge help

[@ricktd6891]

Stop pushing communism. Telling people what to do is communism. Get educated on the global warming scam.

[@C-Here]

Because the ultra rich greedy corporations want us dependant on them!!

[@lloydsingline340]

EV trucks and hydrogen powered trucks wouldn't be able to carry much freight!There would be increased danger of truck fires / explosion. Hydrogen as a power source?How is ZIGGY FORREST and his green hydrogen plans going?

[@glory3339]

@lloydsingline340 the tesla semi truck is more powerful and faster than a diesel truck, including when fully laden. I don't know about hydrogen, how powerful they are etc, but they already have them in California. Electric trucks are MORE powerful, much cheaper to run, faster, simpler to drive and safer than a diesel truck. I'm not affiliated with anyone. 100% renewable or hydrogen powered future IS possible, but it depends whether people are willing to look into it. By the way Pepsi cola bought a large fleet of electric trucks.

[@douglasengle2704]

Earth's greenhouse effect would be in heavy saturation if the strong greenhouse gas water vapor were the only greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. Noncondensing greenhouse gas behavior such as from carbon dioxide and methane do not warm the planet because they can not cause earth's greenhouse effect to retain anymore temperature. Greenhouse gas behavior is only active in earth's greenhouse effect that takes place within 20 meters of the surface. After that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation from the surface is considered to have been entirely absorbed by its weak interaction with the lumpy electrostatic fields of greenhouse gases. Its further heat transfer is by convection i.e. gas molecules bumping into each. The UN IPCC science reports when less than 200 pages only discuss greenhouse gases as a cause for global warming and very clearly state they they sampled their greenhouse gases at 20 thousands meters altitude far into stratosphere were water vapor is near zero. Global warming suddenly paused in the early 1990s at 1.1°C then dipped and recovered to be in 2022 1.1°C. There has been no notable change in these end-to-end global warming temperatures in thirty years..

[@SewayPL]

Do you actually think you're more qualified to make insights on climate change than the thousands of scientists worldwide who constantly refine their theories and models through data collection and peer review? What are your sources for this?

[@douglasengle2704]

@@SewayPL Totally, because what those "experts" are stating is based outside earth's greenhouse effect typically at 20,000 meters. See the truth is in the fine print. The UN IPCC only takes gas reading at 20,000 meters altitude according to their science reports. That have to state that, because all their analysis when pushed in a court room setting can be place back to that. It's well known science that all the inferred electromagnetic radiation for the earth's surface that is the energy of the greenhouse effect is considered completely absorbed within 20 meters of the surface. There is no energy left to further interact with greenhouse gasses. That was taught in my high school! Any science interested high school student should known that. The glaring aspect is global warming hasn't really changed much in the past thirty years prior to 2023! Global warming was reported 1.1°C in 1991. In 1994 it was announced global warming had paused in 1991. On average in 2023 CO2 has a 1/4% share of earth's greenhouse effect! With a 99 1/2% share of the greenhouse effect being on average is from water vapor. The greenhouse effect is in heavy saturation from water vapor without any other greenhouse gases. If you want to support scammers just keep on going the way you are without ever reading the UN IPCC science reports. I have. Al Gore's carbon dioxide warming the planet fraud has made life impossible for many scientists and some engineers. The legal back stop is they are clear and transparent they only took their gas samples at 20,000 meters altitude and not within 20 meters of the surface where earth's greenhouse effect takes place.

[@ricktd6891]

I can save you some time. CO2 doesn't control the temperature of Earth. The hypothesis failed.

[@ricktd6891]

@@SewayPL Sorry but thousands of scientists don't think the world is coming to an end because of CO2. Stop believing government lies.

[@SewayPL]

@ricktd6891 co2 absorbs and reradiates heat. It absolutely leads to a greenhouse effect which warms the planet. You're making a non-scientific statement without any sources

[@ManojIniya]

😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@LarryClark-h1v]

Gonzalez Edward Lewis John Martin Michael

[@hpillsbury06]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iIK1oqVvlM-qa6s

[@citationsloth]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nmfIpKqffph-gsUsi=MwE6n9E-_8MVnv9a Idiot

[@will-fullyblindorwill-fullystu]

WOW....unbelievable the intelectual failures. IF the earth warmed about 5 degrees...where did the ice go?

[@Rick-yk5qb]

There should be more CO2 in the atmosphere, not less. Get a clue.

[@MahamRizwan-dx6ey]

there should be a balance

[@Rick-yk5qb]

@@MahamRizwan-dx6ey Oh really? At what level is CO2 balanced? What's the perfect level of atmospheric CO2?

[@Rick-yk5qb]

Sorry Greg. Did you remove your post because you realized you don't know what you're talking about?

[@epicchocolate1866]

@@Rick-yk5qbwhere did you get your credentials I’m curious, I’d love to hear about your research models?

[@SovannPheng-g2u]

e

[@shankarprasadchakraborty]

Theburningearth

[@ricktd6891]

Check the facts. The Earth is historically cold right now.

[@maroonmaroonmaroon2985]

@@ricktd6891it’s historically beetle * right now

[@bondo6506]

Alarmist propaganda, devoid of science, 'n facts,....

[@JXKVERT402]

there is no global warming so da video is not right

[@rps1689]

Science moves on from well established conclusions to areas of less certainty such as quantifying anthropogenic global warming in the presence of large feedbacks like clouds and water vapour. AGW is hardly the most important or interesting area of climate research because it is occurring and is settled. i.e., it’s a baseline. Just as evolution is the baseline for evolutionary biology.

[@BraveNewUs]

Liars

[@lancer0327]

Proof?

[@BraveNewUs]

@@lancer0327 wheres yours to say there is? Their scientists that they own? Or the ones that get silenced. They been saying it for the last 60 years, we going to flood, we going to burn because of ozone, we going into an ice age on and on to charge us climate tax. Why dont you look at patents for weather manipulation. Its there just google it

[@BraveNewUs]

@@lancer0327 funny that my comment disappeared

[@BraveNewUs]

They been saying the same for over 60 years, ice age, then all gona be underwater, then we all going to burn etc ect.

[@BraveNewUs]

They own the science and the facts, they say this themselves. Whilst other scientists are silenced.

[@jykke638]

bullshit

[@ShellyRossx]

so why are u watching the video ?

[@citationsloth]

How so

[@ricktd6891]

Lies, lies and more lies.

[@Matrix-e8j]

Fake news

[@buzzlightyearlight1247]

French fry news

[@TheresaTownsend-oj4se]

Wow amazing thank you