In the last PAR example are you getting the 28 from the numbers in the 2x2 table? I think it should be 280 (840/3000 = 280/1000) resulting in a PAR of 260 and a PAR% of 93%
@soltman459 жыл бұрын
if you did 840/100,000 it wouldn't make sense because you should be assuming your sample is representative given it is a cohort study (relative risk was used).
@suni66096 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@ametemihret16325 жыл бұрын
I really like the presentation. But I don't understand how does PAR is calculated because we have given town population of 100000 and I think we have to use it as general population. When we start calculate, it will give us 840/100000. And incidence for unexposed will be calculated as 40/2000.
@kamrankhanutmankhail17098 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a such great demo. I just don't get how you calculate incidence for general population in last when you were talking about population attributable risk which is 28.
@brunavieira64827 жыл бұрын
Really, amazing video! Thank you very much! Just one question, how do you calculate the Incidence Non-Exposed (n=20) in the last PAR example? (44:01)
@atifbhore77406 жыл бұрын
Bruna Vieira 40 by 2000 can be reduced to 20 by 1000.
@tinak78618 жыл бұрын
Great video! Made things much more clearer to understand, Thank you! :)
@nateswank99568 жыл бұрын
When you are talking about incidence rate around minute 20, aren't you meaning prevalence. Because you are taking the number of people with the health related outcome and dividing it by the total number of people in that group? This could be incidence if you are saying the numbers right of the 2x2 are the total person years.
@mohamedelbahnasawy10816 жыл бұрын
100*(40/2000)=2 Great lecture. but i think population attributable risk in exposed is 2 instead of 20
@23bleak6 жыл бұрын
Finding this has reassured me!
@kosengtavanh29316 жыл бұрын
Amazing lecture, can understand easily. Could you explain about the Population Attributable Risk Percent (PARP). Is it the same with PAR? Or what is the different among them? Also the advance study design like Case-Crossover Study design?? Thank you very much.
@djj25647 жыл бұрын
Best lecture! 48 min video took my teacher 12 hours to explain xD
@abdisamedshugri99259 жыл бұрын
wow, i get more really thank you so much the way you teach us and summarized huge issues about this section
@martarose66337 жыл бұрын
God am in love with you thank you very much this is very helpful ❤️
@mariam111888 жыл бұрын
Such an amazing video!! That was really helpful!!!
@beckybett12068 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture👏👏
@preshmore7 жыл бұрын
Awesome lecture... thank you very much
@sujalamathema71178 жыл бұрын
I am a bit confused. Is attributable risk percentage and attributable fraction the same term?
@broytingaravsol7 жыл бұрын
for the part with non-exposed but well response, is there any inherent correlation to members of other parts?
@zknolz9 жыл бұрын
very good lecture, thank you!
@skillmanlaw27 жыл бұрын
population attributed risk cost taxpayers, this example shows in our public education with the many problems and cost effectives on a continuous financial increase. Cases determined for the future with dependant variables needing Community services predicted. No school child wants to grow up and not be able to take care of their family.😎
@lindacourtien47899 жыл бұрын
This was very helpful to me. Thanks for posting this!
@mohamedhussein81265 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤✌
@mavisabaya56018 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot!
@Med.School.Survival8 жыл бұрын
Great presentation :)
@theafricanobserver87858 жыл бұрын
excellent! thank you very much
@Godfearing-bm2kh8 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much but I just don't understand how you got 28 for the PAR and the PAR% at the end. How can I get your lecture notes.
@actabdo8 жыл бұрын
840/3000=0.28
@23bleak6 жыл бұрын
The presentation is really helpful until PAR. I don't know where the 20 comes from. I get 2. Population Attributable Risk (PAR) = Total incidence in general (not just exposure) population - Incidence in unexposed group PAR = (840/3000 x 100) - (40/2000 x 100) = 28 - 2 = 26 per 1000 people Could anybody explain otherwise :)??
@23bleak6 жыл бұрын
This would make the PAR% = 93% i.e. if you public health made an effort to eradicate the toxic susbstances from the factory it would reduce the risk of lung cancer in population by 93%. Based on this example.
@Aj-zq2xx6 жыл бұрын
Hi Guys, I think there is an error in this. For PAR = Incidence of Disease in Population - Incidence of Disease in Nonexposed. PAR % Is a proportion of this difference divided by the Incidence of Disease in the Population. Can also be expressed as (1- Incidence of Disease in Nonexposed)/ Incidence of Disease in Population
@Aj-zq2xx6 жыл бұрын
Incidence in Population is calculated by (Incidence of Exposed x Percentage of Exposed in Population) + (Incidence of NonExposed x Percentage of Nonexposed in Population). Note: Percentage of exposed/nonexposed should be a proportion and the Incidence is marked as a proportion as well. Multiply by the base as needed - Additionally, the question should indicate the number of individuals exposed to the risk factor which allows us to calculate for Percentage Nonexposed and Percentage Exposed.
@TheEphemeralEternity7 жыл бұрын
Thank you ma'am, you don't know how much of a help you have been.
@broytingaravsol7 жыл бұрын
how to construct the time frame for a no-disease outcome and a disease-developed outcome?
@hassanahmedjama3216 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much lectural i have got alot of useful lessons about Epid
@kimhansson87566 жыл бұрын
Good video, thank you!
@angadsingh98679 жыл бұрын
thanks
@karienicholas67118 жыл бұрын
This was so helpful. Thank you.
@kayanjastephen467 жыл бұрын
thanks you have helped me understand the logic of 2x2 table
@BenMadibacheabu7 жыл бұрын
Cogent and straight to the point! Keep it up.
@sawsanmasharqa787810 жыл бұрын
Thank you :)
@drsaimairam157 жыл бұрын
wonderful. you made the concept clear
@abirmohamed1616 жыл бұрын
awesome, thank you so much
@sureshkumar-vs1jj7 жыл бұрын
thanks mam....
@matteyw237 жыл бұрын
Nice Lecture
@blanchardmbay14577 жыл бұрын
Great
@jenniferbertrand18198 жыл бұрын
Thank you for helping make sense of these concepts.
@clinicalpharmacologypublic62428 жыл бұрын
+Jennifer Bertrand Thank you and Do Subscribe
@bunidan23819 жыл бұрын
thanks
@clinicalpharmacologypublic62429 жыл бұрын
Liked Your Comment... Keep Watching and Do Subscribe .....