4 billion people did not fly last year. 4 billion flight tickets were sold and used, many by repeat customers.
@joachimpetersen23015 жыл бұрын
Even if it was about 1 billion people thats still an amazing achievement.
@kuddin90215 жыл бұрын
Schoolboy error
@hhealey7195 жыл бұрын
matt taylor it's like saying 2000 cars crossed a bridge in a year but half were the same cars on different days... Same thing
@JuiceAddiction5 жыл бұрын
Ye some people travel 2-3x per week
@oida100005 жыл бұрын
@Jose Andrade Not all of these people came from Georgia, though you are properly right.
@evanposocco24875 жыл бұрын
"Will supersonic jets challenge Boeing and Airbus"? * checks calendar to make sure it's 2019 not 1969 *
@mro94665 жыл бұрын
Evan Posocco or 2169 :)
@slamdunk1185 жыл бұрын
lol I know right, super sonic technology is not safe
@jacklesg25275 жыл бұрын
There was no Airbus 1969.
@jxsilicon95 жыл бұрын
@@slamdunk118 It's safe but expensive to use in commercial. Just look at the maintenance costs on fighter jets. You would need government to subsidize it.
@AerisReyha5 жыл бұрын
@@slamdunk118 It's safe like other... But not efficient... Why commercial jet engine don't use supersonic engine, because supersonic engine need more fuel with higher hot air to cool air ratio... Even without any cool air output... Commercial jet engine use higher cool air output than hot air output... So that's why its not as fast as supersonic jet engine but its efficient in fuel...
@brianmo29655 жыл бұрын
*Wendover Productions: Breathing heavily*
@bigtechinsights48495 жыл бұрын
LOL
@danielcuevas58995 жыл бұрын
Stepping on Wendovers turf I see.
@safye45 жыл бұрын
Wendover would have correct facts and images..
@30769s5 жыл бұрын
@@safye4 and he would have a more entertaining video
@MassDynamic5 жыл бұрын
not even registering in his radar.
@shotsfiredandmissed90685 жыл бұрын
and he would have nice 3d art modelling than this
@DA-bm2mj5 жыл бұрын
so by your logic CNBC should NEVER EVER make a video about the aviation industry, just because there is Wendover channel that's already making videos on this topic? how interesting...
@XpertPilotFSX5 жыл бұрын
"Spirit and frontier only operate Airbus" *Proceeds to show a picture of a Boeing 747 in the background*
@lastblueride55 жыл бұрын
The Concorde wasn't at fault for its crash, it was a DC-10's fault. A broken part of the DC-10 had fallen on the runway just before the Concorde had taken off from the same runway five minutes ago.
@nickskier15 жыл бұрын
But the crash increased peoples concerns about the planes safety even if it wasn't at its own fault
@lastblueride55 жыл бұрын
nickskier1 how did it raise concerns about the Concorde’s safety? The plane was not the cause of the crash
@nickskier15 жыл бұрын
@@lastblueride5 People just had this misconception that the plane wasn't safe. The crash just reassured those people that had those feelings even though facts didnt back them up
@austinreid39515 жыл бұрын
well technically it was the DC-10s fault, but it was Air Frances fault the plane crashed. The Tires when they hit the scrap from the DC-10 exploded, and tore into the Concords wing, something that wouldnt of happened had they keep maintenance up to scratch
@pikaplays245 жыл бұрын
It's just always the DC-10
@Tackleberry6665 жыл бұрын
Waiting for chinese knock offs; Boink and Airfuss
@gamba46055 жыл бұрын
Jajs
@InForTheLonghaul5 жыл бұрын
@Cumulus Humilis He's not saying that planes don't mostly follow a similar concept and design principle. He's referencing China's hilarious lack of even trying to appear as if they're innovating, with products such as the Polystation, the GameChild, airPhone 4, Michealsoft Binbows, Star Wart, Sunbucks coffee, King Burgur and Pizza Huh.
@d.a.g.c9615 жыл бұрын
hahhahaha
@mukundthorat56725 жыл бұрын
It will be Choeing and Chibus.
@InForTheLonghaul5 жыл бұрын
@@mukundthorat5672 GACHIIBASS
@erikbuiten145 жыл бұрын
“Safety comes with a hefty price tag” well, looks like Boeing shopped during the sale... #mcas
@masonlovesroblox3 жыл бұрын
MCAS May Crash Any Second
@jeanlucc993 жыл бұрын
MCAS Money Comes Above Safety
@icanpooptwiceadayyay87713 жыл бұрын
MCAS May cause abrupt suicide
@icanpooptwiceadayyay87713 жыл бұрын
MCAS My controls are stuck Help....
@goldwinger54345 жыл бұрын
How did it get to be a duopoly? Why could the commercial aircraft industry not support a host of companies like McDonnell Douglas,, Convair, Lockheed, DeHaviland, etc.? That's what I was expecting this video to be.
@junobeckers98025 жыл бұрын
Gold Winger, that’s fairly simple. It was pure competition. There simply wasn’t the demand for so many aircraft manufacturers. Airlines prefer a single or dual manufactured fleet, that just saves tremendously in cost (training, repairs, maintenance and overall flexibility). Boeing and Airbus offer a wide range of aircraft families, so one brand of jets can basically fly all routes. Something that Lockheed, Convair and DH did not offer. For MDD, they where struck by low profits due to heavy competition on their DC-10&MD-11, resulting in an easy takeover by Boeing. You have to realize that with such low profit margins everything needs to be squeezed to perfection. The issue with new emerging aircraft is the simple lack of knowledge. Take the SSJ100 as an example, an overall good performer, but just due to inexperience in maintenance related tasks, repairs take long and therefore operating them is much more expensive. Imo, the only way to break it, is by creating an revolutionary aircraft that solves the climate impact of flight. (Something of which supersonic flight is the exact opposite)
@heavyizthacrown-58425 жыл бұрын
Gold Winger *EXACTLY!* And we didn’t get an answer. I learned nothing here.
@ethanbrody80035 жыл бұрын
Wasn't McDonnell Douglas bought by Boeing.
@rolandxb35815 жыл бұрын
@@heavyizthacrown-5842 the most helpful way of thinking about it is economies of scale. You are only competitive in the aircraft manufacturing industry if you research and build a huge number of planes. If instead, you are a smaller company, that'll halve the number of planes sold, which would require the manufacturer to almost double the price to regain investment costs. This price increase instantly makes you uncompetitive. Only Boeing and Airbus size companies can truly compete given the size of the market.
@hahaLOLhaha725 жыл бұрын
boing bought mcd
@mattforner5 жыл бұрын
I enjoy flying both Boeing and Airbus jets. I've flown the Boeing 787 on American, United, and Air Canada, and will be flying the Airbus A-350 on Delta in a couple of months. In reality, they are pretty much the same...if anything, it's the airlines that operate them at treat passengers differently and ask for different design specs (like wider seats, more legroom, greater pitch, etc.)
@bigchungus26672 жыл бұрын
My ass fits perfectly on the a320neo, but hey every pilot has their preferences 😄
@PeteSimpson5 жыл бұрын
You said "the Concorde was short lived", hey, what? The Concorde flew for almost 30 years, how exactly is that short lived???
@unknownname89885 жыл бұрын
There is a new concorde coming out soon. The original concorde is owned by British airways and they refuse to sell the rights
@foxy94035 жыл бұрын
It is short lived tho... 30 year is not big deal in business model who's rivals are 90+ year old
@zhe85865 жыл бұрын
atif waheed. You are mixing two topics. Commercial supersonic aviation was short lived. But his point was, Concord, one aircraft model, did serve for 30 years which is NOT too short, considering average life for a commercial airliner is approximately 20 years.
@MrKamaboko4 жыл бұрын
Duopoly you say? Corona: How's about Nopoly
@xaifer24854 жыл бұрын
I love how talked about boeings history but left out McDonald Douglas
@daviddima60675 жыл бұрын
Everybody: omg new aibus plane. Omg new boeing plane. Embraer, bombardier, ATR: you guys mocking us right ?
@madingwang77785 жыл бұрын
avgeeks breathing heavily while watching this video
@OLGMC5 жыл бұрын
Fingers ready at the keyboard just in case there is a false fact in the video 😂
@rithvikgujjula14005 жыл бұрын
@@OLGMC lol
@victornderu1435 жыл бұрын
As a plane enthusiast, this was very fun to watch and you did a good job.
@mikehunt5455 жыл бұрын
I got as far as 4 billion people flew last year and quit watching
@michaelrodeback19565 жыл бұрын
The statistic comes from 4 Billion passenger deboardings not 4 Billion different people. Meaning if you have one connection on your way from New York to Los Angeles you count as two people that year.
@nickrowe74515 жыл бұрын
Concorde’s days were short lived *lasted 27 YEARS*
@mk3a5 жыл бұрын
*34 (it's last flight was in 2003)
@stefancodrin5 жыл бұрын
But how long did the production last?
@johnmuthan2864 жыл бұрын
@@stefancodrin from 65 to 79
@tpmiranda5 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: The Aérospatiale-BAC Concorde had technology and features that were transferred to Airbus airplanes, and the Concorde eventually became technically supported by Airbus, as Aérospatiale became a stakeholder, and later part, of Airbus. In fact, the French Concordes and the A300 were both built/assembled in Toulouse, home of Sud Aviation, one of the predecessors of Aérospatiale and Airbus.
@hobie16135 жыл бұрын
It’s really cessna that rules the skies
@beernpizzalover90355 жыл бұрын
Hj Aviation In general aviation, yes; but we’re talking commercial aviation here.
@hobie16135 жыл бұрын
beernpizzalover haha I know
@jkjkjk1005 жыл бұрын
i flew only skyhawk and corporate gulfstream and embraer in 2017... the only year with no boeing or airbus.
@ethank56815 жыл бұрын
Cessna is smaller than Uber for year on year growth
@alexotkerson77774 жыл бұрын
nah 600kts Hot air Ballons rule the skies
@breezy17365 жыл бұрын
Did anyone notice at 2:43 they said "they drew up plans for a short hall European Airbus" THEY SHOWED DRAWINGS OF A BOEING 747!!! WTF
@zhenjiang94783 жыл бұрын
"Spirit and frontier only operate Airbus" Proceeds to show a picture of a Boeing 747 in the background
@aurorajones84815 жыл бұрын
I hate lobbying. The idea of a corporation giving money to government officials to go against the public (which is what our government is SUPPOSE TO DO WORK FOR THE PUBLIC) is despicable and should be illegal.
@user-xd4sk4pk7h5 жыл бұрын
I agree, big companies own the government
@AndjongoRaoul5 жыл бұрын
Lobbying is the legal word for bribe!
@kashmirha5 жыл бұрын
It's the same as alcohol. Better to regulate than benning it.
@BillAnt5 жыл бұрын
That's just the way it is, and probably always will be. He who's closest to the fire will stay warm... as they say. ;D
@Bvic35 жыл бұрын
When you work, you discover another face of lobbyism. The state administration has no technical competence. Corporations negotiate between themselves and the government work as an arbiter. Also, everyone who worked on technical lobbyism will tell you how NGO lobbyists are a bunch a stupid people who have no idea what they are talking about.
@zemlidrakona29155 жыл бұрын
Next video up: Why Airbus Dominates The Sky.....
@manlystan1005 жыл бұрын
@ Zemli Drakona: 👍😂🤣🤣🤣
@anonymousfox3455 жыл бұрын
oooof poor boeing
@AdamSmith-gs2dv5 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousfox345 Seems like buying McDonnell Douglas has cursed them
@guillaumeromain66945 жыл бұрын
Because boeing made big poopy in its trousers - again
@BillAnt5 жыл бұрын
"If it ain't a Boeing, I aint't going" :D Especially with no yoke on Airbus planes, nope I don't think so. What the hell will a pilot do, start pressing buttons in case of an emergency dive?! It's laughable.
@katherineberger63295 жыл бұрын
The airplane at 1:17-1:20 is not a Boeing airplane; it's a B-18 Bolo, manufactured by rival Douglas Airplane Company and based on Douglas' then-successful DC-2 civilian airliner.
@hyraxist5 жыл бұрын
I hate the way cnbc criticise the concorde. It lived a long time from 1976 to 2003 that's quite a while. I am skeptical of a supersonic aircraft coming from the USA I doubt we shall see that.
@Topper_Harley685 жыл бұрын
And the crash was caused by another aircraft that lost a part on the runway.
@beernpizzalover90355 жыл бұрын
Agreed. It's such a small, niche market - I think like 1% - that could actually afford to fly it...
@romanbaranovichi53755 жыл бұрын
It was a massive loss leader at best, certainly made no money in operation, and wasn't even that comfortable.
@Topper_Harley685 жыл бұрын
The Concorde flew right over me and it was the most awesome sound i have ever heard. Jim breuer explains it here. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWXZfmprp7iDgNU
@tams8055 жыл бұрын
@@romanbaranovichi5375 Air France had some financial problems with it, but British Airways made a tidy profit off of it. The future was looking bleak for it though as the cost of maintenance on what were then old aircraft was increasing. That British Airways and Air France pretty much got the aircraft for free definitely made them profitable.
@Giratina19995 жыл бұрын
I feel bad for all the people stomped in the way of the duopoly: Bombardier, McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed Martin, Ilyushin, Antonnov, Dassault, and more :/
@alexandrlarson72525 жыл бұрын
Boeing merged with McDonnell Douglas and it nearly ruined Boeing. Ilyushin made inefficient uneconomical planes. Antonov did the same except with cargo planes. Dassault, in a classic French move made a plane that would only really make sense over the 737 for airlines based in France and other Central European airlines. Lockheed Martin is mainly military but when they did try to make a commercial jet they made an Airbus style mistake and did a terrible job estimating demand and trusting Rolls Royce to make an engine.
@Scriptedviolince5 жыл бұрын
@@alexandrlarson7252 Less that they trusted Rolls Royce to make an engine and more that they trusted Rolls Royce to make a new engine and actually deliver it on time. Their actual jet was amazing, but due to the British, the DC-10 came out first.
@alexandrlarson72525 жыл бұрын
@Samuel Wang I know that the engine that they eventually provided was good, but it was so late that it ruined the L-1011’s chances against the dc-10.
@Clipper10945 жыл бұрын
LM is doing just fine.
@Giratina19995 жыл бұрын
Clipper1094 they are, but not in the market of passenger aircraft
@TheKilman1025 жыл бұрын
Chevy and Ford? Todays Chevy and Ford? I would rather walk... (Mechanic)
@farislatif88464 жыл бұрын
That eagle just chilling there when the plane lending LOL
@AndreasRSD5 жыл бұрын
4:20 puts a 747 when mentioning airbus.
@kerol59055 жыл бұрын
"safety comes with a hefty price tag" Then Boeing Max MCAS scandal happened...
@syxepop5 жыл бұрын
carol, that was because "Boing" wanted to "cheap out" (bad software and too large engines for the wing size)...
@jeffreyfong55265 жыл бұрын
Lol they’re talking about China but @10:01 literally says Singapore
@jarodhara37615 жыл бұрын
Actually good reporting on aviation from the media! It is good for the average person to understand. Yeah sure there are minor mistakes but they are more then negligible. Keep it up!
@rithvikgujjula14005 жыл бұрын
4:23 sees a 747 in an "All Airbus Fleet"
@cnn787-i9e2 жыл бұрын
Used to have 4 manufacturers of wide body aircrafts, Boeing Airbus, McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed
@Av8r_rome5 жыл бұрын
5:55 “If you consider that airlines today carry three billion passengers with a B, aviation globally and kills fewer than 500 of them” That was worded terribly
@badmanno.16504 жыл бұрын
2019: I'm about to end Boeing's whole career..
@winstona36464 жыл бұрын
2020: I'm about to end the whole industry.
@osasunaitor4 жыл бұрын
2021: I'm about to end the whole humanity's career
@joshuahibbs46395 жыл бұрын
Maybe the reason there is only 2 major air commercial jet airliner makers is because it takes alot of money and R&D in order to bring a jet to market. Not to mention the goverment hoops and loops that you got jump through in order get your plane approved for manufacturing as a plane crashing is a big no no. Besides who as a commercial airplane carrier like Delta or United want to own 5 or 6 different planes from 5 or 6 different manufacturers just means alot more hassle to get replacement and new parts for the fleet of planes....
@krashd5 жыл бұрын
The 707 didn't pave the way, the Comet paved the way. Grrr!
@Wirgah5 жыл бұрын
But the Comet basically failed
@supersixjones89055 жыл бұрын
@kenjryker Try again. Boeing introduced the worlds first pressurized airliner in 1938, the 307 stratoliner. Boeing pioneered the NOW STANDARD configuration of swept wing pod mounted engines with the B-47 at a time when Dehavilland was still using wood in their air frame construction in the late 1940s and then again with the B-52 . They did'nt need to "stand on the shoulders of the British" as you put it. The 707 and Comet share absolutely nothing. The Comet was the first commercial jetliner, but the 707 was the first SUCCESSFUL commercial jetliner. DH did it first, but Boeing did it right.
@jamesrodrigues73915 жыл бұрын
Concorde" short-lived" flew from 1969 - 2003 not that short-lived as most of the aircraft were over 25 years when retired and the loss of only one aircraft in the service life of the Aircraft .it had its issues but they were rather Graceful.
@solid13785 жыл бұрын
Both companies receive huge government subsidies.
@votes-haveconsequences21655 жыл бұрын
Not true! Boeing is a Government Contractor! Go back to school and get an education before you open you big mouth! The five country consortium of Airbus is subsidized by those country origins! Boeing does not receive any US government subsidies.
@berndarndt99245 жыл бұрын
@@votes-haveconsequences2165 lul
@d.a.g.c9615 жыл бұрын
@@votes-haveconsequences2165 Yeeah... That's why Boeing had a contract with iag and Airbus had no idea a about it, commonwhealth power...
@coolg9635 жыл бұрын
There is so much that's wrong with this video, here are two. - 4 billion customers, not 4 billion unique individuals -lots of people don't just use Boeing and Airbus jets. Embraer jets are very big in regional activities for example.
@lukefurey14025 жыл бұрын
yes many airports rely on regional jets to operate on
@user-wt6lb3lu4y5 жыл бұрын
did you even watch the video???
@farzana66765 жыл бұрын
It literally spoke about Bombardier and Embraer. So much wrong with your comment.
@arbaz795 жыл бұрын
True.Those 4bn aren't different individual but same people travelling frequently.
@jamelfergusson5 жыл бұрын
Here we go here we got another FSX pilot who is know it all
@hedgehog31805 жыл бұрын
That guy talked about air safety like it was amazing, only 500 deaths. Like that's not actually the record for safest travel. High Speed Rail hasn't had a single death since 2011 and the oldest high speed rail network, the Japanese Shinkansen has not had a single death for it's over 50 years of operation. It's kinda impossible to beat perfect.
@tams8055 жыл бұрын
That comes with high-speed rail running the ground. It's much slower though, pretty much financially impossible to do over long stretches of water (or rather under) and more expensive to construct and run. It's often a lot cheaper and quicker in Japan to travel by air than by high-speed rail (including time to get to an airport and go through security). That's provided the place even has high-speed rail.
@josephsmith82755 жыл бұрын
Feels like they’ve skipped a ton why 707 became dominant and history behind airbus which began as Caravelle and concord manufacturer sud aviation partnering with BAC which is currently BAE systems and why McDonnell Douglas and Lockheed gave up on the market.
@votes-haveconsequences21655 жыл бұрын
McDonnell Douglas did not give up on the market like Lockheed did. McDonnell Douglas was bought by Boeing due to how the economic market was running in the 1990's. Historically it's been speculated that McDonnell Douglas may have had a reverse economic advantage to buy Boeing at the tail end of the first 747 flying... cash flow!
@josephsmith82755 жыл бұрын
votes- have consequences huh interesting. Wonder what would have happened if MD bought Boeing during the 747 crash
@solace6695 жыл бұрын
The reason budget airline don't switch manufacturers is not because of it being expensive. In fact it is to make more money than most other airlines. Southwest only flies the 737 and Easy jet only flies the A319, A320, and A321. This is so that ground crews and flight staff only have to be trained on one type of aircraft thus lowering the amount of specialized workers they have to hire, and reducing the amount of time they have to spend training their employees.
@Rc2Go5 жыл бұрын
Noob Slayer so in other words it is expensive... to train employees
@solace6695 жыл бұрын
@@Rc2Go I think that he stated that the planes themselves were more expensive, or he at least eluded to that.
@dylanpower14385 жыл бұрын
Say thripple 7 not 777
@thestrangeman0695 жыл бұрын
Dylan Power Easy there, Mike Tyson
@jamesgurney65765 жыл бұрын
Why, bombardier way to go
@KeithMetoyer5 жыл бұрын
THripple??
@thedefergynetwork39545 жыл бұрын
Ok the thripple 7 is a good airplane.
@MCMXCVI-April5 жыл бұрын
Triple 7, 75, 76, etc that’s how to did it at ATL
@waseemsam79755 жыл бұрын
Airbus likes competition help improve and develop. Boeing fears competition so buys the companies over. Sad truth but Airbus is way ahead with technology.
@lootgamesyt-97695 жыл бұрын
Waseem Sam fax
@maxsaviation9512 Жыл бұрын
Good truth actually since airbus is great!
@funnynickline5 жыл бұрын
🙌 "Air Bus winner oh hey youw the KING ever,,,."🙌
@mgbot91814 жыл бұрын
Airbus and Boeing dominate mid range to long haul. Embraer and bombardier dominate short haul
@HM-zy2sz5 жыл бұрын
I think it's time for Toyota and Honda make commercial planes.
@stephenh59445 жыл бұрын
Honda does make corporate jets.
@laserbeam38365 жыл бұрын
@@stephenh5944 and mitsubishi
@fidalgoverde4 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Great work.Very easy to watch. Lots of valuable information.
@Twatical5 жыл бұрын
Aircraft economics has got to be the most interesting and unintuitive thing ever
@alboree35 жыл бұрын
This video is all over the place. This is a result of what you get when you cut and paste from other people's work
@GOREilla.5 жыл бұрын
Reason: POLITICS
@tomhughes96395 жыл бұрын
Luv ya Joe. Got the goose bumps. True friendship. Thanks for sharing Casey. You are the best.
@advaitunni80995 жыл бұрын
CNBC lady: ...the “seven seven seven” x Me and all aviation fans: *cries in aviation* It’s pronounced *TRIPLE SEVEN* you guys don’t know anything about Aviation just leave it to Wendover .
@unnamedny5 жыл бұрын
Don't be fooled by list price of planes. List price is like MSRP for car. Planes are sold at big discounts. Actual delivery price might be around 20% less if not more.
@Havoc_ow5 жыл бұрын
An airbus A350-1000ulr is going to be made soon. Probably in the late 2019 or early 2020. Probably a Neo Engine Option(Neo)
@cruisertechgt5 жыл бұрын
Kerezone hope GYG
@ryandymond21953 жыл бұрын
5:08 It is not 7-7-7, triple 7 (777) is the most common and better-sounding way to say it.
@hyouzanren18465 жыл бұрын
These 2 company always have a dinner together and discuss how to fool their customers!
@justmepenz25765 жыл бұрын
Shootout to my hometown, wpic 12:48 Its not that often anymore but i always thought those booms where somekind of loud accident
@igotes5 жыл бұрын
I really enjoy travelling domestic flights in a Dash 8, watching the landing gear emerge from under the engine is spectacular. The A320 is incredibly boring by comparison. However, for intercontinental flight I'd expect Airbus or Boeing. Boring but tried and tested.
@ryandymond21953 жыл бұрын
It seems like Airbus and Boeing can't be stopped by any other manufacturers! Only Airbus can stop Boeing and only Boeing can stop Airbus. Right now, Airbus is winning in the battle against Boeing. Good Job Airbus
@grandiora5 жыл бұрын
"Its definitely a well regulated industry, I don't think there's any question about that" - "expert" Samual Engel. Two month later...Boeing gets exposed that it's essentially regulating itself on safety lol.
@largesoda17295 жыл бұрын
Without any knowledge of aircraft, one may be at awe to see that Cessna sold over 44,000 of their C172 aircraft and have had thousands sold for the 182, 152 and more. That's thrice more than the number of 737s ever produced.
@Agtsmirnoff5 жыл бұрын
Those aren't commercial aircraft....
@abedied15 жыл бұрын
Most air travelers have to consider the time spent getting to the airport as well.
@notmanynamesleft5 жыл бұрын
Airbus will now be king of the sky for the foreseeable future since the Max has failed so epically.
@themanwnoname34544 жыл бұрын
2020(G) “Respect and dignity.” Furthermore:
@aacoimbra5 жыл бұрын
You clearly have to do more research...
@JustinLHopkins5 жыл бұрын
Oh please, do enlighten us with your knowledge.
@jgborn5 жыл бұрын
He’s right, there are a large amount of errors in this.
@michaelrodeback19565 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say that it was very incorrect factually. There are errors but it's better than most. The problem is that it doesn't tell us why, but more of what has happened with the two companies.
@hanj315 жыл бұрын
Boeing and airbus will be a duopoly in the commercial aviation market for the rest of time
@gbautgbautmann12425 жыл бұрын
My answer: innovation, quality, experience, framework
@gbautgbautmann12425 жыл бұрын
@Judean People's Front can you please explain why?
@enigmatic88664 жыл бұрын
Lobby, lobby lobby
@AnuragShahB5 жыл бұрын
What about Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ)?
@robinmorgenstern99275 жыл бұрын
they have like 2 orders for that thing.
@christopherbazaka15645 жыл бұрын
@@robinmorgenstern9927 thats gotta be like %50 or close right?
@bd85945 жыл бұрын
They delayed the delivery date over and over again.
@mebinac5 жыл бұрын
Or there Honda jet?
@hergi-tp9ve5 жыл бұрын
It’s part of that 1%, while boeing and airbus are 99%
@Spido68_the_spectator5 жыл бұрын
Just why didn't you speak about the first pressurised plane, the 347? (Considered as the first modern airliner).
@petergonzsanz5 жыл бұрын
France, Germany, Spain and United Kingdom are the owners of Airbus. You missed Spain.
@freewal5 жыл бұрын
Airbus is basically a French/German company; the whole management is french and german. The weight of others countries is not significant. Spain and U.K. are production sites.
@petergonzsanz5 жыл бұрын
Amazigh Blue Azul - Anti Mafia - Anti ANPD I’m sorry but I disagree, the FACT is that Airbus is owned by these 4 countries, period, like EASA, its parent company. China and USA are the production sites.
@krashd5 жыл бұрын
@@freewal There is actually 5 nations with a stake in Airbus, it was originally the UK, France and West Germany but today it is the UK, France, Germany, Spain and the Netherlands. France and Germany own the bulk because the UK pulled out but then bought back in and has a similar stake to Spain and the Netherlands.
@freewal5 жыл бұрын
@@krashd Actually i worked 16 years for this company. Yes it's an an european company, and UK, Spain, Netherlands are sharheolder of Airbus. But my point was : which countries are able to take decisions in Airbus ? Where are the power centres (geographically) ? From which countries come from the management ? Answer : France and Germany. Like the European Union, it's these two countries which have leaded the principles of Airbus.
@zachrayjohnninan30185 жыл бұрын
What a change in the scene in one year, the Boeing 777X is grounded everywhere in the world and the sales have been at such a decline this year and the stock prices are worser than the S&P
@azizgaming12355 жыл бұрын
3:06 Kuwait Airways A300
@milanothedingo5 жыл бұрын
Don't cry for Bombardier, they are not a small company, and are certainly not hurting.
@jefflovejoy29975 жыл бұрын
Yeah, right. [dripping sarcasm] "Airbus NEO you live. Boeing 737 MAX you die." Choose and choose wisely.
@Schocam5 жыл бұрын
Repair Boeing 737 Max. Re-branding. Make sure the system will not go crazy. Take out the system that makes the plane goes haywire.
@Chromegrillz5 жыл бұрын
I fly neither of those fleets, I fly twin engine propeller. Flies like a champ.
@이주연-x4x3 жыл бұрын
Spoiler: This deal to buy Embraer was canceled.
@vizender3 жыл бұрын
Who knows why…
@gong99013 жыл бұрын
Birds: hold me beer
@Xxfireman024xX5 жыл бұрын
Could we not get subtitles on bad connection robot voice guy?
@aaaadit51555 жыл бұрын
Willybots there are subs
@Xxfireman024xX5 жыл бұрын
Aditya Dandwate but I would have to turn them on. They should just be there
@aaaadit51555 жыл бұрын
Willybots they do have subs(which u don't have to activate) in future videos, noticing this problem. So its fine now
@Xxfireman024xX5 жыл бұрын
@@aaaadit5155 I get it. I will never watch this video again, so I don't care
@michaelrodeback19565 жыл бұрын
If you're lucky enough to be in the cockpit you already know what type it is. It would be better if an outside visual reference like how the join between the fuselage and the vertical tail differs. And as far as flying being safe, we're not just talking financial costs. We're also talking human cost. Thousands upon thousands of people have died to allow us to learn from our mistakes. The title doesn't work either. This is more history than why this is. There are a couple of other small things they didn't quite get right. Other than that this is actually a pretty accurate video for a news source. I'm impressed considering the source.
@truthkeeperfilms5 жыл бұрын
Airbus dominates efficiency, comfort, and reliability
@80sfreak145 жыл бұрын
Boeing 737-800: 15 hull loss accidents Airbus A320: 35 hull loss accidents. Of course the MAX 8 is a different story but Boeing also makes reliable and efficient planes, the 787 is outselling the A350. Your just biased.
@truthkeeperfilms5 жыл бұрын
@@80sfreak14 - Well, those statistics are null.. as the 737 has been in service longer, just as the 787 has been in service longer. But, it remains that the A320 have a better safety record, more efficient, and the A350 again is more efficient than the 787, as well as longer range. You spew worthless numbers without time-frames.
@80sfreak145 жыл бұрын
@@truthkeeperfilms so do Airbus fans when they talk about crashes. They say the 767 is dangerous because it had more accidents than the A330 but they fail to see that the 767 is 11 years older. Same for 737 with A320. Same with 747 and A380. They're guilty of it too.
@truthkeeperfilms5 жыл бұрын
@@80sfreak14 - Well, considering the A330 competed against the 777.. it doesn't sound like a valid argument.
@80sfreak145 жыл бұрын
@@truthkeeperfilms you're right, it doesn't, it was released to compete with the 767 because it was kicking the A300s and A310s ass!
@TheZacman25 жыл бұрын
MAYBE it could be because building a company that designs and manufactures large airplanes is extremely hard. The reason there are so few options in the airplane industry and so many options in other industries is because of the difference in how difficult it is to get the company up and running. There are tons of clothing retailers because making those businesses is relatively straightforward. When trying to start an airplane business, you have to hire hundreds of engineers who take years to design a single plane (really, it took years to design the 737). You would also have to deal with the fact that these types of jobs are so specific and high-skilled that there are a very limited number of people in the world who have the qualifications to do them, and they are probably using their specialized skills in an existing company. Once you design the planes that are able to compete against what's already on the market, you have to figure out how to produce the planes at scale, which requires training thousands of people for a proprietary process. There are many other factors that make starting a plane company hard, but the main thing is that the answer to this video's main question is simple: the reason Airbus and Boeing dominate the sky is that no one else has the resources to start a company that would be a viable alternative.
@shahimagesyt5 жыл бұрын
Please do your homework CNBC, majority of the info is misleading and wrong.
@kellyharris81695 жыл бұрын
I live in Texas and I was outside and saw NASA's silent supersonic aircraft. It wasn't as quiet as a regular airplane, It was dead silent. It went so high so fast me and my friends thought it was a satellite launch.The only things that gave it away was that we saw that it had wings. It was amazing -this test dummy approves.
@SG0035 жыл бұрын
Wait until Elon Musk does something
@trevoncowen91985 жыл бұрын
*goes bankrupt*
@trevoncowen91985 жыл бұрын
@@concert_band *high wears off realizes he's been dancing around naked in an abandoned factory*
@MidnightBloomDev5 жыл бұрын
@@trevoncowen9198 poor peasant who can't think beyond present. Elon is pushing humanity forward unlike you.
@jjstealth75 жыл бұрын
Elon Musk probably won't go beyond what he has currently. Eg. SpaceX, Tesla, Boring etc.
@d.a.g.c9615 жыл бұрын
i though tesla had a lot of problems.
@Lanijiro5 жыл бұрын
Interesting video! Knowledge is power.
@TokyoHouse5 жыл бұрын
If its Boeing i'm not Going.
@vagabond6305 жыл бұрын
If it's not an airbus, I'm taking the bus.
@philipjohn13385 жыл бұрын
Lol Atleast for Now.
@TokyoHouse5 жыл бұрын
@@vagabond630 lol
@BillAnt5 жыл бұрын
Or "If it ain't a Boeing, I aint't going" :D Especially with no yoke on Airbus planes, nope I don't think so. What the hell will a pilot do, start pressing buttons in case of an emergency dive?! It's laughable.
@JM-gz1ej5 жыл бұрын
However dominating Boeing is, I am NOT going to buy and loose money on Boeing stock again.
@pointonelectronics5 жыл бұрын
Airbus all the way.
@18yearsoldnot5 жыл бұрын
---Since MCAS---
@Rc2Go5 жыл бұрын
00:08 I flew on embraer last year 😂😂😂
@surjithrock91395 жыл бұрын
They complain Huawei working with Chinese government right here Boeing working with us government no problem.....!
@rowan10365 жыл бұрын
Surjith Rock that’s because Huawei handles data and security, Boeing doesn’t, lol.
@karlosbricks24135 жыл бұрын
it's not a government owned company and sells aeroplanes, not communication electronics
@surjithrock91395 жыл бұрын
@@karlosbricks2413 Aeroplanes are perfect for Spying outher countrys!!! **Huawei is not government owned (get your facts right)
@surjithrock91395 жыл бұрын
@ON YOUR ASSThey are(China) really successful with Communist government so what's the problem!!!
@KanyeTheGayFish695 жыл бұрын
Surjith Rock their economy is slowing. Communism is a border that closes off an economy to the world.
@andrejohnson14885 жыл бұрын
Very nice video.
@mna92115 жыл бұрын
After incidents of Indonesia,Ethiopia, I'm sure Boeing business going to hit hard at least in commercial sector.
@vikasagarwal92055 жыл бұрын
Without any doubt
@viniciusmagnoni64922 жыл бұрын
Embraer watching both fighting.
@SunKing909 Жыл бұрын
Nah Boeing nearly acquired Embraer
@goldleader28045 жыл бұрын
Sucks the 747-8 and a380 are dying. The Jumbo's are a dying breed sadly.
@BullGator-kd6ge5 жыл бұрын
Hey the 747 did its job excellently. Its served since 1970, and its served valiantly ever since. And the A380 arrived a little too late to become really successful. Unfortunately more fuel efficient twin engines are the thing. nothing against them, but seeing the 747 is something Ive always wanted to see. Ive never grown near airports and the closest one probably can't handle anything larger than a 767, so I've never seen the famed 747 people gawk at.
@randomguy00475 жыл бұрын
De Havilland Comet: Am I a joke to you?
@syxepop5 жыл бұрын
Airbus: Oui!
@Mr-dm5et5 жыл бұрын
Boeing messed up. They got to competitive. The Boeing 737-Max happened...
@yourlocalpikachu5 жыл бұрын
Groundbus actually rules the sky.
@Battlegris5 жыл бұрын
Yeeah... Not gonna put my ass in a chinese aircraft... Ever!
@kexia5 жыл бұрын
BoooB lmao people said the same thing about Japanese cars when they first came. I doubt if you ever travel, or been to China in the recent years. Let s see in another 20years.
@gyehlove64205 жыл бұрын
@@kexia You can never compare Japanese made to Chinese made LOL I would never fly with a Chinese aircraft either
@kexia5 жыл бұрын
@@gyehlove6420 I just want to know if you have been to China in the recent years? if you haven't you should. It will open your eyes. or maybe change your mind too. It took China 50 years to get to where it is now. Only 50 years!!!!
@gyehlove64205 жыл бұрын
@@kexia I don't have any interest in China. And even if I went there, my opinion wouldn't change . I hate the fact that almost everything is made in China now, people are losing jobs because of that. I'm also not a big fan of Chinese people, they don't have manners, also, they're not hygienic.
@kexia5 жыл бұрын
@@gyehlove6420 might I ask what nationality are you? the statements you just made are very close minded. I dont know if you are just trolling around or being serious.