Star Trek the next Generation (Williams 1993)- Pinball FX - Super Jackpot and the Final Frontier!

[@antonvlasjuk3079]

Best Superpin ( Williams/ Bally DMD widebody pins were called Superpins)!!

[@LUPsClub]

well done doc !

[@pplbob5058]

Well done as usual Dan.... Im still not buying it for now. Maybe once it's on sale but but this one Williams table every blue moon doesn't cut it for me. I will stick with my 700+ vpx tables for a while.

[@PinStratsDan]

I keep on supporting Zen for keeping digital mainstream by buying their Williams tables. But yeah, I probably won't play the FX version ever again as the VPX version is far superior.

[@TerryRed]

Do you have Ray Trace and shadows enabled? Also... turn the GAMMA settings down (in FX video settings). It makes a HUGE difference in how good the Williams tables can look. (yours seems a bit bright)

[@PinStratsDan]

Thanks! I can't remember what I have enabled but will take a look.

[@pinballwiz45b]

Warp levels don't carry from ball to ball.

[@Skellotronix]

Are they supposed to? This table is fun from what I've played I want it but this drip feeding is the worst.

[@PinStratsDan]

Thanks for pointing it out... you are right, they don't carry over. I can't tell you why I thought they did as they have never on any version I've played ;-) . I changed it in my description.

[@PinStratsDan]

no... I was just mistaken.

[@pinballwiz45b]

@@PinStratsDan I also have 5.3 billion on the real thing. Multiball being easy to start is a feature on this game, as is Final Frontier. You can plunge the 3rd lock for multiball; other IRL videos show it. I do not see any Operator adjustments on shots for Artifacts, either. It's by design. Zen's recreation of this is quite faithful.

[@PinStratsDan]

@pinballwiz45b I'm more talking about the 60+ million scores already on the leaderboard 😉. But yeah, you are right. The game is on the easier side for scoring big. I guess I'm just not a fan of the easy 450 mil extra ball and the artifacts seem to come easily compared to what I'm used to.

[@tomi5577.]

Great score! Hmm.. weird physics, ugly ball look.

[@Urko2005]

Video isnt ultra crisp mind.

[@PinStratsDan]

@Urko2005 nothing wrong with the video. FX base gama value is too high as Terry pointed out. People commenting are used to VPX graphics and physics which are leaps and bounds ahead of FX (the best tables e.g. VPW mods).

[@Urko2005]

@@PinStratsDan sorry my bad i was downloading something and interfered with image when i was watching.

[@claudiocalise3940]

Comprato oggi su PlayStation

[@dominos7492]

ok the physics is better than in fx3 but the graphics are worse.

[@PinStratsDan]

I won't say the physics is better... it is rather a different kind of OK 😉. I agree though that the graphics is not great. One thing particular that don't look good to me is the ball texture.

[@Urko2005]

Its the video, FX graphics are awesome.

[@claudiocalise3940]

La fisica è peggiorata tanto rispetto fx3, anche la grafica è inferiore rispetto fx3